« first day (503 days earlier)      last day (396 days later) » 

00:00
we are first
yay
yay
this is the new game
we are doing it this year
00:17
Ah, so you have about a year left to tackle this problem. :-)
Anonymous
Good luck!
thanks
is anyone still on?
Anonymous
What's up?
do you do programming
Anonymous
00:27
Yes.
what language
Anonymous
Many.
Anonymous
After a certain point, it doesn't really matter--you just learn whatever language you want to use for your next project
i do c++
Anonymous
Yay
00:28
do you?
Anonymous
Yes. A significant portion of my career has been in C++
Anonymous
I'm not totally caught up on all the neat C++11/C++14 stuff yet though :-)
lisp? Prolog?
00:31
Ada?
Assembly?
does anyone do brainfuck (it's a language, don't flag this)
Never heard of it. I'll too old.
funny name
How do you debug ISRs?
whats an ISR?
00:34
Interrupt Service Routine.
Every used an In-Circuit Emulator? (ICE)
whats your question?
Usually, to debug an ISR, you kinda hafta know the assembly of your hardware.
00:35
Every do embedded programming?
im only a starter to programming though
you mean ever?
So you learned straight from C++?
They no longer teach using Pascal?
Anonymous
I don't do a lot of low-level stuff. I used to--I'm 32, which is old enough that I used to have to do some asm to get stuff done :-)
Anonymous
I think Pascal is no longer in vogue in schools
isn't pascal the math test?
Anonymous
00:37
My brother still does a lot of low-level stuff. There's still a market for it, and the skills are rarer than they used to be
When I left grad school, they just started getting into Ada and C for programming classes.
Anonymous
@Bobthezealot Pascal is a language in many ways a lot like C.
Anonymous
I learned Pascal when I was little before C. (Both of my parents are programmers.)
Pascal was to teach types to students.
00:37
your luchy snailboat
Anonymous
They were very different sorts of programmers. My dad's in his 70s, and he did a lot of stuff like OS/360 and so forth.
Nowadays, I guess they do embedded debugging on workstations. shrugs
Anonymous
Technology changes quickly, even in one lifetime. In a fraction of one's lifetime. Make sure you keep learning :-)
Anonymous
Don't just pick something like C++ and decide you're just going to do that.
Anonymous
Although it's great that you're learning it!
00:39
When I was in Silicon Valley, during the heyday, the startups were still doing "printf()" debugging. Amazing.
Anonymous
When I started working here in around ~1999, we were still printf() debugging ;-)
Anonymous
Probably they never stopped.
Anonymous
Although I don't work at that company anymore
why not cout
Anonymous
00:40
Same thing.
i know
less typing
Anonymous
Well, I mean, not at the detail level. But "printf debugging" is sometimes used to refer to that sort of debugging, even with other stuff besides C's printf() itself.
Even today, they are still making the same mistakes, I'll bet. Especially at system level.
Anonymous
When I started learning programming, it was very low-level, and I slowly made my way up through procedural programming and then OOP, and then to FP :-)
can we talk about something else, im getting bored
Anonymous
00:42
Oh, no!
Anonymous
I guess I can go back to researching an answer about Japanese grammar :-)
Nope, this is the only topic that is legal at this time.
I guess I can get back to learning English
Anonymous
What is your first language?
00:43
me
are you asking me?
No, she's asking the other Bob-the zealot.
? what do you mean
The guy sitting behind you. She's asking that Bob-the-zealot.
programming language or spoken language
Either or both.
00:46
programming: C++ spoken: Chinese
she wouldn't be asking someone sitting beside her unless you are the person sitting beside her and you are called Bob-the-zealot
She wasn't asking me. I'm a tiger. She knows what a tiger's first language is.
Pragmatics. She knows what her first language is. She knows what a tiger's first language is. The 3rd person in our discussion is you. That means, she was asking you.
i answered what she asked already
No, you answered my question.
00:51
whats your question
My question that you answered was: "Either or both."
Are you here to practice your conversational English?
I got stories, stories about embedded programming, all learned the hard way. Boy, do I got stories.
ok
but don't tell any
Anonymous
@Bobthezealot You're a funny guy, Bob. :-)
00:54
hahaha
thanks
Then that leaves you. Start talking.
Anonymous
I left a comment on your meta question, but a moderator deleted it.
Anonymous
Probably 'cause it had an answer in it. :-)
00:56
oh
Anonymous
I said choster's answer was okay.
Anonymous
Although I think octopi is okay, too, descriptively speaking.
Anonymous
But since some people will look down on you if you say it, the safe alternative octopuses is probably fine.
Anonymous
(Of course, you can probably find people who think that's wrong if you look hard enough :-)
00:58
sure
Anonymous
Use octopodes only if you want to tell everyone that you're a pedant or if you're doing it in fun to express your love of language, but not if you're attempting to communicate seriously
Anonymous
It's too rare to be easily understood without being distracting.
Anonymous
It's a word. Lots of things are words. Being a word doesn't mean much :-)
Anonymous
01:04
Words can be common, rare, modern, archaic, appropriate, inappropriate, informal, formal, clumsy, elegant, ugly, lovely, … They can have all sorts of traits. And different traits to different speakers.
02:24
lurking...
02:48
1
A: Past Perfect or Present Perfect?

FrankI couldn't understand the words they have used. Look at the above statement carefully, it has made of two different times. 'I couldn't understand' is one and another is 'the words they have used' 'I could not understand' talks the simple past. However, 'the words they have used' is where you ne...

Hmm... This answer got a +1.
03:36
1
Q: Any English equivalent for the French expression, “endormir quelqu'un avec des propos"?

Franck DernoncourtIn French, one can figuratively use the expression, “endormir quelqu'un," meaning that by using some lengthy/boring/loose explanation, we make the interlocutor less vigilant, thereby forgetting about a few things that you know they had in mind but that you want them to forget during the discussi...

This one sounds like "to pull all the five rivers" in Thai. :)
2
Q: Why am I so epic?

Bob the zealot 2Why am I so epic?Why am I so epic?Why am I so epic?Why am I so epic?Why am I so epic?Why am I so epic?Why am I so epic?Why am I so epic?Why am I so epic?Why am I so epic?Why am I so epic?Why am I so epic?Why am I so epic?Why am I so epic?Why am I so epic?Why am I so epic?Why am I so epic?Why am I...

Finally, someone did what I speculated an easy thing to do. :D
Anonymous
03:55
@DamkerngT. The tip of my tongue never touches the roof of my mouth when I pronounce /l/.
I'm not sure if I should call that part the roof. I probably shouldn't have.
Anonymous
You can.
Anonymous
There's nothing wrong with your description
I've seen some native speakers touch their tongues to their lips instead.
Anonymous
Um, I guess that's physically possible. :-)
03:57
See, I think of English as Slitherine. :D
Anonymous
I think there's a lot of variation in American English /l/.
I tried not to mention dark-l. I hope it can avoid the issue well enough.
Anonymous
Well, I think it's a lot more complicated than that.
@snailboat I believe so. Hmm... Is it fair to say that in all /l/ variances, the tongue must touch some upper part somewhere?
Typos follow me everywhere. :( -- sobbing
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Probably not.
04:01
Hah! That's a surprise.
Anonymous
I remember reading a summary (on linguistlist somewhere?) once in which the phonetician in question came to the conclusion that variation in American English /l/ wasn't well studied enough to be described thoroughly
curious
Anonymous
Well, besides relatively "dark" (velarized) and "clear" /l/ allophones, there's L-vocalization
Anonymous
But I don't think that's the end of the story
Anonymous
Too bad I didn't put that description down in my notes.
04:05
L-vocalization as in "little"?
Anonymous
I don't understand the question, so I'll go for "no"
I'm not sure what L-vocalization is. (So I thought it might be the syllable l one.)
Anonymous
"Vocalization" meaning "turning it into a vowel (or semivowel)" (although /l/ is already a sonorant, so that's not a big change)
Hmm... Looks like Bob is having fun on the main.
Anonymous
@Bobthezealot Hey, are you really 14?
04:11
I'm not sure if they really are the same person.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Oh, we don't need to worry about that. The ELL mods can sort that out.
It's possible that the cloned one is a friend of the real one's.
nods
Anonymous
Ah, I do have this bookmarked, though:
Anonymous
10
A: How can a speaker tell whether their idiolect has "dark l"?

Alain PannetierThe main difference lies in what part of your tongue enters in contact with your velum (aka soft palate). If you try to pronounce "light" [try with a French accent if that doesn't work with your native Australian pronunciation ;-)] you will notice that the tip of your tongue enters in contact w...

By the way, any /l/ sounds are very hard to read on spectrograms.
@snailboat Thanks! -- reading...
> The main difference lies in what part of your tongue enters in contact with your velum (aka soft palate).
Hah! I've never thought of that!
Anonymous
04:15
> Normally you should also notice, in a subsequent phase, that the tip of your tongue touches the front of your palate closer to the teeth, but since you already mentioned that you tend to finish your "dark Ls" with a "w" sound, it is possible that this part is absent in your pronunciation - which is actually quite common in America for instance. On the other hand Received Pronunciation does have both phases.
Oh, I see. A lot of Thais also do that.
Anonymous
If I touch the tip of my tongue to the roof of my mouth while saying an L sound, any L sound, I feel like I'm overarticulating, like pronouncing water with a [t] sound
@snailboat Wait. Do you mean the same when /l/ is at the beginning of the word too?
(Like, life, lead, love, etc.)
(I thought "dark l" never happens at the beginning of a word, or at least at the beginning of an utterance.)
Anonymous
I don't agree with using spam flags for those posts.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. I don't have a clear L.
04:21
Oh! That's interesting!
0
Q: Is this, 'just any', a mate?

Listenever The recipe uses a large amount of pepper, and not just any pepper, but a special blend imported from India. (Merriam-Webster’s) You have to be a member to go there. They won't let just any person in. (Merriam-Webster’s) We don’t publish just any letters: we reject more than half of t...

This must sound silly. I don't know what this mate means.
Anonymous
I don't know. Correlative?
Anonymous
It's unclear to me what the poster intends to ask, at least from the title
Oh, you don't know that either!?
I thought it was something from CGEL.
Anonymous
I'm looking at the actual question now
Anonymous
It seems that she's asking whether she needs to use just any, or if plain any would work
04:24
Probably means "used together as if they were a single word".
Anonymous
Yeah, if they go together as a unit
> The recipe uses a large amount of pepper, and not just any pepper, but a special blend imported from India.
You have to be a member to go there. They won't let just any person in.
Both of them sound weird without just. Hmm... The first one is passable, I think.
This reminds me of your hardly any.
04:41
hi
hello
Hello!
Did you clone yourself?
Oh, that's not very nice. :)
are you a mod?
LOL
No, I'm not. You can see the mods by clicking on "Users" on the main page.
04:45
oh
good
can you keep a secret for me
Anonymous
I am not an ELL mod
Anonymous
I am a regular ELL user
@Bobthezealot Yes?
good
are you sure
Hmm... I probably shouldn't keep that secret for you. :D
04:46
promise?
Will any of those three-letter organizations come after me once I know the secret?
Anonymous
Damkerng fears for his life!
whats those three-letter organizations?
Anonymous
You know. No Such Agency.
04:48
Umm... Some starts with F, some with C, I ran away from a lab that the name starts with N. Really, I think it could be any letters. :D
what do they do?
They built me, or that is what I remember.
@DamkerngT. That's actually a good question! I wonder why it wasn't asked on ELU?
ok im going to tell the secret
FE, are you a mod
Anonymous
F.E. isn't a mod. He doesn't even have an account on ELL
04:49
ok
Anonymous
He's a user of the other English site, ELU (English Language & Usage)
the secret
is
dun dun dun
I made lots of accounts and getting them to 15 rep, and up voting all my questions and answers
Ahh... You're a looper!
ahh!
skullpatroll are you a Mod?
Not me pal :-)
04:51
good
the second part of the secret:
Anonymous
Is "lots" three? Because when you type in "Bob the zealot" into users, three accounts show up
dun dun dun
Anonymous
Oh, sorry, don't let me interrupt :-)
@F.E. I think it's a good question for both sites!
04:54
I am using some accounts to ask really stupid questions and answering with this account, and giving it the best answer
Anonymous
Fiendish!
: )
please don't tell anyone
It's all good in the hood.
04:58
ahh!
helix, are you a mod?
Anonymous
You're just going to ask everyone that from now on, aren't you? :-)
Anonymous
You can find a list of ELL moderators here: ell.stackexchange.com/users?tab=moderators
@DamkerngT. Will someone tell the OP that she/he is correct: "or does the word, just, only clarify the speaker’s intention of negating the free choice?" -- it seems to me, that is what is happening--the speaker wanted to use the free choice "any", and had to use "just" there in that sentence in order to do that.
Anonymous
Listenever is a Korean learner of English who has picked up a copy of CGEL, along with a number of other rather technical grammar books, and has also read Harry Potter about a zillion times. :-)
@F.E. A kind tiger might tell her that.
does anyone have a rubik's cube
Not me. My cubic one doesn't work anymore.
@snailboat Yes, I think I've answered some of her posts on ELU before, maybe, probably, for I can recall a member or two that was studying out of CGEL and was asking questions about it.
Anonymous
05:02
I used to when I was younger
aww
I like to cube
Anonymous
Oh, right! I forgot she was on ELU as well.
and that pic was a rubik's cheese
@DamkerngT. Er, "kind" tigers don't exist. All tigers are ferocious.
Anonymous
@Bobthezealot Was that all of your secrets?
05:05
@F.E. Ahh... I thought anything fluffy is kind. :D
Anonymous
Have you introduced F.E. to Hagu?
yup, not the cube though
Anonymous
Oh, the cube part is public knowledge?
@snailboat Probably not a good idea. My Hagu might become a meal easily. :D
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Oh! I always imagined that Hagu was ferocious, too :-)
05:06
@snailboat yes
@snailboat He is, particularly to my walls and my legs. :)
@snailboat Yes, I don't mind answering questions about CGEL material, as that becomes a sorta review and refresher exercise for me.
Anonymous
Oh, my screen is full of @snailboats
Mine too! (I just"highlighted all" snailboats on this tab.)
mine too
05:12
Hmm, musicals are actually fun, and good for learners.
what musicals?
I searched for "Naughty" and found Matilda the Musical. :)
Anonymous
Chess is a good musical.
^That, too!
does anyone do lasermaster?
Anonymous
05:16
I'm unfamiliar with 'lasermaster'
Anonymous
Is that like laser tag?
sorry gotta go
See you later. :)
Anonymous
See you laser!
05:38
. . . yawn . . .
. . . scratch . . . huff . . . scratch . . .
sniff
repairing the scratched walls...
@DamkerngT. There's another thread on narrative fiction: Fell like dead leaves. -- It's getting bad answers. Perhaps you could enlighten them? :)
Tell them that as each sentence is read, that stuff in the sentence--that is in past-tense--is occurring right then in that scene.
It's as though everyone suddenly forgets all the novels they've read--especially science-fiction novels.
Yeah, I must NOT get an ELL account. (Else, I'll never get any of my own stuff done.)
05:56
I think ESN's answer wouldn't be so bad. -- reading...

« first day (503 days earlier)      last day (396 days later) »