@.Pπ!yansh Ja!Π. wtf r u even talking about its ur f-ing claim which is invalid as it doesn't follow any Sanskrit grammer rules. Hiw can it be even valid.? Huh. Yes Devki Putra Krishna was Brahman so everyone else are bcz those who knows brahman become brahman themselves n sathspratya brahman says that purusha narayana became brahman by knowing him.

So, ur own statement n translations r contradicting itself so is invalid. U should learn Sanskrit grammer properly as u dont know a thing about it. prd. Ys avtar n avtari are same n vyasa n sanjay also saw it. Even we are also avtars of brahman so we r nt diff frm him. Om tat sat know that. Prd..

And @.PaΠde¥a. its ur dead ans qstn knowledge that really needs salvation by me.

Bdw, this site id not that kind of form so stop using informal bs n be more clear in ur language n then probably ppl can talk 2 u n understand u also without accusing u. Or f.o. n same 2 u @.T.N.C. also stop saying bs n pretending stuffs n lying. Prd.. n wateva i said 2 n abt u it was true also.

Chanda, Visargah, Vyakaran, alankar, bhav learn it yourself of sanskrit it's useful. 1st don't get confuse in it @ $|_|π¥@... otherwise 2 mk it undrstnd 2 ya is totally hopeless. Per se. Prd.

I suggest that 2 u @.n.c. 😊..

← 1 message moved from Stack Apps