« first day (3022 days earlier)      last day (1909 days later) » 

12:02 AM
What?
 
Ah, I thought you meant problem as in exercise but perhaps you mean in a test setting?
 
No I mean an exercise
Note I said “can’t”
 
Well, it is my view that exercises should be (sufficiently) challenging
And when you get stuck, you ask the nice folk here:P
 
@enumaris enjoy the training! I'm a month in and just now getting to actually work on things
With nice little bits of "oh we actually have to put in a ticket for you to access that"
Also Randall Monroe is publishing another book! xkcd.com/how-to
 
 
2 hours later…
1:49 AM
hello
how is the spherical basis motivated? defined here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_basis. seems like it is popping out of thin air.
 
@All I know the magnetic field is made up of invisible photons but what are invisible photons exactly and how do we see them? With what instrument?
 
you have to talk to a hermit on a mountain top.
 
@ScientistSmithYT I don’t think the description of a magnetic field being made up of photons is useful. Better to think of it as a field.
@dm__ what do you mean motivated? It’s motivated by spherically symmetric problems being easier to solve in that basis
 
2:04 AM
@JakeRose How do I predict how the magnetic field reacts with different elements if I just think of it as a field?
 
What do you mean ‘reacts’?
 
for example, why choose $e_{+} = -\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(e_{x}+i e_{y})$? it is complex, so I'm assuming I should not be thinking about it physically.
 
PS you’re even using the term field when you describe it
@dm__ have you covered spherical polar coordinates?
 
@JakeRose By react I mean how the elements behave when a certain magnetic field at a certain gauss measurement is exposed to the element.
 
yeah, but I am failing to see the connection
 
2:08 AM
What type of problems are you trying to solve? @dm__
@ScientistSmithYT you have to consider lots of things such as the materials relative permeability etc. Maxwells equations provide a solid bases to get most things and lots of nice tricks have been derived to deal with the problems.
Nowadays most things are done computationally though as real life situations don’t always have such nice symmetries
@ScientistSmithYT you should always think of the magnetic field as a field. Because that’s what’s it’s fundamentally defined to be.
 
@JakeRose Yeah, I get how real life symmetries aren’t as nice. The reason why I ask is because I’m trying to visualize how the magnetic field gets transferred into a material for a split second. Then become magnetized past a certain limit.
 
wigner eckhart one, but figure there's no use without understanding what this spherical basis is all about. all the vector operators are rewritten with it, but I don't see the physical connection to spherical coords
 
Such as the compounds NdFeB and Iron Nitride
 
@dm__ I thought you might be working on something else and accidentally stumbled upon the wrong wiki. I’m afraid I’m only a second year and don’t know much about what you’re doing sorry :’)
 
@JakeRose Then I’m trying to visualize that with the individual elements.
 
2:14 AM
no worries :)
 
@ScientistSmithYT it depends on the dimensions of the object. The values for relative permeability will be in a table somewhere and thus you can calculate how it behaves.
 
The dimensions of the NdFeB compound is 1 inch diameter by 1 inch thick. It is a cylinder shape.
 
@ScientistSmithYT it’s also gonna depend on the field it’s placed in
you only have to do the calculations if you want to know precisely how the field will look
 
A 3 Tesla magnetic field is what the material is going to be placed into.
 
you can make approximations in the centre of the cylinder and ignoring edge effects etc
3 Tesla?
 
2:17 AM
Yes
 
where did you steal an MRI machine from :’)
 
I made one myself through help and wanting a bore of 3 Tesla strength
 
If the material is isotopic and has a linear magnetisation then you can calculate the field
yiu can also do it if it isn’t linear but it probably requires computational efforts
 
For me that part is somewhat unknown.
 
Probanly bets to try and find some hysteresis curves for the magerial
 
2:20 AM
I do know that after 6,000 gauss the compound has it magnetic properties back.
 
Thatll contain everything (I think) you want to know
not familiar with the gauss unit sorry
what is it you want to know?
 
Oh that’s alright :) I want to know the exact Tesla measurement for getting to the full magnetization of the compound NdFeB.
As well as the measurement for iron nitride
 
Best to look at hysteresis curves I think then
I’m not an expert in this topic (I’ve only done one in depth EMAG course)
But hysteresis curves should contain a lot of the information
 
What will the hysteresis graph show me? I’ve seen one multiple times before but I’m shown the generic graph.
 
Tells you the magnetic field inside a material for s given applied external field
 
2:26 AM
Oh ok.
I will look into the hysteresis graphs then. Any good links for me or should I start with the wiki
 
If you want specific ones to your materials you should look in academic journals
You may have to pay for these. If you’re part of an academic institute they usually have licenses you can piggy back on (like mine does)
 
Ok, thanks :)
I’ll be willing to pay.
Are they within the $100 range?
 
They’re quite pricey
can be
but no guarantee that the paper you pay for is the one that has your material in
better to buy subscriptions so you can look at lots of oaoers
 
I’ll do that instead then
Thanks :)
 
 
1 hour later…
3:51 AM
@ScientistSmithYT The library at your local institution of higher learning almost certainly has an on-line catalog.
The journals themselves may well be in the stacks meaning you have to make a trip down there, but you should be able to tell if they have any prospects before you leave home.
Digging relevant papers out of bound copies on dusty shelves may seem every so twentieth century, but it is free to look and xerox charges are pretty low.
 
4:33 AM
How was the "Chernobyl won't be inhabitable for 20,000 years" estimate calculated? I thought the 137Cs has a t1⁄2 of only 30 years (and 238Pu is less than 90 years, 241Am is less than 500 years). Or is that figure just for the immediate area of the New Safe Containment? And if that is the case, are there public estimates available for the how long the area <in a 10 km radius, 100 km radius, etc.> will be uninhabitable?
 
5:31 AM
hellur?
can someone explain reducible cartesian tensor vs irreducible spherical tensor to me?
 
Anonymous
6:08 AM
Hmm, I didn't know Spivak has a mechanics book. It seems way less terse and much more readable than Arnold. Thanks to this answer.
 
7:02 AM
Meh. Kids should get off my lawn. And stuff.
A bare answer of "Because definition.", just doesn't do it for me.
We've seen several of these kinds of questions and answers lately, and they are right as far as they go. But to my mind the more interesting question is "How close to the currently defined value was this quantity when we were using historical definitions?" And I suppose the answer is mostly "Within the then achievable tolerance.", but those would be the interesting details. — dmckee ♦ 5 mins ago
 
7:39 AM
you fancy spherical tensors?
 
 
1 hour later…
8:47 AM
how does one sphere a tensor
heh
 
 
4 hours later…
12:32 PM
@Blue and @Chair You may like to look at our rules for the Python room. They work well for us, mostly. Of course, some of those rules won't be relevant here. But I think "Don't ask for answers to your fresh question on the main site" would work here. We do permit people to ask for meta-help to improve the question, though.
 
user351417
12:52 PM
@PM2Ring Indeed, if I hadn't known that the SO Python room had those rules, I wouldn't have written an answer for our meta post which talked about making chat a bit more active/interesting. However, I'm more concerned about making the rules direct regulars in the appropriate manner too (see ACM's answer to our meta discussion).
 
user351417
@ACuriousMind @Blue @JohnRennie Since you guys are probably the most active mods/ROs here, could you suggest what I should mention about the actions expected when someone thinks that there's some behavior getting out-of-hand? The SO python page has "If any behaviour in the room makes you feel uncomfortable, you may ping (@username) one of the room owners and we'll do our best to sort it out.
If you wish to contact the room owners privately, email us." Obviously I'm not planning to mention the whole thing about messages being deleted/users chat-banned, since most of us agree that it's not so
 
user351417
(I'm planning to write a basic version today and make it a CW post on our meta so everyone can help fix the messy parts)
 
user351417
I was thinking that we could make the guide a CW question, and we could keep the answers for suggestions (by people who aren't sure if they actually want to edit the guide). Does that seem OK?
 
user351417
On the other hand, making it CW may open it to abuse from people who don't like it. I imagine almost every physics chat user would have CW edit privileges, so if they don't like it, they could pull some vandalism. Rollbacks are easy of course, but that may get annoying.
 
user351417
I'm basing that idea upon the homework policy, wherein a lot of the people who rebel against that would probably be new users.
 
user351417
1:04 PM
Thoughts?
 
1:36 PM
@Chair Ah, right. :)
 
@Chair flagging is an option
 
user351417
@Mithrandir24601 You mean a chat flag? Wouldn't that go to any mod, not necessarily one who's aware of the room expectations?
 
1:52 PM
@Chair yeah, sure - if someone has done something that's generally not considered OK in a specific room, if that's mentioned in a flag, then another mod can either read the rules and act appropriately or actively find someone who does know the rules - it's also a way of getting more attention to something that needs to be dealt with, instead of pinging one person and hoping they're around (when there's something that needs to be dealt with now)
 
user351417
Ok okee, thanks! I'll mention flagging in the post then.
 
@Chair I'd say that flags aren't generally a great idea if it's just 'can you do this thing at some point?', as opposed to e.g. 'this person is misbehaving'
 
Flags are visible to all 10k+ users over the whole of the chat network which the room belongs to, so they can be annoying. But if someone is being rude / disrespectful, and no room owners are available, a flag is appropriate.
 
user351417
@PM2Ring I see a flag-for-moderation option, though I'm not sure how user-friendly this whole system is. To some extent, I'm not even sure who would be raising those issues involving room conduct violations.
 
2:09 PM
@PM2Ring mod-flags are only visible to mods though
 
@Mithrandir24601 True.
 
2:58 PM
@Chair Thanks for fixing the question from the "I can't accept negative values" kid. I did try to get him to break up his wall of text on a previous question (now deleted), but he didn't get it.
 
user351417
@PM2Ring I was hesitant to try that one, since he'd been a bit uncouth with a large number of comments the last time we interacted, but I figured that that post was salvageable to a certain extent.
 
user351417
I figured I'd give it a shot since he spent a week away (to cool down, if I remember).
 
user351417
He just doesn't learn that titles should be concise and text should have punctuation and paragraphs, does he? If he tries rollbacks, I'll actually be pretty damn pissed.
 
Sure, Indian writing systems are radically different to what we do in English, eg words often join together in a long stream with no spacing between the words, but that's no excuse, since English is taught in Indian schools from an early age.
 
user351417
@PM2Ring I dunno, my Hindi isn't that bad and I don't think that happens frequently. Of course, I was taught a pretty urban Hindi and I don't know if the shudh (pure) hindi uses english-like commas.
 
user351417
3:04 PM
Even Kannada (which I can understand but not read/speak) has commas. I don't know about the others, but apparently the structures of a lot of the other languages are similar enough to hindi.
 
Anonymous
@Chair ...
 
Anonymous
1. If someone's using outright offensive or crude language aimed at some other user, simply go ahead and flag it. If someone just swearing but it's not aimed at anyone, then you may or may not flag it. Use your discretion. In general, we're OK with playing along if someone drops the occasional undirected expletive. But if you get flagged for it (i.e. someone else finds it rude/offensive), you need to deal with it: you may have to sit out a 30-min suspension.
 
Anonymous
2. There are also some other subtle cases which are unhealthy for the general atmosphere of the room. For instance, if someone's trying to be passive aggressive at you or someone else, and you're uncomfortable, ping one of the mods or ROs in a one-to-one room or request one of the mods to start a private chat room with you. We'll sort it out.
 
Anonymous
3. If you're feeling uncomfortable about someone monologuing too much, ping one of the mods or ROs either in the main room or in a one-to-one room. We'll probably shift those messages to another room and deal with the specific user appropriately. However, be sensible while making such requests. If it's just a few lines of monologue (and isn't a regular pattern), then just let it be.
 
I don't know any Hindi, but I briefly studied Sanskrit for a while, a few decades ago. IIRC, punctuation marks don't really exist, but you may get a vertical bar marking the end of a line in poetry & scripture.
 
Anonymous
3:07 PM
Those are some points for now. I'll think of more. :)
 
user351417
@Blue Yikes, that's a bit much! Could I instead put 'monologue' under the 'generally-not-appreciated' catoegory (like pinging specific users), and just leave the 'what-should-I-do-when-I-don't-like-what's-going-on' section at flags for offensive stuff and one-to-one rooms for other unhealthy general stuff?
 
user351417
I'd like to avoid focusing on that because it could end up looking like we're too paranoid/we're expecting lots of misbehavior.
 
Anonymous
@Chair Sure, sure. I was just giving some pointers. :)
 
user351417
@Blue Maybe we could put that as one of the 'answers'... it's like side information which wouldn't be in the actual concise guide.
 
Anonymous
@Chair Good idea. Once you put that up, I'll add a bit more to this, and write it as an answer.
 
3:12 PM
@Chair Yes, the dominant Indian languages (and their writing systems) are all fairly close to Sanskrit, with Hindi being one of the closest. And modern Indian languages have been influenced by outside influences, from the Mogul and European invasions.
 
user351417
@PM2Ring Yeah, apparently Sanskrit's kinda strange in several ways. Honestly, I think that everything I've ever heard about it is extremely biased, one way or the other, so I'm not sure what I think of it. It never really seemed like a good idea to check it out for myself.
 
Many Indian members of the Stack communities have excellent English. But those that don't always seem to mess up the punctuation & capitalization. ;)
 
Anonymous
@Chair Well, initially we could make it CW so that the chat/site regulars can alter and modify a bit here and there. After a week or so, we can retract the CW status so that we can avoid the potential issues you mention.
 
user351417
@PM2Ring I think the reason why I can watch the Hindi news channels is that they say all the important words in English and the Hindi words are primarily just in the peripheral stuff.
 
user351417
@Blue That sounds perfect.
 
user351417
3:16 PM
@PM2Ring I sometimes feel that mine is deteriorating... my capitalization/punctuation is usually appropriate, but I think I loose track of the subject-verb things every now and then... which is pretty embarrassing since I have always studied in an english-medium school.
 
@Chair I didn't want to actually learn it, per se. I just wanted to get an overview, because I'm interested in linguistics, and Sanskrit is close to Proto-Indo-European. I did learn how to read & write devanagari, but that knowledge is now rather rusty, due to lack of practice.
 
user351417
With 5 answers there already, I think his post is about to go HNQ.
 
Anonymous
@Chair Are you writing up the draft in something like Google Docs?
 
user351417
@Blue I'm using the SE editor :P I could try a google docs thing though.
 
Anonymous
It's okay. Maybe before you post that, you could show it to us in Google Docs or something similar. That way, the other regulars here can give their inputs too, before the first version is posted on meta. :)
 
Anonymous
3:21 PM
Oh, and I've been thinking of relevant food and music references...and have been repeatedly failing to come up with something catchy. :P
 
user351417
I'm a bit hesitant to put my email-related stuff up though... I recently had an SE user send me some Viagra ads, and I think that linking it to my personal google account would make some of that information visible. While I have my first name on my about-me and I've had my last name around too, I'm not sure if I want the email id there.
 
user351417
I'll check out the system to see how it works though.
 
Anonymous
Actually, you could directly copy paste it to chat. It's simpler that way. :P
 
user351417
Loong though.
 
Anonymous
I'm sure there are "anonymous" alternatives to Google Docs, but I haven't used one. Lemme check.
 
user351417
3:24 PM
Eh I'll think of something once I've gotten most of the content together.
 
@Chair I hope not. But at least this question is better than the deleted one. And I guess the answers are useful.
 
user351417
@Blue I'm sure that even a quick screenshot of the thing would suffice; y'all can type the feedback in messages and edit the CW post once it's up.
 
user351417
@PM2Ring You mean deleted ones. :P But yes, it is approaching the doubt from a different perspective. Though my comment mentions that there are certain unclear bits, I do think that the question is understandable in the end.
 
Anonymous
@Chair Yup. Or even something like PasteOfCode could work. Anyway, no use of overthinking this beforehand. We'll see when the time comes!
 
user351417
In the context of food-related hbar titles, does anyone have any cool ideas?
 
Anonymous
3:29 PM
Pinned it. Let's hope someone can come up with a good idea. :P
 
Anonymous
Yesterday's ideas were all flop.
 
Anonymous
23 hours ago, by Blue
Relax...the h Bar is always open
We are programmed to receive
You can check out any time you like
But you can never leave!
 
user351417
@Blue I don't know why people hate that song so much. It's quite fun!
 
user351417
Try replacing all the "I"s with "Greg"s.
 
user351417
It makes every song even more interesting.
 
Anonymous
3:30 PM
Lol. Maybe they just find it creepy. I was amazed at the number of conspiracy theories about the Hotel California lyrics. :P
 
Anonymous
Read through the comment thread here for instance.
 
user351417
Me thinking of food puns is like
 
user351417
 
Anonymous
Lolol
 
user351417
I dare you to redact that one :P
 
Anonymous
3:32 PM
I'm cool with tetrathonks. ;)
 
user351417
I have leaked a highly sensitive image of myself, so you might as well get rid of it ;)
 
user351417
Or star it.
 
user351417
Whichever one works better.
 
Anonymous
Star!
 
Anonymous
On a serious note, I gotta go and finish my homework. Cya, all! :P
 
user351417
3:34 PM
This isn't the last you've seen of me!
 
Anonymous
Happy Tetrathonking!
 
user351417
You should have said "I'll be back" terminator-style instead.
 
user351417
Can we have a poll regarding the best food picture we've had here over the last few weeks/months? I think one picture would make a nice addition to that meta post I'm writing. We can use stars to vote because it'll fill our starboard with nice stuff.
 
user351417
(regarding that removed message) No, maybe that'd be a bad idea. Never mind.
 
5:21 PM
eating a meal makes me listless. I don't particularly like that Sour Spicy noodles. I eat them just to stave off hunger.
 
5:32 PM
@Blue nice knot
it's missing its torus, though
 
vzn
6:07 PM
@Chair [X] none of the above
 
6:18 PM
@Chair we shouldn't use the stars to vote because it'll clutter the star board.
 
@Chair 1. Definitely don't tell people to email the ROs. 2. Tell people to raise a chat flag for stuff that needs immediate action, but use a mod flag for anything that is not obviously rude/abusive. 3. Ping ROs for anything that can wait, possibly with a request to talk privately if it is not suitable for public discussion.
 
@PM2Ring Honestly, ever since they started offering french as a second language in Indian schools I'm pretty sure none of the kids know their devnagri
The hbar may or may not be serving poisoned tequila to cats until observed
Well just in case anyone didn't get the joke it's on the schrödingers cat
It's not very good, is it?
 
6:33 PM
How is poisoned tequila different from normal tequila? :P
 
I don't know what's the punchline?
 
Anonymous
@EmilioPisanty Thanks. :P
 
Anonymous
@EmilioPisanty Torus? O_o
 
@Blue it is a torus knot, no?
 
Anonymous
@EmilioPisanty Oh, I see. It is!
 
6:37 PM
@Blue it's also missing its inner trefoils
 
Anonymous
@EmilioPisanty I think these diagrams are conventional when talking about tricolorability.
 
Anonymous
In the mathematical field of knot theory, the tricolorability of a knot is the ability of a knot to be colored with three colors subject to certain rules. Tricolorability is an isotopy invariant, and hence can be used to distinguish between two different (non-isotopic) knots. In particular, since the unknot is not tricolorable, any tricolorable knot is necessarily nontrivial. == Rules of tricolorability == A knot is tricolorable if each strand of the knot diagram can be colored one of three colors, subject to the following rules: 1. At least two colors must be used, and 2. At each crossing, the...
 
Anonymous
They don't show the whole picture intentionally.
 
@Blue oh, no I was talking more in terms of this
 
Anonymous
 
6:39 PM
the multi-color curve is a trefoil knot
you can also replace the trefoils with triangles
and then the torus is much more obvious
 
Anonymous
@EmilioPisanty Aha, lovely. I didn't know this! :)
 
@Blue well, this is just me and my manipulations
though actually, come to think of it
yes
 
Anonymous
Tbh I really don't know much about knot theory apart from what is written in the couple of Wiki articles. I should definitely read more. Balarka had once suggested me a nice book...I forget the name...
 
I can accuse you of plagiarizing my profile picture
=P
 
Anonymous
Hehe. :P
 
Anonymous
6:45 PM
Jul 3 '18 at 17:07, by Balarka Sen
@heather If you want to read some cool topology without having to go down the rabbithole, try Colin Adam's "Knot Book".
 
Anonymous
Found it!
 
@Blue 30 second question. The convention is to use public methods or private methods?
I remember that we use private data members but I cant recall if we use public/ private methods
 
@Blue that's one scary book
 
(Please reply because I have my ISC practical today and I suddenly forgot this)
 
the amount of trivial-sounding statements sprinkled throughout it and marked Open Problem is unsettling
 
Anonymous
6:55 PM
3
Q: When to use private methods?

simonI understand what public/protected/private accessors mean in Java or PHP for instance. However, when would you choose whether to make a method private? Imagine I have a class that handles configuration strings - they must conform to a particular regular expression, and if so, further logic is pe...

 
Anonymous
In ISC you can always use public methods (unless they tell you to use private methods, of course).
 
Anonymous
@EmilioPisanty Is it? I was thinking of buying a copy. :/
 
Anonymous
Do you know any other book?
 
Anonymous
I'd prefer something with nice pictures. :)
 
@Blue The answers there are all terrible :P You use private methods for things others shouldn't call and public methods for those others should call.
 
6:58 PM
@Blue oh, no, it's great
you should absolutely read it if you're looking to get into knot theory
it's the most readable introduction I found
I mean, I've already cited it in the "I know you're a physicist and you're only going to skim it, though you might dig in somewhat" slot
@Blue nice pictures are kind of inevitable in a knot-theory book, y'know
 
Anonymous
95
A: Why "private" methods in the object oriented?

trzewiczekLot of good answers, but maybe one more from a self-taught Java programmer as I went through all that by myself with a lot of pain ;) Think about a Class as something seen from the outside, not as something you see internally. If you look at a Class from the outside, what you see? Taking the cl...

 
Anonymous
This is a better answer.
 
Anonymous
@EmilioPisanty Hehe, I'll give it a go during the vacations then. :)
 
@Blue Thanks.
 
Anonymous
@EmilioPisanty There are some ancient knot theory books too I guess (with only black and white pics). :P
 
Anonymous
7:02 PM
That reminds me...when/how/by-whom was knot theory invented/discovered?
 
Anonymous
> The original motivation for the founders of knot theory was to create a table of knots and links, which are knots of several components entangled with each other. More than six billion knots and links have been tabulated since the beginnings of knot theory in the 19th century.
 
Anonymous
That doesn't sound much of a "motivation". Maybe for the pure math guys... :P
 
Anonymous
Aha, this looks nice.
 
Anonymous
7:20 PM
Hmm, I think I'll get to pick up some of this if I get into a topological QC project. Gotta search something like that for the summer. I was recently flabbergasted seeing the amount of knot theory used in a Jones polynomial paper...so it even shows up in complexity theory.
 
7:37 PM
@Blue One of the physical motivations was to explain particles as knots in the aether. Vortices & knots seemed like viable alternatives to point particles, which were never very popular, due to the infinities they usually entail.
Bear in mind that before QM, physics was very wave oriented, and corpuscles were unpopular & old-fashioned. The chemists liked them, but nobody else did, and it was generally assumed that some kind of wave theory would explain the chemists' atoms. Eg, Mach could never bring himself to accept that atoms are really particles.
 
any mods around?
there's a conversation on meta that I think I should bow out of early, with a moderator taking over
(about a bounty being set by someone's sibling)
I've flagged it, anyways
 
Anonymous
@EmilioPisanty Hmm, I'd recommend not engaging with them. You don't really need to reply. Just flag and move on.
 
Anonymous
The PSE mods should notice the flags, yeah.
 
@Blue well, it feels like someone ought to reply
 
Anonymous
Meh, I'd just nuke the comments altogether. They're just being annoying now.
 
Anonymous
7:52 PM
@PM2Ring Aha. Interesting.
 
Anonymous
Do you have any references?
 
@EmilioPisanty I'll be there in five.
 
@Blue Here's something that's relatively recent: phys.org/news/2017-06-magnetic-nanoknots-evoke-lord-kelvin.html
@EmilioPisanty Luna's English comprehension skills are rather patchy. Eg
@M.Enns can you please reword what you said because I do not understand it — Luna 49 mins ago
 
@PM2Ring knotted skyrmions
bejeesus
 
Ok, M. Enns used an adjective instead of the adverb, but that shouldn't be a big barrier to understanding.
@EmilioPisanty :) Yeah, they're pretty radical.
 
8:05 PM
tbh I don't really understand how you'd even start making those
skyrmions are 2D, knots are 3D
do you just stack skyrmions on top of each other, and then twist that stack into a knot?
 
@EmilioPisanty No idea. I found that link moments before posting it, and I only skimmed the article briefly.
 
hmmmm, worth a closer look
the one I really want to see is the optical hopfion from p. 9 at jeangilder.it/icoam2017/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/…
but it still hasn't made the published literature, for some reason
 
The stuff I posted earlier was coming from memory, and I haven't thought about vortex theory for 20 years or more. I knew it was big, but I'd even forgotten that Lord Kelvin was a leading proponent. FWIW, vortex theories of gravity & matter go back to Descartes, if not earlier. But IIRC Kelvin was the one who introduced the concept of knotted vortices.
@EmilioPisanty Whoa! That stuff's way beyond my paygrade. Nice picture though. I bet John Baez likes that kind of thing... and his buddy Greg Egan could write an app to make animated diagrams.
 
8:37 PM
Can the flat space time metric really be negative? What does this mean?
 
vzn
9:12 PM
@PM2Ring Maxwell was also an advocate but most of that has been whitewashed airbrushed out of textbook history. suspect 19th century physics was not all wrong and think baby got thrown out with bathwater™
 
9:35 PM
Tensor problem for anyone interested. Hints are welcome! Consider the traceless symmetric Cartestian tensor $T_{ij}=S_{i}S_{j}-\frac{1}{3}\vec{S}\cdot\vec{S}$. Construct from it the 5 components of a related spherical tensor $T_m^2$, where $m = -2, -1, 0, 1, 2$.
 
9:47 PM
0
Q: Is it ok to edit to up vote?

MuzeI made the mistake of down voting an answer to a question I didn't completely understand. Years later I read it again and found it to be good. Is it OK to improve on an answers minor grammar for the purpose to reverse and up vote an answer? https://physics.stackexchange.com/a/122082/148704

 
Anonymous
@dm__ Please be patient. Don't repeat your question. If someone's interested they'll answer, otherwise you'll have better luck on the main site.
 
Copy that
 
@dm__ 1. Your expression is notationally inconsistent, there should be a $\delta_{ij}$ in the second term so that all summands have the same free indices. 2. Your question is answered by eqs. (32)-(34) here with where $v$ and $w$ are both replaced by your $S$
 
10:03 PM
@PM2Ring it seems I was only half right
indeed you stack the skyrmions on top of each other
and then you twist the stack
but only the spatial dependence
the center of the skyrmion remain pointing in one absolute direction
which therefore means that the magnetization of the skyrmion looks different relative to each 'layer' of the stack at different points
but that doesn't matter that much, a skyrmion is still a skyrmion if you rotate everything by a constant angle
still, though
that's one hella crazy vectorial object to try and visualize
I'm not surprised they went minimalistic and just used iso-surfaces of constant vector magnetization
 
@EmilioPisanty I already said that :P
 
d'ough
anyways
@dm__ The prescription $x_i \mapsto x_i x_j -\frac13\delta_{ij} x_kx_k$ generates a cartesian tensor
 
@EmilioPisanty But for the whole thing to be a knot, wouldn't you have to somehow connect the top of the stack to the bottom?
 
but you also have the prescription $\vec x \mapsto r^2 Y_{2m}(\theta,\phi)$ giving you a spherical tensor
then comes the real hint: $\vec x \mapsto r^\ell Y_{\ell m}(\theta,\phi)$ is a homogeneous polynomial in the Cartesian components of $\vec x$
(it's called a solid harmonic)
that core structure is sufficient to build your spherical tensor.
@ACuriousMind yes, obviously ;-)
 
10:52 PM
@All... I have been doing an experiment where I thought I knew what was happening but new things keep popping up and it changes what I think happens. Here’s the info... continues...
@AllI have the materials. An aluminum high purity bowl, a Neodymium grade N45 1 Inch dia by 1 inch thick magnet, and an aluminum magnet wire coil.
As well as an amplifier
I play sound through the amplifier which goes into the magnet wire coil
Then I move the Neodymium magnet in slowly and out slowly. As I slowly get closer(minimizing the eddy currents) the sound is amplified into the aluminum bowl
The coil is not touching the aluminum bowl and the Neodymium magnet isn’t touching the coil
Just with the coil being at a set distance from the aluminum bowl it makes sound through the aluminum bowl. And I get that due to eddy currents. But what I don’t get is why the sound gets louder. A note to take is that the coil is stationary
I superglued the magnet wire to a stand. And the stand, aluminum bowl and Neodymium magnet is all separate and isolated from vibrations.
the sound or volume level is set at the same loudness the whole time.
The sound is louder than just air movements and small eddy currents. It’s is louder than expected.
What is happening here? Can anybody explain to me what is happening?
My hypothesis was that it was Electromagnetic Radiation Induction.
 
11:10 PM
@EmilioPisanty thanks!
 

« first day (3022 days earlier)      last day (1909 days later) »