I call it like it is.
1- John Rennie didnt bother replying to my message above. That's rude. He initially closed my comment as duplicate and initially provided a single link that was not really a duplicate of my question.
2-Emilio insisted on applying dumb rules like "mainstream science" (argumentum ad populus fallacy) & "personal theory" for downplaying my question. It was later shown I wasnt that far from mainstream science (and in agreement with JR himself) . As for the "personal theory" that rule is stupid beyond understanding. It is important for clarifying a question to give context,…
1- John Rennie didnt bother replying to my message above. That's rude. He initially closed my comment as duplicate and initially provided a single link that was not really a duplicate of my question.
2-Emilio insisted on applying dumb rules like "mainstream science" (argumentum ad populus fallacy) & "personal theory" for downplaying my question. It was later shown I wasnt that far from mainstream science (and in agreement with JR himself) . As for the "personal theory" that rule is stupid beyond understanding. It is important for clarifying a question to give context,…