« first day (1520 days earlier)      last day (3707 days later) » 
00:00 - 19:0019:00 - 00:00

00:12
Anyone know of a program for germanium gamma spectroscopy available online?
@Pigeon What do you mean by "for"?
Do you have a spectrum and want to analyze it?
Most of the detector manufactures ship something with their product, but they are generally only so good. As a young post-doc I ended up rolling my own when I needed to do something moderately sophisticated.
Because the actual gain tends to be slightly non-linear and the background subtraction is difficult to do well and you couldn't know the scale of the actual errors without knowing everything that went on inside the code.
Nor was I the only one who did this...there were three code bases floating around the building each optimized for slightly different measurements.
01:09
This FSU vs UO football game is pretty epic.
 
1 hour later…
02:18
Do they really spend 2 trillion on R&D
02:47
@hwlau Which "they" did you have in mind? That seems pretty reasonable for global spending (keeping in mind that the "D" is a big cost in industry).
gov?
so you mean the company are also counted?
I don't image that governments spend that much. Hundreds of billions, maybe.
@hwlau All I know is that the figure says "Global investments".
yup, it seems too much to me.
but if it also counts the technology sector by Intel, whatever
it seems reasonable
To put the investment scale into perspective the US dept. of Energy spends on order of a billion dollars a year just on "the intensity frontier". There are two other frontiers in the DOE scheme and that doesn't cover NSF or the biomed people.
ya, but it is trillion. A thousand of billions.
We need to figure out a thousand of such projects
03:23
@KyleKanos: My SO might be able to answer your bountied question. I mentioned it to her and she seemed interested. If all goes according to plan this will suck her in as a recurring user!
* maniacal laughter
@KyleKanos I could probably join that site and ask about the sun spotter (how to make part, as opposed to the the optics one here)
04:16
I have a quick QM question that I should really know the answer to -- having a brain fart here. Any linear combination of solutions to HΨ = EΨ is also a solution, correct? So any linear combination of energy eigenstates is also a solution. So assume you put the Hilbert space in a basis of the orthonormal energy eigenstates. Now any function can be represented as a linear combination of basis functions, right? But not every function is a solution to HΨ = EΨ. So where am I messing up here?
05:00
@SabreTooth Yeah, probably.
@Nick Your first statement is wrong.
Suppose $H|A\rangle = E_A |A\rangle$.
Also suppose $H|B\rangle = E_B|B\rangle$, and that $E_A \neq E_B$.
There is no $E_{A+B}$ such that $H(|A\rangle + |B\rangle) = E_{A+B}(|A\rangle + |B\rangle)$
^ Actually there might be cases where that works but not in general.
...thinking...
@DanielSank your argument there makes sense to me
@DavidZ: Right, but there are some trivial cases like $E_A = 0$, etc.
Other than those cases you get $H(|A\rangle + |B\rangle) = E_A|A\rangle + E_B|B\rangle$
and then if you try to factor out something as an eigenvalue you get
Even if $E_A = 0$ though, assuming $E_B \neq 0$, you get $H(\lvert A\rangle + \lvert B\rangle = E_B \lvert B\rangle$
$E_A(|A\rangle + (E_B/E_A)|B\rangle)$ which is not a scalar times the original vector.
Okay, thanks that makes sense. Then where was I getting that linear combinations of solutions to Schrodinger's equation are also solutions? Am I just misremembering something...
05:06
@DavidZ good point
@Nick you might be mixing up the time-independent and time-dependent versions?
Any arbitrary linear combination of solutions to the time-independent equation - that is, any arbitrary wavefunction - can be the initial condition to the time-dependent equation
Hmm... I bet that's it. Thanks.
But being an initial condition isn't the same thing as being a solution.
Actually, this is a vocabulary game in a sense.
@DanielSank yeah, I'm being imprecise in order to avoid explaining all those details
Ah.
@DavidZ: Is there a way to customize mathjax?
My web-programming fu isn't very strong and I haven't figured out how it works yet.
05:09
Customize in what sense?
I mean, yes, it is technically possible, but it may require a lot of Javascript hacking depending on what you want to do
For example, in real life I type \ket{\Psi} a lot.
It would just be nice to have some physicsy macros.
Ah, you can do things like \newcommand I believe
But, where?
Just between dollar signs. $\newcommand\ket[1]{\lvert #1\rangle} \ket{\psi}$ becomes $\newcommand\ket[1]{\lvert #1\rangle} \ket{\psi}$
hm... testing: $\ket{A}$
$\newcommand\ket[1]{| #1 \rangle}$
$\ket{A}$
Oh snap!
It lasts from entry to entry!!
05:11
yeah, so the \newcommand only needs to appear once in any given page. Since I defined it, in this case, it also works for your messages and so on.
Sick!
I can just copy paste my macros.tex file here!!
Groovy.
well one wouldn't want to define too many macros ;-)
Just \ket and \bra should be fine, but a large TeX macro file might cause MathJax to become very slow
Just a few:
\ket
\braket{A}{B} -> $\langle A | B \rangle$
\bbraket{A}{B}{C} -> $\langle A | B | C \rangle$
@DavidZ Oh
And I'm still holding out home that we can get Dirac notation wrapped up into an official MathJax package that can be enabled on the main site
"large" meaning probably O(hundreds) or more
^ If I can lend my programming fu to that I am hereby volunteering.
05:15
Dirac notation isn't a matter of programming-fu - the implementation can be easily adapted from the braket LaTeX package. It's a matter of convincing either the MathJax or SE developers to include the module in a script which is loaded on the site, and then convincing SE to enable it.
Implementing units in the style of the siunitx package might take some more programming-fu. That package does some disturbingly complicated things with TeX.
Can I lend my pestering-the-right-person-fu?
If I find anything out, I will let you know who to pester
k
Thanks for caring about this. Good tex environment a happy scientist makes.
I guess, to be fair, the Dirac notation package for MathJax doesn't actually exist yet. Everyone's probably assumed that there's no way it would get enabled, and thus nobody bothered to actually make it.
So if you wanted to create it, it couldn't hurt.
though I'm not sure if @ManishEarth has already done something along those lines... it would be like him
So... you said O(hundreds) of macros. What are you thinking?
I can think of three.
Oh, I misunderstood. Never mind.
05:18
oh ok
Could you explain something:
Why does having a TeX package help? Does mathjax send the content to a server which renders it into unicode or something?
No, MathJax is all Javascript. It runs entirely in your browser.
I was referring to the braket LaTeX package because that package has already solved the problem of automatically sized Dirac brackets, for LaTeX. And I believe the implementation is fairly simple, and could be roughly "translated" into MathJax.
Looking at the js behind the "start chatjax" link, I have no idea what it's doing :P
I will investigate this further and if/when I have some idea what's going on I will try to get something useful done.
05:21
hehe :P I can't claim to fully understand it myself
that is probably the sort of thing one should understand if one is going to add a package to MathJax
^ That.
Oh I see. It's pulling a (probably much larger) script from another URL.
Yeah, it loads MathJax from another URL, configures it, and then sets a delayed callback to render the math markup
Yep. I guess I should just email the guy who owns that web page.
Have you already done that?
What for?
about Dirac notation you mean?
About appropriate channels to add packages/macros.
I'm guessing someone who bothered to make that page knows more than me, and might actually want to help.
05:28
He's a moderator on Mathematics and probably too busy for such things
In any case, he's not the one you'd need to talk to about adding Dirac notation. You'd have to talk to the actual MathJax developers.
@DavidZ Ah.
Oh, ok, just realized mathjax is a real project.
Know what to do now.
Thanks.
a very large real project
Indeed.
Some information about writing third-party MathJax extensions
and a tutorial on extension-writing: docs.mathjax.org/en/latest/extension-writing.html
$\newcommand\braket[2]{\langle #1 | #2 \rangle}$
@DavidZ: Could you type \braket{a}{b} and see what happens?
05:37
sure: $\braket{a}{b}$
Did it render for you?
I'm guessing no
WHAT?!
why wouldn't it?
How did your browser know to do that. Oh, I guess when it rendered my chat message your local js environment processed the command.
Cute.
05:38
yeah
very cute
Oh man, this is an incredible opportunity for pranks.
It is not good that I know this.
lol
hm, now I wonder if there's a way to use MathJax to invoke other arbitrary Javascript? (there shouldn't be, if the security is done properly, but it wouldn't entirely surprise me if someone missed thinking about that)
I was just thinking that too.
Ok real question: It looks like what we should do is make a "Physics.SE" extension and put it up on the ChatJax extensions repository.
Yes/no?
05:44
I'm all for it, except instead of making a physics.SE extension it would be more useful to make specific extensions for the features that physicists use
@DavidZ Ok, that's why I'm asking this.
i.e. an extension for braket notation, another one for units, etc.
@DavidZ: Indeed, but then for ease of use I would make an umbrella package which just imports those.
Yes?
There are already several extensions incorporated into MathJax itself, such as mhchem which lets you render chemical symbols. They use it on Chemistry
@DanielSank that would probably be something to do for your own personal use
Perhaps I don't understand how this works yet. I will investigate further.
05:45
I mean, not that I would stop you, but in my experience it seems to be more generally useful to break things down by feature, when you're sharing with other people
@DavidZ Yes, of course.
I think I don't understand how specific pages control which extensions they use. I need to read more.
so you certainly could make an umbrella package which imports both braket and units and so on, but I just think it's kind of an unnecessary design decision. But that's just me.
If it does get implemented in any form (umbrella package or not), I wouldn't complain.
@DavidZ I only mentioned the umbrella thing because I don't understand how this works. I agree with you about the design in general.
ah okay
well, it's not like I have time to do any of this myself, so I don't really get a say in it anyway
@DavidZ Ooooh, don't know how I feel about that kind of reasoning.
I write a lot of software tools at work. Step #1 is ask other people how they would use it, etc.
06:40
This statement is meant to gauge the possible agreement among other users:
I think the quantum-interpretations tag should be removed. "Interpretations" are not falsifiable, and therefore are not science and not physics. Any question which might attract this tag is either not a science question or simply doesn't need that tag.
...and now I see that this is impossible and doesn't make sense given how SE works.
Never mind.
06:54
Science these days need not imply the scientific method. Interpretations do fall under science; as do mostly-unverifiable string theories and other things.
 
3 hours later…
user54412
09:33
@DavidZ Well, whether it was a valid concern or not, Github removed MathJax support from its wiki pages due to security concerns, and they show no interest in bringing it back.
10:18
Does anyone remember that question about how waves arise from QFT, and someone gave a really long and detailed calculation-based answer?
@DanielSank what do you mean impossible?
 
2 hours later…
12:13
@DanielSank /cc @DavidZ there already is an extension with buttons
12:36
24
Q: MathJax Buttons

Manishearth Adds some math/science buttons to the editor on science SE sites. These buttons are useful for converting selected text to math, formatting SI units, and formatting chemical equations. There are also keyboard shortcuts for them, which are IMO more useful than the buttons themselves. (The SI u...

12:59
@ManishEarth This didn't work for me (completely wrecked the answer composition, in fact)
13:44
@Danu This one?
@DanielSank I would love for that tag and its associated questions to vanish, but, as I recently commented on such a question, quantum interpretations are "physics" in the sense of "what (some) physicists do", and hence I think they are on-topic for this site, even though I don't like them
14:08
@DanielSank SO = significant other? or something else?
@ACuriousMind No, it was a few months ago. Somehow, I think @Phonon had something to do with it
14:37
@KyleKanos I'm just trying to avoid the connotation of condition as something that actually constrains the system
...which something gauge depending cannot do
I understand now your point
What word would you rather I use?
criteria ?
@KyleKanos simply "if we pick the coulomb gauge"
or "work in"
@Danu hmm only recent long answer I recall is Javier's answer in this post, is that what you were looking for?
14:53
@Phonon No, but this was really months ago (august or smth)
@Danu ah ok, let me see
@Danu done
@dmckee I have spectra of an activated metal (possibly steel) which I would like to be able to open, taken in MAESTRO originally, file type is .spe. Any ideas?
15:23
@ACuriousMind Woah, Nelly. If questions are "physics" based on being about "what (some) physicists do" then everything which has been said about the physics/engineering issue is out the window.
I do not mean to use that as an argument for the physics/engineering issue. I'm just using that example to point out that I really don't think that's the criterion most people want to use.
@KyleKanos Yeah, significant other. She had some interesting comments on your question, but no real answer. I don't know whether I can get her to type it up.
@DanielSank I'm inclined to agree.
@ACuriousMind Er, sorry, agree which way?
With you that that is not the criterion we should use
I feel increasingly as if I don't really know if there are any other criteria other than "we've accepted/declined such questions so far"
@ACuriousMind Then... you don't agree with what you wrote in the comment?
@ACuriousMind Yes, I quite agree with that, actually.
@DanielSank I still think this is "what some physicists do", but I'm not sure anymore if that's an argument for their on-topicness either way
15:29
I do think it's a perfectly fine argument for on-topicness, but it is not the case that acceptance/rejectance of answers can be understood solely on that criterion.
In other words, the dynamics of the site are not fully described by an equation of motion using just that criterion.
(Although, using "what physicists do" as a sole criterion strictly speaking would make the site a free-for-all, so I retract my statement that it's a perfectly fine criterion. I should have said that it is a "logically consistent" criterion.)
@DanielSank Let's say it's necessary, but not sufficient.
@ACuriousMind *nods
So I'm back to thinking that tag should vanish, except that as I understand it users can make tags will-ye nill-ye.
@DanielSank With a bit of rep, they can, yes. One can prohibit certain tags from being created again, but the tag is not the issue - if these questions are declared off-topic, one can simply write DO NOT USE THIS TAG in the tag wiki, as is the case with other off-topic tags, e.g.
@ACuriousMind: Here's the thing: physics students, professionals, and enthusiasts are going to wonder about "interpretations". If I'm going to VTC those questions I would want some canonical answer or other resource to which to direct them. I would write this, but I also don't want to presume that I'm the Universe's authority on "interpretations".
Do we have a way to post a common question and list a few common, well written answers which can be linked to subsequent duplicate questions?
Separate issue: Does anyone here know how to deal with random motion on non-flat objects?
15:45
@DanielSank Freeze them
@KyleKanos I think I'm a factor of 3 short of the rep for that.
Short on rep for what?
I was talking about dealing with random motions
Protecting questions. I must not understand what "freezing" is.
@DanielSank That's an idea we've already had ;)
@KyleKanos Oh. What do you mean by "freeze"?
15:48
@DanielSank I presume there's something moving on the surface of the non-flat object. If you freeze it, it'll stop moving. I was tying to be silly
@ACuriousMind: Ok, are you at all interested in putting heads together on an interpretations Q&A? I can make a github file or something so we can hash it out before posting here.
@KyleKanos Oh. A true comedian :P
Yeah, I can be funny.
Unfortunately I can't freeze this
Yeah, that seems to be beyond my 2 semesters of Sakurai QM that I had most recently (5 years ago)
@KyleKanos It's actually not a quantum mechanics question. It's a random-motion-on-a-sphere question.
I almost posted to Math. If nobody here answers I might get rid of all the physics background and ask there.
15:55
@DanielSank In principle, yes - but is there really a "common" question for these interpretations? I feel as if I always see more or less random questions about random details of random interpretations :P
@ACuriousMind What I mean is that if there were a Q&A which spelled out a few points of view on the general issue, I'd be comfortable voting to close the other "random questions" with a link to the canonical post.
@ACuriousMind: Here, if you feel like working on this please just clone this repo and write to your heart's content. Maybe we'll come up with something useful.
@DanielSank I'll try. Step 1: Learn github :D
@ACuriousMind: Oh! I can help if you want. The easiest thing to do at first is make an account, then log in and go to the page I linked.
Then you can edit the file just through your web browser.
To edit you click on the file name and then click the little pencil icon.
When you're done editing, scroll to the bottom of the edit page, type in a little description of what you did, and then click the green "commit changes" button.
That's it.
@ACuriousMind: Oh, and after you make an account just let me know the user name so I can give you permission to edit.
Dammit, I need to think of a new username, mine is already taken
ACuriouserMind?
16:09
UnknowledgeableProgrammer
^ lol
AnUnbalancedWebsurfer
ACupcake
^ wut?
IDK, just going with what pops in my head
Now I want a cupcake.
16:12
Go to the store and get one?
Weirdly, cafes selling cupcakes has become a "thing" around here recently.
Grocery store cupcakes don't deserve eating. I wonder if the cafe ones do...
Hmm, I'm in college town still
Me too.
We just passed a referendum that allows bars to be open on Sundays
I finally just chose the name of my profile picture here, EdwinOdesseiron
16:14
Is your name Edwin?
No, that is the name of the character of my profile picture here
My actual name may contain a bit too many umlauts :P
I see
I was going to ask if I could call you Eddie instead
But nevermind then
@ACuriousMind: What is the little icon github gave you?
It gives you a default profile pic which is a pixelated picture of something. What does yours look like?
@DanielSank It's...uh...an arrow pointing upwards, I think
Could also be a hut
@ACuriousMind: Ok, you can now edit files in that repository :D
@KyleKanos You must live in Ye Olde Protestantsville.
16:19
BibleBelt FTW
When I was in college you couldn't buy alcohol on Sundays.
There was one year I was in town over the summer for research and the 4th of July was on a Sunday.
People realized what was going on around 11am or so.
If you had bought your beer/etc ahead of time you were quite popular.
@DanielSank You can't buy anything (except at gas stations or the like) here on Sunday. All regular shops are closed.
@ACuriousMind Europe?
16:22
@DanielSank Germany, yes
I was talking to a pair of German friends of mine who described something similar.
@ACuriousMind Ah, yes.
This always baffles tourists from the US.
"La dee da I'm touring a European country. Gee, I'd like a sandwich."
*looks around, nothing open
"What the..?"
better not travel on sundays ! :D
16:41
...
I like learning new things
Today I learned how to script Python to do my images for me
17:34
Again no leap second at the latest New Year's Eve. :( But did people adjust their celebrations in 2005 and 2008?
17:56
...
What is with the insane number of Barron AP textbook questions?
its just one user right ?
i dont know why that user is trying to solve problems without knowing well anything ><
I wrote something in one of her posts saying that Physics.SE isn't a HW help site (my normal stamp)
is there some system in SE to stop users from spamming HW type Q's ?
18:00
I think if you ask enough bad questions there is a block put on
I'm not sure what the key value is
18:29
@KyleKanos matplotlib for the win?
I do 2D hydrodynamics on 60+ processors which requires high compression data formats (specifically HDF5 = hierarchical data format v 5)
VisIt allows python scripting, but, until today, I hadn't figured out how to script it such that it slides through all the outputs
(at least not without closing & reopening them)
18:49
@DanielSank there is potential for the new Engineering proposal
@SabreTooth Sure. The nature and relevance of that site to experimental physics questions will depend entirely on who frequents it.
I would see it as annoying if applied physics questions are expected to go there.
I'm also confused as to how to view "engineering" in light of the already existing "electrical engineering" site.
@DanielSank unfortunately, I see it as inevitable
@DanielSank Fluid dynamics, statics & mechanics?
@KyleKanos What about my work? My job title is "quantum electronics engineer". Where do I put questions about that? :P
It's probably good to have umbrella sites like "engineering". I guess you go there if a more specific site doesn't exist. That's an easy system to grok.
I was pointing out that engineering isn't just electrical engineering
18:54
i have a horrible feeling, my 'backyard physics' questions (all of them) would be migrated there, due to them not being TP
@KyleKanos Oh, indeed!
@SabreTooth I dunno. I asked an applied physics test question yesterday and it wasn't closed.
@DanielSank did you faint?
@SabreTooth Nope. I think I understand what gets applied questions closed now. When I posted ^that question I did not expect closure.
and CuriousOne did not mock you!
That part almost made me faint.
Kidding. He doesn't mock people AFAICT.
18:57
my questions are 'lower' down the totem pole than yours @DanielSank
He wasn't mocking you, you know.
@DanielSank very funny
He just has a particular... tone.
@SabreTooth Not trying to be funny. He wasn't mocking you, I don't think.
my questions have the double whammy...
Engineering (from Latin ingenium, meaning "cleverness" and ingeniare, meaning "to contrive, devise") is the application of scientific, economic, social, and practical knowledge in order to invent, design, build, maintain, research, and improve structures, machines, devices, systems, materials and processes. The discipline of engineering is extremely broad, and encompasses a range of more specialized fields of engineering, each with a more specific emphasis on particular areas of applied science, technology and types of application. == Definition == The American Engineers' Council for Professional...
18:59
my questions are not only applied, but atmospheric
00:00 - 19:0019:00 - 00:00

« first day (1520 days earlier)      last day (3707 days later) »