« first day (823 days earlier)      last day (76 days later) » 

16:46
@pazzo , my mistake, an author gave an example "Common to many Indo-European languages". Anyway, thanks for the minus. — Avtokod 4 hours ago
Aww...
 
2 hours later…
18:29
@DamkerngT. Aww, poor Avto! ;P
 
3 hours later…
21:05
1
Q: Difference in nuance between "not minding", "having nothing against it" and "having no objections"

Study.English.WellIs there any difference between the sentences below? If not, which one is least awkward to you? I felt (had a feeling) that they didn't mind. I felt that they had nothing against. I felt that they had no objections. Could you also tell me what type of subordinate clause it is: predic...

 
2 hours later…
Anonymous
23:29
New linguistics term of the day: mirative
@snailboat It's a miracle!
Oh, no! All the bounties are gone!
Anonymous
Are there bounties that are supposed to be there still?
I was thinking about posting an answer to this: ell.stackexchange.com/q/35156/3281
Anonymous
Ah, there's still time! :-)
checking my old notes in another room...
Hi! @ʇolɐǝzǝɥʇqoq
Anonymous
Hello, Bob!
@snailboat I wasn't sure about this:
Anonymous
What about it?
H̢͙̦͉̩̬̰̺͎̻̼̗̖̗͉̮̤ͭ͗̿ͪͭ͆ͨ͑͛ͯ̓̈́ͤ̏̀̽̽̇͟ͅe̖͓̰͔̱̮̪̻̱͔̫̖̟͓͍͍̗͒̓͑̓ͨ̚͢͢ͅl̸̡̛͚̳̻̦̮͖͕͓̃͂̏̅ͨ͑̚l͉͍̦͈͕̩̗̣̰̭ͩͤ́̋̌͋͒ͭ̔͋̄ͩ̋̌̅̾͋ͨ͜o̶̢̜͕̺͍̫̟̱̦ͤ̀ͤ͂͌ͦ̄͛̐̒ͯ̐̓͒́̏̿̍̕!̵̧͇̬̰̳̲̣͓̳̐͗͋͗͑̿̆͗̾̄̃̀͌́̚͞ͅ
̶̡̛̲̙̼̜̘̦̜ͮ͛͐̎ͧ̕͢ͅ
23:42
To answer "what is the construction verb + (verb + ing) called?", I think my answer would be "a gerund-participial which can be considered as either an object or an internal complement of verb?"
@ʇolɐǝzǝɥʇqoq A very strange Hello!
Anonymous
Both verb to verb and verb verb-ing are catenative constructions
@DamkerngT. Ỷ̨̰̟͎̰̥̱̠̻͉͇̦͓͔̦͉̬͎̖̊̇̉̈́ͭ͑͂̈̀̚ͅe̶̷̶͔͇̻̻͙̭̣̤̱̯̗̥̒ͮͫ̾̕s̸̡̭͍̖̲̦̟͊ͥ̊̓͆̎ͫ́̇̌̋ ̷̵̫͍̭̮͍̲̜̠̄̎͋̒͗͂͆̽̌̿͜͡i̸͖̼̭͉͉͑ͧ͑͐̇ͥͭ̓̇ͯ͋͐̂ͦ̑̈͑͢n͒ͣͦ̑ͭ͊̂͛ͤ̿̄̿̈́͢͜͏̛̣̻͓̟̯̥̞̜̖̞͓̮͉͜ͅ‌​d̝̗̺̫̰̜̜̉ͫ͐͋̾ͧ̃̉́̀͞ͅe̢̡̱̘̭̯̪͈̬̮͉̥̱̼ͭ̂̅ͩ͊̕e̶̮̞̹̻̘̰̝͉̠̬̼͔͗ͦ̌ͯͮͤ͗ͧͯ̾̀ͦ̄̔́͛̅̚d͆ͭ̑ͦ͋ͯͯ‌​̴͇̻̠̦̱ͨͫͥ̍͜͡!͚͎͖͓̳̬̪̘͕̞̱̜̐ͮ̋ͭ̓ͦ̿̇͛͆ͥ̍̈̋̋̕͢͟͠ͅ
@snailboat Oh, nice name! Does that Student's book use the same term?
@ʇolɐǝzǝɥʇqoq ?!?
A-ha! Found it on some pages.
Anonymous
Turn to page 214
Page 214 is unavailable. :(
23:46
@DamkerngT. Z̢͚͍̠̣̪̟̮̠̘̖ͣͥ̑͌͋̔̈́̌̎͢͜a̸̠̲̦̘͉͎̝̳͎̤̼̺͉̦̳̩̬̫ͭͫ̉̆ͭ͋̑̓̒̉͐̿ͨ̓̚̕͟͞͠l̏̊̍͗̔̋̃̅͒̎̄ͯ̂ͪͦ̅ͤ‌​͓͉̫̫̣̫̦̣͍̰̣͕̀́ģ͖̲̜̖͉͈̫ͥͩ̉͋̓͊͐̄̉́͢o̸̝̝̘͍͗̔̈́́̌̍ͪ̆̓̄ͨ̈́͊̆̉͊͒̈́̕͠ ̷̴̱̤̣̤̰̲͖̝̖̖̲̩̊̆ͧ͛̂̽̋ͣͦ̀͟͟͟t̐ͧ͆ͦͪ̑́͛͐̅͛̓ͧ͂͏̴̠͍̲͚̙̪̥͓̩̰͕̱͚̬͢͜͝e̷̡̧ͫ̃̈͒ͧ̇̽͊͋̑͌̔ͣ̒͟‌​̱̝̺̝͓̣̘̝̼̹͍͎͜ͅx̡̨̰͈̞͉̦͙̹̰̻̬̞̬͇͇͌͊̀͌͒̽ͩ̿ͭ̀̋̒̀̎ͬ̃ͫ̚͢͠ͅt̨̗̤̠̜̝̹̲̼͚͈̤̐̾̆̐͑ͥ̀̓͜͢͞
Oh, wait, I can open it!
Anonymous
Basically, a verb is taking a non-finite clause as a complement.
Anonymous
> He started [to feel sleepy].
> He started [falling asleep].
Anonymous
The bracketed portions are two different kinds of non-finite clause
Anonymous
The first one is a to-infinitival clause
Anonymous
23:47
The second is a gerund-participial clause
nods -- I was trying to find a hypernym for it. Thanks for the tip!
Anonymous
Can you see page 215, too?
Anonymous
> She seems to want to stop trying to avoid meeting him.
I can go as far as page 216.
Anonymous
23:49
Read the explanation around that example
catenative construction/verb/complement. Nice!
Oh, I didn't notice that F.E. had already added the tag catenative-verbs to the question! Silly me. :D
​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​
​​​
Anonymous
@ʇolɐǝzǝɥʇqoq ​
​​​​​
​​​​
Anonymous
23:53
Why is my text not showing?
Oh, this message is showing.
Glitch ended.
Good.

« first day (823 days earlier)      last day (76 days later) »