« first day (807 days earlier)      last day (92 days later) » 

Anonymous
16:04
Oof :-)
Anonymous
Yes, only one perfect auxiliary per verb group, please!
Hee
Hello, @snailboat!
Anonymous
I think you can describe perfect constructions in English by drawing a timeline with two points on it, then drawing an arrow from the time in the past leading to the time in the present (or whatever the reference time happens to be)
Anonymous
A change of state in the past, and that state continuing up to the reference time
Anonymous
Then we have to talk about what states those are
Anonymous
16:10
And that's where it gets complicated :-)
We need InstantGrammarTimeline (TM) on ELL!
Anonymous
For example, "I've been to New York" has a point in the past at which the state of having the experience of going to New York begins
Anonymous
And that state continues into the present
Anonymous
But the point of time in the past was just that—a point, and the actual event doesn't continue into the present, just the resulting state
Anonymous
16:14
And the necessity of explaining this stuff makes our attempt at unified semantics a little more complicated than we might hope :-)
Plotting "I've been to New York several times" would be a little complicated. :-)
Anonymous
That's still the same—the event in the past is whenever you leave New York for the severalth time :-)
Anonymous
Until then, the sentence would be false
Yes, but I think we might need to add several more dots to make the point clear. :-)
Anonymous
It's complicated by the indeterminate quantifier though
Anonymous
16:17
Because that makes it clear that our idea of a single point in time at which the resulting experimental state begins is something of a fiction :-)
Anonymous
That was supposed to say experiential but my phone autocorrected it :-(
Anonymous
In fact the time at which the state begins is often not a point or not specific
Anonymous
But it's okay as long as we can conceptualize it roughly that way
0
Q: What do mean by this sentence?

Ajay RameshI want to understand what is the context of quoting "a six-pack was how you bought your beer" At 44, I am old enough to remember when reconstruction was something you read about in history class, when a muffin top was something delicious you ate at the bakery, a six-pack was how you boug...

Oh, no! StoneyB and I tried to find images and posted our answers at around the same time!
Anonymous
16:20
Anyway, that's how I'd describe the perfect in English, except with an awful lot more details I've left out because I'm lazy and typing on my phone is taking me a long time :-)
nods
I think it's a bit more complicated when being used with the progressive aspect.
Anonymous
I do think backshifting and the alternations between simple and perfect in AmE and BrE are interesting topics
Anonymous
(Here I coopt simple to mean 'nom-perfect', which I shouldn't do :-)
Anonymous
Ack, non-!
Hallo!
:)
16:23
@snailboat I wonder if that was because words like nom, nom!
Anonymous
I do think perfect constructions are often optional in BrE too
@Iplodman Hallo!
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Maybe my phone knows me too well! Om, nom, nom
I'd like to ask a favour of the more UK politics-savvy of you, if any are here c:
16:24
@DamkerngT. Does that mean you're one? ;)
Oh, that was for Om, nom, nom, but I think it's applicable to your message too!
Ah, good! Sorry, I was confused by hee ;P
Anonymous
I'm afraid I'm an ignorant American
@DamkerngT. Mind helping me out? I had to write some stuff on the Lib Dems for English homework, and I'd appreciate it if you gave it a quick scan.
@snailboat Don't worry, I'm an ignorant Englishman ;)
@Iplodman Okay.
A-ha! This is the first time I've seen dem in real life!
(I found it once or twice in the context of "persuasion" in a book.)
16:28
Thanks! Here's an image form of the article, but there's a PDF download link somewhere here if you prefer.
I assumed Lib Dem was a popular/current term. D:
The last two paragraphs are what I might be hazy on c:
Wait, you wanted me to scan through the article, right?
Yeah, if you don't mind c:
Somehow I stumbled on the first sentence!
> ... with the various groups of liars (commonly congregated under the blanket term politicians) gives me, ...
16:31
If you couldn't tell, I chose a slightly satirical approach ;)
I think I understand the meaning, but I couldn't parse the sentence neatly enough.
It basically "various groups of liars (commonly congregated under the blanket term politicians)" means "there are liars, and we call them politicians."
Yes, but what is the subject of the sentence clause?!?
Oh, I see. [n]ot being ....
Was that a real quote by the Lib Dems?
Yeah, it's from their constitution!
I think you meant whose policies are by who's policies are.
(after UKIP)
Ah, a bad habit of mine!
Thanks very much! c:
Welcome!
I like it!
Great, I'm glad! c:
Thanks for checking it out!
My pleasure!
I wish I could write like you. :-)
Maybe I should buy TIME, and eat it every day. :P
16:45
@DamkerngT. Thanks for your kind words, I appreciate it! :)
I recently started writing a novel, although I'm not sure how far I'll get ;P
Ah, that's exciting!
Is there a robot in the novel? :P
I'm not sure it would suit the theme!
Ahh... I understand that. Don't worry. :-)
I'll try to get chat.stackexchange working on my phone, if not, I'll be forty minutes or so (Going for a quick walk.) c:
@DamkerngT. ;)
Have a nice walk!
16:50
Thanks! :)
Hullo world!
Hallo!
How's it going?
It's going rather okay, or so I think!
How are you? (I hadn't seen you earlier today.)
Busy in classes?
Been fine. And sleep.
16:55
Ahh
@DamkerngT. That's another story. For three days straight, I slept for 1 hour or two hours only. So, I needed to take a break.
Oh, no!
Get some sleep, then.
I already slept too much. Now I'm a little caffeinated, but am okay.
ELL status: 15,006 questions
Good. Too bad it isn't 15006 good questions...
16:59
Hehe!
I'm trying to measure how many questions we really have a day.
The number of questions was 15,003 three hours ago.
So, we are at about 1 qph!
BTW, that is inaccurate.
Oh, I guess you have detail info.
We're not persistent in getting Qs and so, the average qph is inconstant.
@DamkerngT. I could, if I weren't undrunkenly sozzled....
Oh, yes. That's right. I'm trying to do this for a couple days.
Don't forget to graph the result!
17:03
I wouldn't go so far as to plot a graph or something!
No graph, no cookies.
No pain, no gain, right?
Nothing ventured, nothing gained.
It's a tough world. :P
But I get that. You wanna measure the qph to find our busy hours, but what about when you sleep?
17:05
I think we can just approximate it.
For the sake of fun:
-23
Q: Add "undecided" to the up vote/down vote system

Jon Mark PerryI propose an third option - UNDECIDED/NOT SURE. Sometimes a post leaves me unsure as to whether it is any good or bad, and I wish to make my opinion clear on this, so I propose this as a voting option. And no, this is not an April Fool.

:D
That's interesting, actually!
17:27
Good morning @StoneyB!
Hullo @StoneyB!
Did someone call the chatroom police?
I am here.
I did. And here I am!
o.0
17:39
39 mins ago, by Damkerng T.
The number of questions was 15,003 three hours ago.
I think you meant "number of tabs open on my browser was . . ."
Oops.
He meant.
Typo.
17:42
@JimReynolds o_O
Whew. That was a lot of work for a little joke.
Don't joke then when you see a sleepy sloppy acid and a distracted robot.
I think I'll need at least 16 GB of RAM to handle that many tabs, and that's for FF alone!
@DamkerngT. FumbleFingers?:P
(And assuming that FF can handle that.)
@MARamezani You confused me! Argh!
17:44
@DamkerngT. He can. He's a good linguist.
You shouldn't go without sleep like that.
@JimReynolds Like what?
Like an hour or two a day, dumb-dumb.
Don't make the mistakes I did!
Look at my picture.
@JimReynolds Hmm, is dumb-dumb an intermolecular force?
o.0
I'M 22 YEARS OLD!!!
o.o
17:46
Or is there a nonpolar covalent bond going on there?
0.o
O>0
That sounds like snailboat's name for Dam's latest attempt to construct a clause.
@JimReynolds That? You mean O>0?
That that is not what I mean.
I mean when Dam tries to write in English, and out comes some gibberish.
Then snailboat will correct him.
17:50
@JimReynolds He's not here to see what you mean.
GOOD! THEN HE CAN'T ARGUE. O.O
Good. Wait, why am I saying good?
o.0
I do not know.
Why thou not know? You usually know everything about me...
o.0
You might be psychiatrically unstable.
17:53
Might be? That's an understatement.
I try to let you feel included.
I used "Iranian" in a grammar example a few hours ago.
o.0
@JimReynolds Hah. Did you succeed?
Certainly.
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
@MARamezani I didn't see what he will mean. o_O
17:58
@DamkerngT. Mean? What is this? San Francisco?
I don't know what to be thinking for or of or about or to his will or would have or would have been or would have had been thinking.
I'm considering that that is one of those possibilities that he might have been expecting me to be able to manage to have had been thinking.
Having to had been thinking is something I'm not having to have had done now.
user116848
Oi!
18:01
Salam!
15-11!
user116848
Walaikum asalam!
(Jim had been putting me into a would have been so-called debugging mode.)
@DamkerngT. And got away with it.
user116848
My internet is crawling for strange reasons. I don't even know those reasons.
user116848
18:03
rimshot!
I'm feeling like I want to write something that is resembling to what you would read as "sadly".
Sadly, do it.
Anonymous
Only one perfect auxiliary per verb group please! :-)
I'm thinking that maybe or perhaps or possibly Jim was or is or would be some sort or some kind of a virus!
user116848
@snailboat Oi!
18:05
@snailboat Hullo!
I got infected! Argggghhhh!
Anonymous
> I'm considering that that is one of those possibilities that he might have been expecting me to be able to manage to have had been thinking.
@DamkerngT. Robot zombie.
0.O
@snailboat From this or that point onward or now on, please blame my strange or weirdness in syntax or semantic on or upon or over Jim. :P
Anonymous
Or "Rob zombie" for short
18:06
Rob J. Zombie.
(Why did I use J?)
0.O
Rob J. Zombie Jr.
Rombie!
@JimReynolds That's too much like Rambo. But would do for a nickname.
Between Rambo or Romba, which one would you like?
Rembo.
user116848
18:08
Rainbow
@arrowfar Wait! The zombie sense went away!
rem is a stage of sleep.
user116848
Yeah rapid eye movement
@Jim Please give me the antivirus, so I can get back to function normal or normally or normalily once again.
user116848
I like that stage of sleep
user116848
18:09
Very comforting
@JimReynolds Exactly.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Okay. I blame everything on Jim already, so that works out nicely
All the world is a browser, and to Dam, each of us is simply a tab.
0.o
A new word: tabification!
user116848
18:10
^_^
@DamkerngT. Tabifiedity is the scientific name for that.
Tabilusion is the lingu name.
Anonymous
Remember, have had is only possible if the first have is the perfect auxiliary and the second have is the lexical verb
I starr-edd thhatt!
core dumped
rebooting...
Beep beep!
The Tabification of Phenomena by Damkerng T.
18:12
Welcome to windows 47
o.0
Hello, world!
user116848
@MARamezani No way. Which year?
@Dam has windows OS. Where is this world coming to?
@arrowfar 3147.
What happened? I can't remember the last 15 minutes.
Dam wrote a book, 624 pages. Edited by snailboat.
18:14
That... sounds like a good idea. :-)
@DamkerngT. You are a serial killer. In the middle of a murder. Go ahead.
o.O
snailboat's corrections and footnotes: 7457646643784 pages.
Who was my target, again?
@DamkerngT. Dunno. I'm not killing anyone.
@DamkerngT. Maybe the tripods from Mars.
@JimReynolds screaming at 18.724 kHz.
18:15
:D
@DamkerngT. MY EAR!
Is it a felicitous frequency?
That would depend on whether you can hear it or not. :P
@JimReynolds Wait. You didn't hear it through your soul?
My dog's cat's baby can feel it.
18:17
So, why do you ask?
Gimme half an hour. Answering meta thingies.
We gladly give you half a century.
Oh thank thank you! You're a life-saver (Jacket)
Let's give him half a millennium.
18:19
I remember that that was the time required to form Gaia successfully.
I see your half a millennium and raise you one geological epoch.
@DamkerngT. Eww. What is that?
ELL status: 15,008 questions
@JimReynolds Ouch!
@MARamezani You could [find] that in old book films, particularly ones that mention Earth, the unknown origin of humankind.
@DamkerngT. I could what that?
18:23
It was in the same universe as R. Daneel Olivaw.
WS2 over on ELU needs to read this discourse.
user116848
Hi Mr B
Hullo. Hey! --a sequitur!
Hello!
I found WS2! (Yay!)
user116848
You mean non sequitur? :)
18:26
Congenial greetings, DT. JR. MAR.
We talk gooder than we think.
@JimReynolds You mean "weller"?
Sweller.
@arrowfar Quite the opposite: two consecutive utterances, the second of which follows rationally upon the other.
user116848
@StoneyB Ah. Got it.
18:28
WS2 is fun. He asked John Lawler for an example of the morphologically eviscerated English of the future.
Warmest greetings, StoneyB.
(Suspenseful music plays.)
Ego moriturus te saluto.
user116848
Btw my language improves a lot when I talk to you native folks here.
Somehow Tom Hanks' accent in 'Cloud Atlas' popped up in my mind.
IF THAT IS YOUR REAL NAME.
18:29
It's sorta like my "real" name.
(Suspensful music sputters, dies.)
@arrowfar Are there natives here? Are they restless?
@JimReynolds still echoed in the cloud for a few more cycles...
Anonymous
Who decides which name is really real? :-)
user116848
18:31
@StoneyB I don't know :-)
@snailboat Context, context, context!
Jez
Jez
Hey! anyone here interested in... furniture?
user116848
Hi Jez
I know someone here moved some pieces of furniture a few hours ago. :-)
Are we!!
Anonymous
18:33
Like, interior decorating?
Jez
Jez
if so, please follow my furniture proposal at: area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/86175/…
i had a question and it didn't fit into the DIY stackexchange :-(
"1.1 The world is the totality of facts, not things. 1.11 The world is determined by the facts, and by their being all the facts. 1.13 For the totality of facts determines what is the case, and also whatever is not the case. " --Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
2
Ahh. Good idea. Good luck!
Jez
Jez
@JimReynolds dont want to participate?
18:35
@Jez Will it have a tag? I have a lifelong craving for bookcases. You can't have too many bookcases.
Jez
Jez
yeah of course
bookcases are furniture
Bookcases are the apotheosis of furniture.
In my next life, I want to make furniture, maybe.
I think I abused a few bookcases.
18:38
Those bookcases might be thinking, "We are bookcases, not PC cases!"
It's a slippery slope, Jim. I was invited to build a throne for a play my freshman year in college and didn't get out of theatre for 30 years.
Jez
Jez
so
you guys will follow it then
We might.
Jez
Jez
people are surrounded by furniture all day and yet they seem to care so little about it
18:41
If not for that apparently trivial incident of furniture-building I would have followed my (to that point) lifelong dream of becoming a (tenured) Professor of Comparative Germanic Philology and would now be widely admired and retired like John Lawler.
Jez
Jez
it's curious
But you finally did, Stoney?
Jez
Jez
take chairs. they tend to be uncomfortable and break over time. not enough time and attention is paid to them
Takes a chair.
Not at all. I succumbed to the siren lure of cabinetmaking and ended up a parasitic hack and corporate whore. Let that be a lesson to you.
18:43
I wish I hadn't designed my chairs myself!
Why, Dam?
Why the wish?
Did they break?
Or, worse, did Dam break?
@JimReynolds It had no ergonomic thinking at all.
@StoneyB In a way!
(The most surprising thing about my chairs is that the carpenter was able to make them look good enough, based on my funny drawing!)
You should have had him make bookcases instead. Bookcases are a constant incentive to stand up and pluck a book from the shelves and read it: both your intellectual tone and your muscular tone are enhanced.
Indeed!
Oh, but my bookcases were made by the same carpenter. :-)
18:49
Break up your chairs and employ the shards in building more bookcases.
That's very tempting!
Chairsitters of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but your backaches!
And gain more bookcases!
Actually, I'm a stander.
Except to sleep, and that's whar I blow now.
Goodnights, me lovelies!
Good night!
18:55
That's one small shelf for a man, one giant library for mankind. Defy the Establishment. Challenge Google Books. Écrasez l'infâme!
Good night, JR. Flights of angels &c.
0
Q: What is the meaning of homey?

Dmitry FucintvI came across the word homey in the movie Coach Carter. That's how it was: Lyle, why don't you shut your month before I close it for good? You didn't do shit either the whole game. What, homey? [...]

@Jez I am inspired. I follow.
Hmm... easy to understand, difficult to explain.
Jez
Jez
@StoneyB woot, welcome to the furniture club

« first day (807 days earlier)      last day (92 days later) »