@amWhy If you look at the C/D requests, numberphile videos were linked from two of them. That was what we were talking about. Of course, I'm fine with you moving these comments away from that room, but they were in fact about the poor questions.
@amWhy One of the users who posted the questions is "Number File", but I have no idea whether it is owned by numberphile or not. We didn't mention that username, anyway.
Anyway thanks for your reminder about the monitoring and associated intention to clean up the comments!
@user21820 I leave it to you to use your "owner" privileges to keep the chatroom from veering off topic in an obsessive manner, leading to some twenty posts that confuse users who are coming here, given the occurrence of CURED in the mods questionnaire. If you think you can do a better job, or if Peter, can do a better job, I'm out. I'm tired of peoples egos taking over in CURED. You're just as much a room owner as I am. I am tired of Peter's concern being centered only around number theory
And seeking for validation by answering a PSQ in the field he obsesses over. Have fun, keeping in mind we are at all times under the microscope.
@amWhy I agree with you that I found the question he answered poor, and that's why I close-voted once I saw it. But I was trying not to antagonize directly since he does help with much of the cleaning up.
@user21820 Sorry, my browser is stalling, badly: my point is that Peter enters many chats, in an effort to connect with Teresa, wrt the number theory Michael Hopf's; and often engages in conversations no longer on topic. In any case, thanks for trying to understand. He's also often prone to take offense at anyone challenging him. But enough said. Thanks for asking me, and commenting to me, too!
@amWhy Yes, I have observed the same as you do. I don't really understand why he's so interested in large-number searches either, nor why he keeps roping in others.
@robjohn basically you take the zeroes of the Riemann zeta function and then using the goldbach conjecture you find the bijection ! It is a great proof; and also brings me closer to the proof of RH .
@user21820 I went to that chatroom, to give robjohn heads up about the reincarnation of one user over several user. All I can say is that mods need to realize that the most abusive users on our site, disguise themselves, over and over again, and to expect and anticipate this. You an I have been around long enough to realize unfamiliar names, on site, for a seemingly long span of time, are likely impersonating names. Anyway, thanks for the heads up. It did seem as though robjohn shared
he would look into it; who knows. In any case, adios! You should be sleeping shortly! ;D
@amWhy Actually it's just a username change, not a sockpuppet. He did have sockpuppets, but one had been merged with the original account, and the others had been destroyed.
However, he changed username to "Lobic" before trying again to gain access to the Logic chat-rooom. That's what irked me.
