@JohnRennie The later books have their points to make, sure. But ... the points are made in the form of engaging narrative so they don't come across as polemics and he varies the particular nature of the point to be made from book to book so you don't feel like you are reading the same polemic over and over again.
Some of the points are very much of the time, but others are—perhaps—destined to be more enduring.
@dmckee maybe it sounds as if I'm being critical of the later books, and I certainly don't mean to be. There are no bad Terry Pratchett books. It's just that my own personal preference is for the more slapstick (as ACM put it) end of his range.
There aren't many books that will make me laugh out loud. Comedy is a very hard thing to get right in SFF and the genre is replete with authors who almost get it right. But Pratchett managed that feat with his early books.
@JMac I was going to mention that next time I bumped into you here. Don't you just love the subtle diplomatic approach of the xkcd mods? :D But now that pittsburghjoe's been banned on xkcd, he's come back to Physics.SE: physics.stackexchange.com/q/485407/123208
@JMac Well, The Light Fantastic does follow straight on from The Colour of Magic, but it has a slightly different feel. It's more of a single united story, rather than a collection of fairly separate episodes, like the CoM. It's not totally necessary to read them back to back, but they do have a strong linkage. And you definitely should read The Light Fantastic before any other Rincewind books.
But I agree that Mort is a good next choice. The character of Death is different from the glimpse we get of him in the CoM. But that applies a fair bit to the first 2 books, they have a lot of Early installment weirdness.
@JMac Another option is Pyramids, which isn't part of a sub-series, but it's a good idea to read it fairly soon because of its info about a slightly more modern Ankh-Morpork than its depiction in the 1st 2 books. It's quite funny, but some of the humour is rather dark, and it doesn't quite have the slapstick feel of the 1st 2 books, but there's still a fair bit of parody, unlike the later Discworld books, where Pratchett tends to use satire rather than direct parody.
For the record, I'm a hard-core Discworld addict. I started reading them before the 3rd book was published. I had a bit of a break for a few years, somewhere in the middle of the series, but in the last decade or so I got back into it. I've read all the older Discworld books at least 3 or 4 times, and the last half-dozen or so at least twice. Except for the final novel, The Shepherd's Crown, which I've only read once, so far.
hmm, I found the fundamental aspects of these quite interesting, but I cannot think of good examples of objects where firing these torus knot pulses at it will e.g. cause them to be twisted in certain ways, thus e.g. making unusual photo driven molecular motors
I can see that with so much extra angular degrees of freedom, the spectrocopy community may find it useful in structure elucidation, since it should be expected that different topological angular momentum will cause the object to be imaged to respond differently, thus prodviding richer information to e.g. resolve complex structures like proteins
The only thing I don't quite understand is, since a trefoil torus cannot be embeded in 3D space, which means it should self intersect (fig.1 showed the self intersection clearly), yet the experiment plots of the polarisation does not seemed to indicate the presence of these intersections. Where does the electric field point to at those locations of the beam?
@Secret the 3D plots in the paper are not in real space
the coordinates are (Ex,Ey) away from the center of the torus, and azimuthal real-space angle as the torus's azimuthal coordinate
self-intersection (to me -- this is a personal view) is ultimately fairly bogus, it depends on the embedding and how you draw tangent-space vectors on the (real-space) manifold itself, which isn't a thing
the knot lives in a four-dimensional space (2D real space + its 2D tangent space)
To Kill a Mockingbord didn't click for me in school. I have it on my list to do again with my new more grown-up sensibilities, but it hasn't happened yet. Then I'll think about it.
I supposed I just disagree and ought to be using a different website then. The idea that a "check my work" question is not allowed, and a question like this is answered in full, physics.stackexchange.com/questions/485479/…, leads me to simply give up and find another site. — Lopey Tall1 hour ago