« first day (3046 days earlier)      last day (1926 days later) » 

03:27
4
Q: Entropy preservation through cryptographic hash function

GratisBackground First, while studying MinEntropy a bit, I came across an NIST paper, "DRAFT SP 800-90B (second draft)," which suggests "twice" the entropy of the underlying block of a cryptographic hash function be used as input in order to have an output hash having fully saturated entropy capacity....

I am completely lost, and the discussion in comments has left me more confused than I was when I started. Can anyone figure out what the question is?
 
1 hour later…
04:55
…is there a way to fix tag misclassification in bulk without filling up the question queue with old questions? Asking for, uh, a friend.
(There were approximately thirty-eight bajillion questions wrongly tagged hash-signatures, and now there are approximately zero.)
 
1 hour later…
06:01
Every question on the front page says modified by Squeamish Ossifrage
06:52
I think he made tag clean uo
 
2 hours later…
09:08
@SqueamishOssifrage yes, it's called tag-merge (mod-only)
and we probably could have merged hash-signature into signature
 
2 hours later…
11:07
And this removed people's updates, new answer etc. from the list
Does the tag-merge has the same effect or it executes silently?
 
1 hour later…
12:36
@kelalaka I'm moderately sure that a tag-merge is an operation that essentially works against the database immediately and therefore is silent
(and irreversible)
12:55
The mod's tag merger is silent and irreversible.
power
A tag-merge would not have been what Squeamish was looking for though, since the "hash-signature" tag should be preserved for those questions correctly tagged for dealing with hash-based signature schemes.
13:34
I see
there are still 53 questions tagged
@SqueamishOssifrage in that case there are ways to use e.g. the API to do this slowly and stretch it out to a couple of edits per day
(eg by feeding the tool / script the list of ids of Qs that need the tag removed)
e.g. @ glorfindel does something like this on a couple of sites
13:59
@SEJPM Those 53 questions are rightly tagged hash-signature. That was the point—there was a large number of questions not about hash-based signatures for which the tag was inappropriate, but the tag is still useful because there are nevertheless a good number of questions about hash-based signatures.
 
5 hours later…
18:35
I've reached 1K from first-posts. Should I continue to look at the queue or leave the points to someone else? I'll still consider editing and looking for dupes and related questions, of course.
19:14
@kelalaka <3 <3 <3
thank you so much for looking through these queues
you may continue of course and if you want to "give others a chance" you could lower your pace, e.g. only check half as often as right now?
heart or :)
Maybe, I can look and skip :)
@kelalaka yes, it's meant to be a heart and urbandictionary is trolling (not unusual)
Thanks for all of you my mods and of course others those make this site better.
But if the accepted answer is decided by with upvotes in the urban dictionary, it is :)
19:34
3
Q: Looking for a detailed example of proof by reduction

Dingo13I'm looking for a very detailed example of proof by reduction. Say we have two or three protocols (that have been proven secure) and we construct a new protocol. We want to provide a proof of security for this new protocol. For instance, we can consider the following simple example: we have a (s...

I've marked this question for close. But it is no longer a homework. Maybe someone wants to give an answer?
 
3 hours later…
22:25
@kelalaka I left a possible proof strategy in the comments, I'm not confident enough to write a fully spec-ed out proof of that strategy though

« first day (3046 days earlier)      last day (1926 days later) »