« first day (471 days earlier)      last day (428 days later) » 
06:00 - 12:0012:00 - 00:00

Anonymous
06:15
I took that English vocabulary test again. It was cheating, since I learned some of the words on it specifically because I saw them on the test last time.
Anonymous
So it biased my score upwards, and I got a slightly better score.
Anonymous
Yay! I'm a cheater!
Anonymous
06:46
I took a Japanese one, too. I didn't do quite as well.
Anonymous
*sniffle*
06:57
@snailboat I can't believe you used the word "cromulent" in this room :p
Anonymous
@Nico Why not? It's perfectly, um, er...
perfectly cromulent?
Anonymous
Yes! That's the word! ;-)
:)
Anonymous
Cromulent has gained wide currency in recent years.
Anonymous
06:59
It has embiggened us all.
so... is this word just a word David X cohen came up with in a TV show and now is fun to use? Why did he invented the word?
Anonymous
The Simpsons is known for wordplay.
Anonymous
It was funny.
It is. It got to trip my current version of Artha.
Anonymous
07:04
Perfect! There should be a link to that video in both the entries for cromulent and embiggen.
I'm not sure about the copyrigth thing :( *sigh*
Anonymous
Me either.
Anonymous
But you can cite it without linking to the video directly.
Anonymous
Ah, it's already cited.
Anonymous
> 1996, Dan Greaney, The Simpsons, episode 3F13: “Lisa the Iconoclast”, credits, beneath the statue of Jebediah Springfield: "A noble spirit embiggens the smallest man."
Anonymous
Although the actual quote that introduces it isn't cited, I guess.
Anonymous
07:09
Ah, it's cited at cromulent
I've just found it.
Anonymous
> 1996 February 18, Matt Groening et al., “Lisa the Iconoclast”, The Simpsons season 7 episode 16:
Anonymous
> Mrs. Krabappel: "Embiggens"? I never heard that word before moving to Springfield.
> Ms. Hoover: I don't know why, it's a perfectly cromulent word.
> […]
> Principal Skinner: He's embiggened that role with his cromulent performance.
Anonymous
I think citing it in text format works well.
I think someone was having a laugh:
> The characterization of "cromulent" as a nonce-word is more appropriate than slang. It was invented for a particular occasion. The etymology may be from the Dutch krom or the German krumm, meaning "crooked" or "bent", but which in turn has such strange derviative expressions such as zich krom lachen, krom spreken and zich krom werken. This etymology is speculative, and should not be a part of the article without further verification. Groening's ancestry was Mennonite German, and he spoke German (perhaps a low German) at home when he was young.
Anonymous
07:14
There is no doubt that cromulent is a word.
but would you go as far as proposing an etymology?
Anonymous
No.
Do you think "cromulent" has become so common that people could use it in a serious context (I mean without trying to be funny)?
Anonymous
People do now and then.
Anonymous
There's a big grey area where you can use it seriously but it still sounds kind of humorous.
07:22
my firefox doesn't like wordie.org (bad certificate domain) -- *another sigh*
This makes a favour to no one
> mcbaine commented on the word cromulent

I was unaware of the Simpsons episode in which this word was used. I am however familiar with the word used in the British comedy series Black Adder. Original air date of the Black Adder episode (Ink and Inkability), according to Wikipedia, in which this word appears is 09/24/1987. The Simpsons episode however was aired on 02/18/1996.

There is some discrepancy as the word "cromulent" does not appear in the original Black Adder script but Rowan Atkinson does in fact say the word cromulent on film. As I own the DVD and have watched that episode sev
Anonymous
Haha.
Anonymous
I don't know contrafibularity!
Anonymous
Cromulent definitely began its life as a nonceword, but a lot of people use it now.
Anonymous
I feel comfortable using it in most situations, but I probably wouldn't use it in a very formal situation
07:29
ROL (this episode is great!)
"It's the most pointless book since how to learn French was trasnlated into French" :D
Anonymous
Hehe!
"I'm delighted to be instrumental in keeping your bossom free of arses" (British is humour is unique!)
Jane Austen is a huge, Yorkshire, bearded man? :)
6'50''
Anonymous
08:05
Six foot fifty is rather tall.
indeed, about 3.1 metres
Anonymous
I joined Reddit yesterday and posted a little bit about Japanese.
Anonymous
Unfortunately, today I received my first downvote.
Anonymous
Since I derive my sense of self worth from imaginary internet points, I am now sad.
who dare downvote you!!!?
Anonymous
08:08
Haha!
Anonymous
It's a fact of life on Stack Exchange. I've had posts on all of ELL, ELU, and JL downvoted.
Anonymous
(Poor JL. It lost its U! I really liked typing "JLU".)
Anonymous
It seems like it's a fact of life on Reddit, too.
I thought one gets immunised to downvote after the first few.
Anonymous
Oh, probably.
Anonymous
08:10
It's my first downvote on Reddit. Yippee!
Anonymous
Is there a way to look at your list of downvotes?
Anonymous
not enough privileges
Anonymous
Oh, er
Anonymous
I meant to link to the one on ELL
Anonymous
I've received one downvote on Japanese.SE
Anonymous
Eight downvotes on ELL
Anonymous
And five downvotes on English
only?
Anonymous
I guess? I don't know. I could be misinterpreting the numbers.
Anonymous
08:18
19
A: What is the opposite of "abbreviation"?

snailboatI'd go with expansion if I were forced to fill in the blank (although I'm more comfortable with expansion of than expansion for). You can expand an acronym. However, it would be more usual to say: What does ELL stand for? Or: ELL stands for English Language Learners. Especially in n...

Anonymous
This was downvoted!
Anonymous
A-ha
Anonymous
Some of those -2s are when I voted down twice. (I'm a jerk!)
Anonymous
I'm checking on ELU because I've had the least activity there.
I've got 8 downvotes on ELL so far
Anonymous
08:20
I've had 3 downvotes on ELU.
Anonymous
I counted!
Anonymous
That sounds reasonable since I haven't participated much there.
Can you downvote twice?
Anonymous
Not on the same post. Just in the same day.
Anonymous
That reputation printout isn't as handy as I thought it would be.
08:22
Do you know of any other URLs like that one?
do you think it's possible to get all our questions and answers?
Anonymous
76
Q: List of unlinked pages on Stack Exchange sites

rightfoldHere is a list of special, unlinked pages (they may be linked in questions and answers) on Stack Exchange sites. Most pages listed here are work in progress. Currently, this list is incomplete. /reputation - show your reputation and where it came from /election - elect moderators /posts/<id>/ti...

Anonymous
This is where I found it
Anonymous
Ahh, the data explorer thingy!
Anonymous
I have too many answers to want to count my downvotes by hand on ELL.
Anonymous
08:32
Actually, it's only 12 pages. I suppose that if I wanted to, that wouldn't be too bad.
Anonymous
Hey, I got serially downvoted one day!
Anonymous
It was okay since I hit the rep cap anyway :-)
Anonymous
Ohh, serial downvoting reversed!
Anonymous
Yippee!
Anonymous
I guess it's worth it to check. I can see if there are any answers I should fix or remove or such.
Anonymous
08:39
And it'll only take five minutes.
Anonymous
Aw, the unaccept indicator looks so sad.
Anonymous
Okay!
Anonymous
Grand total: six! I have six posts on the site that have been downvoted.
Anonymous
Out of 326.
Anonymous
So about 2%.
Anonymous
08:43
So with what little data I have here, with all its problems, I find:
Anonymous
I get downvotes 4x as often on ELU as ELL!
Anonymous
Maybe I deserve more downvotes on ELL. Are we strict or lenient around here?
Anonymous
Maybe people are nice to me on ELL because they recognize my name. :-)
I just got two downvotes today, I think.
Hello!
Anonymous
Do you think people are influenced by how new users are?
08:47
I think people are influenced by rep points. :D
Anonymous
I feel like over time I find myself softening to people whose names I remember, more like they're old friends. I don't know if it influences me.
Anonymous
Even people who I've never managed to have a friendly exchange with.
Anonymous
"Oh, it's old whatsername! I remember them! Yay!"
That's quite likely.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. So I should give away more reputation in bounties so I can be judged more fairly! ;-)
08:49
Hah!
@snailboat See what those tests can do to us!
"Lisa the Iconoclast" -- What a title!
Hmm... come to think of it, it's my first real downvote on ELL.
(I don't care much about the downvotes on my sockpuppet question.)
Anonymous
What did you get downvoted?
Oh, maybe not, I found another one.
Maybe I didn't write it very carefully. I was kinda sleepy a little.
Anonymous
I'm comfortable with my five downvoted posts.
Anonymous
For what it's worth, I upvoted that particular post, and Kaz's answer as well.
I think Kaz pointed out some important thing for the OP.
Even chapka did that too.
Anonymous
09:02
Chapka is a valuable contributor.
Anonymous
I didn't upvote that comment because it's already highly upvoted and I feel weird upvoting a comment past the rating of the post it's on.
I didn't want to post that answer of mine at first, until I saw an answer saying that deep is an adverb.
Anonymous
That user posts a lot of things I disagree with.
Anonymous
I've noticed that when one answer is downvoted, others are much more likely to be downvoted.
09:04
So, it's more than two months from the last downvote I got (which I already forgot about it): ell.stackexchange.com/a/17572/3281
@snailboat Maybe some people think they know better. (It would be better if they say something, not necessarily to the answers they downvoted, but for the OP.)
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Oh, that was me.
Anonymous
I must have clicked wrong.
Anonymous
If you edit it I can change it to an upvote
Oh! That was you!
So do you really want to upvote it?
(You don't have to.)
Anonymous
Well, I just took the time to read it and it seemed like a good answer.
Anonymous
09:07
Actually, reading the answer was the easy part.
Anonymous
Reading the question was the hard part :-)
Okay, I deleted one space.
:D
Anonymous
I do click wrong sometimes. Especially using the mobile interface.
Anonymous
I don't think I do it very often.
Anonymous
But there have been a couple times I came back and was surprised to see a vote.
09:08
I click a wrong button quite often enough.
Anonymous
I've also voted once or twice scrolling down the screen on my iPhone.
I think SE understands that, so they provide a short time for the voters to change their minds.
Anonymous
Oh, yeah.
Anonymous
Usually I notice and change it when I click wrong.
Anonymous
That happens to me pretty frequently :-)
09:09
Hmm... should I say "provide the voters a short time" instead?
Anonymous
No, the votes don't get a time, the voters do.
Anonymous
Your original sentence was fine
Anonymous
Hmm.
Ah, thanks, and thanks. :D
Anonymous
"Provide the voters a short time" might be an improvement
Anonymous
09:10
Now that you put that R in there :-)
Heehee.
I don't know how short is that short, that we can still change our votes. Maybe fifteen seconds?
Anonymous
I think it's five minutes.
Oh! That's very long.
Anonymous
This old answer of mine got a downvote:
Anonymous
4
A: Are the meanings of "free" and "FREE" the same in "Totally FREE service"?

snailplaneit's not a matter of grammar, but of style. capitalized words stand out because of CONTRAST. if i decided to write in all-lowercase, even though it wouldn't be stylistically appropriate for a formal paper, it still wouldn't be ungrammatical. arguably, some sentences become ungrammatical with i...

Anonymous
09:13
Someone originally edited my unusual capitalization away. I rolled it back today. Mischievous of me!
LOL (because of the ad)
Anonymous
Hah
It says FREE (but not actually free).
It seems like they didn't make my their minds.
Anonymous
The picture reminds me of the trait known as "hitchhiker's thumb".
09:15
I also found all-caps is typically used in movie scripts.
(Now I'm not sure if I should write "allcap(s)" or "all-cap(s)".)
Anonymous
Sure. A SENTENCE IN ALL-CAPS IS NO LESS GRAMMATICAL than one in lower cae.
Anonymous
I just echoed what you did.
Anonymous
But I think I would normally write it with a space.
Thanks for the tip (and the echo)!
@snailboat I can do only at about 45 degrees!
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. I'm somewhere between 30 and 45.
09:19
Yes, I think I got the same range, it's just closer to 45 than to 30.
Anonymous
I'm not good at gauging that kind of thing by eye.
ho ho... santa here...
Anonymous
So I gave a relatively wide range because otherwise I'd probably be wrong :-)
Eh, I didn't see eye gauging mentioned in the page, but I'm not good at it either.
Oh, is Christmas near already?
Anonymous
Oh, I guess I just assumed that the author of the page measured :-)
Anonymous
09:21
> Glass and Kistler (1953) did a similar study, except they used a protractor held against the outside of the thumb to measure the thumb angle
Anonymous
Protractor!
I have a few of them!
I also had one slide rule!
(I might still have it, but I don't know where it is.)
Anonymous
I've never had a slide rule.
Anonymous
I've heard some people lament that kids these days, growing up without slide rules, are missing something-or-other
09:23
Hmm... I tried searching for an image of protractor, and almost all of them are round. (Most of mine are square. I have one or two of them round, I think.)
Anonymous
Most are indeed round.
Anonymous
I'm sure if you wanted to, you could search for square protractor.
@snailboat Oh, I miss those phones with a dialer.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Rotary phones?
And its dialing sound: tap, tap, tap, ...
Yes. :-)
Anonymous
09:25
I remember those.
Anonymous
We had touch tone dialing by the time I was born, I think, but
Anonymous
The phones we had in the 80s and early 90s all had pulse modes. If you bumped the switch it'd switch
Anonymous
And we still had one rotary phone.
Yeah! It's neat, isn't it?
Anonymous
And of course, computers had (in HAYES modem commands) ATDT and ATDP
09:26
It will take us about at least half a minute before we can finish a dialing. :-)
Anonymous
My brother always tried to negotiate handshakes with modems using his voice.
Anonymous
My brother was funny. :-)
Oh, I tried that too.
uuu eee uuu eee uuu eeeee...
Anonymous
Hah!
Anonymous
You're funny, too, then :-)
09:27
Thanks. :D
I wasn't very successful at it, though.
Anonymous
Successful
Oh, yes. TyftC!
I think I got the rest of my downvotes from theuserwithbunchofdigits.
Anonymous
Ahh.
Anonymous
A certain user targeted me once, but their votes were reversed.
Oh, I found a few more downvotes I got from the time I was still posting my answers to learn or just after I learned what I thought an answer.
I think I deserve them.
Anonymous
09:34
I'm relatively happy with all of my downvoted posts.
Anonymous
There are posts that aren't downvoted that I'm less proud of, though.
I think I'm gonna keep them for historical reason.
Anonymous
Sounds fair.
Anonymous
0
A: How can I ensure that my pronounciation of [ɛ] and [e] is correct in spoken English?

CodeswitcherLike Damkerng T. says, the American English [e] is actually more-or-less a [ei] or [ɛi] diphthong. So, for practice sake, try wedging in an explicit [i] (as in the word "bee") after the [e] and smooshing it into it. That is, try pronouncing "paper" as [pɛi-pɛr] and major as [mɛi-jɛr]. You migh...

Oh, my name was mentioned!
Anonymous
09:36
I think he should write [ɚ]
excited
nods I think the notation used there was a little messy.
Anonymous
It's not really IPA.
Anonymous
I'm not sure what precisely it is.
I think he was trying to suggest adding [i] after [e] when saying [ei] in paper, I think. (I used his notation.)
Anonymous
But I think major is [ˈmeɪ.dʒɚ] and paper is [ˈpeɪ.pɚ]
09:40
(Now I got "I think" twice in the same sentence. Probably related to my double "too" in the same sentence.)
Didn't he say (approximately) the same?
Ahh... I see.
[ɛr] and [ɚ] are different.
Anonymous
And [j] and [dʒ] are different
Saying "pay-peh-r" might sound funny.
Anonymous
For that matter, [ʒ] is different from [dʒ]
nods
Should we do something? Or should I leave another comment?
Admittedly, I didn't catch that CS wrote ə as e the first time I read his answer.
Anonymous
> In IPA: major [ˈmeɪ.dʒɚ] versus measure [ˈme.ʒɚ], paper [ˈpeɪ.pɚ] versus pepper [ˈpe.pɚ]
Anonymous
09:45
Does that seem like a reasonable comment?
Anonymous
That user doesn't seem to like my comments very much, so I'm trying to be selective in what posts of theirs I reply to
I think that's fair.
Eh, you didn't post a comment yet. Would you like me to post that for you?
Anonymous
I can do it
Anonymous
I was just trying to check to see if I made any mistakes
Okay. That's fine.
Wait
Oh, nothing. I was confused by too many different dictionaries.
They use different notations, so it's a bit confusing sometimes.
Anonymous
09:48
I think maybe I should write d͡ʒ instead of plain dʒ
That curve is not absolutely necessary, I think.
Anonymous
I think you're right.
Anonymous
In IPA: major [ˈmeɪ.dʒɚ] versus measure [ˈme.ʒɚ], paper [ˈpeɪ.pɚ] versus pepper [ˈpe.pɚ] — snailplane 6 secs ago
Anonymous
By the way, I like the name "schwar" for the r-colored schwa.
Anonymous
It just sounds so funny!
09:52
Hah!
I tried pronouncing it as schwa-errr. It's funny!
It somehow makes sense. :D
Anonymous
In fact, I've already gotten two downvotes on Reddit. (I signed up today.)
You signed up today and got two downvotes. That's quick!
Anonymous
Yeah! :-)
I've never participated in Reddit.
But I read things on Reddit sometimes.
Anonymous
It generally has very low quality content.
Anonymous
09:59
From what I've seen.
Anonymous
Here is my illustrious profile: reddit.com/user/snailplane
Some people there have very strong opinions.
Wow, 6 posts in just a day!
I think people can vote brutally on Reddit.
Anonymous
Well, they're all short.
Anonymous
None of them took research effort.
I think the format of Reddit encourages people to answer without having to research anything.
Then someone else might come and challenge.
And, then the research might begin.
That's how I see Reddit.
It's kinda like a poker table, so people are sort of chatting and bluffing at the same time, but it can be fun to read.
I didn't know that Reddit also has LearnJapanese.
Anonymous
10:07
Yeah. It's a place where anyone can ask anything, and only a minority of questions end up being about the Japanese language, I think
10:43
@snailboat What about "make do"?
Anonymous
@Nico It's true, there are a few fossilized forms with two verbs in sequence.
Anonymous
Specifically with verbs like make that took bare infinitives as complements but appeared without objects
Anonymous
Make do with, have done with, put paid to
Anonymous
Do you think take root is of that sort?
Anonymous
The OED considers root a noun in take root, but without an article
Anonymous
10:48
One reason to consider this is that it appeared in other constructions without an article, and not as a bare infinitive only with those verbs that take one
Anonymous
e.g. strike root
Anonymous
Another way the fossilized verb + verb idioms differ from take root is that the latter can have intervening elements
Anonymous
Another way it differs is that root can be modified by an adjective: take deep root
"root" in "take root" could be a noun. I'm not conviced is verb. I'm still trying to think a way to decide.
Anonymous
I think the argument from modification (it is modified by an adjective, not an adverb) might be the best evidence pointing to noun rather than verb
10:50
@snailboat OK, that convinced me.
As an aside, I think it's a little strange that we say take root but put down roots.
Anonymous
I think root used to have that usage, lost it, and it's preserved only in a few idiomatic phrases.
Perhaps establishing oneself somewhere needs the act of putting down many roots. :-)
I've removed my answer and added a comment instead.
Anonymous
> PS: Answers like "it is an idiom" will not satisfy me. Why should take root sound better that take roots?
Anonymous
10:54
I don't feel this is a reasonable postscript.
Oh, I haven't noticed that PS.
@snailboat It sounds rude, but it might be unintended.
The biggest factor that can slow most learners down is asking for the "why".
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. I think take root is a lexical phrase, and asking why it is the way it is is a question of etymology.
Anonymous
It's not produced synchronically from take and root because root no longer has that usage, generally speaking.
Anonymous
10:57
It's in the lexicon. It's still two words, so we can insert modifiers, conjugate the first one, and so on. But it's in our mental dictionaries pre-composed.
For me, it's fine just saying that's the way we say it. (Most of the cases, I think.)
Anonymous
That's what's mostly relevant to learners.
Anonymous
There's no reason learners can't take an interest in etymology and in diachronic language study generally.
Anonymous
And it can be informative to do so.
Anonymous
But I don't think it really helps you speak to know how the phrase came about.
Anonymous
11:00
After all, native speakers don't know how it came about either, unless they were taught or read about it somewhere.
> Regarding your PS. Would you edit it and explain what kind of answer you're seeking? Perhaps, other idioms showing the pattern "VERB + SINGULAR_COUNTABLE_NOUN"? – Nico 56 secs ago edit
If it helps, then it's good; but I think it's usually not very helpful (for the learners).
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Oh, learning about etymology definitely helps.
Anonymous
But, well
@Nico That's fair, I'd say.
Anonymous
11:01
It's really very secondary.
Anonymous
You don't learn a language by studying how it came about.
It helps you identify patterns
nods -- I just mentioned yesterday or the day before that I haven't noticed that bartender was from bar + tender and tender = someone who tends.
Anonymous
Yeah.
Anonymous
Yep! They tend bar.
Anonymous
11:02
(What's this? Bar with no article!?)
Bar is countless?!
Anonymous
You can tend bar.
Anonymous
> To manage the activities and transactions of; run: tend bar; tend a store in the owner's absence.
So I think knowing that bartender = bar + tender could add some depth to the understanding, but it's unnecessary.
@snailboat It's strange that that link returns an empty page to me.
Oh, but tend bar is indeed another idiom. (I just looked it up.)
@Nico: Read my last paragraph. Yes, knowing other idioms would help. But some insights into the machinery of grammar would be the best. — Graduate 2 mins ago
Oh-oh!
I think I can't explain things like go bananas. (Why they went bananas, not banana?)
Anonymous
11:09
@DamkerngT. It does fit a pattern.
Anonymous
Went bonkers, went bananas
Went nuts, too, I think.
Anonymous
Yeah!
Anonymous
You can go all sorts of plural food.
Anonymous
11:10
Well, I don't know what a bonker is.
Me either! But it does sound bonk!
Gotta go out for a while. BBL
Is there an easy way to link to a figure in google's ngram viewer?
Anonymous
I don't know
ok, I'll use imgur. I should make bookmarlet for this.
06:00 - 12:0012:00 - 00:00

« first day (471 days earlier)      last day (428 days later) »