« first day (433 days earlier)      last day (466 days later) » 
05:00 - 09:0009:00 - 21:00

05:21
Good news. I think I can see through Hemingway's usage of "as if X were" vs. "as if X had been". He was a man who was truly true to his words. :D
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Hooray!
Anonymous
Actually, maybe I would be able to see too if I had context.
I think it's about unreal vs. hypothetical possibility.
Hemingway always use "as though X were" for hypothetical possibility, and "as though X had been" for unreal thinking.
I'm sure you must be able to tell the nuance when you read them.
Anonymous
05:41
Give me an example.
> It was dark in our room except for the small light of the night over the town and the bat was not frightened but hunted in the room as though he had been outside.
vs.
> Pablo and Anselmo knew how good they were and while Pablo stood now proud and less sad-looking, watching them lovingly, the old man acted as though they were some great surprise that he had produced, suddenly, himself.
Oh, I can't edit the first line to bold as though he had been.
Anonymous
I cheated and changed your other bolding to include as though, too :-)
Anonymous
Thank you for the examples!
Yay! Thank you for the bolding!
Hi all :) @snailboat Thanks for tip.
Anonymous
05:55
@GATA I no longer remember what you're referring to
Using advantage as a verb - you said its not common.
I have asked it in ELL but I have changed it to "taking advantage of"
Anonymous
Ah, people do say take advantage of fairly often.
Anonymous
That can be interpreted at least two ways:
Anonymous
> 1. Make sure you take advantage of today's sale! All books 50% off!
Anonymous
> 2. I had to break up with him--he was taking advantage of me.
Anonymous
06:01
The second one has a negative meaning the first one does not
"How do you take advantage of these characteristics of colors in your paintings?"
I think the positive sense of it in this sentence is obvious. isn't it?
@DamkerngT. what does "hunted " mean in that context? is it the usual meaning? "not frightened but hunted" sounds awkward to me
@Nico It's not "not frightened but hunted". It's "the bat was not frightened but (the bat) hunted".
Anonymous
@GATA Yes
@GATA Somehow I think the question is very direct. :-)
06:08
@snailboat Thanks :)
@DamkerngT. Thanks you :)
It could sound not as direct in some appropriate context.
I was confused about it because I have always seen it negative contexts.
Anonymous
@GATA I think it's generally negative if you are taking advantage of a person or an attribute of a person
Anonymous
Take advantage of him ← negative
Anonymous
Take advantage of his generosity ← negative
Anonymous
06:11
Take advantage of the resources you have available ← not negative
so its final meaning is completely depended on the context.
Anonymous
Yes.
I love those arrows.
Anonymous
Unicode arrows are the best! I'm a fan.
me too :)
Anonymous
06:15
@DamkerngT. That thing I said about keeping my sentences simple? I often do the opposite when I talk to you in here :-)
Anonymous
But I'm really pretty inconsistent about it.
Anonymous
Simple sentence here. Needlessly complex sentence there.
Anonymous
Sometimes I think I should pay more attention to etiquette.
Anonymous
"Give me an example."
Anonymous
Now there's a direct statement. :-)
Anonymous
06:16
But I'm so used to talking like that here.
Anonymous
"Could you give me an example?"
Anonymous
I felt guilty, so I thank-youed to make up for it afterwards.
Anonymous
Actually, I think most of the members here understand even when I talk funny.
Anonymous
Which is good, because I like talking funny.
Anonymous
But I worry about the lurkers on ELL itself, the ones who might not be advanced enough to post a lot themselves.
Anonymous
06:19
Do you suppose there are many people reading ELL who have trouble understanding some of the explanations, comments, and so forth?
@snailboat Somehow I didn't feel it as a direct one. :-)
I think in our context, it's beyond perfectly fine. :D
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Well, I think it's a pretty normal thing to say in conversation, where you have tone of voice and so forth.
Exactly!
Anonymous
Generally you don't have to be particularly polite when casually chatting.
Anonymous
Actually, if you're too polite, it puts distance between you and the listener.
06:20
GATA's question made me think of it as a questionnaire.
So I thought it might be a little too direct. That's all. (But it's probably not so.)
Anonymous
"Hello, snailboat! Do you think you could please take a look at the following sentence?" I feel distant, like I've just received a letter.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. The question in quotes or outside of quotes?
@snailboat I like that in you too!
18 mins ago, by GATA
"How do you take advantage of these characteristics of colors in your paintings?"
Anonymous
It sounds to me like someone is giving a painter a semi-formal interview.
Even as a questionnaire, I think it still should be fine, if used properly.
@snailboat I see. That would be perfectly fine, to me.
:D
@snailboat I'm sure that many users have trouble understanding explanations, and they usually opted to just upvote and accept the answer.
Anonymous
06:25
Oh, then there are people who use politeness to be rude.
I was surprised that Maulik's answer was accepted yesterday, in almost no time.
Anonymous
There's a Japanese word for that! Ingin burei. (Well, pair of words.)
Later StoneyB came in and salvaged the question, I think.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Which one? I haven't been able to keep up with all the ELL questions.
@snailboat Oh, that's another kind of people.
Frankly, I don't like them very much.
3
Q: Possessives - "this year's question paper" or "this year question paper"

TzDI found this in a grammar book: Wrong Sentence - All the candidates felt that this year's question paper was too easy. Right Sentence - All the candidates felt that this year the question paper was too easy. Is "this year's question paper" really wrong, and if so, why? What makes "this...

Anonymous
06:29
Oh, I edited that one, too
Anonymous
And then I voted to reopen
I voted it to reopen too.
Anonymous
But it would be better if they explained why the book says it's wrong
Anonymous
Oops
Anonymous
Did I accidentally answer that 'taking advantage' question in chat, when it was asked on the site? :-)
Anonymous
06:33
That "I'm a large" answer I typed on my phone last night as I was falling asleep got like twenty upvotes.
I said I ve asked it on ELL :)
Anonymous
(In this sentence, like means "approximately".)
Anonymous
@GATA Ah, I'm sorry! I wasn't paying close enough attention.
Anonymous
I should have posted over there, huh? :-)
Anonymous
Well, you can get other people's views!
06:34
Sorry I wont do it again.
Anonymous
@GATA You don't have anything to apologize for
Thank you :)
Anonymous
I meant that sincerely: you can get other people's views :-)
Anonymous
(In addition to mine, which I already typed in here)
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. I searched and found a paper on ingin burei and pragmatics, but unfortunately it's not open access, so I can't read the paper :-(
06:37
sad
You and Damkerng have always been a great help to me since I've joined ELL . Sometimes I feel the need to final check everything with you guys :)
Anonymous
ELL is fun!
Indeed :)
I concur!
Anonymous
06:42
This is a funny word:
Anonymous
Cupronickel or copper-nickel is an alloy of copper that contains nickel and strengthening elements, such as iron and manganese. Cupronickel is highly resistant to corrosion in seawater, because its electrode potential is adjusted to be neutral with regard to seawater. Because of this, it is used for piping, heat exchangers and condensers in seawater systems, as well as marine hardware, and sometimes for the propellers, crankshafts and hulls of premium tugboats, fishing boats and other working boats. A more familiar common use is in silver-coloured modern circulation coins. A typical mix is...
Funny that copper-nickel turned into cupronickel. Perhaps the root of copper is cupro something.
A-ha! It's cuprum. Thanks!
Anonymous
That's another one you might know from the periodic table:
Anonymous
06:47
Copper is a chemical element with the symbol Cu (from ) and atomic number 29. It is a ductile metal with very high thermal and electrical conductivity. Pure copper is soft and malleable; a freshly exposed surface has a reddish-orange color. It is used as a conductor of heat and electricity, a building material, and a constituent of various metal alloys. The metal and its alloys have been used for thousands of years. In the Roman era, copper was principally mined on Cyprus, hence the origin of the name of the metal as сyprium (metal of Cyprus), later shortened to сuprum. Its compounds ...
Anonymous
Amusingly, the oneboxing changes "from Latin: cuprum" to "from "
Hmm... I see that lobster... food... where is my food? ...
Foodeses. My foodeses.
I hate sea foods.
Even fish?
yes :)
I am 90% vegetarian.
06:53
Poor fishes. Hmm... maybe lucky fishes.
:D
@GATA Good for you! I can't stay being a vegetarian for more than a few days.
Anonymous
I would never eat a lobster.
Anonymous
@GATA Me too! I usually eat vegetarian food.
I would never eat a lobster alive.
Anonymous
06:57
But occasionally I eat meat.
@snailboat me too :)
I like fish. :D
Anonymous
Me too! They're so fun to watch, swimming all about!
Fish, fish, fish. Fisheses. My Fisheses.
Anonymous
I don't want to eat them, though.
Anonymous
06:58
I'm always surprised by how intelligent they seem.
Anonymous
Since I eat meat on occasion I can't really claim to be a vegetarian, but I do mostly eat vegetarian food.
What is the collective noun for fish? (I think I know it but can't recall it.)
Anonymous
A school of fish?
Ah, yes! :D
Thanks.
@snailboat Thats why I call myself 90% vegetarian.
07:02
I like to see schools of fishes on TV.
Fish screensavers are also nice!
screensavers are supposed to save the energy :) I always set it to go off. (I hope this is the right way to say it :)
Anonymous
...are supposed to save the energy
Would you please explain a bit why it must be omitted?
I think we already have that question on ELL. Going to check it out...
Thanks I am searching on google.
Anonymous
07:10
You're talking about energy in general. You're not talking about some specific energy that was previously referred to or that both speaker and listener know about
Anonymous
So it should be indefinite. Don't insert the.
Oh, it was about the "energy savings": ell.stackexchange.com/questions/14573/…
Thank you both very much.
> Baseball boys baseball boys bonk bonk baseball boys.
I like this explanation of Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo. :D
Anonymous
By the way, it's debatable whether some of the sentences in your question should actually be referred to as "grammatical".
07:13
Perhaps the last one is the riskiest.
Anonymous
I hit my hand on a doorknob. :-(
oops
Anonymous
I know, right? The doorknob shouldn't have done that.
I hope you don't get hurt much.
Yes. Bad doorknob!
Anonymous
07:16
I was right there minding my own business when wham! The doorknob hit me.
You should hit it back. :D
:D
Anonymous
That's how this fracas got started.
How is the doorknob now?
Anonymous
It's okay. It took this whole equal-and-opposite-reaction thing pretty well.
07:18
For a moment, I got an idea that it might be shredded into pieces.
Anonymous
Well, my hand isn't that solid. Or heck, that sharp.
Anonymous
I hardly ever sharpen the back of my hand, in fact.
Is it (your hand) still hurt now?
Anonymous
Yeah, li'l bit :-(
Anonymous
Not much.
Anonymous
07:20
I just mentioned because I noticed my hand feeling funny while I was typing.
Aww... my idea of distraction didn't work.
Anonymous
Did you try to distract me from my hand hurting by talking about hitting my hand on a doorknob? :-)
Yep. Hehe.
Anonymous
Well done!
:D
It reminded me of one of pink panthers cartoon series.
Anonymous
07:23
You edited your message too fast for me to attempt a witty reply.
Sorry :)
Anonymous
Hooray for editing!
:D
What just happened? (I was away for a while.)
Anonymous
A lot!
Anonymous
07:25
A lot just happened.
Oh, what are they? Tell me. Tell me.
Anonymous
But edits have obscured the details, and the truth may never be uncovered.
Thank you snailboat :)
0
Q: Hello, I need help on Subjunctive. Thanks

RolanI'm confused on the structure of Subjunctive; especially on the base form of the verb. I need to know on the word "that" does it have to have that word in a sentence before you can put it on the base form? Guys your feedback will be much appreciated, I'm hoping to meet someone who I could talk to...

@DamkerngT. I made a typo that must not be divulged :)
07:29
Ahh... secretses. Your secretses.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Pass!
Is it just me or he really wants to have someone to talk with more than a help on subjunctive? :-)
:D that was funny.
Time to read "Casting away". be back later :)
Have a nice reading!
Thanks.
Anonymous
07:38
I, too, hope you have a nice reading.
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Do they have enough reputation to join ELL chat?
They have 1 rep point.
Anonymous
Oh, so I suppose not.
Anonymous
I think ELL is best when people ask questions about specific examples of things they need help with
I'm still not sure about the minimum requirements for joining our chat.
Anonymous
07:43
You need 20 reputation.
Anonymous
Your chat user's reputation is based on the combined reputation you've earned on all the sites you're on, I believe.
I was thinking about closing it because it's "too broad or unclear what you're asking", but decided to post this comment to him: ell.stackexchange.com/questions/20354/…
Anonymous
(I'm not sure if it counts the initial 1 point or the 100-point association bonuses)
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Comment is intransitive
Ah, I see. That explains why sometimes a user with 1 point could chat in here.
TYftC.
:D I'm trying a brand new acronym for "Thank you for the correction!"
Just in case that I might need to type it very often.
Anonymous
07:46
Ah, I got as far as "thank you for the", but I thought "comment" first.
Anonymous
You probably don't need to specify a reason.
Reading his reply, I decided not to scare him away, so I think I will leave his question like that for a while.
Anonymous
I think most everyone is familiar with "ty" (don't hold me to that, though!), but here on Stack Exchange chat most people seem to avoid typing things like that, it seems
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. You should never decide to scare someone away from ELL, so I'm glad you made the choice you did. ;-)
Yay! I made the right decision.
Anonymous
07:49
I suppose if you did want to scare them, you could tell them to beware the thane of Fife.
I'm not used to "the thane of Fife".
Anonymous
Then you probably aren't being ware. Or bewaring. Or ware being.
Anonymous
Being aware?
Not being aware, I guess.
Nice wordplay. :D
Anonymous
Yep, it looks like beware is related to ware, from which we get aware and wary
08:01
> The teacher insisted that Rocky study hard to get good numbers.
I think the tense is incorrect; it should be "insists".
Anonymous
It's not tensed, it's subjunctive.
Anonymous
Oh.
Anonymous
You're talking about the main clause verb. I am not reading very carefully!
Anonymous
So why should this sentence be in the present tense?
Because Maulik wanted to give some examples on the subjunctive with bare infinitives.
Anonymous
08:03
But why should it be in the present tense?
Doesn't it have to be in the present tense?
(Unless he used lest or in order that.)
Anonymous
I think the tense changes when the insisting is going on.
Anonymous
In the present tense, the teacher is insisting right now that Rocky study hard.
Anonymous
In the past tense, the teacher was insisting at some point that Rocky study hard.
Hmm...
Perhaps similar to something like: I told you you are right.
Anonymous
08:06
That's different, since the subordinate clause there is tensed
Isn't this better?
> The teacher insisted that Rocky would study hard to get good numbers.
Anonymous
That means something different.
Whatever good numbers mean.
Or,
> The teacher insisted in order that Rocky study hard to get good numbers.
Anonymous
That broke my parser.
Anonymous
Let me type up a couple examples.
Anonymous
08:09
> The teacher insists [ that Rocky study hard ] .
Anonymous
> The teacher insists [ that Rocky studies hard ] .
Anonymous
In the first one, the teacher is making Rocky do something by insisting.
Anonymous
In the second one, the teacher is claiming that Rocky studies hard, and they're claiming quite insistently.
Anonymous
In the first, study is the plain form of the verb. In the second, study is a tensed verb and it agrees with the subject and shows a present/past distinction, etc.
Anonymous
> The teacher insisted [ that Rocky study hard ] .
Anonymous
08:11
> The teacher insisted [ that Rocky studies hard ] .
Anonymous
I see the same distinction here
Anonymous
The only difference is when the teacher compelled Rocky, or when the teacher described Rocky's behavior
@snailboat Is this one okay?
Anonymous
Yes
Anonymous
Insists/studies, insisted/studies, insists/studied, insisted/studied all seem okay to me (with different meanings)
08:13
> The teacher insisted ten years ago that Rocky studies hard.
Anonymous
That seems degraded to me
> The teacher insisted yesterday that Rocky studies hard.
Anonymous
That could be okay.
nods
Eh? Is this one possible: insists/studied?
Anonymous
I think I wouldn't call any of the verbs in the examples we've discussed infinitives, though
Anonymous
08:15
The teacher insists [ that Rocky studied hard (all night long) ] , although I don't believe her.
Ah, I see.
Anonymous
The teacher is reporting Rocky's past behavior, but she's doing the reporting now.
The problem was I couldn't figure out a good example.
Then, now, I'm a little confused. What's the point for the past subjective?
Unreal?
Anonymous
What thingy are you referring to as "past subjunctive"?
Anonymous
I have a different subjunctive-label ideology than you.
08:18
11 mins ago, by Damkerng T.
> The teacher insisted that Rocky would study hard to get good numbers.
Anonymous
It's not clear to me that there's a subjunctive involved in that sentence.
Not quite right. It's not a good subjunctive.
I think I see its point now (the present subjunctive).
Anonymous
Hmm?
It's about demanding, or insisting, or something necessary to be done.
No tense involved.
Anonymous
There are lots of uses for subjunctive constructions.
08:21
I mean only the present subjunctive.
Anonymous
Again, we're using words differently from one another.
What's your definition?
Anonymous
Subjunctive constructions use the plain form of a verb, the same form used by infinitival constructions.
Anonymous
So, be.
Anonymous
08:24
But you can't generally turn a subjunctive construction into a past tense form by replacing e.g. be with were
Anonymous
Be that as it mayWere that as it might? Probably not.
I think "the present subjunctive" (I use the definition I found on Wikipedia) is about the form.
Anonymous
It's essential [ that he keep us informed. ] → It's essential [ that he kept us informed. ] Nope, not the same construction differing in tense.
I reread it again. The present subjunctive can be used in the past, present, and future.
Anonymous
So there's no reason to posit a relationship between the two.
Anonymous
08:25
I looked at Wikipedia's article on the English subjunctive before. I'm not sure it's useful.
I think it's very useful to me. It helps me to understand English subjunctives.
Anonymous
"Were I to say that ..." "Be I to say that..." Nope, no obvious relation there, either
At least up to this point.
Anonymous
I'm just not convinced that English has a past subjunctive.
I couldn't find them in there.
Anonymous
08:28
And I don't see a reason to suggest that English has a subjunctive form.
Perhaps they use "past" not because of it's about the past, it's just the past form.
I see. I think I've heard something similar (about English has no subjunctive) before on EL&U.
But I don't know how to explain these constructions without subjunctives.
Anonymous
Well, I said no subjunctive form.
Anonymous
It demonstrably doesn't have a form that uniquely expresses well, whatever subjunctiveness is.
Anonymous
It has a form that is identical to the infinitive. We can abstract away and say that both the infinitive and the subjunctive use the same form, and we can call that the plain form if we like.
08:30
Is this also a subjunctive? Let there be light.
Anonymous
We could just call them the infinitive and subjunctive forms, too. I don't see any motivation, but it doesn't really hurt anything to do so.
Anonymous
Ah, you're only concerned about the English there and not the original?
? confused
I'm not sure what you mean by "original"?
Anonymous
Oh, well, it's a translation, you see
Ah, is it because Let there be light wasn't written in English originally?
I see.
Anonymous
08:34
Sometimes when we talk about a phrase, we want to analyze it just in the language we're talking about. Other times, we want to interpret it in the context of the original so we can avoid misunderstanding--in other words, the original is a guide to the intent of the translation, so it gives us a hint as to how we should think about it
Okay, let me rephrase. Is Let him do his homework a subjunctive?
Anonymous
That's a rather different sentence, at least under normal circumstances.
Anonymous
That looks like a simple imperative to me.
By the power of skullpatrol, let IceGirl understand her essay!
:D
Anonymous
That optative does look a lot like an imperative.
Anonymous
08:43
I'm thinking.
Anonymous
Or rather:
Anonymous
Let me think about that for a moment. :-)
Anonymous
Also: let us think about this for a moment. Let's think about this for a moment.
A-ha! I just learned that it's called the optative mood.
Anonymous
Well, English doesn't have subjunctive or optative moods.
08:46
So where do all these moods come from? Latin?
Anonymous
Well, each language that has grammatical moods has a different set of them.
I think English must be special because there seem to be many grammars of English.
Anonymous
But a grammatical mood is based on word forms. English doesn't have special word forms for subjunctives or optatives, or heck, even imperatives
Anonymous
But there's no reason you can't use those terms to describe constructions, ways of using forms
Anonymous
By putting them together with other words in particular ways.
08:49
nods
Anonymous
The plain form of a verb is often used in infinitive constructions, but we can see the same form of the verb in imperative constructions, subjunctive constructions...
Anonymous
When you say "subjunctive mood", you are (in my mind) claiming that English has a special grammatical form, because I think of "mood" as a matter of grammatical form.
Anonymous
But English doesn't make those distinctions in that way, although it's capable of making them in other ways.
Anonymous
So I leave off the word "mood".
Anonymous
I just say "subjunctive".
08:51
A-ha! Now I get why you usually say "constructions" instead.
Anonymous
Yeah, imperative constructions combine words in a particular way. One of those words is the plain form of a verb
Anonymous
But it's easier to just say "imperative" most of the time.
Anonymous
Here I started saying "construction" because we were using words with different meanings, and I needed to make it clear what I meant by the words.
Anonymous
The labels aren't actually super important, but sometimes talking about the labels is the best way to get the underlying ideas across
Anonymous
08:55
English has a bunch of fixed expressions, some of which are fairly archaic or formal-sounding...
I think I should be careful when I want to use the word "mood" from now on.
Anonymous
If you like, but I'm going to continue avoiding it personally :-)
To me, modality and moods are overlapped.
Anonymous
In CGEL, "modality" is in terms of meaning, while "mood" is in terms of grammatical form.
Oh, thank you. That makes it clear.
Anonymous
08:58
So in English, you might say there is no optative mood because verbs don't have a form that signals optative modality.
Anonymous
But we do have modal verbs, including may, which can express optative meaning.
Anonymous
"May you eat ten hamburgers!"
:D That's too much for me to eat.
I haven't eat hamburgers for years.
Anonymous
"May you eat ten hamburgers over a considerably long period of time!"
05:00 - 09:0009:00 - 21:00

« first day (433 days earlier)      last day (466 days later) »