« first day (3011 days earlier)      last day (1919 days later) » 

12:00 AM
I mean generally speaking, is there such a thing in electromagnetism as, amplitude dependent interference? Somehow trying to find an explanation for how router can tweak this :)
 
@user929304 1. I don't actually know anything about how WiFi routers work. 2. I would assume that WiFi routers generally try to conserve energy, i.e. transmit below their maximal signal strength. If the noise is too high, simply turning up the signal will improve the signal to noise ratio. 3. I would also imagine that the routers can tweak their frequencies to channels that are less noisy.
 
@user929304 Im not sure you can 'change' it in the settings
@ACuriousMind that sounds pretty reasonable
 
E.g In the SNR impact performance paragraph here wireless-nets.com/resources/tutorials/define_SNR_values.html may be relevant, suggesting that lowering SNR will translate to more frequent transmissions and less noise
 
@user929304 that is about optimising the signal, and emphasises you want a good SNR
 
12:06 AM
It uses SNR as a number you can use to say if the signal is good or bad
 
@user929304 You may be misunderstanding the post. It is not saying that you actively lower some "SNR" setting in the router. It is saying that if you are in a region with low SNR - meaning that there is much noise compared to signal - then the router will on average need more transmission of a package to get it through to the receiver.
 
I expect it changes the value by moving the router, or changing paramters about the environment
@user929304 I dont see anything in that second link about changing some setting on the router etc
@user929304 its just a useful number
 
@ACuriousMind in that post it s true, but Fritzbox router allow you to change snr!
 
@user929304 where does it say that?
 
Hence my confusion
 
12:09 AM
 
Pay attention to the last line
 
@user929304 Yeah, for that, see my first message. the router is probably simply changing frequencies and signal strength settings until it hits one where it detects so little noise that it predicts the SNR at an "average reception position" to be equal to what you set.
 
@ACuriousMind right i see, but is the noise level itself, that the transmitted signal is susceptible to, itself dependent on the amplitude of the signal?
 
Well, the stronger the signal, the higher the signal-to-noise ($\frac{\text{signal}}{\text{noise}}$) ratio :P
 
12:12 AM
An alternative explanation may be that increasing snr required more frequent transmissions between client and router, and as a result it can more quickly error-correct sent data packages?
 
@user929304 Since the SNR is measured in dB, this seems purely about strength of the signal and not about successful transmission
 
Ye i guess makes sense. But does it then explain why increasing snr reduces throughput?
 
Hmm, that would indicate Jake is right and it has to do with re-transmission of packages
 
Man im confused, what the heck are these routers doing? :PP
 
Which makes little sense to me because I thought the policy was generally "re-transmit any package until the client acknowleges reception or some time limit is exceeded", but again, I don't really know how any of these things work
 
12:17 AM
Could re-transmissions intefere constructively and therefore improve signal quality? :)
 
I have a feeling there is an SE site where this sort of question would be very much on-topic but I can't put my finger on it
 
Mo_
@ACuriousMind DSP.SE
and EE.SE
@user929304 retransmissions do not take place at the same time. How can they interfere?
 
@ACuriousMind such a wierd diagram here community.arubanetworks.com/t5/Controller-Based-WLANs/… see last figure. It seems snr and data-rate are related non-linearly!!
@Mo_ true, trying to make sense of how different data rate leads to different SNR :(
 
@user929304 That's because dB is a logarithmic unit. The diagram is just saying that the better your signal reception is, the more packages you will successfully receive on average
 
Mo_
There is a scheme called MIMO where multiple antennas are used to transmit data to compensate for adverse effects that may have affected signals arriving from various paths
@user929304 each SNR level leads to a single bit rate, which depends on the performance of the coding method used to transmit data
 
12:27 AM
@Mo_ is data rate different here than signal strength?
 
Mo_
@user929304 yes. Data rate is an indicator of the number of bits per time you can transmit
signal strength is the power of the (analog) signal used to transmit the data
 
It depends very much on the protocol. Imagine a terrible protocol that sends all data as a single blob. A single bit error will invalidate the package, needing re-transmission of the entire data. You need to strike a balance between the effort needed to partition the data into meaningful chunks and the effort needed to retransmit a failed chunk
 
@Mo_ ye sure, but does that mean lowering data rate can potentially increase SNR? We re trying to figure out how router let user tweak the snr
 
oh boy, there's so much logistics lol
 
Mo_
@user929304 SNR depends on the physical environment (antenna, temperature, etc.)
@user929304 That probably means lowering the transmission power which leads to lowering SNR
and it is useful when the current SNR level is much higher than what you need to achieve the expected data rate (say 100Mbps), and thus you can lower transmission power for other reasons (such as security)
 
12:34 AM
@ACuriousMind true, so i guess that makes rly hard to relate throughput loss to SNR increase
 
@enumaris Low-level communication protocols are really sophisticated to achieve reasonable speeds while not sacrificing accuracy. Checksums such as CRCs are a crucial part of it.
 
@Mo_ indeed. I wonder, how any of this can explain that by increasing SNR, throughput (dl and upload rates) is lowered? Maybe as acuriousmind says jt s a matter of used protocol
 
@ACuriousMind oh, I was talking about onboarding logistics and documents I had to sign lol
I have not been following your conversation XD
 
@user929304 Where do you get that from? The diagram you linked has throughput monotonously increasing with SNR
@enumaris If you're gonna interject into the middle of a conversation, I'm gonna assume you're commenting on it :P
 
@ACuriousMind ah yeah, fair assumption...but I mumble random thoughts in here often XD
 
12:38 AM
@ACuriousMind the fritzbox link i sent you, it warns about that, namely if snr is changed data rate changes
 
@enumaris hmmm
 
It's not this chat, it's me
 
Also, did you expect a German company to not be bureaucratic? :P
 
I'm not sure if it's related to that SNR option, but transmission power can also be configurable in order to have a piece of hardware work with different regulations. Sometimes firmware will let you have free choice of your transmission power with a disclaimer
 
Mo_
@user929304 By increasing SNR, throughput is either increased or left constant. You can't have worse communication quality when you increase the signal level!
 
12:41 AM
@ACuriousMind XD
 
@enumaris you should tell them that you want to work on COBOL too
and ML...using COBOL
 
nothx
 
@Mo_ yeah makes sense. I guess i m mis-interpreting the whole thing. Confusion arose from point 4. Here en.avm.de/service/fritzbox/fritzbox-3490/knowledge-base/…
 
or SNOBOL or SPITBOL
because early computer scientists had a sense of humor
 
Where somehow interference resistance can be tweaked in router settings but at cost of lowered throughput.
 
12:44 AM
@enumaris Really, a German company that automates business processes. Turning individual workflows into standardized logistics is what we do
 
I'm joining an innovation center
So I may not have the best high level overview of SAP :P
 
You should automate automating business processes
 
Automate SAP
sounds legit
unfortunately, I have to stay within the innovation center's charter
 
We...might be doing that :P
 
which is on smart hospitals or smart healthcare
 
Mo_
12:46 AM
Assume I have a gas of two kinds of particles (A and B) in thermal equlibrium. I can calculate the statistical average of the number of A and B particles in a region around the origin. Now, does anything change if A and B particles are + and - charged (like a plasma)?
 
maybe in a year I can influence them to be broader in their directions
 
In the end, I'm happy that I have nothing to do whatsoever with specific businesses :)
 
one of the reasons I chose this role is that I felt it had a high(ish) degree of influence within the innovation center :D
 
@ACuriousMind fritzbox manual calls it " increasing interference resistance", does that more likely relate to what you were saying with tweaking freq instead of strength?
 
@ACuriousMind are you like...in an IT lab, isolated from the rest of SAP?
do you use COBOL to warm you up during the winters?
 
12:49 AM
@enumaris No, I work on source code analysis (of code written in ABAP), which is mostly independent of specific businesses. Garbage code is garbage code regardless of what process it's supposed to model :P
 
hmmm I wonder if we may be your competitor. I share a floor with an IoT group, but I'm not really sure what industry they're in
 
is there a central HR directory at SAP...could I in theory find you in the employee section somewhere...if I spent enough time digging through it...
 
well @enumaris...I don't think they're working on code analysis IoT...I hope
 
I'm the opposite of isolated - our work is part of every ABAP containing product we ship.
 
SAP is probably your competitor in some domain...they have a ton of businesses...
 
12:50 AM
@enumaris Yes.
And you don't even need to dig - just enter my surname and you'll find me, it's unique at SAP
 
Sounds like I got something to do for when I'm bored LOL
oh
that's interesting
unique among 95,000 people is a feat
 
I'm not even the only Daniel Underwood at Cisco
 
although not as impressive as if it were unique within facebook
 
Rare German name with an umlaut :P
 
as people found out when they tried to email me
 
12:52 AM
so you're at Cisco? lol
you didn't reveal this before
Yeah I'm pretty sure SAP and Cisco compete
although the primary competitor in the US would probably be Oracle
Cisco has more of an emphasis on telecoms right...
 
I work for the anonymous company C***o
 
sounds legit
 
@danielunderwood Every SAP employee has a username based on their surname, and, if this is not sufficient, on their first name. For common German names like "Müller" and common first names they've had to assign numbers to people with duplicate names, complicated by the fact that the usernames are limited to 12 characters for historical reasons
 
Cisco has government contracts so I guess that was why you worried if it was confidential? o.o
I'm apparently number 168
cus I got a 0168 number
appended
 
Well what I do is a bit confidential. I don't suppose the fact that I work there is
And wow
I was impressed when I saw someone with a 5
 
12:55 AM
So there's people with usernames like MUSTERMANN14
 
yeah my surname is pretty common if you romanize it
it's unique if you use the Chinese character
and by unique I mean afaik I'm literally the only person with that surname
not even my father/grandfather have my surname lol
 
But my username is just my surname. I'm special :)
 
Our username system is quite weird though. Like I have half of my first name and half of my last and the other with my name has each offset by a letter
 
My dad disowned me before I was born so I have a different surname than him
(jk about the disowning part)
 
I'm also special because both my names contain umlauts and it's never consistent across all tools how they handle it :P
 
12:57 AM
so far I have not logged into an employee portal
I've only logged into some account to sign onboarding documents
time to play some more overwatch :D
 
I sat there for an hour on my first day thinking I was waiting for my password change to propagate and that's the reason I couldn't log into anything...I had actually typed in my username incorrectly
 
1:13 AM
lol
 
1:45 AM
hmmm
anyone here use wechat? I'm not receiving new message notifications from it for some reason...
-.-
 
2:08 AM
Use uschat
or youchat
or ichat
 
@danielunderwood Huh, someone else remembers ichat
 
lol nope
 
The cool people use AIM
I also used MSN Messenger at some point...or whatever it was called
Hey it was MSN Messenger. At least my memory isn't terrible
 
man i miss the old internet
Huh you can still download an AOL browser
 
2:24 AM
uhh
> Windows 7, 8 or 10, 266 MHz or faster computer processor
From discover.aol.com/products-and-services/… feel terribly sorry for anyone on those OSes with a 266MHz processor
 
@danielunderwood Aw never mind then
How can apple not support aol after all these years
 
Did apple ever support AOL?
 
yeah when i was like 5 i think
now i'm getting flashbacks of old computer disk games and dial up
 
2:41 AM
I'm pretty sure my first game was Carmageddon, but then my parents only let me have E rated stuff and I played through the Harry Potter games as they came out
I also remember the assorted color plastic computers Apple had
 
3:13 AM
apparently Arena of Valor is the same game as 王者荣耀。。。
but not quite the same...my main is slightly modified...
not as strong it feels like
 
3:46 AM
Hey guys, if you din't mind me asking
how is velocity ever measure? like in problems in physics when we have a ball being launched at 20m/s, how this actually haopoen? Dont we need to measure the final and initial positions divided by time to calculate velocity?
 
@Dude156 That would give you average velocity. Here, there is a notion of instantaneous velocity: intuitively, we obtain at the velocity at launch by measuring the smallest amount of time possible around it
This time is actually taken infinitely small
 
4:19 AM
but still, how would we ever reach that number? i was thinking maybe f
fdt=mdv
 
 
4 hours later…
7:52 AM
@Dude156 you are quite correct that we can never measure instantaneous velocity because all measurements take a time greater than zero. However we can make the error in the velocity measurement as small as necessary by making our measurement fast.
 
8:06 AM
Morning
 
 
3 hours later…
10:46 AM
 
 
2 hours later…
12:38 PM
-1
A: What would happen if the Earth was tidally locked with the Sun?

JaviIn my oppinion if the earth were to stop rotating (only once a year), still the Moon could unlock it. The Earth used to spin faster, but the Moon slowed it down (and is still slowing it), so it makes sense for the Moon to create the opposite effect. Although coriolis force would be 364 times les...

 
 
1 hour later…
1:57 PM
-7
A: Why aren't neutron stars full of dark matter?

John Duffield Why aren't neutron stars full of dark matter? Because dark matter doesn't consist of particles. There's something of a myth that it does, which I think comes from particle physicists who have never actually read Einstein's original material. I also think science is something of a competitiv...

please stop banning JD. he comes over to astro in the meantime.
 
2:12 PM
@Blue Can you write a C++ code for me? :P
 
When people say that an object cannot heat up another object above its own temperature because of the 2nd law of TM, they mean it only in regards of using mirrors/lenses etc, right? I am pretty sure i could use solar panels and batteries to collect energy from the sun and then use some process to heat up an object way beyond the sun's temperature
 
2:33 PM
@SirCumference Ban him network-wide
 
what if he reincarnates?
 
I'm not worried about baby Duffield
4
 
so can a cold body heat up a hotter body after all? Solar panels + batteries + some process seem to allow for such a feat
maybe not at a high efficiency, but it can be done, or so it appears to me
 
 
1 hour later…
3:42 PM
@pZombie no you cannot use lenses or mirrors to get a temperature higher than the source. See:
14
Q: What temperature can you attain with a solar furnace?

JeremyA solar furnace is a device that concentrates the sun's light on a small point to heat it up to high temperature. One can imagine that in the limit of being completely surrounded by mirrors, your entire $4\pi$ solid angle will look like the surface of the sun, at about 6000K. The target will then...

 
Anonymous
@SwapnilDas I can write in C. Haven't used C++ in a while.
 
Anonymous
Anyway, I could try. What's the question?
 
Anonymous
@SirCumference Hmmm, I was expecting that.
 
Anonymous
I don't use Astro SE, but this is something you really need to pick up with your mods.
 
3:59 PM
@PhysicsMeta wow.
This is just getting weirder and weirder.
 
Anonymous
@EmilioPisanty Yeah, it seems intentional now... :/
 
Hello

Quick question. I feel like objects weigh more at the North pole than at the equator *because* $v=\omega \cross \r$. When an object is located at the equator, r (the distance to the earth's rotational axis) is at its maximum, so the object's velocity is the highest. Meaning the centrifugal force is the highest
Which is why as the latitude increases the weight decreases
So there is some correlation between the object's velocity due to the earth's angular velocity and its latitude

Am I right?
 
@vzn the GR reddit thing was more about seeing similarities of tensor notation to GR more than anything fluid-ey unfortunately
 
@Blue OP has mentioned previously (in a comment somewheres.....) that they are on the autism spectrum.
 
Anonymous
Huh. I see.
 
Anonymous
4:12 PM
They can be a bit difficult to deal with (sometimes).
 
I'm wondering at what point do we get to having a responsibility to treat this within that lens.
Consider the extreme case where someone has some sort of schizophrenic episode in a comment thread on meta. What are our responsibilities then?
 
Anonymous
These are very touchy issues. And it's not the first time I'm seeing something like this. There's a similar user who frequents the Tavern.
 
Anonymous
We can assume good faith only upto a certain point. And we're not here to provide medical support (neither can we).
 
Anonymous
The general rule of thumb is to deal with them just like you'd deal with any other user. Not being able to SE for a while isn't gonna harm them anyway. If this continues, a mod message might be in order.
 
@JohnRennie any idea's? I allowed myself to ping you (as described on your profile) because I am pretty sure you know the answer : p
 
vzn
4:27 PM
@bolbteppa its fragmentary like much of everything else related. reddit has occasional brief flashes of insight in the desert (so to speak)
 
@traducerad what you say is true for a perfect sphere, but there is an additional effect because the Earth isn't a perfect sphere. At the poles you are nearer to the centre of the Earth than you are at the equator. This also makes things weigh more at the poles.
 
@vzn I think that's called picking and choosing evidence that supports your biases and ignoring those that don't :p
 
@JohnRennie Thanks! :)
 
@traducerad I'm sure there are already questions about this on the site.
 
vzn
@bolbteppa lol (and the criticism immediately ensues.) aka confirmation bias aka hall of mirrors... did you read any of the comments?
 
4:30 PM
@JohnRennie I had a look at them, but wanted to explain it in my own words and be sure that I understood it correctly that way
 
vzn
> I am not an expert on elasticity and such. However, my professor for GR always used to say that we should imagine the cosmos as some kind of fluid. In light of this, I think the relation between deformations and stress tensor à la plasticity should be expected.
> Another (mathematical) way of saying this would be to abstract away the physics and talk about how we can generically treat deformations within some material and then construct quantities such as stresses and strains within the material. Then the correspondence between einstein's equation and the plasticity equations are similar. reddit.com/r/Physics/comments/alpxal/…
wonder what professor said that... :o o_O
 
@vzn "Derivation is based on continuum mechanics framework" from the thread, as I pointed out before, this assumes things like thermodynamics (and so QM)
 
vzn
@bolbteppa dont know why some (eg around here) have so much hangup about thermodynamic... analogies ... there is now even some solid experimental evidence published by Vinante + Adler...
 
@vzn the first sentence of the wiki section: "The concept of strain is used to evaluate how much a given displacement differs locally from a rigid body displacement", GR and even SR show the concept of a rigid body does not even exist, how do you square that one?
 
vzn
@bolbteppa look, lets try another approach. have you ever seen any paradigm shift(s) in your own lifetime?
 
4:38 PM
@vzn I don't think so, why?
 
vzn
@bolbteppa lol then maybe you will (continue to) never see one in your lifetime...
 
M theory, ads-cft maybe?
 
vzn
@bolbteppa lol and whats the experimental evidence for those? :P
 
@vzn fair enough, my only point is merely to point out you're trying to start from concepts like rigid bodies and thermo to get GR when there are basic reasons why this is inherently flawed, there are reasons why people would look to things like strings and not this fluid stuff, you know what I mean
 
vzn
@bolbteppa youre a smart guy at times... am aware of all the objections, we've gone over them, have gone over them with others, there are plausible ways of addressing them, but ofc not for anyone who doesnt really want to.
 
4:45 PM
@vzn these notes web.ihep.su/library/pubs/tconf03/ps/c2-4.pdf on pdf page 2 (p. 102) point out the issues with rigid bodies and GR, and tries to get relativistic elasticity from GR, without assuming GR you can only use non-relativistic elasticity theory to work backwards, which means assuming rigid bodies exist, a basic logical error right, how are you going to fix that one
 
vzn
@bolbteppa very interesting/ thx! but the ref you quote seems not to contain any of the objection that you claim. in other words it seems to undermine, even contradict your own position.
 
@vzn not sure what you mean about an objection, they are getting relativistic elasticity starting from GR
 
last day at this job weeewooo
 
vzn
@bolbteppa its an excellent/ outstanding ref/ finding that gets into the math detail. dont have an immediate answer. the field is new. am not an expert on the equations myself. but the basic idea is that the deformations in GR are in spacetime. one has to look at the actual equation analogies/ analogs. it sometimes helps to put them in a table. dimensional analysis is a key aspect of the challenge...
 
"Relativistic elasticity has been treated by many authors. The earliest references we are aware of are Herglotz [7], in 1911(!) for Special Relativity and Nordstrom [14] in 1916, on General Relativity. A very influential paper has been that of Carter and Quintana [2], of which a clear presentation has been given by Ehlers [5]." arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0211054.pdf
 
vzn
4:53 PM
@bolbteppa thx another nice find. opens up another realm. maybe Tenev + Horstemeyer have cited some of this. clearly serious ppl/ authorities are taking it seriously...
 
@vzn my vague memory of what you were hoping for was that you would start with the equations of elasticity as if they were pulled out of thin air and end up with GR as a way to get a new paradigm shift, despite the serious logical error that you could only start with non-relativistic elasticity equations (that also assumed things like thermo, which you just ignore) and end up with GR, you are hoping you can just ignore how those elasticity equations are derived.
Even worse your source was actually working with some approximation and was not claiming to get some general derivation iirc
 
vzn
@bolbteppa your refs support this direction. there is apparently some challenge on nonrelativistic vs relativistic but believe that is what will be sorted out in near future if it hasnt already in some obscure/ unknown ref. do not see them getting tripped over the idea that thermodynamics is invoked or isnt compatible somehow.
 
It's like trying to derive Newtonian mechanics from the equations of elasticity as though the equations of elasticity have nothing to do with Newtonian mechanics, and if you ever tried to do this, you'd have to ignore "Physically, the change of relative distances between particles may result in many other changes: in heating, in chemical transformations, in magnetization, etc." which we need QM to deal with
 
vzn
@bolbteppa BT lets just face it maybe youre not well suited to deal with paradigm shifts. you are like the moth around a flame eh? maybe doomed to be like that forever? :P
 
@vzn there is no challenge on relativistic vs. non-relativistic, if there was one that would be enormous news haha
 
vzn
4:57 PM
@bolbteppa the authors seem to be saying they have the relativistic eqns down fairly solidly and the nonrelativistic case is harder to resolve/ not yet resolved. coincidentally similar to bohmian mechanics.
 
@vzn What authors?
 
vzn
> This theory is the relativistic version of classical elasticity in the hyperelastic, materially frame-indifferent case and, on Minkowski space, reduces to the latter in the non-relativistic limit. / Beig, Schmidt
 
@vzn no they are saying they used relativity theory (instead of the usual Newtonian theory) to derive some equations for elasticity theory that reduce to the usual non-relativistic elasticity equations in the non-relativistic limit, which is what every relativistic equation with a non-relativistic analogue has to do
 
vzn
@bolbteppa by the way there are analogs of (non)relativistic-like eqns in thermodynamics, have pointed this out before, its worth exploring at length by someone with an open mind who can draw analogies between different areas of physics and sees them as compelling/ revealing etc... someone who used to like to do that: Einstein...
 
@vzn you mean some thermo equations can be applied to systems of particles which move at relativistic speeds, right... That's irrelevant to trying to fundamentally work backwards from elasticity to get GR... It's really not clear what you're hoping for anymore with this fluid paradigm
 
vzn
5:04 PM
@bolbteppa the fluid paradigm is a plausible/ viable GUT/TOE candidate. have made that clear from the beginning.
 
@vzn if that was true, you could derive either GR or Newtonian mechanics from it - how are you going to do that if the equations you start from assume either GR or Newtonian mechanics to even be stated?
 
vzn
@bolbteppa the equations have strong analogies to classical mechanics but a sufficiently openminded theorist wont get tripped up on that. its a feature, not a bug™ ... also ofc theres a point where the eqns cannot be derived from other eqns...
 
@vzn so where did the equations you start with come from if not from either GR or Newtonian mechanics?
 
vzn
@bolbteppa lol the equations came from the universe, from physics, from nature, etc ... reality
 
@vzn right, this is why Bohmian mechanics is a joke as well, they take as god-given the insanely complicated special case of the non-relativistic Schrodinger equation, you could become a hero in some circles if you start with the insanely complicated special case of non-relativistic equations of continuum mechanics and claim it's a TOE haha
@vzn this is not serious thinking, it's so inherently and obviously flawed, and you wont address those flaws, instead you've really been thinking about this for years now?
 
vzn
5:11 PM
@bolbteppa applying equations that apply to materials to spacetime is a bold, seemingly near-crazy idea wrt conventional wisdom but the math supports it in all the refs youve cited.
@bolbteppa and am in very good company eh? as the realization is slowly dawning on you :P
 
@vzn if 'the establishment' had an ounce of the problems your hoped-theories had, you would be the first one to call them out, but when it's your pet theories, suddenly that doesn't matter
 
vzn
@bolbteppa look we probably agree on far more than you realize and you seem to be expert at finding ways to disagree and my philosophy is find ways to agree... its true this project is extremely difficult and spans decades even nearly a century at this point. but feel it is inevitable and will be carried out in the long run and yes, possibly not finishing in my life...
 
At least you have admitted that the equations you're starting from come from thin air, that's a serious issue I think other outsiders will call you out for once you proclaim your TOE haha
 
vzn
@bolbteppa the equations come from classical physics. did not say "thin air". its not a TOE yet, its an idea for a TOE...
 
@vzn I agree, I'm just trying to point out this path you're taking has real flaws, it doesn't mean some other path won't work
@vzn if "the equations come from classical physics" was true, you could not derive either GR or Newtonian mechanics from your TOE which mean's it's not a TOE at all, "classical physics" is the TOE - how are you going to call this a TOE if the equations you start from assume either GR or Newtonian mechanics to even be stated?
@vzn your equations have to come from thin air, that's the only hope you really have to pretend to defend your pov
 
vzn
5:19 PM
@bolbteppa youre getting a little tripped up on the math. the theory will unify existing math eqns in a way that hasnt been understood before. if existing eqns that are known to be correct are derivable from it, it is simply correct and one can wonder/ marvel at its conceptual aspects, but not really question them.
 
@vzn you need existing equations to get your TOE, you can't derive existing equations from your TOE if you need them to even state your TOE, it's like computer programming dependencies...
 
vzn
@bolbteppa in software its called (equivalent!) refactoring! (of "(convoluted) legacy code")
 
@vzn what you are saying is like saying you can use a computer without electricity because once you used electricity to invent Linux, now you can just start from Linux and get electricity, madness...
 
vzn
@bolbteppa think of it instead more the way Maxwell unified E/M theory from a bunch of disconnected eqns known at the time using more advanced ideas/ vector algebra etc.
 
@vzn Once you derive your fluid-equation-TOE/Linux from classical-physics/electricity, now you can just start from your fluid-equation-TOE/Linux and derive classical-physics/electricity, you know this makes no sense, but it's what you've been saying all this time
 
5:25 PM
@bolbteppa I think the idea is that literally any partial differential equation, to somebody who doesn't actually know the math, looks like support for "the fluid paradigm".
You're not going to convince somebody totally set on this idea, so don't stress about it!
 
vzn
lol!
 
People can believe what they want to believe.
There's a long history of people overfitting by putting on extremely blurry glasses and saying that absolutely everything comes from their one magic paradigm.
But hey, maybe somebody one of those people might be right? It's not the kind of thing you can prove or disprove over an internet chat.
 
oh snap
 
@knzhou yeah
 
just realized there's only 1 month left
until...dun dun dun...no deal brexit
 
vzn
5:27 PM
actually, do think it can be proven or disproven, but it requires an extremely advanced audience :P
 
I feel like Brexit draws a lot of parallels with this conversation haha
 
no deal!
 
@vzn In physics we usually ignore this kind of thing until somebody puts their money where their mouth is. Like, publishes a paper arguing for something specific. Grand paradigms are cheap.
 
List of nonsense Euromyths fed for decades to people thelondoneconomic.com/news/…
The cucumber one is amazing
 
vzn
@knzhou a lot of solid papers have been cited and presumably you havent looked at any yet.
 
5:30 PM
Cucumber one: blogs.ec.europa.eu/ECintheUK/ec-to-ban-curved-cucumbers ("Furthermore Brussels is actually planning to introduce even more cucumber regulation", this is back against the EC, 93!), "It must be made clear that the demand for these standards came from the industry itself"
 
I've looked at a few over the past few years you've been posting them, and some of them do say interesting, specific things. But that is not the same thing as proving the much more general paradigm you allude to.
 
0
Q: Does the mechanism for marking duplicates change when you reach 50k rep, and if so, can this be avoided?

Ben CrowellI voted to close this question as a duplicate, and to my surprise it was immediately closed. The message in the yellow box lists only my name, which makes it sound like my own vote was the only one involved. Did this change because I recently passed 50k rep? If so, then I don't think I want this...

 
Also, it's an empirical fact that the same theory can be written in a hundred different ways, each suggesting different intuition.
 
vzn
@knzhou yes! agreed! its called a research program
 
I don't dispute that almost everything in modern physics can be written in a way that leverages fluid intuition. If it works, that's great!
 
5:31 PM
@vzn the linux/electricity analogy should shock you out of this, if it wont I don't know what will
 
But they can also be written in a million other ways, which so far are generally more computationally convenient. (e.g. Bohm vs. Copenhagen)
 
vzn
@knzhou trying to remember do you have some degree(s) in physics? am looking thru old transcript now... we did discuss some of this last summer it appears...
 
I have a bachelor and master's.
Anyway, if it just comes down to different ways of writing down the same theory, I wouldn't run to the fluid version unless it really was easier to use than the others. It's like how I'm not going to switch to using twistor theory for calculations either (and it also has a very different picture of the world than standard field theory...). Or like how I'm never going to use string theory for my particle physics model building.
Then there are fluid models which are separate theories of their own and really do make different predictions, like the theory where dark matter's a superfluid.
 
vzn
@knzhou it has a greater validity if much more can be seen to be derivable from it. the theory is going in that direction. its a work in progress. we are seeing early stages of it. its not complete.
 
Well then, wake me up when it gets a bit further! There are a _lot_of people working on rewriting physics in a lot of different ways.
 
vzn
5:36 PM
@knzhou pardon me didnt mean to interrupt your zzzs
 
It's not just "fluid vs. the establishment", everybody is trying to bring down the "establishment" in the sense that everybody is looking for new physics.
 
vzn
@knzhou everybody is feverishly looking and then when they stumble on it, they trash it :P
 
Your fluid stuff, if you group it all together, is one of a hundred new paradigms trying to emerge.
 
vzn
@knzhou theres 1 crucial difference, its the right one :P
 
If you talked about string theory 40 years ago, people would have had a very similar reaction -- wait until it achieves something. And now it's one of the dominant paradigms because of what they've done with it.
 
vzn
5:38 PM
@knzhou think its very ripe to be replaced. ripe in the sense of an overripe banana with flies on it...
 
I'm sure you think so! But don't forget to talk to the holographers, twistor theorists, amplituhedron people, conformal bootstrap people, the qubitzers, and so on.
 
vzn
Dec 13 '16 at 17:54, by vzn
> The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear. https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Antonio_Gramsci
 
All I'm saying is that it's more complicated than that. Everybody would love to be at the spearhead of a new paradigm.
 
vzn
@knzhou not really. words and actions dont always line up in humans as we all know.
 
There are lots of them with varying degrees of promise. If your 'fluid paradigm' does something great and new people will hop on, possibly so many that you'll get sick of it.
I know that's true because that's what already happens in theoretical physics, though people usually lament it as 'jumping on the latest fad'.
 
vzn
5:42 PM
@knzhou lol no danger of that at the moment. its a very long-spanning bandwagon as already stated.
 
@SirCumference well, at least he doesn't (yet) have negative score on his top tags on astro.se
 
vzn
Jul 3 '18 at 15:34, by knzhou
Maybe wavefunctions are made of yarn. They collapse when a microscopic cat comes along and smushes them.
 
sounds legit
 
The 'Fierz' identity $\chi_\alpha (\xi \eta) + \xi_\alpha (\eta \chi) + \eta_\alpha (\chi \xi) = 0$ is a bit different to the usual Fierz'ing derived from the usual $\delta_a{}^b \delta_? = \frac{1}{2} \sigma_{\mu} \sigma^{\mu}_?$ kind of thing, it uses Levi-Civita, is it really a Fierz at all
2
Q: Understanding Fierz rearrangement identity

Peter AndersonI'm trying to get a better grasp of the Fierz rearrangement identity for 2-component spinors (Equation 2.20 I'll be using the Van der Waerden notionation used in the given link) $$ \chi_\alpha (\xi \eta) + \xi_\alpha (\eta \chi) + \eta_\alpha (\chi \xi) = 0. $$ Now I can easily prove that this ...

 
Ah the famous Fierz identity first proven by Sasha Fierz
 
5:58 PM
The one everyone Fierz
 
6:32 PM
@JohnRennie Yes, I was already aware of mirrors and lenses are not supposed to allow to heat up a hotter object, using a colder object as i thought i made clear in my statements. However, that does not necessarily mean that a colder body cannot heat up a hotter body as it appears to me, when using the proper tools like for example, in the case of the sun, use solar panels and batteries and then use the energy stored to heat up an object far beyond the sun's temperature by various means.
@JohnRennie So the statement that a colder object cannot heat up hotter object without being specific seems to be wrong. One could consider the solar panels + batteries + whatever process to turn the stored energy into something that heats up an object beyond the sun's temperature as a black box. A similar black box could exist on the micro/nanoscale etc.
 
7:13 PM
@vzn So I've thought about it a little bit, and I think it follows immediately from the symmetrization requirement. If we consider a system of two fermions (say hydrogen), then this system, an atom, is a boson. The reason for this is because we don't consider the atom (as a whole) as a function of 2 variables, but rather of one combined (electron+neutral) variable.
So it's possible to interchange two such atoms, because what we get will always be an even permutation for the fermions inclued (as we always permute "couples").
In the case of fermion-boson pairs, if we were to permute such pairs, then an odd permutation of a pair, is still an odd permutation for the fermions, which means that a fermion-boson pair is still a fermion. I can't really write it down perfectly in words, but the point is to distinguish between the particles (or subsystems) and the system as a whole.
 
Anyone know if there exists any sort of established notation to indicate that two operators, say A and B, are equal, up to an unspecified unitary transformation (i.e. writing something like $A \variant-of-equal-operator B$ if $B = U^\dagger A U$ for $U^{-1} = U^\dagger$)?
 
@ShaVuklia You're correct :)
@daysofsnow There's no notation, but the standard term for that is to say that the operators are unitarily equivalent
 
@ACuriousMind Okay, too bad. I realized afterwards that another phrasing would be that A is unitarily isomorphic to B? Maybe I will go with something like $\cong_U$
 
@daysofsnow generally when writing similarities or denoting a class of objects or something like that, I've seen $\sim$ being used
but it depends on the context
 
7:28 PM
Hi guys I have a stupid doubt that's not worth opening a question on the main site, I hope you can help me, it's basically just a minus sign
 
you mean question?
doubt != question
 
@enumaris $\sim$ and $\cong$ are used interchangeably for isomorphisms, is that right?
 
@daysofsnow notation is not always universal, sometimes it depends on the author
 
yeah question, the first pics is clear to me
 
7:30 PM
@enumaris Sure, valid point.
 
this second one is clear too, but in the next one i obtain something different
I obtain $2P^k$ in the last line, using the commutator calculated in the second pic, using the algebra of the group of Poincarè, I should have a minus sign cancelling the two terms, but I can't find it
 
 
1 hour later…
8:38 PM
@ACuriousMind Thanks for the confirmation~
 
8:53 PM
fun times
 
 
1 hour later…
9:56 PM
@enumaris congrats on your big hours!
 
big hours? o.o
 
Big end to a big day
 
ah yeah XD
thx :D
 
vzn
10:35 PM
@ShaVuklia not an expert on this but it seems to come down to accounting for full and half spins. the field was revolutionized with discovery of einstein bose condensate. liked the ref here that says For reasons we do not fully understand, a consequence of the odd half-integer spin is that fermions obey the Pauli Exclusion Principle and therefore cannot co-exist in the same state at same location at the same time. particleadventure.org/fermibos.html
 
Yeah you add the spins
 
vzn
synchronicity, using IBM QC to empirically study pauli exclusion principle!
 
@vzn Wrong. We do understand the reason why fermions obey exclusion, it's called the spin-statistic theorem.
 
Mo_
10:52 PM
@ACuriousMind both you and that ref can be correct considering that we can refer to various persons ;)
 
We...approve of this interpretation
 
vzn
11:04 PM
@ACuriousMind the ref is sponsored by DOE/ NSF. my interpretation was that it was pointing to some "TBD" aspect of (active) theory/ research, of which there is lots. the statement is vague.
 
I don't care who sponsors the site, whoever wrote that particular sentence is simply wrong, and you referring someone interested in learning actual physics to it is concerning.
 
Anonymous
That website doesn't look particularly trustworthy either. It's a popular science website aimed at the general public (read: layman).
 
vzn
The Mysteries of fermions / Weiner inspirehep.net/record/811757
> It is conjectured that all known fermions are topological solitons. This could explain the non-observation of bosonic leptons and baryons and provide a physical mechanism for the Pauli exclusion principle.
 
Ah, a poorly typeset Word document containing your favourite word. That certainly is more trustworthy.
 
11:42 PM
@vzn maybe adding solitons to the fluid stuff is the way to go, after all, fluid mechanics is where solitons came from (e.g. look into KdV equation history) :p
Soliton stuff is really hard non-linear pde stuff
 
Anonymous
Sep 11 '17 at 15:47, by John Rennie
I wandered lonely as a soliton
 
Anonymous
Good ol' days! :D
 
Anonymous
@bolbteppa Whoa, that sounds really nice! :)
 
Yeah it's not bad
 
Anonymous
11:48 PM
> When the two songs first came out I kept getting the lyrics mixed up. I thought they sounded nice together so here they are all intertwined.
 
Anonymous
Explains the sudden changes in rhythms. :P
 

« first day (3011 days earlier)      last day (1919 days later) »