Irony punctuation is any proposed form of notation used to denote irony or sarcasm in text. Written English lacks a standard way to mark irony, and several forms of punctuation have been proposed. Among the oldest and most frequently attested are the percontation point proposed by English printer Henry Denham in the 1580s, and the irony mark, used by Marcellin Jobard and French poet Alcanter de Brahm during the 19th century. Both marks take the form of a reversed question mark, "⸮".
Irony punctuation is primarily used to indicate that a sentence should be understood at a second level. A bracketed...
In mathematics, the Minkowski question mark function (or the slippery devil's staircase), denoted by ?(x), is a function possessing various unusual fractal properties, defined by Hermann Minkowski (1904, pages 171–172). It maps quadratic irrationals to rational numbers on the unit interval, via an expression relating the continued fraction expansions of the quadratics to the binary expansions of the rationals, given by Arnaud Denjoy in 1938. In addition, it maps rational numbers to dyadic rationals, as can be seen by a recursive definition closely related to the Stern–Brocot tree.
== Definition... ==
In mathematics, Weierstrass's elliptic functions are elliptic functions that take a particularly simple form; they are named for Karl Weierstrass. This class of functions are also referred to as P-functions and generally written using the symbol ℘ (or
℘
{\displaystyle \wp }
), and known as "Weierstrass P"). The ℘ functions constitute branched double coverings of the Riemann sphere by the torus, ramified at four points. They can be used to parametrize elliptic curves over the complex numbers, thus establishing an equivalence to complex tori. They also yield...
I've just tried to make sense of the De-Broglie wave relation. That is what I came up with: $E=mc^2$, but $E=hf$ as well. $\lambda=vT$ so $f=\frac{v}{\lambda}$. Equating the two equations for energy you get $mc^2=h\frac{c}{\lambda}$ because for light the velocity is $c$. $mc$ is just the non-rela...
@ACuriousMind On Windows 10 both Chrome and Edge just show the square. However some determined Googling has found the symbol for Egyptian hieroglyph d053. Those naughty Egyptians :-)
Following on Derek's great answer, it is very important to remind that the conventional way we use to add half-cell potentials is a consequence of the conservation of energy. Therefore, we should look at this from the perspective of Hess's Law.
How so?
Well, if we add two reactions, no matter w...
@0celo7 I do not approve of such pictures. But I considered the ban excessive, especially in light of it being you who cast the flag, clearly to get Slereah banned. That's all I'll say on this matter.
@ACuriousMind I think its reasonable to suspect someone viewing the chat might get a PTSD attack from seeing such an image. Would you have deleted it and not suspended him if I had not flagged?
de Broglie suggested that a moving body behaves in certain ways as though it has a wave nature. His conjecture of dual nature of matter was based on two points : (1) dual nature of radiation, and (2) nature loves symmetry.
de Broglie deduced the connection between particle and wave properties fr...
is the last part correct?
You treat the electron to be wave moving in a circle.
Here are the few images I have taken from Quora.
First Image is the question and last two are the answer written by some users.
I want to know are there answers real and consistent with physics?.
@YashasSamaga The microwaves form a standing wave inside the oven so you get points of maximum intensity and nodes where the intensity is low. The chocolate remains unmelted at the nodes and melts at the maxima.
@YashasSamaga First of all, what makes you say it's wrong?
It's a very clever experiment and the author reports that it gives an answer only off by a factor of order 1. That's pretty good for measuring the speed of light from your desk chair.
Yes it's unpredictable. It's still a good idea as something to check. If nothing else, you get a lower bound, which is useful and you can do it in seconds from your computer!
If you really don't think that's worth upvoting, then don't upvote and move on with your life.
@Mostafa Hmm. In most problems like this we assume that the transistor is in active state. Why would be consider cut-off region or saturation region anyway when amplification is not possible? These problems are based on specific concepts which we need to identify. Here in this case they want to test a students knowledge of the relation between base current and collector current when electrons are injected from common emitter in active state.
Because signal amplification is not the only use of transistors.
if I have determined a wavefunction, and want to know how it would evolve given a sudden change in the potential, can I simply plug my initial wave function into the TDSE with the new hamiltonian?
Specifically, going from a 1d infinite potential well in the ground state, to a free particle suddenly
(we could get pedantic and say that $\partial_\mu$ is a basis of the tangent plane and $\mathrm d^nx$ is a basis of $T^*_nM$ or whatever the proper notation is)
I was wondering what the quantum equivalent solution of the "biased random walk off a cliff" problem is (example of the classical problem: math.stackexchange.com/questions/359989/… )
You can't quite do the exact same problem with amplitudes in place of probabilities, because the steps have to be reversible. So what I had in mind was something like...
You have a 2-state unitary operation, and you alternate back and forth between applying it at even splits and odd splits.
A drunk man stands with a cliff one step to his left.
He takes steps randomly left and right.
Each step has probability $p$ of going left and probability $q=1-p$ of going right.
Each step is the same size.
If allowed to randomly step indefinitely, what is the probability that the drunk falls off...
Solving the classical problem is much easier because you can add probabilities from different times, e.g. by waiting for all the probability to "drain out of" a small section to figure out the long-term behavior. But with amplitudes you need all the contributions before you can square to get the "weight" of a time slot, so you can't focus on a narrow slice as easily because the stuff that leaves and comes back seems to matter.
Basically, the "slices" you make need to be spacelike instead of timelike.
For all the help you guys have given over the years, I offer this: on the pcb project I'm working on, I will include a logo of your choice somewhere in the silkscreen.