« first day (1900 days earlier)      last day (3328 days later) » 

21:01
...
I ve read two links so far regarding to the kinetic theory
I googled exactly what u told me @FenderLesPaul
but I don't really see how this explains
still no answer D:
why you need these two conditions in order to
apply this law
They are just explaining that u can calculate
the force exerced by the particles due to their velocity (kinetic energy)
on the walls of the container
is there anything specific I should read about
?
ok well that right there obviously relates to elastic collisions
now think about why you need negligible intermolecular forces
21:07
and what id the collisions weren't elastic?
what would that change
?
the force would depend on the intermolecular forces knocking the particles about
you tell me
there's no point in me just telling you if you want to learn anything
IDK, seems absurd:they d stop moving after a certain amount of collisions. No more movement means no gas=> liquid => gas. Omg...
*=>solid
this would seem incredible
that you could turn water vapor to ice by just "smashing" a brick against the gas!
...
21:11
(some energy dissipates at each collision)
xD
ok
so that affects the recoil velocity
which is a direct input into the derivation
mhm
ok I ll try to reread the part with the derivations
you're also ignoring internal degrees of freedom
yeah see where diluteness comes in
it's instructive to reproduce the derivation yourself using kinetic theory
since it mainly just uses Newtonian mechanics
if you're bored, also use kinetic theory to derive $PV^{\gamma} = \text{const.}$
which is somewhat more involved
21:15
i m not bored
:p
well it's a fun derivation either way
it's not fun
it's a lot like the famous ball bouncing between moving walls problem in Kleppner
what s the funniest thing you ve done so far
in physics?
funniest?
21:18
the thing where you had the most fun I mean
I pissed on Weinberg's GR book that's pretty funny I guess
ah
hahahaha
well that was fun too
@FenderLesPaul the fuck
no but regarding to what you learned/worked on
cause u r saying that doing derivatives is fun
21:19
@privetDruzia I had a lot of fun learning GR
more so than any other physics subject
and I think my current GR research project is the most fun thing I've done so far, as far as physics goes
what does GR stanbd for?
@0celo7 I'm pretty metal
GR = General Relativity
Great Rowdiness
that s really very broad I think
I do have a lot of respect for people who study/studied physics
I am studying engineering
21:21
and truely believe that physics is much harder than engineering
well then my idea of fun and your idea of fun is definitely going to be different haha
what do u mean?
we r indeed both active in different domains
I don't know about all engineers but the ones I know don't really do physics problems for fun
mhm
there s one thing I d like to dive into
it s astrophysics
is this a difficult branch of phyics?
@FenderLesPaul what am I
@privetDruzia I'm not sure you can rank stuff like that
21:23
@0celo7 my trophy husband
@privetDruzia you should ask @ChrisWhite he's an astrophysics PhD
Only if you're down for polygamy
@0celo7, in engineering for instance I think you can. there are some things that are easier to calculate or conceive
@0celo7 fuck that I need an exclusive emotional connection
@privetDruzia yeah, I'm sure nuclear fusion (what I want to do) is "harder" than building a microwave
hahahah true
21:26
but I was talking about theoretical stuff
sophus lie
@FenderLesPaul get a dog then
I did get a dog
you're not as good as @ACuriousMind and I have to make a choice
21:28
it left me for another owner
sobs
sucks to suck
@ChrisWhite, hello @FenderLesPaul adviced me to ask my question to you. If everything goes well I should graduate pretty soon and I ll be an industrial engineer. I am really interested in aerospace engineering. Especially attitude determination and control systems for satellites. My dream would be to pursue a PhD in that area. So I was wondering whether diving into astrophysics as a preparation for my eventual PhD could be a good idea. Also what could be an interesting domain about astrophysics to learn about in order to be well prepared?
still no answer from Lee RIP
oh yhea I am extremely motivated, I am ready to do anything in order to be accepted and succeed
He is researching black hole accretion disks
21:32
sounds crazy
@0celo7 I completely changed my hairstyle
Uh, ok?
thought you'd like to know
Do you still look homeless?
possibly
21:34
do u know each other in real life?
nope
but yepe?
21:36
pepe yepe
you're a bad meme
bo diddly
would you guys ever consider working with a professor who is 66?
Why not?
idk there are certain advantages to working with an older professor and certain advantages to working with a younger one
just wanted to know your thoughts
21:47
If he goes senile you can take over Mrs. Reagan style
they could die at any moment
you could die at any moment
from old age
I know where you live
21:57
@FenderLesPaul be very afraid...
nah
only one more week
and I won't be the only undergrad on campus anymore
 
2 hours later…
23:42
This chat is awfully quiet
what gives?
reading
ffs Dr. Analysis prof why are you making me do absolute value proofs :(
@yuggib However, my Japanese analysis prof defines the natural numbers without zero...that might make things awk if I mix the two up.

« first day (1900 days earlier)      last day (3328 days later) »