@CalvinKhor Same here. But after unwrapping, the paper strip allows you lift the chocolate up more easily. No idea if that's the intended purpose or not.
@quid: If I notice that a particular user repeatedly posts the same rude comment on multiple threads, should I search for more such comments and flag them?
@user21820 @CalvinKhor I’m getting a downvote for putting time and effort in answering a question, lol
Why are you even answering a bad question? It lacks context and even does not specify what the OP doesn't understand! — Arjun20 mins ago
If the question was not meeting some standards it would have been closed and I couldn’t add an answer, but it is still open (after 2 hours) so it clearly means we can add answers to it.
I have found this video of $3$Blue$1$Brown where he talks about acceleration. He introduces the concept of higher derivatives and uses acceleration as his example.
The physical definiton of acceleration is
acceleration is the rate of change of the velocity of an object with respect to time.
If ...
@Knight No that is not what it means. There are bad questions that remain open simply because not enough people saw it. You shouldn't answer a question just because it is open. However, I see no reason for your answer to be downvoted because it attempts to teach the asker rather than provide free solutions to lazy people.
That said, I also haven't upvoted because acceleration is certainly not as you defined it. I don't agree with simplifying mathematics until it becomes wrong.
@Knight disregarding y/our history with this user, what he said is definitely something I have seen echoed by other people, but in fact I believe that there is some context in the question, since we were given some text indicating the background of the OP. Whether or not its a 'bad question', I don't know if you can see that there are already 4 close votes on it. So it is likely to be closed soon
@Knight You said that acceleration is change in velocity over change in time. That cannot be true, and you already do know it. Acceleration is the derivative of velocity w.r.t time. There is no other simpler way to put it.
@CalvinKhor It ought to be closed for being unclear. It says "I know that acceleration is derivative of velocity, but I wonder what that means.". Well, it means just that? No? That's why the question is unclear. As Toby Mak said:
How to ask a good question. Your question needs more details, such as the specific parts of the videos you don't understand. You should also indicate your own background: have you taken any calculus classes before and what did you learn there? — Toby Mak2 hours ago
@Knight I don't know, and we can only guess. This user, who I shall comment is watching us discuss this right now in this chatroom, may well be checking in on you more
@Knight It doesn't help that you seem to have started to interact with him, instead of the other way round. I don't really know what jobless entails; is teacher not a job?
@CalvinKhor Yes that's all I meant by "bad question"; I did not mean to imply "question with bad intent", though the "jobless" part may very well be problematic (I can't determine for sure what the asker is trying to say, as it is just as unclear as the rest of the question).
@user21820 It’s normal high-school anger that we have when teachers don’t teach us. You remember once a user told you that “My teachers have told me how to solve a limit, but they haven’t explained what a limit is” and then you taught her limits with such a beautiful symbols and concepts
I can understand it sir, i have been receiving multiple downvotes by a user and my chat privileges have been banned and i can't complain to any mod — Arjunyesterday
@CalvinKhor I accept that, but I said it in the beginning that I will not go for calculus symbols and concepts. Because OP new that acceleration is derivative of velocity, but couldn’t understand it so I took the question as “why acceleration is the derivative of the velocity”?
@Knight No, that approach does not work contrary to what you think. Acceleration is defined as derivative of velocity. There is no simpler definition you can give for it such that you can then explain "why [it] is the derivative of velocity".
So a failure to understand derivatives automatically leads to a failure to understand acceleration. In my opinion there is no possible shortcut.
Though usually if you are banned on one main SE site you are also banned from all chat-rooms on the domain related to that site.
Not sure why on earth they did that, but at one point one user was banned from Math SE for a short while and so from Math SE chat-rooms, but not chat-rooms for certain other SE sites.
well theres some truth to it, theres maybe 30+ minutes of "did i get that right" even if the post is following a very standard argument in many of my answers...
@CalvinKhor Heh. I actually make plenty of minor mistakes on Main too, and then fix them when pointed out. Sometimes it's even due to repeated revising while typing, such as changing variable names and forgetting one instance...
There was once someone commented on a few-years-old post asking me whether I meant some other variable names, and I no longer remembered what I was thinking when writing the post.
I still don't know what I was thinking in one answer from years ago...couldn't give a good response to the years-later-commenter and they seem to have sorted it out and not reply me, so I didn't bother relearning it :D
@CalvinKhor I'm just trying to understand the comment I responded to: (posting on meta is) "easier than posting on main and irl maths is tiring me out enough."
I'm not always the quickest at understanding acronyms :(
I have some anonymous accounts, but I think using my name makes me more accountable for my answers and general behavior (that was the thought, anyway). And people are usually 'professional' on SE
.....I have some anonymous accounts elsewhere, where I want to benefit from being anonymous. I only have the one MSE account :) :) :) :)
@user21820 I just don't think I can be of much help. I have no degree in interior design. Just because I'm a woman doesn't mean I'm into interior design.
@sai-kartik I don't consider myself a fan of any particular fiction in the same sense that people seem to use the term. But I do enjoy reading some. HP has quite a number of severe plot holes, but if we ignore those then the overarching story is quite an interesting one. Though honestly which dumb evil wizard would make a horcrux and not throw it into the middle of the ocean or something?
Dumbledore, presumably knowing that house elves have powers that wizards do not, (such as being able to apparate within Hogwarts), could have asked them to help search for the chamber of secrets, since he knew it existed and Tom had opened it, though he could not find it. He also knew that Myrtle...
@sai-kartik That's not actually implied. He promised to tell Harry the secret, and that's what he did. He was very loyal, but never did anything more than what he promised.
@sai-kartik I didn't watch the movies, but I read that there were a number of significant changes. One was snapping the Elder wand, which I agree was better than what he did in the book.
@AbramIvanov Are you referring to this book? That wikipedia article has a criticism section, which among other things says:
> In the English-speaking world, Frederic Raphael wrote that no one could recommend the book "without having a tin ear for fiction and a blind eye for evil."
> Ron Rosenbaum, criticizing the film adaptation of The Reader, wrote that even if Germans like Hanna were metaphorically "illiterate", "they could have heard it from Hitler's mouth in his infamous 1939 radio broadcast to Germany and the world, threatening extermination of the Jews if war started. You had to be deaf, dumb, and blind, not merely illiterate… You'd have to be exceedingly stupid."
Do you think the criticism is justified? (I've not read the book.)
@AbramIvanov I see. Just curious what you'd say if I wrote a true account of the holocaust except that I changed only the name "Hitler" to "Lincoln"? Would that have "its own essence"?
Unrelated to what I said above, I generally avoid war stories (whether fiction or non-fiction) because the evils in real life are already depressing enough. Now you know why I like fantasy. =)
@AbramIvanov And what if (purely hypothetically) my intent as such an author is to smudge history so that in ≈100 years' time there would be a cult who believes Hitler is framed whereas Lincoln is the true holocaust mastermind?
Anyway, my personal subjective opinion is that any work (book or film or other) should be judged based on the author's intent in creating said work, as well as its estimated effect on other people. For a non-polarized example, I would recommend against a book that targets children and says that mathematics is just an art and one is free to assume anything one likes, even such as 1+1=3.
And author's intent is meaningless, unless they successfully express it. So The success includes the success of the delivery and the receipt of the intent.
@amWhy Indeed that's what I think too, hence the separate evaluation of intent and estimated effect, where in my judgement the latter does not impute any responsibility to the author except negligence, but the former does.
@XanderHenderson Definitely not! There are always two aspects to the interpretation of the book, the author and the reader (within a wider culture or context). =)
@AbramIvanov Do me a favor, and read this very short story. I think it is an example in which the author may suggest, but leaves enough space for the reader to conclude in any number of ways. Ursula Le Guin The ones who walk away from Omelas
@AbramIvanov Indeed. But it's an excellent example of how the author sets up a journey for the reader to experience, and wrestle with, in any number of ways.