« first day (2010 days earlier)      last day (2014 days later) » 

12:00 AM
RELOAD! There are 5778 unanswered questions (89.7287% answered)
 
 
6 hours later…
5:40 AM
0
Q: User form validation using a POPO

ProgrockI'm trying to sketch out a stripped down generic form validation example. I started by creating plain old php objects for form input with some classes such as a validator and html renderer class, that I then reduced to explicit functions. The POPOs are useful in as much as you can comment and g...

 
 
4 hours later…
9:26 AM
0
Q: Code Review is getting boring

t3chb0tBoring I find that Code Review is getting pretty boring and unprofessional. The reason why I think this way is that many good questions about real-world problems don't get very much attention. Instead, the hundredth implementation of linked-lists, heaps, project-euler, factorials, fibonacci, sor...

 
9:37 AM
0
Q: React container component: fetch data, control page number, pass data to lower component

M3RSTableContainer.js does the common task of fetching data and passing it to a lower component, Table.js, which is a stateless functional component. currentPage is stored in redux, I did this just to practice redux. Question 1 Is this all reasonable? Question 2 I noticed that the component will...

0
Q: Slowness of my code

AnthonyI am doing automation. But my code working takes more time. I am taking index value from deDupStringList array. for click on the gui application. I read the data from back end. This is my entire number sequence: [1,2,3,1.5,5,6,7,4,5,6,7,12,13,1.75,4.5,16,17,6.5,7,12,13,16,17,24,25,14.50,14.51,6...

 
9:52 AM
0
Q: Given an integer, return its binary representation. You cannot use any Integer.toXXXString methods

Maksim DmitrievHere is my code: package com.app; public class Solution { public String toBinaryString(int n) { char[] buffer = new char[32]; for (int i = 0; i < buffer.length; i++) { buffer[i] = '0'; } int i = buffer.length - 1; while (n != 0) { ...

0
Q: Given an integer number, invert its bits. You cannot use the ~ operator

Maksim DmitrievHere is my code: package com.app; public class Solution { // Suppose the operation ~ doesn't exist public int invertBinaryNumber(int n) { int singleOne = 1; int singleZero = 0xfffffffe; while (singleOne != 0) { if ((n & singleOne) == 0) { ...

 
10:37 AM
0
Q: Space invaders game, bullet is not being drawn or moving

ChameenThis is my space invaders game. For some reason, the bullet does not move at all and is not displayed. I have tried to debug it myself but I couldn't find out why it wasn't working. Can you guys see anything that is wrong with the code which stops it from working? Thanks. Code: //This func...

 
10:58 AM
If the code is working you should present it at codereview.stackexchange.com and not here. — alk 46 secs ago
 
It seems that SE Code Review needs a better culture with close voting off-topic questions since its popularity is growing. You receive a notable number of off-topic questions like SO during the typical seasons (starting semesters) now, but there are not so many people who seem to care about. I am not sure if a chat room like the SOCVR with a defined protocol for close vote requests might be a good idea for SE Code Review. What do you think?
 
How to properly handle Simple recursive transformation solution in Python? – The recent edit clarified the problem (“the input can be negative numbers as well”) but the provided code does not work for negative input. VTC as off-topic?
My answer was written in the assumption that the input numbers are positive (because that's what the provided code handles). Should I delete the answer, since off-topic questions should not be answered?
 
11:21 AM
0
Q: Better way of access the stateful variables objects in the given class hierarchy

joha2I asked this question already at stackoverflow together with a serialization related part. Since the design related part receives no answers or comments I'd like to have a review on this here. The problem: I have a complicated class hierarchy in which the classes are similar to each other but ev...

 
@Mast Particularly you already have experience with the SOCVR, I'd like to hear your opinion.
 
 
2 hours later…
1:03 PM
@πάνταῥεῖ And over 1600 CVs on CR, yes. We used to use this chat for it, and up to a degree still do. If you're in doubt about a question or want to request CVs, this is the place. Duga helps with other problems, like invalidation and incorrect referrals.
Currently the main problem is lack of active regulars in the review queue, lack of comments on off-topic questions and plenty other things, not so much that we need a dedicated room for it, IMO.
@MartinR Don't delete it.
 
@Mast At least I am here for service.
@Mast Establishing a protocol might help.
 
I'm not sure it has to be closed. It's incorrectly tested, but it did work as far as OP knew when posting. It's one of those edge cases. Anyway, if the clarification invalidates your answer, we could roll-back the clarification. In this case however, that would be unhelpful. I'd opt for adding a note to your answer instead and leave it be. The answer is still partially helpful after all.
@πάνταῥεῖ The people currently in the review queue don't always agree with each other. So good luck with that.
On Code Review, a lot of things are in a grey area. Judgement calls.
Part of the reason we close questions is so reviewers don't have to be bothered by them. They can focus on what's left open, which is hopefully of decent enough quality. Votes help in that regard. The moment a question already has 2 answers, meh.
Thing is, if we want to force questions to contain thoroughly tested code before they get posted on the site, we need to edit the scope of the site. The rules allow a grey area at the moment.
 
@Mast A better culture needs to be established here tho IMO.
 
So, @MartinR while I'd like to close the question, I have no rule to base this closure on.
@πάνταῥεῖ We need more votes. A lot more votes.
Review queues should be taken seriously and a heck of a lot more voting should happen.
 
1:18 PM
As mentioned I am here for service :3
 
Good :-) Reviews and votes, IMO that would be a great help already.
 
Promote campaigns in chat rooms, invite regulars. Encourage down votes and close votes.
Engage!
Ask @rene what they did in the early days :-P
 
SO is a bit different from CR, but yea.
I've tried inviting regulars to chat with varying success. Some are absolutely not interested, others stuck around for ages.
Welcome @rene
 
\o/
I was summoned
 
@πάνταῥεῖ Do note we got a meta running which is somewhat related to your question.
 
1:29 PM
Monking
 
In the early days of SOCVR I promoted a lot in comments on meta and we had the weekly close vote events. That annoyed users enough to either participate or never visit again.
That concludes my advice.
 
@Mast Seems needful, rather boring is the probably wrong approach.
 
@πάνταῥεῖ It's part of the participation problem, which is linked to the lack of votes.
 
@rene You're the master of so yes!
 
@rene A weekly close vote event. That's an event where you run around the site looking for crap to get closed and plenty of people in the review queue?
 
1:32 PM
we ran it until last year or so
then in a roommeeting it was decided those events had to go
 
@rene Why?
 
A definite protocol is seriously helping to sort out pearls from the sand.
 
@Mast we did three events per week, for a third of the timezomes. That gave pings for events people didn't intend to participate in. The annoyance was higher then the benefit
 
@πάνταῥεῖ I've been thinking of writing a flow-chart to help reviewing questions. Succinct questions which have to be answered with yes or no, leading to a verdict. Could work for at least the CV and first posts queue. That might help with getting more consistent reviews and keeping people engaged.
@rene Ah. Yes.
 
I think @rene is summoned for our overall CCO (chief closing officer)
 
1:37 PM
I assume you do know our room site: socvr.org with FAQ and links to Roommeetings ?
 
Yes, I've been there.
 
okay, just checking
 
I'm not very active on SO though, when I'm in the SOCVR it's more to see how you lot are handling it and learn for CR than anything else.
No close privileges on SO.
 
I think it is the combination of guidance, rules and tooling to make some impact.
 
CR is going a bit downhill. Not enough to worry the most of the site, but enough to be noticeable. I rather help the community to fix the problem now than wait till it's too late and we get SO-like queues.
Small acorns, big oaks.
 
1:41 PM
Do know that sometimes the grumpiness is the room is bit too much to my likings but there is a lot thrown at the regulars so it remains a balancing act.
 
@Mast "CR is going a bit downhill" That comes with popularity and seasons IMO. We need to fight that a bit more.
 
@rene Yes, which is a good argument to keep a different room for it.
 
If you have a room where the caretakers can publicly establish some common sense about what value looks like I think that can help.
In both teaching new reviewers and correct mishaps
 
Yeah a different room might help. Just dedicated for a close voting protocol.
 
Yes. It would only need a small group to start, 2-3 users even, but could roll into something bigger.
 
1:44 PM
Should we establish one and see what happens?
 
I have to go now, real life thing, back later
 
@rene Thanks for your time.
 
@rene Belgian choclit addict, has to go. OKeh, we'll do what it's necessary to do without you.
 
@πάνταῥεῖ It's definitely an interesting idea. I don't have the time to dedicate to it today, but I'll think about it and ping you later with a proposal, all-right?
 
@Mast Done, thanks.
 
1:47 PM
Assuming we're into this together.
I'm fairly sure we can get more people involved along the way. There's plenty of willing people to be found once the ball rolls.
 
I believe such room would be useful and I'll start a seed soon. The side hit at @rene was just a joke, and he'll know that.
 
@πάνταῥεῖ Math SE also has a dedicated chat room CRUDE (“Close/Reopen/Undelete/Delete/Edit”)
 

 SE Code Review Close Questions room

We should discuss close worthy / off-topic questions at the SE...
@MartinR I am trying to setup a room now. Feel invited to participate.
 
 
1 hour later…
3:05 PM
0
Q: Drag and drop implementation in Android App

Alexey  UsharovskiI want to ask about code review for a part of my Android App which is using drag and drop. The application you can find here https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.usharik.app that's a quiz application to study noun declension of the Czech language. The full code is on Github https://...

 
3:40 PM
possible answer invalidation by infinitEplus on question by infinitEplus: codereview.stackexchange.com/posts/206220/revisions
 
@Duga Rolled back.
 
4:05 PM
In current form your question sits at the limit of being off-topic, because improving code that works is not part of SO's allowed topics, so your question might be better suited on Code Review. Besides, it's highly unlikely that an answer to your question will ever help anyone other than yourself, which strips most of the incentive for anyone considering answering it. However, if you provide a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example, I'm willing to have a look and optimize it. — Andrei Gheorghiu 27 secs ago
 
1
Q: Manage a Student Library

Grace MathewThis library management program can do following functions: Add a book to the library Display all available books Lend books to students Return books to the library Display students who have yet to return a book Question: How do you refactor this code so that it follows OOP, reads better, is ma...

 
 
2 hours later…
6:28 PM
Please note that: 1. code reviews are not on topic; and 2. if you post an actual question here the code must be in the question itself. — jonrsharpe 50 secs ago
 
6:47 PM
I think you should post your codes as a snippet at here . this site is not the right network for code reviewing. — Towkir 16 secs ago
 
 
1 hour later…
7:48 PM
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it belongs in codereview.stackexchange.com — David Wilson 1 min ago
Alright, seeing that you are a new user, I regret having to be the one to inform you that much of the stackoverflow community is very toxic. As a result, there are many people who might shut down this legitimate question if you do not move quickly enough. What you need to do is copy this entire question over to a new question at CodeReview, and delete your question here on StackOverflow. Code Review is intended to be a place for people who already have working code that doesn't do as intended whereas stackoverflow is for finding the error in the code. — Jack Giffin 57 secs ago
 
8:05 PM
Welcome to Stack Overflow! It seems that your code currently works, and you are looking to improve it. Generally these questions are too opinionated for this site, but you might find better luck at CodeReview.SE. Remember to read their requirements as they are a bit more strict than this site. — FrankerZ 14 secs ago
 
 
3 hours later…
10:42 PM
I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because this is not a code review service. — vanje 53 secs ago
not really looking for a code review. Just wondering if there is a more efficient way of doing this. — DCR 8 secs ago
 
11:05 PM
You throw in a lot of code claiming it does exactly what you want and asking us "Is there a better way to do this?". What else could it be other than a code review? These kind of questions are off-topic here. You can look at codereview.stackexchange.com but you should read the docs carefully to be sure your question fulfills their requirements. — vanje 9 secs ago
 
11:58 PM
SO is not a place to ask others to review your code and fix the issues you made. There are sites dedicate to code review, codereview.stackexchange.comLex Li 55 secs ago
 

« first day (2010 days earlier)      last day (2014 days later) »