« first day (421 days earlier)      last day (478 days later) » 

03:27
Good Morning Folks!
Nobody here?
03:40
Hi, @Utkarsh. I'm a little busy at the moment. Is there anything I can help you?
Hey, you just deleted your message! :-)
Nope I was just saying casually
Oops ;p
Oh, I just found a clip for @snailboat. If someone claimed that they've never heard "Me either," before, you could show them this clip from Oscars 2013: youtube.com/…. (Presumably, they'd have never seen Oscars before. :-)
 
6 hours later…
09:22
Cool thing of the day: "would" as verb meaning wish: " I wish: would that he were here. "
09:32
Cooler thing of the day: a sentence with three colons that makes sense :D
Hi!
09:52
Hello, all.
Just have a quick visit. I've just noticed this question...
0
Q: Past Tense vs Past Continuous Tense

user4084What is the difference between the sentences below? Employees names were not appearing in the pay register when they had negative salary earlier but when we changed their salary to positive they stared appearing. And, Employees names had not been appearing in the pay register when they...

> Employees names [were not|had not been] appearing in the pay register when they had negative salary earlier but when we changed their salary to positive they stared appearing.
While I don't have any problem with past vs. past perfect, I think it's rather strange to use the progressive (continuous) with appear(ing).
("they started appearing" sounds fine, though)
Hi all. Sadly one of my answers has negative votes and I'm considering removing it. I'd appreciate if people would comment on what's wrong with the answer.
@DamkerngT. I wrote an answer to that question because I think both the question and the other answer got the tenses wrong. Both tenses do have a continuous aspect.
@Nico I'm not sure. I think if you got a downvote, other answers should get some too. Anyway, I think no verb was given in any answers there.
@Nico You mean the names of the tenses?
@DamkerngT. I mean they both use a progressive aspect
"were not appearing" and "had not been appearing"
the ~ing bit is telling
@DamkerngT. does the sentence in my answer sound wrong to you? maybe there is a problem of collocation that I'm missing.
I think you can say "were not appearing" is in a past tense.
The past tenses can mean either the simple past tense, or the past progressive tense.
10:07
it is but it also has a continuous aspect. I think it is called continuous past
@Nico Actually, your sentence sounds.
@Nico Tense names are tricky. :-)
yeah, not every one calls them the same
Some can even say that English has only two tenses: the present tense and the past tense.
And I think some might claim that English has something like 24 or 36 tenses.
I think both of you in that "were not appearing" got the tenses right (with different sets of terminologies). What bothers me is the use of "appearing".
it depends if one considers that changing the aspect of a verb counts as a different tense
@Nico nods I agree with you.
10:11
In which way does it bother?
He appears to be ... is a common usage, I think.
His ID came up once I entered his name into the machine.
His name was showing on the screen yesterday.
His name appeared on the screen yesterday.
His name was appearing on the screen yesterday. <-- Not sure, doesn't it sound a little weird?
yes, i have a similar feeling, maybe, the use is formal. But the use is listed on the dictionary "2. come into sight or view"
> Employees names were not appearing in the pay register when they had negative salary earlier.
@DamkerngT. is it perhaps the preposition "in"? Can I say "appear on the registry"
I'm not sure what "pay register" is.
So I'm not sure about "in" or "on".
10:19
in the registry is more common
Oh, I think most of "registry" examples there are IT specific.
It's shorten from Windows Registry Database.
So, "in registry" makes sense. It's in the database, actually, the registry database of Microsoft Windows OS.
I don't think it's the preposition
Ah, I'm sorry, but I have to go. See you later.
I think I'll be back in an hour or two.
10:21
@DamkerngT. coming to back to the bolded tenses you wrote above
I think both are past tenses "were not appearing" and "they had" and that's fine
Just leave a message with @ my name, if you want to post anything to me. :-)
@DamkerngT. sorry I keep forgetting
It's not needed during a conversation. It's just that I've to go now. So, see you. signing out -- poof
ok
 
3 hours later…
13:40
How Funny XD

« first day (421 days earlier)      last day (478 days later) »