« first day (2763 days earlier)      last day (2184 days later) » 

3:29 AM
0
Q: What is the source for Osmium's colour?

ShroomZedThe majority of metals are known for appearing grey to our eyes, but the main exceptions to this are the "famous" group eleven metals, where their distinctive colours have been adequately explained before due to electron bands and the jump from d to s shells (along with the relativistic effects h...

 
4:12 AM
@Mithrandir24601 Was it good? :-)
 
 
1 hour later…
5:30 AM
@BalarkaSen mein sides
 
5:49 AM
IT spins
$S(n) + pin(4) = Spin(4)$
%$n=?$%
Prufer grop:
2,3,5,7,11,13,....
yesterday, by Mithrandir24601
@JakeRose Just you wait...
21 hours ago, by John Rennie
To be fair she's very good at what she does. She's paid to entertain, and she does that well.
17 hours ago, by Secret
dies
yesterday, by Loong
@JohnRennie Taisho is a bot.
When will it be the day when the stairwell can be used to compose a message
2
ugh, starwall stupid autocorrect
The Supreme Court does have some nice stairs
 
6:40 AM
All "supreme" buildings have nice stairs.
 
hello
10th results coming from 4 hours from now, I'm dead
 
Mornin'
 
@NovaliumCompany Morning :-)
 
6:59 AM
henlo
 
olnhe
 
@Secret what are you doing?
 
7:56 AM
May 22 at 12:05, by Slereah
"One first cute improvement appears in the list of authors. Aside from Aharonov, Cohen, and Elitzur – who have produced lots of garbage about "weak measurements" over the years – another stellar co-author has been added, the crackpot-in-chief Lee Smolin."
 
@JohnRennie Oh yes :) It was very nice :)
 
Meanwhile I am curious why vzn found this ok since whoever behind this quote is, is criticising something he likes alot
The h bar has many instabilities, but nothing truimphs a Slereah Instability
2
> in h bar we discuss everything except physics!!!
In other news, still no good news from wormhole research
seems that paper that showed wormhole violate WEC basically put a nail in the coffin of wormholes
 
@Secret XD
 
8:25 AM
@Secret What is a "slereah instability" ?
 
whenever he er... forgot to address where certainquotes came from that might be disputed
 
@Secret lol
 
9:12 AM
@Slereah the best one from the ancient lores of Petersonian twitterism: twitter.com/jordanbpeterson/status/224723751504326658
 
Sid
@BalarkaSen it seems you are stalking JBP now
 
I'm just reading his RationalWiki article
it's so flipping good
 
9:34 AM
@BalarkaSen Sorry, this content is no longer available
No big surprise
Damn soft sciences
 
I am afraid he does
 
hello
I got my results for class 10th
I scored 85%
 
noice
 
very noice
 
9:41 AM
congrats
 
I think I wrote my exams that time with a fountain pen
 
thanks
I wrote with pencil and pen
 
Really liked foundatin pens
 
I just use crayons
 
submit articles to JHEP written with crayon
 
9:43 AM
One first cute improvement appears in the list of authors:
JPB who publish lunatics
 
What did Jordan do now?
 
I write with chalk and blackboard
 
I write with a blackboard too
 
Aside from Jordan, Perterson, and Jaywalking
– who have produced lots of garbage about "semen"
 
9:44 AM
XD
 
over the years –
 
@secret I got my results, I scored 85%
 
another stellar co-author has been added, the lunatic-in-chief SPJB"
@AbhasKumarSinha nice
 
Are people fighting again because of Jordan?
 
THe helium balloon will be trapped in a time loop until the Slereah Instability is resolved
Likewise for Jordan Whatever Peterson
There can be no piece in h bar times pi
 
9:46 AM
@secret Thanks
 
It's ashame Avantgarde get pulled into this mess, but we will get the timing better next time
Sincerely, The Labs
 
sperm and semen are different
 
I didn't even know there was a mess.
 
oh yeah, as every biological book will tell you, the latter is a mixture of different fluids and male sex hormones
 
Semen is released from Prostate Glands and Sperm with Testosterone Hormone
 
9:49 AM
Biology in a physics chat room. Oh well! xD
 
yesterday, by user187604
@JohnRennie @Blue in h bar we discuss everything except physics!!!
 
that's style
 
Another flagfest?
 
9:52 AM
what is flagged this time?
 
flag is flagged
 
I considered you are talking about Jordan algebra. I recently see the term Jordan algebra often, wondering what it is.
 
I see that my message about flagfest was flagged. Ultimate irony :-)
4
 
uh... I am not that familiar with Jordan algebra, thus I cannot really have talked about it
 
I have looked up Jordan algebra in Wikipedia but have not clarified myself about it. Too many math terms I don't know. For example, I don't know what "unital" in "unital associative algebras" means.
 
9:59 AM
Unital means there's a multiplicative identity.
 
Jordan Peterson algebra?
 
In abstract algebra, a Jordan algebra is an nonassociative algebra over a field whose multiplication satisfies the following axioms: x y = y x {\displaystyle xy=yx} (commutative law) ( x y ) ( x x ) = x ( y ( x x ) ) {\displaystyle (xy)(xx)=x(y(xx))} (Jordan identity). The product of two elements x and y in a Jordan algebra is also denoted x ∘ y, particularly...
No, it has nothing to do with jordan peterson
It is one of the common nonassociative algebras besides lie algebra
 
I was joking.
 
@DawoodibnKareem then I probably know what unital means. thank you very much. Wikipedia uses the term "a multiplicative unit", which confused me much.
 
10:16 AM
allo
 
ello
 
no more
 
today I waked from dream with a vivid classroom full of classmates, some of them are my senior high school classmates.
 
10:22 AM
XD
I too get some dreams like that
 
What made it so "vivid"?
 
vivid word
 
Why did you wake up? Was it not a good dream?
 
@Avantgarde because the classroom is full of classmates.
 
10:23 AM
Classrooms are supposed to be full of classmates.
3
 
I used to be in a research institute which is so desolate most of time; I felt it like a desert.
 
Were you the only researcher there?
 
desert
dessert
 
@Avantgarde not that way, but not many colleagues. In the beginning, my boss was my only colleague; afterwards, he employed two other research assistants but they were not congenial to me.
 
@CaptainBohemian That's not a very healthy situation.
 
10:33 AM
@Avantgarde indeed. I shared an office with a postdoctor, who also lacked colleagues and seemed to feel very lonely so every day called someone to talk with his conversation disturbing me.
 
@CaptainBohemian I can imagine
 
that kind of desperate loneliness never occurred when I was in school, which is always a vivid campus on school days.
 
Yeah that's right.
Hopefully you don't have a similar situation anymore
 
 
@Avantgarde I have left that institute, and afterwards my boss also left that institute because of social relation--most people in that institute seemed not to be congenial to him.
well, I would say I really hate frequent solitude. I prefer to be surrounded by congenial people most of time.
 
10:44 AM
For me it depends, I can handle some solitude if I am focused on some task or hobby, but I cannot be solitary for extended periods of time
 
in my dreamland, I am always surrounded with people, even people I don't know in reality.
 
As for me, my dreams can be full of people or have no people at all
 
I don't have many hobbies, I guess, because I seem to do everything seriously.
 
Anonymous
@CaptainBohemian Interestingly, I feel lonlier when I'm surrounded by more people (N>3). I find it quite hard to blend into the crowd. However, when there are just one or two people in the room I seem to be able to converse more easily.
 
Anonymous
There must be a term for that...
 
10:49 AM
introvert? but that sounds too broad
 
Anonymous
Sort of I guess. Funny how my online identity is pretty much the exact opposite of my real life identity :P
 
Anonymous
Everything changes when you don't hear people's voices or see their faces
 
@Blue I seldom feel lonely when being surrounded with congenial people. I would only feel lonely when I am completely alone.
 
Anonymous
Hmm, but it's quite rare to have a lot of "congenial people" around you
 
even fighting with my enemy makes me less lonely than being completely alone.
 
10:53 AM
My social dynamics follows the following pattern:
Statistics:
Pairs: 8
Trios: 8
Quads: 3
Quintet: 4
Sextets: 2
Medium scale (6 < x < 10): 1 (x = 8) 1 (x = 7)
Large scale (> 10): 6
which means I am most stable when in pairs and trios
 
Anonymous
@CaptainBohemian That's probably because your enemies are human. If it was a giant alien intending to cut you into parts and testing you, you would feel differently :P
 
I felt more lonely when being with people who are indifferent
 
@Blue actually my fighting just means quarrel, which I have encountered since adulthood. I have fighted with boys when in primary school.
 
and sometimes that loneliness will be strong enough to make their day bad because of my frustration
I, however like being with people who are congenial, including those who have opposite worldview to mine as long they respect
 
Anonymous
@Secret Yes, that is true
 
Anonymous
11:00 AM
Apparently there's some sort of mental satisfaction gained by appearing tough and indifferent
 
and that indifference is a complete waste of efficiency
I wish I could just erase these people from existence but the law forbid me to do so
 
Anonymous
Tbh, I would not associate a static behavioural characteristic to such people. Everyone keeps changing with time. I don't think I am the same 5 years into the past or the future.
 
well that's true
 
Anonymous
11:22 AM
@Secret I tried a little experiment once. I concluded that the initial days of your interaction with a group matters a lot. The saying "first impression is last impression" is very true in social settings. Say in the first 3 days with a group you behave like a loner: people will mentally label you as a loner and after that even if you try it gets quite difficult to change that notion, both for you and them. People have a strong preference for "homeostasis".
 
Anonymous
On the other hand if you're (say) feisty in the initial days, they'll label you as that for the rest of the time. So, perhaps, some of the people who appear indifferent to you, are not indifferent by "free will". In fact it might be possible that they're trying to get out of that and be more cheerful and congenial, but guilt is holding them back :)
 
11:49 AM
\o @MartinSleziak & @Jim
 
He's drowning again!
 
:(
 
12:33 PM
:(
 
>8(
 
Jim
@skull what's up?
 
Chillin, pal @Jim how are you?
 
Jim
pretty good. Not doin too much, just at waork
 
 
1 hour later…
1:51 PM
 
Wheeeeeeeeeeeeeeel
 
2:32 PM
In other news...
Still none of my calculations are working
 
2:54 PM
hi
 
3:53 PM
what's a physics chat session
 
@enumaris in the early days of the chat room it was very quiet, so we organised a regular chat session for an hour every two weeks to try and draw people in. We'd have a subject to discuss.
 
hmmm
what's the topic today?
 
These days the room is busy enough that we don't bother, but we never got around to cancelling the scheduled event.
Just ignore the notification.
 
I see
lol
 
Unless of course there is some subject that you desperately want to talk about :-)
 
3:57 PM
not really lol
 
vzn
@enumaris how about cosmic censorshp :)
 
I don't know much about it
 
vzn
@enumaris ah, beginners mind maybe, you said you read wald and thats quite significant.
 
These days I am so busy to meddle with either quantum or GR
 
vzn
@Secret quantum chemistry right?
 
4:03 PM
I read Wald a while back
 
yup, and you will understand how messy this new batch of calculation is when you see this table:
 
and I can't really recall what his comments on cosmic censorship were...
 
Red colours = fail, green colours = success, white, black = unable to read file
I just grab some advice from Periodic Table chat and will try higher spin states next
 
vzn
@enumaris the field has probably evolved substantially since he surveyed it, but it seemed to be helpful earlierish survey
 
Mostly I recall reading about very technical definitions for the global structure of spacetimes and the singularity theorems of Penrose and Hawking
but I can't even reproduce those arguments anymore lol
 
vzn
4:05 PM
@enumaris skimmed it (after you cited it, thx), he had maybe ~1 dozen pgs & related material etc
 
quantum cloud computing...
sounds like a jumbo of buzz words
lol
jumble?
 
vzn
@Secret QM + biology! interested in that field & have collected misc links on it over the yrs, emerging, even... paradigm shift :)
 
jumble
 
Who needs that when you have Weizsäcker?
 
4:08 PM
quantum biology was previously being driven back due to many conflicting reports and papers, but it is good that a nature article suggested the effect is actually there
 
vzn
@enumaris cmon dude thats what physics is these days :P ("jumbo jumble"!)
@Lozansky ?
 
vzn
@Lozansky ok, but what were you referring to ("who needs that?"). are you familiar with some of that? hmmm
> The theory is based on the liquid drop model proposed by George Gamow, which can account for most of the terms in the formula and gives rough estimates for the values of the coefficients.
 
It was in jest as a reply to "quantum cloud computing"
It can for example be used to approximate binding energies for molecules
 
vzn
@Lozansky looks like an interesting theory reminds me of... fluid dynamics/ pilot wave hydrodynamics, solitons :)
> The liquid drop model in nuclear physics treats the nucleus as a drop of incompressible nuclear fluid of very high density. It was first proposed by George Gamow and then developed by Niels Bohr and John Archibald Wheeler.
also reminds me of this ran across recently "black hole electron" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole_electron
 
4:23 PM
nuclear physics...mmm
 
vzn
@enumaris so hows the ML going? have you heard of auto ML? am interested/ looking into that lately
 
4:36 PM
I've been learning reinforcement learning lately
I've heard of automl but I don't know much about it
 
vzn
@enumaris its relatively new tech, google has an early cloud version this year but its for vision only right now
 
I find reinforcement learning to be much closer to what I would consider "A.I." than the supervised and unsupervised learning I've encountered thus far
 
vzn
hmmm, googling around, cutting edge research on gamow liquid drop model arxiv.org/abs/1708.04292
> The liquid drop model (3) was introduced to describe nuclear structure. In fact it appears in various other contexts (mathematical and physical) to describe systems with competition between short- and long-range effects on many scales, from the nuclear to nanoscale (in condensed matter systems), to centimeter scale (for fluids and autocatalytic reaction-diffusion systems,) and even on cosmological scales. (p6)
@enumaris awesome stuff, RL beat worlds best Go player, its semirevolutionary, think it will advance further... saw the deepmind Go documentary a few mos ago, highly recommend it, lively/ fascinating
 
yeah...
it's a combination of traditional RL techniques and deep learning that did the trick
 
@Lozansky all I can say is... Vive la Quantum!
4
 
vzn
4:47 PM
@Mithrandir24601 congrats on the new site & your election. hows the mod'ing going? any highlights from your mtgs so far? any (aptly named!) strangeworks news?
 
@Mithrandir24601 You should randomly tunnel mesages from other chat rooms into that one :P
 
vzn
@enumaris hypothesize RL can be viewed as a more general scheme/ theory of "(systematically) exploring the environment" to potentially highly substantial effect vzn1.wordpress.com/2018/01/04/…
 
I'm gonna slowly write a small RL library for myself
streamline my use of RL algorithms
heh
 
vzn
+ ML increasingly showing up a lot more in physics with innovative/ substantial/ promising uses/ results, am gonna write up/ blog a set of links sooner or later... yet another paradigm shift™
 
@JohnRennie Well, in theory we keep meaning to revise the idea of what we do in these sessions, but we never really get around to that, either ;)
 
4:58 PM
@Lozansky I could... :P
 
@Mithrandir24601 Writing a bot that moves around chat messages at random? That's one way to lose the diamond, I guess... :P
 
@ACuriousMind there's a lot to be said for constructive procrastination. It's a surprisingly effective management technique :-)
 
vzn
lol on other hand a bot might liven up this wkly chat session o_O :P
 
@vzn thanks! :) It's been reasonable so far - nothing's gone majority wrong yet. We'd like more people, but hopefully that will come with time
 
vzn
@Mithrandir24601 IBM ~50 qubits + Google ~72 going live sooner or later should help some! really hope to see some major results in the area soon, but it seems very alive... intel making some noises also... :)
 
5:02 PM
@ACuriousMind Yeah... that's not a good idea :P But it's not like there hasn't been conversations in here about quantum computing. Not that I'd do such a thing :P
 
vzn
@Mithrandir24601 there have been some very lively conversations over the years in here on QC, have enjoyed some myself (notably with DS), but maybe you guys will specialize in that now (amazingly, not everyone in physics/ elsewhere is a fan of QC...)
 
QC will become relevant to us chemists when it reaches at least 500 qubits
 
@vzn yeah, I hope so, once we get some more chat users
 
but already in the field of diatomics and nuclear physics it is promising
 
vzn
@Mithrandir24601 it seems to be extremely challenging to build up chat rooms/ activity on SE, spking from long experience. even harder than building up main sites (which is already very challenging.) have really long wished SE/ mgt could be of more assistance in the area & that there were other ways/ methods etc
 
5:18 PM
@vzn we've got a few users but not much in the way of conversations :/
 
vzn
@Mithrandir24601 if your chat room doesnt need pings by the mods every 2wks to stay alive youre doing better than even some major/ long est sites such as MathOverflow!
 
@vzn huh. We're doing better than that at least...
 
@Slereah amazon.com/…
I think this is one of those group books you can trust
 
I'll give it a look
 
vzn
5:35 PM
@Mithrandir24601 idea: someone from your site could be a speaker for a physics session and mention your Quantum Computing site/ chat etc, keep it in mind, these seem to work out better in the summer (maybe wrt peoples schedules... ps thx again re your participation) :) physics.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/7783/…
 
6:20 PM
@0celo7 poor Roseanne
Having skimmed through it, it looks really complete, maybe too complete
 
6:59 PM
Hmm, doesn't construct the exceptionals :\
 
only string theorists and that guy Motl hates care about the exceptional groups
 
that's the one
 
 
2 hours later…
8:45 PM
 
9:17 PM
Not happy with it anymore, back to these notes wuzhengyao.oschina.io/homepage/Lie.pdf with Humphreys :\
 
 
2 hours later…
11:08 PM
Quick question. If $\int_{a}^{b} f(x) dx = F(b)-F(a)$ for $F'(x)=f(x)$, does that necessarily imply $f$ is continuous?
 
@SirCumference Forget about the integral, any derivative is continuous.
 
@ACuriousMind There seem to be examples of piecewise functions with discontinuous derivatives
Most people cite
$$
f(x) = \begin{cases}
x^2 \sin(1/x) &\mbox{if } x \neq 0 \\
0 & \mbox{if } x=0.
\end{cases}
$$
 
Ah, I forgot about the difference between differentiable and continuously differentiable because it never matters, you'll always just add the assumption that the function is continously differentiable if you need it :P
But if you know that counterexample, what is your question?
 
Is the fundamental theorem of calculus ever useable for discontinuous functions?
 
@SirCumference I suspect that the fact that what Wiki calls the "second part" of the fundamental theory does not require continuity implies the answer to your question is "no".
 
11:31 PM
weez
I learned long ago to never bother with worrying about smoothness
just assume everything is smooth
or just assume everything is analytic
 

« first day (2763 days earlier)      last day (2184 days later) »