« first day (4292 days earlier)      last day (629 days later) » 

fqq
12:03 AM
I might have had the same/similar course and I ended up doing a PhD in statmech, so I am not sure you can blame it on that :P
 
@fqq Yes I was misunderstanding stat mech.
I was confusing the Boltzmann distribution with the MCE
And also where stat mech applies
 
 
11 hours later…
10:45 AM
An interesting question from the HNQ: academia.stackexchange.com/q/187521
> Many years have passed since then, and I have built a solid career and have articles published in Physical Review Letters, even as the first author, but I still feel uneasy about the fact that I started my academic career with a misleading MS thesis and deliberately concealed the flaw in order to graduate smoothly.
 
 
4 hours later…
2:40 PM
How do physicists and astronomers find out that alpha centauri is closest to our sun? I mean there are so much stars in the sky so did they calculated distances of each star from sun and after that calculation said that alpha centauri is closest?
 
3:03 PM
@Abbas We can measure the distance to nearby stars using parallax.
Stellar parallax is the apparent shift of position of any nearby star (or other object) against the background of distant objects. Created by the different orbital positions of Earth, the extremely small observed shift is largest at time intervals of about six months, when Earth arrives at opposite sides of the Sun in its orbit, giving a baseline distance of about two astronomical units between observations. The parallax itself is considered to be half of this maximum, about equivalent to the observational shift that would occur due to the different positions of Earth and the Sun, a baseline of...
 
3:43 PM
So do scientists used parallax method for each star that can be identified to confirm that alpha centauri is nearest? It seems pretty hard as there are so many stars .
 
@Abbas Parallax method is not the only way for determining the distance to stars. It's mostly suitable for nearby stars. For stars which are further away have even smaller parallax so it's hard to measure the distance using parallax method. Anyway, to know which star is the closest you can actually find it yourselve. Use any star catalog such as Hipparcos/gaia/Gliese and find the star with the largest parallax.
 
 
1 hour later…
5:00 PM
@Abbas Parallax method can be used for distances only up to some parsecs
Hubble law or better Standard candles like supernovae 1A are used for further away stars
There are also other methods based on empirical facts on Cepheids or Galactic motion
 
5:50 PM
Hello, it is known the article on arXiv What if Planet 9 is a Primordial Black Hole?, the autors of article are two professors, and has identifier arXiv:1909.11090 I would like to ask, if it is suitable for this chat, when the scientific community could to study (with observatories or probes) if this thesis (the hypothesis implicit in the title) is right. Many thanks.
 
@Earman I think his primary concern is related in identifying nearest star.
 
I ask, what date could to be ellucidated the question/concern. Will it be possible in a year, or in five? Will it be possible in the next 10 years?
 
6:15 PM
@user250478 It's not easy. There's not a lot of sunlight out in the Kuiper belt, and the orbital speed is slow, so it's hard to make good observations. Also, a primordial black hole with the appropriate mass would be tiny. A BH with the mass of the Earth has a radius of ~8.87 mm.
 
6:46 PM
@An_Elephant yes, the answer is the star with largest parallax. If one is familiar with python, one can actually do it using astroquery. Use a catalog of your choice and then just find the star with largest parallax.
 
 
1 hour later…
7:54 PM
We think we know all the stars in our galactic neighbourhood out to 10 parsecs or so.
12
Q: Radius to which all hydrogen-burning stars are known?

notovnyFor the purposes of this question, I wish to consider active, hydrogen-burning stars, not deuterium-burning brown dwarfs, or stellar remnants like black holes or neutron stars. (Though including those would be interesting questions in and of themselves) What is the upper limit of distance that w...

 
 
4 hours later…
11:55 PM
4
Q: "Holy grail" future observation to confirm presence of neutron stars in the centers of massive, otherwise conventional stars? (Thorne–Żytkow objects)

uhohWikipedia's Thorne–Żytkow object begins: A Thorne–Żytkow object (TŻO or TZO), also known as a hybrid star, is a conjectured type of star wherein a red giant or red supergiant contains a neutron star at its core, formed from the collision of the giant with the neutron star. Such objects were hypo...

 

« first day (4292 days earlier)      last day (629 days later) »