« first day (803 days earlier)      last day (96 days later) » 

17:00
Hmm... That makes me doubt the OP's cool.
Doesn't change the fact that this is worth a "WTF?".
Um, I really went what?! when seeing this. Saying whatever coolically does mean I don't care what you say! Saying this stuff is cool among friends. Also, saying almost anything is cool among friends, as long as you don't blunder. :) — MARamezani 40 secs ago
Anonymous
17:16
Anonymous
There's an unreduced ("careful") pronunciation, followed by a pair of reduced pronunciations, slow and fast
> It's time you finished with your book.
Is this correct?!
Anonymous
@MARamezani Hmm, that's a curious example!
Anonymous
I don't know what to say. I guess I might not notice anything weird if someone said it
@snailboat I think it lacks a get to get correct.
Anonymous
17:18
But if I take the time to think about it, it looks a bit unusual
Anonymous
Maybe it's a blend of two different grammatical sentences
Anonymous
Something like: "Are you finished with your book?" + "It's time you finished your book."
0
Q: Are there any differences between 'finish' and 'finish with'?

karlalouIs it like 'finish with' is more specific and more grammatically correct? Or are there any differences between the two? It's time you finished your book. It's time you finished with your book.

I think
Anonymous
So, a syntactic blend (usually a type of error)
Anonymous
You can hear that in the reduced pronunciations, I replaced the [t] with a glottal stop [ʔ]. In the first slow-fast pair of reduced pronunciations, I replaced the [dj] in d'you with [dʒ], which is called yod-coalescence
17:22
@snailboat So, that was you in that weird audio?
Anonymous
Yes
@snailboat Wow! Clear examples!
Anonymous
He made me record! :-)
Anonymous
So if you don't like the audio, blame Jim.
You remind me of Interchanges' listenings. :P
17:23
@snailboat Your voice reminds me of an English teacher our DLTV invited to give a lecture to our English teachers.
(Distance Learning TV)
@snailboat I knew you couldn't possible be weird, or make something weird. Should've known it's that do|t.
@DamkerngT. Well, at first I thought the clip was from OED, or something.
I mean the website.
Hehe! But yes, our snailboat has a similar voice to teachers in English audio examples.
But it was like a snailbot, rather than a snailboat.
I mean, I didn't hear ocean.
Maybe a snailbat? Haven't seen or heard of one, so...
Anonymous
17:28
I searched for a picture of snails and bats together but I couldn't find one
Anonymous
I did find this snail picture though:
Anonymous
Oh, that reminds me of Tom!
@DamkerngT. Tom?
By the way, I found one of his cousins today!
I named a stray snail in my garden Tom.
17:30
Tom is a cat name!
Anonymous
He shared some pictures of Tom the Snail not too long ago!
Anonymous
Hmm, that's true.
Anonymous
In Star Trek, there's a cat named Spot. :-)
Anonymous
When I was little, I had a newt named Bunny.
Anonymous
0
Q: How to use the word whatever (slang) to be cool among native speakers

MuratMy native friend uses the word whatever(slang) quite often in the sense of "anyway" I think. I would like to use it too but I am worried about sounding like "I don't care what you say"..So could you tell me where and how to use it "properly" to sound cool..This question could be controversial but...

Anonymous
17:31
That's a tricky question!
@MARamezani Maybe it was this Thai song that inspired me. It begins with "Tom, Tom, where you go last night?" "I love Thailand. I love Pat Pong." :-)
@snailboat I wasn't sure about the OP's "cool"!
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Well, if we just ignore the reason why they want to use the word
As long as you look ignorant, you're considered cool.
Anonymous
We can take it as a question about how to use whatever without sounding offensively indifferent
Anonymous
17:33
And I think a lot of that is in tone of voice
Anonymous
Context is also important
And when other people pointed out your mistakes, instead of apologizing and/or (oh, I used slash) say whatever.
Then you're "cool".
@snailboat I think it perhaps has nothing to do with the intonation or prosody, even!
Anonymous
@MARamezani The slash is a fun bit of punctuation.
@snailboat That is not what I can understand from the bg.
17:34
I mean, we usually can sense the other's tone.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Imagine sighing or rolling your eyes before saying it :-)
Anonymous
And saying it in a low, flat tone versus saying it in a high-falling tone
Anonymous
I think the high-falling tone sounds a lot friendlier than a low, flat tone
Anonymous
17:37
There's also the stereotypical valley girl what ... ever! with a long glottal stop in the middle
Anonymous
See, it's yet another question where the audio player feature would be helpful.
Exactly!
Anonymous
Oops, I just realized I pronounced a full released [t] in the 2nd of 5 examples in my recording
Anonymous
I wanted to pronounce the slow ones the same as the fast ones, but a lot slower
Anonymous
It's really hard to do, though!
Anonymous
17:41
Reduced pronunciations sound really silly when you slow them down
Anonymous
And when you're speaking slowly you naturally revert to careful pronunciation
Anonymous
Oh well :-)
I think it's not easy to do consciously!
What do you want?
Anonymous
Yeah! I mean, it's not like it's hard to say [t] or [ʔ]
17:42
Whaddya want?
What do you wan'?
Wha dya wann?
Anonymous
The apostrophe isn't technically accurate since the /t/ isn't missing, it's just pronounced [ʔ]
Imitating snailor is phun!
@snailboat A very good place to say why you little...!
Anonymous
If I said wan' without any kind of /t/ sound, it'd sound a bit different
Anonymous
The glottal stop itself doesn't make much sound, but it cuts the previous sound off abruptly
Anonymous
It does make just a little bit of sound though as the glottis closes :-)
17:46
I think for most people, the reduced /t/ in want sounds more like "wa'n" than "wan'".
Hmm... I don't like "wa'n" much when I read it.
Maybe I want ' on top of "n"!
Anonymous
I think I might know what you mean
Anonymous
Since the glottal stop isn't quite instantaneous (although it is pretty fast!), there's some sound made by closing the glottis that typically overlaps the preceding sound
@snailboat I'm now making that sound.
Anonymous
17:49
But if the glottal stop really preceded the /n/, well, then we'd get something like button [bʌʔn]
Anonymous
@MARamezani Yeah, if you keep your glottis mostly closed and make a voiced sound, you can make a creaky sound
Sounds like drowning with a glass of water
@snailboat Too bad they don't have ' on top of a letter!
@snailboat Or, I'll be making a polished mumble.
Anonymous
Because although we like to talk about discrete sounds, in fact it's a physical system and everything is continuous
Anonymous
17:51
You can't instantly go from open glottis to closed
Anonymous
You have to have a partially open glottis in between
Anonymous
So the sound is briefly glottalized before it's cut off entirely
Anonymous
Like "creaky voice".
> ˈstɑːp̚ bʌʔn = start button (BrE), stop button (AmE)
That's really interesting!
17:55
Yea'. Tha' jus' the fun in English.
Continues pronouncing button in BrE
Anonymous
Hmm, I think button is pretty similar in both AmE and BrE
Anonymous
Wait a sec.
English is phuunny!
Anonymous
I'm not a native speaker of BrE, so sometimes I get confused and have to look things up :-)
Anonymous
I speak Midwestern American English
17:58
Ah well. What do you want?
Anonymous
Though there's been some California influence on me.
Whaddya want?
etc.
Anonymous
Having fun? :-)
Yeah. 295 messages already.
No wonder that's what ya want!
18:03
Ah well. What do you want?
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Ah, now there we have /tj/, and this gets optionally coalesced into [tʃ]
Anonymous
Whatcha
nods
@MARamezani I wan whatcha wan'!
Anonymous
But if you ever need the strong form of you, you can't do it: "I want what you want"
18:06
Ah well. What do you want? ....
Anonymous
Oh, wait
Anonymous
Maybe you can, but you can't reduce the vowel to schwa
Anonymous
So it'd be more like "I want whatchoo want" :-)
@MARamezani Whatever.
:P
Anonymous
Whatʔːːːever!!
18:07
@snailboat Yeah. That makes sense. Ah well. What do you want?
@DamkerngT. Whatever whatever whatever? Whatever.
Anonymous
Maybe people would write that: What. Ever.
Anonymous
Using additional periods is a recent trend in English writing
Anonymous
Like "Oh. My. God."
Yes. You're. Right.
Anonymous
18:09
I want to say it's just something people do online, but I've seen it in published novels as a form of emphasis
Anonymous
As of a few years ago
Anonymous
So I think it's actually becoming fairly well established
Wow. Hehe. Tim Post is some writer!
Anonymous
Did you have a link to share?
Well, I'd suggest you look at his highest voted meta posts.
15
Q: Kill the jokers!

HaobinThe famous and ruthless explorer Wyoming Wilbert reports in one of his books that he once visited an island inhabited by jokers and truth tellers. Truth tellers always tell the truth, whereas jokers sometimes lie and sometimes tell the truth. Furthermore when a joker is killed than his body turns...

This is an awesome question!
0
Q: Type of Assimilation

Study.English.WellSo, assimilation may be of three degrees: complete, partial and intermediate. But I don't understand the difference between intermediate and complete assimilation. For example what’s [wɒts] is a short form of what is [wɒt iz].What degree of assimilation is it? And one more question... Why there...

Assimilation?
ASSIMILATION?!
ASSIMILATION?!
Anonymous
18:22
@MARamezani Yep.
Anonymous
For example, in in- + possible, the /n/ has assimilated to the point of articulation of the following consonant /p/
Anonymous
So we get impossible instead of inpossible
Oh yes. I mixed it up with something else.
Anonymous
Of course, that assimilation took place before the word was even borrowed into English.
We had a discussion a while before.
Anonymous
18:23
There's also dissimilation.
Anonymous
Yes, I used the same example to remind you of it.
Eh? Assimilation?
Wait. What did I mixed this thing with? o.0
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. When a sound changes to be like other sounds.
Hmm... I've never thought it had a use in phonology!
Anonymous
18:25
Assimilation usually happens with sounds that are adjacent or very close
Anonymous
But there is rarely assimilation at a distance
Anonymous
Dissimilation is the opposite―two sounds are too similar, so one changes to be unlike the other
Anonymous
Anyway, questions about assimilation are more or less questions about linguistics
It's interesting that the OP mentioned "what's" as an example of assimilation. I think it's different from your "impossible".
Anonymous
It is.
Anonymous
18:27
But think about it for a moment.
Anonymous
First, let's try eliding the vowel [ɪ] from wɑt ɪz
Anonymous
We end up with wɑtz
Anonymous
But that's strange. We've got the unvoiced [t] followed by the voiced [z]
Anonymous
Maybe the [z] could devoice, changing to be more like the [t]
So we wats the watz.
Anonymous
18:28
So we'd end up with [ts] instead of [tz]
nods -- I think logically, we have two choices: either wɑts or wɑdz.
@DamkerngT. wadz? Seriously?
That's like two negative charges beside each other to me.
Why not? In an alternate reality, it could happen!
@DamkerngT. Well, in an alternate reality, dolphins fly.
Anonymous
18:31
Assimilation can work in the other direction, too. have to, for example: hæv.tə → hæf.tə
Anonymous
Now the /v/ is devoicing to be like the following /t/
Anonymous
There are lots of ways sounds can change to be more like one another. Voicing is just an easy example.
Anonymous
The impossible example involves assimilation to a different point of articulation
Anonymous
If it helps you remember it, just think of it as related to the word similar.
Anonymous
Assimilation itself is an example: ad- + similatusassimilatus
18:33
It's easier to just think of Borg!
"You will be assimilated," said the Borg.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. That was your cousin, right?
@MARamezani I'm not sure if he's a first, second, or third cousin, and whether he's once or twice removed!
That's cool.
Anonymous
18:37
Removed, I think
Oh, sorry!
Anonymous
I had to think about what cousin reduction was for a moment :-)
Anonymous
When it comes to robots? The opposite of cousin oxidation, probably.
@snailboat I was reminded of redox reactions. Rusting came to my mind.
@snailboat Great minds think alike! Ah well. What do you want?
Anonymous
18:39
My conquest of the star board is nearly complete.
@MARamezani I will catalog that as one of your catchphrases. :-)
lol
@DamkerngT. Sane choice. Won't regret it.
Anonymous
Coincidentally, the star board is on the right.
(I was thinking of "the right side" for a while. But hey, it's right either meaning!)
Anonymous
I remember learning starboard and port when I was little.
18:41
What. Ever.
Anonymous
I thought they were great words.
Anonymous
Japanese has two pairs of words corresponding to those
Anonymous
I'm not sure what the difference is, if any
Oh, two pairs?
18
Q: Is there any English word in which "ph" is not pronounced as "f"?

NicoleA few days ago, a friend and I were discussing how every "rule" of English spelling or pronunciation has an exception, and every exception has an exception as well. Then I brought up the rule of a ph cluster equaling an f sound (as in phonetic, elephant, morph, etc.) as a pronunciation rule that ...

Anonymous
18:42
Yeah, torikaji and omokaji are the native words for port and starboard
Anonymous
@MARamezani Yes!
Imbeciles. There's pH!
Anonymous
In fiction, I've heard/read those two words most of the time.
Anonymous
But there's also the Sino-Japanese words, sagen and ugen
As far as I know, Thai has no special words for two sides of a ship.
Anonymous
18:44
And it seems like those two are overwhelmingly more common in web corpora
Anonymous
Which is another thing I can't explain!
We have the word กราบ combined with left or right.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. See, that's what I'd do if I were designing a language.
@snailboat Do they use the same set of written forms?
@JimReynolds Ah well. What do you want?
18:45
lol -- And the quest continues!
Anonymous
Google web n-gram counts:
取り舵  1849  (torikaji)
取舵   1238  (torikaji, alternate spelling)
とりかじ 1707  (torikaji, alternate spelling)
取りかじ 36    (torikaji, alternate spelling)
面舵   9734  (omokaji)
面かじ  69    (omokaji, alternate spelling)
おもかじ 4102  (omokaji, alternate spelling)
左舷   98155  (sagen)
右舷   92603  (ugen)
Anonymous
Hmm, maybe I should throw in kana combinations
Hmm... They don't look exactly the same, but I can see some similarities.
Eh, don't 左 and 右 mean left and right (or right and left)?
Oh, yes. I guessed right!
Anonymous
There we go
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Yeah, and those are the ones borrowed from Chinese
18:49
Someone's waiting for Avengers 2 too.
Anonymous
The native Japanese ones have to do with, originally, steering
Anonymous
Hmm, maybe that's the insight I need to get the difference between them :-)
Anonymous
I should ask a Japanese friend
Oh! Good point!
Anonymous
18:50
Poor Suparman
I'm surprised that Tao Okamoto will be in Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice too!
(She was the lead actress in The Wolverine.)
Anonymous
I haven't seen that movie
Anonymous
Now that I think about it, those uses in fiction were probably more to do with steering the boat one way or the other.
Anonymous
Ahh, I'm just a slow learner, so it takes me a while to realize this stuff :-)
18:54
This provokes a question:
Anonymous
Clever! A good demonstration that the semantic relationship between an attributive noun and the head noun it modifies is very nearly arbitrary
What are those modifiers?
@snailboat Good. I was waiting to get some stars from you.
Anonymous
Never!
Anonymous
The stars belong to me and me alone!
Nnnoooooooooooooo!
18:59
A pair of incompatible couple names: Joy Bryant, Jeff Stich.
Anonymous
He can take her name instead!
I think this applies to me:
Anonymous
What's the movie on the bottom?
Anonymous
19:07
It's still bugging me that I have no idea what "I only want to die alive" means
I think the right one is from The Incredibles.
@DamkerngT. Yeah.
Anonymous
By right do you mean bottom?
Anonymous
Or is it made up of two movies?
user116848
Hi friends!
Anonymous
19:08
Hello!
Hullo!
Anonymous
Didja do the writers chat thingy?
@snailboat Bottom right.
@snailboat I think the upper one is frozen.
Anonymous
@MARamezani Yes! I've seen that movie almost twenty times
user116848
19:09
@snailboat No, no one is there sadly. Are you coming?
Anonymous
Oh, so there's no topic, either?
user116848
Well, I think I'll wait. If we are the only ones there then we might look like big time losers :D
user116848
just kidding XD
Oh, I can remember the tailor now, so both sides of the bottom movie are from the same movie: The Incredibles.
Hi, @arrowfar!
user116848
Rimshot!
user116848
19:10
@DamkerngT. Yo!
user116848
@snailboat Not yet :)
Anonymous
That's okay, pretty sure I can determine my loserness on my own without outside input :-)
user116848
@snailboat Hehe!
Anonymous
Hey, I saw The Incredibles!
Anonymous
But I don't remember that scene.
Anonymous
19:11
Well, I don't remember the movie terribly well, I guess.
user116848
I see.
@snailboat Showing the red suits.
Has anyone seen kung fu panda?
raising hand
well, hands. One for each of the sequels.
user116848
Me too
This is the poster for Kung Fu panda 3:
That must be Thai Long.
19:14
Oh, no!
He's back!
Anonymous
I saw Kung Fu Panda
Have you seen Garfield?
Anonymous
Precious, precious starses
@snailboat Ah well. What do you want?
Whatever.
Anonymous
19:17
It's actually somewhat confusing that you keep repeating that question :-)
What. Ever.
@Ahwellwhatdoyouwant do you have an account on meta.SE?
@snailboat
@snailbot
@snailbat
Anonymous
I have one, but I don't use it much
Anonymous
I don't think a Q&A site format makes sense for meta discussion
Anonymous
The site was designed not to be a discussion forum
Anonymous
So just cloning it and using the copy as a discussion forum is sort of a lazy approach
Anonymous
19:23
It doesn't work very well, but it does at least function as a request tracker with the red tag system they bolted on
Anonymous
And the community there is kind of caustic
Shhhhh. They'll retain your diamond...
Anonymous
I don't think they're going to take away my diamond for having an opinion about meta :-)
Ah well. What do you... You get the idea.
19:46
I wonder how the hell he got up there.
Now I see why internet is Internet.
Star that.
Awesome.
OMG! I went easily impressed on this one:
20:21
@DamkerngT.
Hi, how are you?
If you have any suggestions for this Q... I will highly appreciate this ell.stackexchange.com/questions/54329/…
@Ilan Hullo!
hi
how are you?
Fine, thanks. You?
I'm ok, have some English work to do :)
Hmm, regarding your question, what exactly is this letter about?
20:25
As I mention
it is not a letter
it is an official confirmation that an employee has finished Internship
Searching These things usually have a norm and it's not about suggesting something.
hm
did not think about Internship as a searching word
:)
thanks a lot
going to search again
Sure. I gave it my shot.
1 a.m. here. Bye!
thanks!
good night!
Nighty night!
20:40
@Ilan Hi! I'm good. Thanks! It's nice to see you again.
ya
:)
Yes, like @MARamezani suggested, internship is a good word.
but the question was how to name the document
about its header
Some useful keywords: internship, trainee, job experience, work experience, certificate.
DECLARATION OF INTERNSHIP COMPLETION
20:41
I'd use Certificate.
or Certificate?
Declaration is probably okay, but it sounds too big a word for me.
so, CERTIFICATE OF INTERNSHIP COMPLETION
OK
I think that I take Certification
20:42
Or, Internship Completion Certificate, even.
HM
ok :)
what a tough task :)
:D
Usually, this kind of letters is what I think of as stock letters.
I mean, it's very likely that your organization might already have a template for it.
> To whom it may concern,
This letter is to certify that Mr. X Y was working as a full-time employee with [Company Name] from ___ to ___.
Usually, it begins with something like that.
Argh! What happened to my internet connection!
:)
@snailboat
greetings!
Oi oi!
How's life?
20:57
@Iplodman Life goes on!
Ah, good!
And what are you doing in this life? ;P
I'm doing good! :P

« first day (803 days earlier)      last day (96 days later) »