« first day (261 days earlier)      last day (2268 days later) » 

01:58
Focusing on mains for now. My plans change every week. If I get bored of mains, I'll do advanced.
02:17
@IceInkberry I get inspired by the way you always enjoy your preparations.
 
5 hours later…
06:49
Ya
 
9 hours later…
16:17
@IceInkberry Hello, a small doubt.
The following reaction was carried out in aprotic solvent
Doesn't the product suggest it must have proceeded through SN1?
I don't understand because I've read aprotic solvents support Sn2 mechanism
16:37
What are the conditions? Post the exact question @Dante
What is the source?
My college material
What are the wordings?
What is the question?
Reagents? Temperature? Solvent?
@Dante It is indeed SN2 dante, but attack happens at the other carbon and double bond rearrangement happens.
5 messages moved from Problem Solving Strategies
16:39
Write the structure of the nucleophilic substitution products in each of the following in aprotic solvent
@Abcd Just solvent
@Dante Its an SN2' reaction. (S N two prime)
@EshaManideep Well, how did you make out's Sn2?
Let's both listen to abcd
are you being sarcastic?
No, I read it in March, but forgot
So, remind me please
16:42
@Abcd I don't remember reading about any kind of rearrangement in SN2 :/
Please explain
Attack happens at the double bonded carbon and the double bond shifts.
@Abcd reason is ?
@EshaManideep see the stability of the double bond in the product
So, it's basically thermodynamic control, is it ?
@Abcd Why there and not on the carbon having halogen?
16:45
Read 1,3 and 1,2 additions
@EshaManideep dont you see kinetics are also supporting it here
attack at less hindered
Wait no that's for carbonyl
hmm
16:46
That's it
@Dante Both thermodynamics and kinetics are supporting that
The first explanation is good
$SN2'$ is most common with RCu-BF3 combination
@Dante one minute
10 mins ago, by Dante
@Abcd I don't remember reading about any kind of rearrangement in SN2 :/
7 mins ago, by Dante
@Abcd Why there and not on the carbon having halogen?
@Dante Why there? You answer: why not at the least hindered top carbon? Which is one of the main characteristic of SN2, nucleophile prefers least hindered electrophilic carbon
@Dante The aprotic solvent is even a supporter in this...because you know aprotic solvents favour SN2.
@Dante Also see the bottom of the above page pic.
I noted that from Clayden most probably.
That clearly shows that SN2' is strongly favoured at the least hindered carbon
17:07
@Dante And another thing: Thermodynamic support. More substituted double bond is more stable. After all this why wont the above product be major?

« first day (261 days earlier)      last day (2268 days later) »