« first day (3460 days earlier)      last day (1767 days later) » 

06:56
@PM2Ring thanks:-)
user434058
07:52
Hi
08:19
hello
user434058
09:02
Sup
chillin, you?
user434058
Listenin'
user434058
09:36
I got a -2 because a user was removed. How can user removal result in loss of 2 rep?
You lose reputation for suggested edits.
user434058
@Loong But do questions get deleted if a user is removed, no, right?
The question you edited was deleted.
user434058
@GuruVishnu But in those cases I don't even get a notice. This was specifically mentioned as user removal. I suppose some questions are also deleted if a user deletes themselves...
Maybe 1 upvote and 4 downvotes got removed along with the deleted user?
09:45
@ACuriousMind do you know, why @manishEarth left the site?
user434058
@GuruVishnu That seems probable :)
50
A: Update on the Manish situation

ManishearthOh, wow, I hadn't realized this was going on :) I first just wish to apologise to the community, both Chem.SE and Physics.SE, for my lack of activity. I'll shortly explain what happened, but I also just feel bad for causing this conflict, and think I could have handled this better. Sorry about t...

10:07
0
Q: What is different between 'Physics' and 'Physics Meta'?

정우남I'm recently join stock exchange. So I am not used to this system(also I'm foreigner; Korean). I join this group because I want to get a physics information. but there are two choice that physics and physic meta. What should I choose? (I'm sorry to my English writing skill, I'm practicing now)

@Loong recent 207 days ago?
Why the community has not accept his resignation till now?
user434058
@YuvrajSingh... He's no longer a mod...
820
Q: What does "user was removed" mean and why did my reputation change because of it?

aef Message appearing when a user was removed. It seems I lost 1765 reputation points on Stack Overflow yesterday. The reason given in my history is "removed", with the description of "User was removed (learn more)". I don't understand what that means. What caused this? Return to FAQ index

user434058
10:22
@PM2Ring Thanks! Now the "-2" makes sense :)
user434058
$$\mathfrak{\Huge{\color{blue}{BYE}}}$$
Also see meta.stackexchange.com/a/7238/334566 which mentions that posts over 60 days old are generally protected from rep loss due to user removal / deletion. But I must confess I'm not totally clear on all the details, the rules are a bit complicated. ;)
FWIW, a year or so ago a prolific Physics member deleted their account (so they could focus on their exams). Several people got hit with rep losses >100. They didn't mind too much, since they were members with lots of rep.
user434058
@PM2Ring May I know who?
On Stack Overflow, it's not unusual to lose rep from deleted accounts. SO tends to attract a lot of sock-puppets and voting rings. Apart from the site powers that high rep brings, in the programming world, SO rep is a bit of a status symbol. So some people try to cheat the system in order to accumulate rep that they don't deserve.
Voting rings & sock-puppetry happens to an extent on all sites on the network. It's more of an issue on SO because of its huge number of members, and the huge rate that questions & answers get posted there, so it's a bit easier for the bad guys to hide in the crowd.
@FakeMod You can read about it in the transcripts of this room. ;) It wouldn't be appropriate for me to name names.
user434058
@PM2Ring Links ;)
user434058
10:34
?
@FakeMod Nope. ;)
user434058
@PM2Ring Time range??
Prolific posters like John Rennie tend to get hit with rep loss when voting rings are broken. The ring voters tend to randomly upvote existing good questions & answers in the attempt to disguise their voting patterns. It'd be kinda obvious if they only upvoted each other's posts.
user434058
user434058
Me right now... LOL
user434058
10:39
Mar 19 '18 at 16:30, by diobuc eulb
@Secret im deleting my account, do you have a discord or other thing i can add you on?
user434058
This?
user434058
@PM2Ring
user434058
👍
11:05
"All this time, however, category theory was consistently seen by much of the mathematical community as ridiculously abstract."
user434058
0
Q: Confusion regarding the time derivative term in Lagrange's equation

ModConI am solving a pendulum attached to a cart problem. Without going into unnecessary details, the generalised coordinates are chosen to be $x$ and $\theta$. The kinetic energy of the system contains a term (which contains) $\dot x\dot \theta cos\theta$. Now when evaluating $\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{\part...

user434058
Should I flag this as a duplicate of the question suggested by QMechanic?
user434058
@Slereah Who's that guy in your profile picture?
It's the cover of one of Spivak's book
user434058
@Slereah oh, alright.
11:31
@FakeMod Don't bother wasting a flag on it, I just voted to close it as a dupe of the target proposed by Qm. The 1st dupe flag sends the question to the Close vote review queue, but a close vote does that too (if it hasn't already been sent there). But dupe flags are also helpful to the close voters, since the proposed dupe (or dupes) appear in the close voting dialog.
user434058
11:48
@PM2Ring I don't think I am ever going to run out of flags (at least that's what I hope :)) since I get 34 flags a day.
user434058
But as you have already VTCed, I would not flag it redundantly.
"The study of sets is the study of things in bins."
Rubbish!
user434058
@PM2Ring See that question, the OP has edited it and it no longer looks like a dupe.
In mathematical physics, some approaches to quantum field theory are more popular than others. For historical reasons, the Schrödinger representation is less favoured than Fock space methods. In the early days of quantum field theory, maintaining symmetries such as Lorentz invariance, displaying them manifestly, and proving renormalisation were of paramount importance. The Schrödinger representation is not manifestly Lorentz invariant and its renormalisability was only shown as recently as the 1980s by Kurt Symanzik (1981). Within the Schrödinger representation, the Schrödinger wavefunctional...
Currently reading baez's category page
and when that knowledge of categories crossed with the little bit I am familiar with first and second quantisation (because we chemists do use these in many body solid state chemistry), I am starting to wonder,
whether the highly nonlinear interaction regime between two relativistic quantum fields lack a known mathematical formulation, may have to do with the notion $\Psi[\phi] = \langle \phi | \Psi[]\rangle$ becomes invalid, that is, it is impossible to separate out the components in an interacting relativistic QFT state because the nolinearlity screw up the notion of eigenoperators
user434058
What does mean?
Have you tried googling "random walk physics"? :P
user434058
@ACuriousMind Oh! I see. I first thought that it might be some sort of pseudo-tag...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multicategory
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operad
Ok these are so cool and answer my question of "why not more than 2"
This is a very nice intro to category theory and it helps to consolidate some of my learning of said subject back when Mathien in maths chat wrote a blog series on category theory
as well clarify some of my intutions back when I read Mclane
Ok. I've retracted by duplicate close vote. — PM 2Ring 21 secs ago
@FakeMod The topic of random walks came up briefly a few days ago:
2 days ago, by PM 2Ring
@JingleBells Also see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Random_walk
user434058
12:26
@PM2Ring Hmmm... I see.
An important thing in random walk theory is that if the space is 1 or 2 dimensional, then the walk is very likely to cross over itself, but in 3 dimensions & greater crossovers are much less likely.
The probability is 1 and 0 respectively, even
 
1 hour later…
user434058
14:01
user434058
Ah, finally a PALINDROME!!! This is probably the best thing that could happen to one's rep and badges...
3
user434058
I have seen everything, $\mathscr{\color{red}{BYE}}$!!!
15:55
@JohnRennie hi:-)
@YuvrajSingh... hi :-)
@JohnRennie actually today I was looking Einstein energy mass equation!I am surprised that till now this equation holds for every particle am I right?
Yes, and in fact it is even broader than that.
Broader in the sense?
In GR the geometry of spacetime is related to an object called the stress energy tensor, and one part of that is the energy density i.e. energy per unit volume.
In this tensor mass and energy are treated as identical except that mass gets multiplied by $c^2$.
So mass and energy both curve spacetime in the same way.
16:01
It create a impression inside me, if I say mass and energy are both same thing and universe fundamentals are based on mass
If new theory is discover it's fundamental should be based on mass and energy
And every particle will follow $$E=mc^2$$
@JohnRennie
I think any new theory would have to be compatible with relativity because relativity has so much experimental evidence.
Yes
I will consider relativity as biggest discovery of century!
@JohnRennie
@ACuriousMind Is there a point in having the fancy higher order geometry in classical mechanics?
Or is that something that is only relevant in QFT
I suppose that in classical mechanics, the choice of bundle is set, and there's no need to have it be flexible?
@Slereah In principle, you have instantons (and hence importance of the bundle choice) in classical mechanics as well. But $U(1)$ instantons are boring and don't really require the full machinery and classical non-Abelian theories where it would matter (other than for the purpose of quantizing them) are pretty rare.
I don't mind that it's not realistic, just that it's there
Do initial conditions set the bundle?
I know that classical magnetic monopoles are directly related to the bundle's class
and they are conserved
Also assuming the spacetime globally hyperbolic, I would guess that the fiber bundle over the Cauchy surface is the same for all time?
 
1 hour later…
17:29
What does it mean physically that a fermion propagator has a negative sign?
 
1 hour later…
18:56
Hi
I wanted to know if three non equal vectors could add upto zero if they don't lie in a plane.
It's not mentioned if they are free vector s, can we translate them?
user434058
@JordanLawson No.
user434058
@JordanLawson Mostly they would be free vectors. Sometimes the "free-ness" is implicit.
user434058
Yo @Charlie wassup?
Hello sir
FakeMod I never asked you the same question back, where in education are you?
and/or research
user434058
19:11
@Charlie what, don't call me sir...
Sirn't
2
user434058
@Charlie That's better :D
user434058
@Charlie oops I misunderstood that message. I am a 16 year old high schooler who would be in a college/University in the next 6 months.
user434058
@Charlie Seems like you're busy, are you?
Ah ok
In general or right now?
user434058
19:15
@Charlie nvm, i just thought that coz you stopped responding :)
No I'm just doing stuff in the background
user434058
Same here :)
user434058
@Charlie What are you currently learning?
user434058
I mean in your Physics course...
user434058
Hi
user434058
19:24
¿WƆ∀ lloɹʇ I op ʍoH
user434058
Hi @tpg2114
user434058
:)
user434058
Hi @CaptainBohemian
user434058
:)
@FakeMod what's up?
19:33
Thanks, guys
user434058
@CaptainBohemian nm. I sometimes see you here. I haven't seen you on the main site. However that has nothing to do why I pinged you ;P I just wanted to chat...
user434058
@JordanLawson Anytime.
@FakeMod It's like this is the first time I see you.
user434058
@CaptainBohemian hehe, but yeah lately I am quite active. BTW, i see you're interested in gravitation and geometric physics, if you don't mind, then are you a researcher, or a student, or an enthusiast?
@FakeMod I am a research student.
user434058
19:40
@CaptainBohemian oh, nice. That means you are learning and researching at the same time, right?
user434058
Anyways, I need some sleep now (that's why I was sounding so dumb), so good night :)
user434058
Bye
I'm basically sitting third year undergrad @FakeMod
20:03
ew university
Hi
is there any body?
Yes? @amir
I am confused about future of my physics studying
What's your question? I won't necessarily know the answer but someone else might when they see it
20:18
Often,I try to learn deep and perfect all the theories and problems not just memorizing them
but in other hand I have lack of the time and I lose my grades
Are you in school? University?
I am second year of uni
and grades are important for applying
but some people just memorize everything for the exam and get best grades
Wow, I've got again 2 ups to my old posts. I think I will lose them again, with an "user removed" entry in my rep history
It would be so nice to know, what is in the background.
I am searching for new users with many ups in the SEDE
If you're finding you don't have time you are either spending too much time doing a sub optimal revision strategy or aren't making enough time to study, there isn't really a magic formula
Learn the content from your lectures and then do as many practice problems as you can.
lack of time is often a problem.
20:35
@AmirhosseinTaebi I was pretty much the same way in freshman/sophomore year
For starters, if you're planning to pursue physics, then the physics classes is what grad schools care about. Other classes are not as important
So if you're spending a sizable amount of time on others, try shifting it more toward the physics ones
my goal is applying in great universities and grades are important
this term we have classical mechanics,statistics,mathematics of physics and modern physics(krane)
At least in the US, Physics GPA holds considerably more weight than total GPA
 
2 hours later…
22:47
@ACuriousMind Steenrod says that most tensor bundles are vector bundles, what the hell is a tensor bundle that isn't a vector bundle?
Infinite dimensional rep of the linear group?
23:45
2
Q: Good answers to duplicate questions

DaleI had a decent answer that received upvotes to a question that was later deleted as a duplicate. Where does the energy go when I short a capacitor? Since the answer was well received I thought it would be good to post it to the original question. I had assumed that this was the desired behavio...


« first day (3460 days earlier)      last day (1767 days later) »