« first day (2634 days earlier)      last day (2300 days later) » 

7:00 PM
or, rather, trying to convince myself that geometry is correct
 
Anonymous
I've lately been looking into the applications of percolation in cell and tissue generation. So far, not much luck :/ Adsorption looks like a nice avenue. I'm still stuck with trying to find invariants and power law scaling at the critical points
 
vzn
> Maxwell's and other scientists interest with so-called "cat turning" was reputed to have caused the death of many cats after being dropped from windows of multi-storied buildings.[citation needed]
 
HAHAHA
 
I hate scientists for this
 
Anonymous
Someone on math overflow said that power law doesn't exist unless correlation length diverges
 
Anonymous
7:02 PM
That's bad news
 
vzn
@BalarkaSen going on ~5yr blog/ collatz etc :)
 
Anonymous
@vzn 5 years is a lot
 
Anonymous
Congrats
 
Anonymous
I can't keep up for 5 days
 
@Yashas lack of citations?
 
vzn
7:03 PM
now wondering if schroedinger was influenced/ inspired by maxwell etc! o_O
 
@Slereah tossing cats out of windows of buildings
 
vzn
@Blue thx man :) not easy yeah. sometimes think entire "center of gravity" of cyberspace moving to facebook/ twitter etc o_O
 
wait is Yahas the guy who feeds the ants
 
vzn
@Blue ps lol saw your script idea back there :)
 
Anonymous
7:05 PM
@vzn Which script?
 
vzn
or was that phase? trying to remember darnit
sorry trying to keep you guys straight lol
Jan 17 at 15:33, by Phase
I want vzn and secret to write an anime
 
Anonymous
Ah
 
vzn
@BalarkaSen are you taking any math classes? what books are you reading lately
 
Anonymous
He's still a school kiddo :P
 
vzn
wow ok thought he was in college by now
 
7:11 PM
 
@0celo7 I was momentarily appalled at the consecutive $p$'s but I kinda like it retroactively now
@vzn Right, I'm still in high school.
 
@BalarkaSen $p\in M$
 
Mhm
 
vzn
@BalarkaSen what year? looking fwd to college?
 
last. no.
 
vzn
7:13 PM
@BalarkaSen are you (planning on) going?
 
oh please, you're gonna get a degree in a year and a PhD in 2
 
yes
 
vzn
@BalarkaSen why not looking fwd?
 
its a hassle
 
vzn
lol no kidding life is like that eh
 
7:15 PM
@0celo7 I'd probably have said that I want a conventional academic life if it was a year ago but now I feel like if it worked out that way it'd be nicer because I wouldn't have to go through the hassle.
getting into universities is too hard in india
me no likey
 
you're the next Smale
you'll be fine
 
hahhah smale gives me hope man
 
vzn
BaSe do you have a university in mind? think the entrance exams may not be hard for you in particular
 
actually smale was a shit in school
you're the next Nash then
 
yeah
well i like me some schizophrenia
 
7:17 PM
Nash did his undergrad in 2 years and his dissertation was 20 pages
 
vzn
@#%& the stuff you guys joke about :(
@BalarkaSen trying to follow this stmt, hard to parse. "conventional academic life" reqs undergraduate degree. btw things are not all that diffent in US wrt SAT test...
 
Anonymous
@vzn Umm, the thing is the entrance exams test fishes by their ability to climb trees. So I sort of understand Balarka's situation. It's not really his type of maths (although I'm sure he's quite comfortable with it)
 
@vzn My close family members have schizophrenia (and it's provably inheritable, so I have a sufficiently nontrivial probability of having schizophrenia later in life). Not even joking.
 
vzn
@Blue BaSe probably will not like the multidisciplinary aspect of the tests, not focused on math. but still think the other areas will not likely be hard for him.
 
Not taking something seriously is not equivalent to joking about it.
I mean I am taking a math-only test.
 
vzn
7:20 PM
@BalarkaSen "liking schizophrenia" is obviously a joke, dont know how else to interpret it.
 
Anonymous
@vzn I'm talking about just math. Some calculus and algebra problems involve lot of manipulation and regular practice. Only knowing a lot of higher math isn't enough.
 
I am not a great problem solver. Can't think fast enough.
 
vzn
btw there are many other famous examples of scientists who didnt want to study outside their expert/ niche areas.
@BalarkaSen felt the same way at your age. remember you really only have to pass the tests, not Ace them. dont tie your self esteem to the tests/ scores, defn recipe for disaster.
 
I mean you're right but India is super competitive
 
Anonymous
@vzn Well, if you don't ace the test you're not gonna get into an uni here :P
 
7:22 PM
Hi everybody! First time I'm in this chat!
 
vzn
@BalarkaSen agreed, and hyper competition defn really takes the joy out of life! (aka neoliberal capitalism!) but clearly you are also naturally competitive.
 
Anonymous
Once you are in college you can again get back to smoking weed and watching memes though
 
It really is stressful.
@Blue I don't actually smoke weed :P
Sorry to blow my own covers
 
vzn
lol
 
Anonymous
@BalarkaSen That was a joke
 
Anonymous
7:23 PM
XD
 
@vzn that's because other fields are lame
 
@Slereah HAH!
 
vzn
picturing BaSe in highschool yearbook with caption under pic "most likely to smoke weed" lol :P
 
"most likely to not wash"
 
He was also in "less likely to get married"
 
Anonymous
7:25 PM
@Slereah That's what non-gdp increasing field-ists would say ;)
 
Hi again. Just wondering, are these all professional physicists here?
 
@Slereah less likely to get married automatically implies less likely to get cucked
 
lol
 
Anonymous
@Inflationary_Bubble Nah, but you can ask your physics questions.
 
:roasted: :fire:
 
vzn
7:25 PM
anyway isnt weed supposed to help with stress? :P
 
@BalarkaSen what does "cucked" mean?
 
google
 
Okay. So, has anyone here head of Tommaso Bolognesi, like the guy whose blog is here:
 
@0celo7 it is cuckolded
in the vernacular
 
the use of that word has suddenly increased for some reason
look everywhere in 4chan
 
7:29 PM
the whole "cuck" thing is slightly amusing, because calling someone a cuckold is such an old timey insult
It's something a ruffian from a medieval tavern might call you
 
the insult has ripened like whiskey, one might say
 
I hope "cad" comes back next
 
same
 
Anonymous
Shakespeare apparently used it a lot. Maybe he's related to 4chan
 
HAHAH
 
7:31 PM
@vzn Alright, I'm back
 
Hmm... well, guess this conversation is about something else. Perhaps I should take whatever I was going to say elsewhere.
 
This chat is weird, @Inflationary_Bubble. You should bring it up later when the actual physics people are around :)
 
vzn
@Inflationary_Bubble lol welcome n00b! (they come & go so often!) o_O
 
Anonymous
"actual"
 
Anonymous
chuckles
 
7:32 PM
@BalarkaSen Just wondering, what time of day is that?
 
Heavens knows!
 
@vzn I'm a noob? Is this a place where I'll be insulted?
 
You could alternatively write down a question or something if you have one, so we (at least I) could star it
 
Anonymous
@BalarkaSen He wrote one ^
 
@Inflationary_Bubble lol
 
7:33 PM
Then it'd have more probability of getting noticed by the actual people
 
vzn likes to insult people
 
@BalarkaSen Well, I think my question would be a bit too general. And @Blue, I'm not male, and those other questions were long ago. Sorry. I have something new now.
 
@Blue rekt
what a sexist
 
Anonymous
@Inflationary_Bubble I starred your message so that more people can view it
 
I was just asking whether anyone had heard of the researcher Tommaso Bolognesi.
 
vzn
7:34 PM
@0celo7 lol not even sure how to respond to that
 
I have starred it accordingly. I am not a physicist so I naturally have not heard of him
 
I don't think that would be a whole Physics Stack Exchange question. That's why I asked here.
 
Anonymous
@Inflationary_Bubble Since no-one has replied so far, I'm guessing they haven't heard of them
 
Anonymous
Your message has been starred already
 
Sorry, @Blue. I didn't notice the first star.
 
Anonymous
7:35 PM
If someone does know and comes along in this room later on, they'll ping you
 
Thanks, @Blue! I was just trying to explain myself.
 
Anonymous
And I'm sorry if being called "he" was offensive. I normally use it to refer to both sexes given the statistics of the gender of people who visit this room. I should be more careful and use "ze" or "they/them" in the future.
 
Anonymous
@Inflationary_Bubble Sure, no problem
 
@Blue question: why do people think that adding in a third gender will solve gender-related problems, when an alternative is to remove genders altogether?
 
Anonymous
Wait, how do you remove genders altogether? :P
 
7:41 PM
The existing gender-neutral terms are rather awkward to use. I always thought referring to users by their username is the best option over internet.
 
Yes, Balarka Sen
 
@Mithrandir24601 I actually think that way too sometimes, that many gender problems would be solved, or at least less prevalent, if gender itself wasn't so much of a focus. Also, you're on here as well as Worldbuilding. Didnt' know that before, but cool.
 
Anonymous
@BalarkaSen Usernames are often too big, like @Inflationary_Bubble...phewwww
 
Anonymous
Also I'm on mobile
 
First three characters ping a user
@Blu
See?
 
7:42 PM
Perhaps the English pronoun system could be completely revamped, so it was based on something other than gender altogether. Not likely to happen, I guess.
 
changing language is a hassle
 
@Blue Anne Leckie's Ancillary Justice put the idea into my head - everyone there is referred to as 'she'
 
only the germans have managed to do it
@Mithrandir24601 is that done to piss off men?
 
Anonymous
@Mithrandir24601 I think the best alternative is to stop getting so worked up about getting called "he" or "she". :P
 
typing an extra character can only be done out of spite
 
7:43 PM
@Inflationary_Bubble yeah :) I'm on here, WB and Awkward Silence (Interpersonal Skills chat)
 
Ola
 
@0celo7 Language should evolve though, so it's just how people use it that define what it is
 
@Blue I don't want to get too offended about this stuff, because it's so small. But it just...startled me, I guess?
 
@0celo7 Doubt it - it's a really good trilogy and cleaned up the sci-fi awards that year
 
@Inflationary_Bubble Physics is always welcome in this chat, don't mind if people are tlaking about something else currently!
 
Anonymous
7:46 PM
@Inflationary_Bubble I'd advise taking it more cool-ly. Often I've been mistaken to be a lady when I order pizza, so there's that. I just laugh it off. :P
 
@ACuriousMind Yeah. But does that mean being off-topic is OK? It seems that a lot of the chat rooms I've went to were often off topic.
 
@BalarkaSen I find the English singular 'they' much less awkward than any German construct, and at least English professions aren't gendered!
 
@Blue I'll try that. Need to stop being so angry about stuff...
 
On-topic is an undefined notion in the physics chat
Anything is on topic
 
Anonymous
Other than physics
 
7:47 PM
@Inflationary_Bubble Whether off-topic is okay or not depends on the room. In this room we're perfectly fine with "off-topic", but there are other chats with different rules
 
@ACuriousMind Ah, good point. Well my issue with "they" is that I am too used to using it in the plural.
It just feels like I am referring to a person indirectly :P
 
@ACuriousMind oddly, the thing that convinced me that I'd rather get rid of genders over start using another term, is precisely because I view things like 'ze' as the English version of the Germans' neuter gender, which makes me think that in the future, if this keeps up, people are just going to want a fourth gender and the problem's just going to get worse, not better
 
Anonymous
@Mithrandir24601 People will always find out stuff to get offended about, no matter how hard you try. :P
 
@Blue yeah, very true :/
 
@BalarkaSen Hah, that's no issue for a German because our polite form of address for a single person is identical to the 3rd person plural
@Mithrandir24601 The English version of the German neutral gender is 'it' :P
 
7:49 PM
Oh pretty cool
Actually that works the same way in Bengali
 
@ACuriousMind and yet, people would rather be called things like 'ze' for some reason
 
Anonymous
@BalarkaSen True
 
I am forgetting my native tongue ...
rip me
 
Anonymous
Ooni, Sey, etc.
 
Right
 
7:51 PM
@Mithrandir24601 Well, that's because the neutral 'it' is reserved for things in English, i.e. using it for persons is implicitly dehumanizing.
 
@ACuriousMind which is why it's not truly a 'third gender' ;)
 
Indeed - the neutral grammatical gender is not supposed to correspond to any human gender!
 
A lot of people who identify themselves as nonbinary actually prefer to be referred as a gender neutral
I think "zhe" and "zher" are gender neutral, technically
It's too confusing
 
@BalarkaSen I don't even know how I'm supposed to pronounce such words
 
Again, I see nothing wrong with 'they' :P
 
Anonymous
7:54 PM
@ACuriousMind It doesn't sound good when referring to a single person
 
Anonymous
Or at least I feel so
 
Anonymous
"they" sounds very plural
 
@ACuriousMind If I use they it makes me feel like I am referring to a person as a member of a collection or group of human beings of unspecified gender instead of talking to the person directly
That... is somehow not right
 
Anonymous
That ^
 
I want to talk to the person.
 
7:55 PM
Well, have to leave right now. Bye!
 
@Blue "Used to refer to a person of unspecified gender"
@Inflationary_Bubble bye!
 
@Blue As I already told Balarka, the German polite address for a single person is identical to the third person plural, so I don't think "sounding plural" is an argument against using it for single persons ;P
 
Anonymous
@Mithrandir24601 Yeah, I know that definition. Just my personal issue maybe
 
Let "them" decide...
 
supposedly "The word they (with its counterparts them, their, and themselves) as a singular pronoun to refer to a person of unspecified gender has been used since at least the 16th century"
 
7:57 PM
It's not unnatural to you, but it is to at least a proportion of the English speaking world.
 
all of the above are just more reasons that I'd rather get rid of 'gender' entirely than introduce more genders
 
Look at Jordan Peterson's argument on why he doesn't want to use it
It's analogous
 
Balarka alt right confirmed
 
Anonymous
I'll probably just follow the Indian method of calling everyone "Sir" and put the matter to rest.:P
 
0
Q: Umbiguity of $k$-vector in solid state physics

user1364012It is known that $k$-vector is defined up to a reciprocal lattice vector. So we can write in one dimensional case $$k'=k+ \frac{n\pi} {a}.$$ But this corresponds to a completely different wavelength and energy! In fact energy is infinite for $n \rightarrow \infty$. Is it normal after all ?

 
7:58 PM
"We" are not amused @Mithrandir24601 :P
 
that's some grand spelling right there
 
Anonymous
@EmilioPisanty Add it to urban dictionary :P
 
Interesting: "Word origin of 'they'
C12: thei from Old Norse their, masculine nominative plural, equivalent to Old English thā"
 
@Mithrandir24601 It appears humans run a wide gamut in how strongly they identify with their gender, and those at the strong end of the spectrum make that idea pretty impossible.
@Blue lol
 
@Blue also masculine :P
@ACuriousMind but if there are no genders... :P
 
8:00 PM
The royal "we" has no gender.
 
@Mithrandir24601 Oh, you can abolish the grammatical gender, but not the social construct...
 
@0celo7 LMAO
 
I found it very irritating to be addressed as 'Sir' by Indian users even when I had female profile pictures
 
oh, we're bashing/defending singular they?
 
@ACuriousMind Sir is not male...
 
8:01 PM
@EmilioPisanty I think we're just bashing everything right now :P
 
How about... Sire?
 
@Mithrandir24601 ah
 
@BalarkaSen that's probably male
 
@BalarkaSen also male
 
Madam?
 
8:02 PM
probably even more male than Sir
 
How about... SYRE?
 
is this a meme
 
@Blue Why not just use "he" for everyone? ;)
 
@BalarkaSen if you're going there, then why not Zhe?
 
Anonymous
@lılostafa I did that and someone got offended
 
Anonymous
8:02 PM
Anyhow, that was just a joke
 
@EmilioPisanty You fell into my trapp
use homeomorphism to escape
 
Anonymous
lol
 
@0celo7 What? Why are female knighted persons called Lady, then?
 
It was a meme on Jaden Smith
 
@BalarkaSen ugh
 
8:03 PM
s/he @EmilioPisanty
 
@ACuriousMind That's true, but I wish one could abolish the social construct (ha! Finally thought of a gender-neutral term :P)
 
@BalarkaSen I know how to use homeomorphisms to escape traps
 
@BalarkaSen Just use Ser, then die horribly.
 
@ACuriousMind I cannot decipher the mysteries of the British Empire for you
 
but that doesn't translate into using them to escape trapps
 
8:04 PM
@ACuriousMind Joking about death is Not Nice
2
You played yourself
2
Congratulations
 
lol
 
flagged
 
@BalarkaSen talking about Game of Thrones characters dying isn't joking
it's just an accurate description of the show
 
@BalarkaSen It's a GoT reference - Ser is the form of address there, and everyone there dies horribly...
 
Context doesn't matter
 
8:04 PM
@ACuriousMind "a" form of address, not "the"
@BalarkaSen admittedly true
 
Do flags have a gender? :P
How about countries?
 
Just to make it clear in case a phantom flag hits: I was meta-joking. Of course I realized it's a joke.
 
Anonymous
@skullpatrol In Bengali they do
 
...and numbers?
 
@BalarkaSen I was uncertain whether they a cerebal person like you knew GoT ;P
 
Anonymous
8:08 PM
Also many other Asian languages I guess
 
Anonymous
Arabic, Sanskrit, etc
 
Anonymous
@skullpatrol Not sure
 
What is the gender of zero?
 
@ACuriousMind I see monsieur Freud made you add a they in that statement unnecessarily. But yeah, I know that reference. I keep up with the memes :P
 
lol
no idea where the they there came from
 
8:09 PM
Freud, you dirty man
Bleach your mind
 
A slip.
 
@skullpatrol fun fact: in Spanish, one has a gender, all bigger numbers don't. In Catalan, one and two have genders, the rest don't.
 
@EmilioPisanty that's fantastic
 
cool
 
Okay, this was a surprisingly nice conversation given the notoriety of this chat. I shall depart and study chemistry and cry some more now that that's done
 
8:11 PM
This leads naturally into the gender of the irrationals :-)
cya pal
Let's not get into the imaginary gender.
 
@EmilioPisanty Meanwhile, German numbers are all female
 
@ACuriousMind yeah, well, German gets grammatical gender just plain wrong about 50%+ of the time
kinfe/spoon/fork being the most egregious example
closely followed by Sun and Moon
 
Ah, right, romance languages tend to have male suns and female moons
 
how does one get grammatical gender "right"
 
8:20 PM
@0celo7 easy
by using the same ones that Spanish does
 
that's not a biased opinion at all...
 
indeed it isn't, I agree
seriously though
female forks and male spoons? what's up with that?
 
Consistency is what counts.
 
@ACuriousMind had some spinach for lunch
 
Tinkering is the enemy of efficiency.
 
8:26 PM
@Blue How do I make pinacol from acetone?
 
Anonymous
A pinacol coupling reaction is an organic reaction in which a carbon–carbon covalent bond is formed between the carbonyl groups of an aldehyde or a ketone in presence of an electron donor in a free radical process. The reaction product is a vicinal diol. The reaction is named after pinacol (also known as 2,3-dimethyl-2,3-butanediol or tetramethylethylene glycol), which is the product of this reaction when done with acetone as reagent. The reaction is usually a homocoupling but intramolecular cross-coupling reactions are also possible. Pinacol was discovered by Wilhelm Rudolph Fittig in 1859. ...
 
Anonymous
Free radical reactions are the ones which first come into mind
 
Wow! That was fast.
 
Noice!!
 
oh, HNQ, the places you lead
> Since, by definition, someone who's taken Felix Felicis couldn't be accused during their lucky period, since their luck would cause the accusation to be shrugged off or the testing procedure to throw a false-negative, it stands to reason that the detection takes place after the match
good point
 
8:30 PM
Have you taken any biochem @Blue?
 
Anonymous
@skullpatrol Yeah, we had a chapter on that
 
Anonymous
In grade 12
 
@Blue I'll nag you a bit more. If I react aniline with H2SO5, it oxidizes to nitrosobenzene, am I right?
 
Anonymous
@BalarkaSen Right, it's a weak oxidizer
 
I thought so.
 
Anonymous
8:42 PM
In fact that is one of the reactions for preparing nitrosobenzene in lab. H2SO5 has a name - Caro's acid :)
 
I 'member
 
Anonymous
This oxidation thing can be confusing at times. I had a nice chart last year with almost all reagents which can oxidize
 
Anonymous
Aniline can be oxidized to various degrees
 
Yeah H2SO4 fucks it up I think
you get sulphonated
 
Anonymous
@BalarkaSen Yeah, it forms the anilinium ion which can be used for potentially several other useful reagents. Some sulpha drugs are made using that method
 
8:45 PM
huh i see
 
Anonymous
Sulfanilic acid (4-aminobenzenesulfonic acid ) is an off-white crystalline solid which finds application in quantitative analysis of nitrate and nitrite ions. The solid acid exists as a zwitterion, and has an unusually high melting point. == Synthesis == Sulfanilic acid can be produced by sulfonation of aniline: == Applications == As the compound readily forms diazo compounds, it is used to make dyes and sulpha drugs. This property is also used for the quantitative analysis of nitrate and nitrite ions by diazonium coupling reaction with N-(1-Naphthyl)ethylenediamine, resulting in an azo dye, and...
 
10:45 PM
"Private conversation, 1954"
This is the worst bibliographical reference
 
Yup, it's terrible. E.g. Best I can tell, the only proof of the harmonic forms for monopoles in Taub-NUT gemoetries exists only in private communication.
 
private communication, there's the hope that it may be released upon someone's death
Private conversation, short of a time machine
Little hope
 
I'm not sure that difference actually exists
People just say "communication" because they know how bad citing "conversation" is :P
 
the continuity of the Yamabe energy in the $C^2$ topology is proved in unpublished lecture notes from a conference in Japan in the 80s
 
could be
could be a letter tho
worst part is when you contact the authors for more details and they just tell you "I don't really remember"
 
10:51 PM
Ah, that feeling where unpublished claims of dubious formulae will never again hold sway over my work :P
 
We are all but dust in the wind
So do we have clues why perturbation theory works in QFT, anyway
 
screw you
 
The Hilbert space isn't the same as the free theory, but is it "close" in some sense
or is it just one of those things that we have no idea and we're just hoping it holds
 
my calculus homework was supposed to be "trivial" (private communication with the professor) but now I'm digging up fucking weak topology bullshit in Yosida
 
@Slereah Do you mean the LSZ formalism instead of "perturbation theory", perhaps? :P
 
10:53 PM
@ACuriousMind whatever we're using to actually get results
Interaction picture and all that
 
Because perturbation theory also works in the path integral approach and there you don't really have this sort of issues
(you do have other issues, though :P )
 
Yes, like how path integral is probably bogus
 
no issues with path integrals?
nvm
 
@0celo7 if the solution has been done before, then it's trivial $\leftarrow$ this is how some Profs' brains seem to work ;P
 
But is there maybe something like
"It probably works because the two Hilbert spaces are close in the mega hilbert space"
 
10:54 PM
@Mithrandir24601 she doesn't think that way
 
Or something to that effect
 
Also, there is things like Haag-Ruelle scattering - you really shouldn't use "perturbation theory" as a shorthand for "LSZ formalism in the canonical approach" :P
 
@Slereah you should read volume 3 of Reed and Simon
 
There are many things I should read
I still haven't finished reading Sherlock Holmes
 
fook, this problem is so hard
you basically have to reprove that L^p is a Banach space, and who wants to do that
 
10:56 PM
@0celo7 Why don't you want to be happy for me? :'(
 
@ACuriousMind you're rubbing it in my face
especially because you know my field is marred with such things
the positive mass theorem was proved in private communication for 35 years
turns out the proof was wrong
 
"The German term "Nahwirkungsprinzip" is more impressive than the somewhat colourless world "locality"."
 
I propose replacing "locality" with "principle of not-so-distant action"
 
"The result is obvious when $p=\infty$." :(
 
Why does Haag's book just have a recap of special relativity
If I'm reading Haag I probably know what SR is
 

« first day (2634 days earlier)      last day (2300 days later) »