« first day (491 days earlier)      last day (408 days later) » 

Anonymous
17:00
I've noticed that speakers of Indian English are sometimes more keen on titles than I'd expect. I've been knighted several times in this chat room alone.
Thats why I dream of a world where everyone follows the same culture...
That'd be kind of boring.
Anonymous
Which is always awkward.
@snailboat Yes, sir.
:D
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Don't make me frown at you.
Anonymous
17:01
I'll do it.
Anonymous
Not bluffing!
I was just trying to demonstrate a bad usage. :D
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Well done! Please refrain ;-)
Time to go! Bye! (making like a foetus and heading out) }:>
@Nico bye!
Anonymous
17:02
Well!
Have a nice evening! See you soon!
Anonymous
I must admit I'm nonplussed
@snailboat Gotcha.
ok, back in there just 1 last time. Is it ok if I just say - "Stop it." no titles?
It sounds like our @AwalGarg would like to woo or court someone. :-)
@AwalGarg Prolly.
17:04
assuming I am obviously in a convo with that very person...
@DamkerngT. haha, you!
ok. Its enough of serious business for today...
Lets talk fun.
I wanna say - "Busy-ness"
Anonymous
@Nico I like the tree version better.
so, probably, it should be "bus'i'ness"
but, it isn't. why?
}:> <-- looks like a moose.
@DamkerngT. it looks like a random arrangement of symbols used to make emoticons.
@AwalGarg You mean, bus-eye-ness?
Anonymous
17:07
People put words together all the time.
@DamkerngT. y-e-s-s
@snailboat to make sentences?
Anonymous
No, from pieces. Like, let's say, busy and -ness. Some hundred years back, people put those two together
Anonymous
It ended up spelled business, but it also took on a new meaning.
Anonymous
So it was no longer simply the combination of busy and -ness.
Anonymous
When this happens, we say the combination is lexicalized. That is, it's has become a "lexical item". It needs its own entry in a dictionary to explain it, because you can't figure out what it means from busy and -ness
17:09
so, if I wanna make a "busy" translation of the word "trueness", then how will we spell it according the damn rules of linguistics?
Anonymous
There's lots of examples. Like disgruntled. It needs its own entry in the dictionary because you can't put it together from dis- and other stuff.
Anonymous
Business is one such example. Busyness is a more recent coinage which is intended to have the meaning you'd expect from -ness, but it's somewhat clumsy and people prefer to work around the problem by rephrasing
@snailboat but, busyness breaks rules, doesn't it?
gotta go. power died. bye!!
Anonymous
17:12
See you!
See you soon!
Anonymous
Busyness is distinguished in writing by spelling, and in speech by the middle vowel (which is, I think, obligatorily reduced by syncope in business)
Anonymous
But it's a clumsy word and I wouldn't use it unless I were forced to.
Strange. I've just heard a tall beer in Django Unchained, but there was no glass, I think. It's in a bottle.
Anonymous
I don't know about beer height.
Anonymous
17:14
May your beers be tall and in a hand!
@snailboat nods -- I think I don't like busyness much; but some people might know how to use it creatively.
@snailboat LOL
Anonymous
Hey. If you were to hold a bird in your hand, but put your hand inside a bush, would the bird then have the value of an unbounded number of birds?
I think it depends on whether I put the same hand I want to hold a bird inside a bush or not.
If it were the same hand, it would be fair to say it's an unbounded number of birds, I think. :D
Oh, Django Unchained has lots of interesting songs, including rap ones.
Anonymous
I'm not familiar with that
I mean, the most challenging thing for me in listening tasks seems to be the rap music. :D
I could use some of rap songs in the movie.
Anonymous
17:29
I don't listen to much rap, myself
Oh, it looks like we really have a voting problem.
Anonymous
Yeah?
The best of my last three answers got +3.
Yours is +5, jimsug's is +3.
Anonymous
Hey, I'm 2/3rds of the way to getting that 1000 back.
Anonymous
I'm at -326 rep for the week :-)
17:31
You got a lot of votes from that "a... a... a..." question. :D
Anonymous
I have two answers at only one vote
Anonymous
And six answers at only two votes
I mean I expected a user like jimsug to get more than +3 on average.
And me is somewhere between +2 and +3.
It looks like it dropped a bit.
Anonymous
Eh.
17:33
I expected you'd get +5 or above on average.
Anonymous
My average, for the last 25 answers, is +6.6
See, that's in line with my estimates. :D
Anonymous
I think that when you have more rep, people upvote you more often.
Anonymous
So there's a bit of feedback.
I think it's not only that; the quality and style of answers are the factors too.
Anonymous
17:35
I don't think it's only that. But I think that newer users, on average, who write good content, don't get as many votes.  ← Which of these commas should I kill?
Anonymous
Commapocalypse!
If you told me to delete one, I might choose to delete the one before on average.
Actually, I think your sentence reads fine without any commas at all.
Anonymous
> But I think that newer users on average who write good content don't get as many votes.
Anonymous
> But I think that on average newer users who write good content don't get as many votes.
Anonymous
17:38
> But I think that, on average, newer users who write good content don't get as many votes.
@snailboat That's even better.
@snailboat This one seems good enough to be in some published paper. :)
Anonymous
Hah!
Anonymous
Since I'm a terrible writer, I'll take that as a compliment. :-)
I believe you can say that, though I don't rather agree with the "terrible" part, maybe "terrific" is better. :D
Tea time! brb
Anonymous
I think that I too will Tea time! brb.
17:46
I see this chat is dominated by you two, lol.
18:11
What should I make of it?
Anonymous
I don't know. The proposal doesn't do anything to help sites like ELL or JLSE
Anonymous
But there are other things mentioned in that post, so I can't be certain which you're referring to
Anyone here can approve edits?
I am trying to get my rep to be a multiple of 5, lol.
Anonymous
Yes, we can.
Ah maybe you can take a look at my edit here ell.stackexchange.com/questions/24549/…
Anonymous
18:16
There you go
OK, I will try to aim for 200 rep and then retire, lol. But I will try to keep my accounts instead of delete them
Anonymous
You could change substracting to subtracting here
@snailboat OK I will work on it
Anonymous
It's too minor an edit, so the site won't let me make it :-)
18:19
Ah I see. I joined that site because they migrated my post there, lol
> Essentially, we are scaring legitimate, thoughtful people away from getting help. That’s one side of the problem. Additionally, some of our best users are getting more frustrated than we want them to be and (importantly) expressing that it’s hard for them to find questions that they want to answer.
Though I'm not sure about how their solutions will help our sites
I think we share the same problems.
s/sites/stack/
18:37
@JasperLoy It's nice to see your new avatar! :-)
@DamkerngT. Oh yeah, the default one is nice this time, so I kept it
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. It won't.
Anonymous
And to some extent, yeah, we do.
Anonymous
The average quality of a question on Q&A sites is pretty low, though
Anonymous
18:43
You have to draw a line somewhere, and on some level the act of rejecting a question is never going to be nice
Anonymous
No matter how nice you are about it
Anonymous
Some of the mechanisms built into SE are negative in nature, too, like downvotes
Anonymous
@snailboat reading...
Oh, it looks like a nice article. Thanks!
It's indeed a vicious circle.
No, they used the term a vicious spiral.
Anonymous
Yeah, one of them vicious round things
Anonymous
18:54
Round things can be virtuous, too.
Like wheels. :D
Anonymous
"We were trapped in a virtuous wheel, always spinning, spinning, spinning toward justice!"
Whoever said that, I thank them. It gives us hope.
> “Given that users who receive no feedback post less frequently, a potentially effective strategy could be to ignore undesired behaviour and provide no feedback at all,”
Interesting.
Is that what happened to some of my answers? :-)
(When they got no votes at all.)
There is usually nobody in the math educators chat lol
@JasperLoy It's not the same stack as the Math.SE, right?
I'd like to note that you don't need difficult words to demonstrate this feature of English. Most beginners know how to pronounce Bye!, by, and baby. Just point this out for them would work. :-) — Damkerng T. 29 secs ago
19:03
@DamkerngT. Nope
Somehow I think repeating the verb twice in two different tenses reads better. For example, I might say, "I have (always) trusted, and hopefully will (be able to) continue to trust you" It's just my opinion, anyway. — Damkerng T. 1 min ago
Hmm... Maybe I should convert that into an answer.
Anonymous
Maaaybe.
Anonymous
In this situation you could get away with some coordination of unlikes, too.
Already posted it. :)
Anonymous
Not that I'm recommending it :-)
Anonymous
19:18
A-ha!
Anonymous
I hopefully will be able to continue to trust you is a little long-winded for me
I think the sentence could be read in several ways. One way I think I might like is a very emphatic version: "I have always TRUSTED [pause] and hopefully will be able to continue to TRUST [pause] YOU." (The YOU part is not as emphasized as TRUSTED/TRUST, but it's not dimmed.)
Anonymous
The OP's example is right out, though.
I think I hopefully will continue to might sound better.
Anonymous
*hopefully will always trusted
Anonymous
19:20
> I have always trusted and hopefully will always trust you.
Anonymous
This is okay.
Anonymous
> *I always have, and hopefully will continue to trust you.
Anonymous
This is worse. (Sorry, FumbleFingers!)
Anonymous
I wouldn't call that grammatical.
Anonymous
Is Why so sure? really a common idiom? I can't specifically recall having heard it
19:29
Me either. It looks like it's common enough for many people, though.
Anonymous
I can think of lots of examples of Why so X? but sure doesn't fit in that slot for me
Anonymous
I find zero examples of this common idiom in COCA
Ahh... Why so serious? -- I remember this one.
Anonymous
Yep! And Why so glum?
Why so X is just short for Why are you so X
Anonymous
19:45
Sorta.
I've a short clip (2 minutes long) I'd like to have my transcription checked. If that's okay with you.
Anonymous
Most of the time, you can take it as ellipsis of a verb and a subject. If you do, then you have to supply different ones in different contexts.
It's a very famous clip, I think. It's iPhone 4 unveiled: youtube.com/watch?v=wn3OCIcE8ds
Anonymous
"Drum Hadley has a lot of friends." "Why does he have so many?" "Because I need them."
nods -- I think it's ellipsis.
> For 2010, we're gonna take the biggest leap since the original iPhone.
[*Whoo! Whoohoo! -- applause*]

And so today, today, we're introducing iPhone 4,
[*Whoohoo! -- applause*]

the 4th generation iPhone.

Now, this is really hard,
[*laughter*]
and there are... there are well over a hundred new features and we don't have time to cover all of them today. So I get to cover eight of them with you. Eight new features of the iPhone 4. The first one, an "All new design".
[*clapping*]
Now, stop me before I'd've already seen this.
I think I found a good example of people who "Wow-a-lot" all the time. :D
Anonymous
19:57
This is really hot, not this is really hard
I thought of hot too, but I wasn't sure. Thanks 1. :D
Anonymous
Stop me if you've already seen this
Ahh... that one is hard for me. Thanks 2.
Anonymous
You've got to see this thing in person
Anonymous
One of the most beautiful designs
19:59
Oh, I haven't heard that 've. Thanks 3 and 4.
Anonymous
One of the most beautiful things we've ever made
Thanks 5!
Anonymous
The precision of which this is made
Anonymous
Is beyond any consumer product
Anonymous
Is like a beautiful old
20:00
@snailboat I think he said it twice, maybe is and then it's.
Anonymous
It's unheard of in consumer products today
Anonymous
No, he says is twice
Ahh... Thanks. Thanks 6-10!
Anonymous
Apparently the camera brand is spelled Leica
Anonymous
I had to look that up
Anonymous
20:02
Geogous should be spelled gorgeous
Thanks 11 and 12!
Anonymous
His phrase beyond the doubt strikes me as unusual
Anonymous
Some of your punctuation would need to change.
Oh! Eh? Isn't it common? Please tell me about the punctuation.
Anonymous
Umm
Anonymous
20:04
Do you have an updated version of the transcription? :-)
Here goes.
> For 2010, we're gonna take the biggest leap since the original iPhone.
[*Whoo! Whoohoo! -- applause*]

And so today, today, we're introducing iPhone 4,
[*Whoohoo! -- applause*]

the 4th generation iPhone.

Now, this is really hot,
[*laughter*]
and there are... there are well over a hundred new features and we don't have time to cover all of them today. So I get to cover eight of them with you. Eight new features of the iPhone 4. The first one, an "All new design".
[*clapping*]
Now, stop me you've already seen this.
Anonymous
A minor fix: that should say stop me if you've already seen this
Oh, yes.
Anonymous
I was thinking you'd need to join the sentences once you changed it's to is, and you did that
Anonymous
You wouldn't usually put quotes around all new design, and if you did, you wouldn't usually capitalize it, but I understand if you wanted to refer to what was on the screen
20:07
nods
It appears so on the screen.
Anonymous
Yeah. I still wouldn't do it.
Anonymous
But I understand
How about I italicize it?
Anonymous
I wouldn't do that either
nods -- I see. Fixed.
Anonymous
20:08
I think he was using the words normally
Anonymous
I wouldn't put a comma after Glass
nods
I think it looks quite good now.
Anonymous
It's pretty good. I don't think I'd put a comma before is either, personally. It's pretty rare that you want to put a comma between a subject and a predicate
I'm going to suggest "followers" and "enthusiasts".
Anonymous
Suggest them for what?
20:11
@snailboat I see. Fixed. I was influenced by his long pause.
Hmm... Where was that link gone?
It's the "Wow-a-lot" question.
0
Q: What to call someone who cries out "wow" all the time?

user76935What to call someone who (silently, but loud enough that the talking person hears it) cries out "wow" (throughout another person's monologue) all the time as an expression of delight or admiration (?) The talking person is someone of authority.

Anonymous
Oh! From the other day
Anonymous
Hmm... Why the downvotes on Maulik's answer?
I just got an idea that people in that event also Wow! and Woohoo! a lot. :D
I didn't.
Anonymous
I didn't suggest that you did
Anonymous
20:13
I was just wondering aloud why the two downvotes are there
But I think flattering doesn't sound like a sincere thing.
Anonymous
Well, Maulik asked before writing his answer whether the OP meant sincere or otherwise
Does my reasoning make sense?
Anonymous
Is that person really surprised or just falsely praising? — Maulik V May 26 at 9:01
Anonymous
@Maulik - Perhaps it seemed a bit artificial, because it was done so consistantly. — user76935 May 26 at 9:05
Anonymous
20:14
So it seemed like he was trying to respect the OP's intent.
Anonymous
Follower or enthusiast...
Anonymous
I dunno :-)
Anonymous
I couldn't think of a good answer, myself
Anonymous
Follower could work
@snailplane - I was thinking about a lickspittle, but wasn't sure actually. — user76935 May 26 at 9:02
Oh, if the OP thought of lickspittle, follower might not work.
What the OP wrote in the question and in comments are not in agreement.
Now, I'm not sure what the OP meant either.
Anonymous
20:18
Yeah, that's why I was asking questions
Anonymous
I got rid of them after the OP clarified what they meant
Anonymous
Hey, look at this!
Anonymous
2
Q: "Not only will we ..." or "We will not only ..."?

cherry8.8vanillaIs it possible that both of the following sentences are correct? Or is only the second one correct? Not only will we hear more noise during the day and night, but we will also lose our special old park. We will not only hear more noise during the day and at night, but we will also lose ...

Anonymous
A clear question with helpful comments and a helpful answer :-)
Anonymous
20:21
Anonymous
This is my onion. It flowered, and it also fell over.
Oh, it's beautiful!
Anonymous
It looks like most of the little mini-flower thingies haven't opened yet.
Anonymous
But you can see a couple that did on either side
Anonymous
It's like a flower made up of a hundred smaller flowers
20:22
They're gonna bloom soon, I think.
Indeed!
I didn't expect that many flowers from the same stalk!
Did I spell it correctly?
Ahh... Looks like so.
Anonymous
I don't know which word you mean, but it all looks like it's spelled correctly.
Anonymous
It's about two feet tall. Onion flowers grow taller than I imagined.
I don't say stalk very often.
Anonymous
It mostly grew straight up, wobbling a bit as it went
Anonymous
But it finally gave up and fell over!
20:25
Eh? It fell over?
Anonymous
See, the top of the flower is inches from the sidewalk
I thought you used a strange angle. :D
Anonymous
It was growing straight up!
Anonymous
Actually, it fell over a couple times, but I helped it recover its upness
Anonymous
Its upward orientation
20:26
A-ha!
Anonymous
It's strange.
Anonymous
It was very windy one day, and I saw it had fallen over in one direction, all the way to the right
Do you have a full picture of it?
Anonymous
The next day, it was all the way to the left!
Anonymous
No, I didn't take one, but I will later
20:26
Oh, it's alive!
Anonymous
I straightened it slightly after that, and the next day it was growing straight up without a bend!
Anonymous
Plants are a mystery to me.
They generally follow the sun.
Anonymous
All I know is, I had an old onion and it started to sprout, so I put it in the ground.
Anonymous
And then it turned into a plant!
Anonymous
20:27
Sometimes I water it.
Wonderful!
Anonymous
I found out about a strange construction in Japanese today
Anonymous
If a noun can be construed to have a gradable component semantically, it can informally be modified by an intensifier
Anonymous
> Ano hito wa totemo inaka da. 'That person is very rustic.'
Anonymous
Inaka is a noun! It means the countryside, way out away from the city
Anonymous
20:30
And totemo is a generic intensifier like English very
Gradability is different in different languages, I think.
Anonymous
So this example is literally "That person is very countryside"
Oh, I think we grade the countryside quality too in Thai. :D
Anonymous
It's very rare that totemo modifies a noun in Japanese.
> Mr. A is more countryside than Mr. B.
LOL -- I laughed at my own sentence above.
Anonymous
20:31
In English, you can do it because, informally speaking, you can zero derive an adjective countryside from the noun countryside
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Hehe!
Anonymous
Zero derivation is very productive informally.
Anonymous
In English.
Anonymous
Not so in Japanese, where it's much more difficult for words to jump between categories
Ahh... I think it's because of the cases.
Anonymous
20:33
The cases mark the roles various nouns play.
Anonymous
Mostly.
Anonymous
But Japanese has a lot of other inflectional morphology that marks other parts of speech
Anonymous
Every verb ends in u
Anonymous
Almost every new derived verb ends in ru
Oh, I haven't noticed that.
Anonymous
20:34
(Forming verbs with other consonants isn't really productive in Japanese)
Anonymous
That every verb ends in u, you mean?
Yes.
But it looks like so.
Anonymous
It's true. That's the form you'll find in a dictionary.
Anonymous
They have multiple inflectional forms.
Anonymous
When you coin a new verb, it almost always has r-u at the end.
Anonymous
20:36
So Guuguru "Google" becomes gugur-u "to google"
:)
It sounds cute!
Anonymous
But most words, when you verb them, you end up adding ru.
Anonymous
It is! It loses the long vowel, because Japanese verbs don't typically have long vowels.
Anonymous
Kopii "copy" becomes kopir-u "to copy" for the same reason.
Anonymous
The long i vowel gets shortened.
Anonymous
20:37
Japanese is a cute language.
Oh, they don't use the word xerox.
@snailboat Indeed!
Anonymous
It's much harder for words to become verbs in Japanese.
Anonymous
I have only maybe a thousand examples.
Anonymous
Whereas in English, making up verbs is practically an everyday occurrence.
Only a thousand?
Anonymous
20:38
Well, most of them are informal and don't generally occur.
Anonymous
Some are very widespread, like the examples I gave to you.
I don't know how many would be many enough that you wouldn't say only. :D
Anonymous
You can coin one on the spot if you like.
Anonymous
Ah, well, I have to collect examples :-)
Anonymous
If I ever want to describe verbs adequately.
20:40
Hmm... I don't know how many verbs there are in English.
Anonymous
I have rather a lot of examples of Japanese.
Anonymous
Probably most people know less than 10,000 verbs.
Anonymous
The largest and most open category in English is that of the noun.
Anonymous
Anyone can join noun club, no membership fee required. No shirt, no shoes? Join noun club!
3
We do have lots of nouns and adjectives!
And they could combine and pile up!
@snailboat Hey, I like free shirts. Do you have one? :-)
Anonymous
20:41
And I think that is generally true in all languages. About nouns being the most open category, I mean.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Sorry, noun club has very few perks.
Anonymous
That was an allusion to signs posted everywhere: "No shirt, no shoes, no service!"
Anonymous
Anonymous
That is, stores reserve the right to kick out people who aren't dressed properly.
20:43
Epp, Image not found!
Anonymous
But noun club? Noun club welcomes all.
Ahh... I see.
Oh, it looks scary!
Anonymous
I was actually quoting the Simpsons earlier. I do this on occasion, mostly because my brother does, and growing up I absorbed a number of Simpsons quotes from him via osmosis.
Anonymous
At the time, I didn't watch TV.
Anonymous
But there was no escaping Simpsons quotes.
20:47
It's difficult to escape from them.
Anonymous
Even today, The Simpsons is still going, apparently.
Hmm... They're like Doraemon in terms of popularity, I think.
Anonymous
Anonymous
I was kind of misquoting it.
Lately, I haven't watched The Simpsons as often as before.
I can't remember that scene, but it looks funny. :D
Anonymous
20:56
I should star stuff in chat more often.

« first day (491 days earlier)      last day (408 days later) »