« first day (10 days earlier)      last day (20 days later) » 

00:30
@AsafKaragila I feel like you could probably get the other thing just by looking at badges... But just for the heck of it:
that's % of voters who voted each day of each election
...on, uh, Stack Overflow, because I'm not paying attention to what I'm doing
that's Math
probably slightly inaccurate because I'm hungry. Gonna find a burrito
 
6 hours later…
06:08
@Shog9 Thanks! There's a really nice burrito place right outside of London Liverpool Street Station.
@Shog9 Hmm, I see how one could do that. But my SQL chops are practically non-existent, so I didn't think about it like that. So double thanks!
@AsafKaragila Did you retract your candidacy then change your mind?
@RobertFrost Huh?
@AsafKaragila I thought somebody's candidacy disappeared from the election page (I thought it was yours but wasn't sure). When I came back you were still there, so I wasn't sure what had happened.
@RobertFrost And taking a quick look to see if my name was still there is too much for you? :P
No candidate withdraw. But one of the nominees did.
@AsafKaragila Who was it?
That must have been it
06:20
@RobertFrost Von Neumann. After having declared to have withdrawn in the comments of the nomination, a few days had passed, they declared that again, and finally either themselves or by "external help" the nomination was removed.
Ok thanks. I was on smartphone at the time, it was the middle of the night and I saw some comment bout it being a shame somebody had been driven from the race, so I decided to come back later when I could see properly and it was gone
06:56
@RobertFrost Oh. That.
@RobertFrost That would be Zachery Selk. Who also deleted his account.
But that happened before I even nominated myself.
07:10
@AsafKaragila oh dear :(
So he went from diamond moderator candidate to ex-user. What made him do that?
07:26
What was the gist of his withdrawal notice?
@Shog9 You can never have enough tabs open. You should open more
@TheSimpliFire Philosophy is of course further to the right on that graph.
@RobertFrost "Screw this site. I'm leaving."
07:58
@AsafKaragila Any indication what it was about? Part of my concern is that I was active in the room before it happened, challenging candidates re attitudes towards psq's and new users, so I was hoping my actions hadn't reasonably contributed to his leaving.
@RobertFrost I'm not entirely sure.
Aug 3 at 14:36, by quid
@JyrkiLahtonen for all I know there was nothing overly specific. IIRC, there was a string of hostile comments on the nomination, though. Yet, I cannot see it anymore either.
08:14
@MartinSleziak Shame
08:31
What did I do?
@MartinSleziak It's what you didn't do that is shameful.
 
1 hour later…
10:00
@MartinSleziak Maybe our wires were crossed. I was saying shame Zak got upset and left after standing for election.
... "It's a shame...", not "shame on you."
10:49
Well, as you can see from Asaf Karagila's response, I am not blameless either.
@RobertFrost Yes, I understood. But I could not resist making a joke. (Probably a lame one.)
11:08
@MartinSleziak Joking can be a dangerous business
 
2 hours later…
13:20
@Shog9 nice mustache
@SimplyBeautifulArt That's the Captain Marvel logo.
@AsafKaragila true
 
2 hours later…
15:04
kinda obvious that Stack Overflow has never not had a primary phase... So the election always wraps a weekend.
@Shog9 Ah, that explains it.
 
5 hours later…
20:12
@Shog9 should have emphasized both never and not, or else, perhaps "kinda obvious that Stack Overflow has never not had a primary phase..."
never not had...
:P
@amWhy That's not a constructive comment, amWhy.
@AsafKaragila Yikes, is that what I'm in for after the elections, too? :P
@amWhy It's not unlike me to make LEM jokes... :P
20:34
I might be an idiot, but what is an LEM joke?
@XanderHenderson I just found a list of 30 acronyms for LEM!
Yeah, #metoo
when I searched for LEM jokes, all that came up was "Did you mean 'lame jokes'?"
Yup. It seems like Google is telling us both the same thing.
But only @AsafKaragila knows what was really meant.
..... Makes sense, 'cuz every once in a while, @AsafKaragila makes a 'lame' joke! Quickly ducks
20:38
Well, if he has kids, it is acceptable to make "dad jokes"
and one might argue that one's students are like one's children, so maybe all teachers / instructors / professors / whatever can be permitted to make "dad jokes"
"dad jokes" $\neq$ "lame jokes", but the two are similar
Here we go: "dad jokes" $\subset $ "lame jokes" !
You wound me!
All of my dad jokes are gold! Pure gold!
20:57
@XanderHenderson and @amWhy: Law of Excluded Middle. Specifically, double negations. It's not constructively valid, in almost all the contexts of constructive mathematics.
@AsafKaragila That was on the list of 30 acronyms of LEM!
Oh, of course. It is LOGIC joke. Not constructive.... I get it now, though it kind of hurts.
Very clever, @Asaf! :)
@XanderHenderson Tough luck. :P
@amWhy It's an old joke. Really, not the first time I've made it on the site, either. :P
@AsafKaragila especially during the time "not constructive" was a reason to flag a comment, I imagine.
21:06
There aren't any good Floer homology jokes.
Actually, there aren't any good math jokes, but more people are likely to object to that statement.
@MikeMiller I DISAGREE!
@MikeMiller $i$ said to $\pi$: "Be rational!", and $\pi$ responded to $i$: "Get real!" ... hardy har harr.
Q: What do you call someone who reads a paper on category theory?
A: A coauthor.
I called it. I knew this moderator election would all come down to candidates' positions on the final question: "Are there any good math jokes?"
81
A: Do good math jokes exist?

Deane YangBased on the answers above, no.

21:13
@AloizioMacedo That's hilarious!!
That's my favorite answer to that question.
@XanderHenderson I try not to get into situations where I call those guys my co-authors. ;D
Perhaps, the question is undecidable.
@amWhy If that was the final question, I think I would shamelessly reference that answer.
@AloizioMacedo Is that your final answer? :-)
@amWhy I hope not! There are still some days until the end of the election (which is challenging my perception of time. I could swear I read "election ends in 5 days" 3 days ago, yet the system insists in telling me that the election ends in 4 days).
21:30
I think when it is 5 days, it doesn't become 4 days until it drops a minute less than 5 days... so 5 days = x really means $5 \leq x \lt 6$, and 4 days means $4\leq x \lt 5.$ And it changes after UTC 20:00.
21:50
@AloizioMacedo All I know is that the election (voting) will end at 20:00 UTC Wednesday, August 8th. Right now that means that it will end 4 days + roughly 22 hours and 10 minutes from the time of this comment.
@amWhy So part of my time-perception deficiency has some justification. Thanks : )
@AloizioMacedo Yeah it does!!!
 
2 hours later…
23:43

« first day (10 days earlier)      last day (20 days later) »