« first day (4 days earlier)      last day (17 days later) » 

Manu de Hanoi
Manu de Hanoi
06:21
who's lacking patience ? you cant even answer the question because it has been closed by the mods !
As for me, I merely ask that the answer be focused on experiments. That's not lack of patience
 
9 hours later…
vzn
vzn
15:39
@ManudeHanoi have been long inquiring into exactly the area/ idea you have proposed. here is something close, its called the "sound digitizer LSB idea". its outlined in this blog post. vzn1.wordpress.com/2015/01/26/…
have much more recent findings, this refers to a new 2018 experiment that seems to confirm the hypothesis of subquantum waves. Adler-Vinante (re my comment now deleted by mods from your post.) vzn1.wordpress.com/2018/08/12/…
this is a semirecent viral video on bohmian mechanics/ pilot wave hydrodynamics experimental breakthrough by veritasium vzn1.wordpress.com/2016/11/07/…
Manu de Hanoi
Manu de Hanoi
16:04
@vzn thanks
vzn
vzn
16:30
@ManudeHanoi yw. basically youve asked a very deep question, but to answer with other than the conventional answer (which youve been given by many) overturns certain deep edifices-(bordering-on-dogma) of physics. aka a paradigm shift. hence the commotion/ near alarm/ some )( overreaction over your question. the evidence is mounting but the establishment is not shaking yet so to speak.
Manu de Hanoi
Manu de Hanoi
16:45
i've had a quick look at the pilot wave theory, and it's not my cup of tea. I find "my" theory more elegant/simplifying. My theory, in short, is that particles dont exist, everything is wavy, and made of real waves, not waves of probabilities.

I suggest you dont censor yourself here or anywhere else. Truth doesnt care about being mainstream or not. The childish reputation point strategies, schorlar pride, and group think you'll find here must be what they are, but no more than that. If u wrong , let them prove you wrong if they can. If they can't, their opinion doesnt matter.
vzn
vzn
@ManudeHanoi what you are describing is something like soliton theory, it hasnt been comprehensively formulated yet, but it appears we are witnessing a ideological shift from bohmian mechanics → pilot wave hydrodynamics → soliton theory. as for this site, the system does rather accurately reflect consensus (scientific) wisdom in voting/ other activity patterns. as for censorship, its a potential issue anywhere there are humans + words...
> My theory, in short, is that particles dont exist, everything is wavy, and made of real waves, not waves of probabilities.
btw you didnt say that in your question. what you are describing is the fluid dynamics theory of particle physics outlined here vzn1.wordpress.com/2018/05/25/fluid-paradigm-shift-2018
Manu de Hanoi
Manu de Hanoi
17:20
My theory doesnt involve solitron, just plain regular, not quantized EM waves.
In my question I was looking for proofs (invalidating my theory) that the EM field was quantized and didnt get anything. So, so far , my idea stands, quantum effects, come from the atom, not the incident light.
vzn
vzn
@ManudeHanoi if you look into soliton theory its basically what youre proposing with your words.
Manu de Hanoi
Manu de Hanoi
I just read the 1st parag of the wiki on solitron "In mathematics and physics, a soliton is a self-reinforcing solitary wave packet that maintains its shape while it propagates at a constant velocity.Solitons are caused by a cancellation of nonlinear and dispersive effects in the medium. "
I dont need that. I'm fine with dispertion of EM waves
vzn
vzn
@ManudeHanoi re that, the sound digitizer LSB idea is similar mathematically. yes, it proposes that all the probabilities come from the interaction of light and matter (atoms). it appears to already be proven to me by some diverse experiments/ angles/ pov but they havent been consolidated/ assimilated as a whole by the community yet.
@ManudeHanoi this is not well known or articulated anywhere but 3d solitons behave essentially like particles.

« first day (4 days earlier)      last day (17 days later) »