« first day (2080 days earlier)      last day (2853 days later) » 

12:09 AM
@ChrisWhite Good evening
 
12:29 AM
@0celo7 Express a symmetric matrix as part of a quadratic form, then (as long as there are diagonal terms) just continually complete the square and you get a diagonal matrix, (if there are no diagonals just change variables until you get one then do it), use this to prove you can diagonalize a symmetric matrix, exercise.
 
@bolbteppa The fact that Hermitian matrices can be diagonalized in an eigenbasis is proved in Shakar's QM book
Symmetric $\subset$ Hermitian
 
 
1 hour later…
1:42 AM
@MAFIA36790 The moderators have access to a suspension reason "consistently low quality questions over time", but we don't have one for consistently poor answers.
And we try not to be in the business of judging correctness in our official capacity.
In our capacity as users with the downvoting power is a whole 'nother matter, of course.
 
$$H=n\cdot\sigma\otimes I $$

\begin{align}
[H,\rho] & =\sum_{ijklm}n_i \sigma_{i,jk}\delta_{lm}\rho_{kp,mq}-\rho_{pj,ql}n_i \sigma_{i,jk}\delta_{lm}\\
& =\sum_{ijkl}n_i \sigma_{i,jk}\delta_{ll}\rho_{kp,lq}-\rho_{pj,ql}n_i \sigma_{i,jk}\delta_{ll}\\
& =\sum_{ijkl}n_i \sigma_{i,jk}\rho_{kp,lq}-\rho_{pj,ql}n_i \sigma_{i,jk}\\
& =\sum_{jkl}n_x \sigma_{x,jk}\rho_{kp,lq}-\rho_{pj,ql}n_i \sigma_{i,jk}\\
& +n_y \sigma_{y,jk}\rho_{kp,lq}-\rho_{pj,ql}n_y \sigma_{y,jk}\\
& +n_z \sigma_{z,jk}\rho_{kp,lq}-\rho_{pj,ql}n_z \sigma_{z,jk}
 
As for your question "Is there a way to stop them...", well, a high enough downvote to upvote ratio brings the a-ban down on them for a while.
But these users tend to be very persistent. In some case that means patient and in other it means making new accounts to carry on.
 
and the compactified expression for Pauli matrices as shwon in wikipedia, it is still in some sense need to write out all 4 terms of it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauli_matrices

Is that all I can simplify down to in index notation and then I must swtich back to computing them via the matrix way (by writing out explicitly all components?)
(grr, will massage this problem into one that can fit the main site's guidelines as per advice, and see how it goes. I am just so bad at indices)
 
@dmckee I'm doing a guided reading course and my prof was supposed to email me yesterday with the problem set for next week
should I email him and remind him
 
@EmilioPisanty Of all the users who rank high on that list I feel that Marty Green could have something really worthwhile to offer the physics community if he would treat it as a set of puzzles and interesting facts instead of trying to right a percieved wrong from a hundred years ago.
@0celo7 Depends. Does he have a history of forgetting stuff? Or is he usually on the ball?
In the former case you probably should, but in the latter give it a bit.
 
1:49 AM
@dmckee He's not great about remembering things
 
2:21 AM
@dmckee lol this structure:
does that even make practical sense
 
2:40 AM
@Slereah You got destroyed here physics.stackexchange.com/questions/267916/…
 
2:55 AM
I'm sure Shankar does it with eigenvalues, you can also prove it by completing the square, and there's a third quicker method when all principal minors exist
 
Shankar does do it with eigenvalues.
 
Look in Gelfand or Anastassiou for Lagrange's Method (complete the square) or Jacobi's Method when you get sick of computing all that stuff to get the answer
 
@0celo7 Seems intended for a single, very tightly defined lift. Presumably at one end of a assembly line or something similar.
 
Solving for all the reaction forces was not fun.
 
I'm told that such specialized designs make up a surprising fraction of some engineer's careers.
@0celo7 Well, no. It wouldn't be.
 
3:02 AM
Although there is something satisfying about finding that one equation that allows you to unravel the rest.
 
But knowing from experience (a) that it can be done and (b) some of the tricks to make it go smoothly is part of the point, I'm sure.
 
@dmckee The prof was an industrial ME, he secretly loves this stuff.
 
::chuckles::
Not that secretly, I suspect.
 
@dmckee Nah, he's pretty chill. But he lectures without notes and has a bunch of horrible machine designs memorized.
So he probably enjoys it.
 
Hello people :-)
 
3:16 AM
hello
I made some sign errors -.-'
Found it!
 
 
1 hour later…
4:28 AM
Anybody knows a good experiment (IRL not an animated) video which shows the properties anode rays?
 
@YashasSamaga Yes, but it's NSFW
 
user218912
what?
 
no problem. I just need one :P I don't have the aparatus in the lab (perforated plate) and I am not going to make one.
Just need to know how it looks in IRL. Youtube spams with all cartoon/animated videos. -__-
 
@YashasSamaga Sorry, I read anal rays, no I don't
 
4:39 AM
I have a question about this video. youtube.com/watch?v=2xKZRpAsWL8
Why do you see blocks/patches of light in the tube?
Why isn't it continous?
Gas exists everywhere in the tube? Hence, the electrons should excite the atoms everywhere and hence one should see a continous line of light (wrong terms but I guess you understood what I am trying to convey).
 
user218912
@BernardMeurer anal rays are related to fish.
 
user218912
I discovered.
 
@3750 You're pretty brave if you googled that
 
user218912
xD
 
user218912
I searched it on google books.
 
4:44 AM
Well, those were not the anal rays I was referring to though
 
user218912
The anal ray is a flap in the area at the bottom of a fish.
 
user218912
 
user218912
where A-B is.
 
Not the ones I was talking about still
 
user218912
._.
 
4:54 AM
@Obliv yes, you just need $10^{36}$ protons and wait for a year.
 
@JohnRennie Hai
 
Morning
 
Top of the morning.
 
@JohnRennie Innit a bit early over there?
 
user218912
@JohnRennie you're an early bird.
 
4:59 AM
I start work at 05:30!
 
user218912
woah.
 
But then I only work until 09:00 :-)
 
@JohnRennie Aren't you retired?
 
user218912
@JohnRennie what do you do all day then? answer questions on pse? or...?
 
5:00 AM
And to be honest I only do a couple of hours work during that period. The rest of the time I spend surfing the Physics SE.
@3750 that's a hard question to answer because I don't have a routine (apart from the few hours up to 9 a.m.)
 
@3750 He cooks nice food and posts it on facebook
 
I spend a lot of time on the PSE, but I read, exercise (walking or cycling), listen to music, watch TV. The time passes ...
@BernardMeurer I've stopped posting the pictures on Facebook since everyone got bored with it :-)
 
@JohnRennie Awwww, I think they're pretty cool
 
At the moment I'm scratching my head and trying to research this:
0
Q: Electron Beam does not appear to be continous (CRT Experiment)

Yashas Samagahttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xKZRpAsWL8 Why do you see patches of purple in the tube? Shouldn't there be continous lines of colour? As far as I know, you see the rays because some of the electrons knock the electrons out of the gas contained in the tube. When the excited gas atom de-excites...

There has to be a simple reason why you get something that looks like a standing wave, but at the moment I can't think what it is.
 
:D It doesn't happen in my lab.
probably apparatus related...
 
5:05 AM
@YashasSamaga my guess is that it's pressure related. Note that the pattern changes as the air is being pumped out.
'kin 'ell I've got a server down! Excuse me for a few minutes ...
 
user218912
you guys should check out noise music.
 
user218912
I posted a few links before.
 
user218912
am I the only one who likes this kind of music?
 
user218912
5:20 AM
because I listen to this genre everday.
 
I guess it's cool if you're so high on synthetics you've gone death
 
user218912
It's cool period.
 
Unique comes to mind.
 
user218912
aube died in 2013.
 
user218912
I'm in process of listening to all of his songs.
 
5:37 AM
Have fun :-)
He preferred to call them "designs," btw.
 
@Sᴋᴜʟʟᴘᴇᴛʀᴏʟ for a small and rather select subset of meanings of the word fun :-)
 
Pink Floyd was once called "noise."
 
Not by me they weren't. Though come to think of it I suspect my parents may have referred to them as that bloody noise a few times.
Actually my Mum quite likes Dark Side of the Moon, and she's 83 :-)
 
She's not so keen on Hawkwind though ...
 
5:48 AM
Floyd has an almost mystical appeal to all generations.
I still get goose bumps just thinking about "welcome to the machine."
Dunno what it is.
 
So, so you think you can tell
Heaven from Hell,
blue skies from pain.
Can you tell a green field
from a cold steel rail?
A smile from a veil?
Do you think you can tell?

Did they get you to trade
your heroes for ghosts?
Hot ashes for trees?
Hot air for a cool breeze?
Cold comfort for change?
Did you exchange
a walk on part in the war
for a lead role in a cage?
Some of Roger Waters' lyrics are almost painfully beautiful
 
6:05 AM
By the way which one of you is Pink?
 
Lime and limpid green, a second scene
A fight between the blue you once knew.
Floating down, the sound resounds
Around the icy waters underground.

Not all their lyrics make sense :-)

Still beautiful though.
 
poetic
Speaking of poetry @JohnRennie I found this the other day, what do you think?
In the midst of life, it happens that death comes

and takes a measure of man. That visit

is forgotten, and life goes on. But in silence

the suit is being sewn.

Tomas Tranströmer, Black Postcards
 
6:30 AM
I have to admit I don't like poetry unless it's song lyrics. I wonder if anyone has set Tranströmer's poetry to music.
 
I think it has potential. :-)
Perhaps, I'm reading too much into it.
 
6:54 AM
can anyone tell me what is the difference between voltage and emf of a battery?
 
@JohnRennie : Games where the point is to achieve an arbitrary target aren't that appealing to me. Reputation 190,176:
 
@koolman There are essentially the same. E.M.F is the potential drop across the battery when no current is flowing whereas voltage is a general term.
 
@YashasSamaga when internal resistance is present
 
Yes ^ the internal resistance will cause a potential drop when current flows through it which is why the external voltage you measure of the battery is ALWAYS lesser than the E.M.F.
^ not true if you are charging the battery.
 
1.Emf is the total voltage in the battery while the potential difference is the work done in moving a charge against the electric field between two specific points in the circuit.
2.Emf is always greater than the potential difference.
3.The concept of emf is applicable only to an electrical field while the potential difference is applicable to magnetic, gravitational, and electric fields.
 
7:00 AM
E.M.F is just a term used to differntiate between actual voltage across the battery and the voltage across the battery when there is no current.
If there wasn't a special term called E.M.F, we would have lot of trouble in describing circuits because voltage across a battery depends on the external circuit whereas E.M.F is a fixed constant for a given battery.
 
How do you find that ironic? @JohnDuffield
 
@MAFIA36790 : As Emilio Pisanty is to Pentcho Valev, so am I to him. Don't forget that I'm the guy who's always referring to Einstein and the evidence.
@Sᴋᴜʟʟᴘᴇᴛʀᴏʟ : JR indulges in gaming here to get his high score.
 
user116211
@JohnDuffield Well, you talk some sense; that guy is surely a crackpot.
 
@Sᴋᴜʟʟᴘᴇᴛʀᴏʟ : No matter what system you make up; there are always going to be "gamers."
 
Having high rep @ PSE might help with your resume?
 
user116211
7:07 AM
@JohnDuffield Well, you talk some sense; that guy is surely a crackpot.
 
Players gotta play @JohnDuffield
 
@YashasSamaga nah, not for academic jobs, but maybe in other fields
 
@MAFIA36790 : he's "misguided", Mafia. See this exchange where I tried to educate and inform. I didn't succeed. But there again, I didn't succeed with Slereah either.
 
Any publication date on your second book yet? @JohnDuffield
 
user116211
@DavidZ: I've seen a guy referencing his SE account in his letter_statement of purpose_ to foreign school for admission in phd course under other activities involved. Also, seen some math guy mentioning his activity at MSE in Linkedin.
 
user116211
7:15 AM
@JohnDuffield yeh; he lives in his own world outside of which all are fostered from conspiracy and all that stuff; I don't wan to talk about that anymore.
 
@MAFIA36790 It's under "Other activities" for me too ;)
 
user116211
@Danu Yeh, it's a nice thing to mention that, I suppose.
 
@Sᴋᴜʟʟᴘᴇᴛʀᴏʟ : hell no. I'm only on chapter 2.
Noted Mafia.
 
Well... okay, it might help a tiny bit, in the sense that professors don't want to be seen as encouraging research to the exclusion of all else. It's supposed to be good to have a couple filler items under "service" or "other activities" for that purpose. But in practice, they're looking at your research potential and everything else gets mostly ignored.
Most professors have probably never heard of Stack Exchange, and if they know what it is, they're more likely to view having a high rep as a strike against you.
 
^
Oh, wait, no I don't agree it'd be a thing against you, ever
Just skimmed over
 
7:20 AM
Why not? I'm pretty sure more profs would consider it a negative than a positive contribution
 
What, really? It's "outreach", which I think shows passion more than anything
Trying to teach people physics in your free time...
 
@MAFIA36790 : Reminds me of a famous guy. You must be taking about Voldemort.
 
How would that be a bad thing?
 
user116211
@JohnDuffield :)
 
A lot of people call it a "cheating site." @Danu
 
7:23 AM
"cheating" why? :-(
 
@Danu to the kinds of people who read and evaluate CVs, "free time" - or, time spent contributing to PSE - is just time you should be working on research but aren't
 
@DavidZ Cry evrytiem
I will now blame my rejection by the top US universities on this :D
 
user116211
@Danu oh, Jesus ;)
 
@Danu haha. Sure, why not.
To be honest, I doubt it really makes a difference, but in the few cases where it does, I do think the difference is more likely to be negative than positive.
 
Hmkay.
 
user116211
7:27 AM
 
Maybe like 95% of the time it doesn't matter, 4% of the time it counts against you, and 1% it helps you.
2
 
user116211
71
Q: Do Danish and Canadian militaries exchange gifts on a disputed island?

JonathanReezThe following image is circulating on LinkedIn: There is an island which is disputed territory between Canada and Denmark. The militaries of both countries periodically visit to remove the other guy's flag and leave a bottle of Danish schnapps or Canadian whiskey. This is what happens whe...

 
rough estimates
 
Fair enough.
 
user116211
That's how a war needs to be ;)
 
user116211
7:28 AM
@DavidZ noted
 
@YashasSamaga one could be given a take home exam and then post the questions on the site, right?
 
How are you @DavidZ?
Still in China?
 
7:45 AM
Yep
 
How's things there?
 
Hot, lately
Well, not so much today, but most of this week it was very hot
 
Mmm...
It cooled down very quickly here over the past days
It's like 12 degrees (Centigrade) now :(
 
user116211
@Danu WoW! when is summer?
 
@Danu sounds very nice
Here it dropped from about 35 to 22 over the course of one night
 
user116211
7:50 AM
Here 32 degrees Centigrade; raining :)
 
user116211
This is monsoon of India.
 
user116211
@DavidZ yep; sounding same like here.
 
@DavidZ Awright
22 is nice though
 
Relatively, yes
I guess 22 was earlier today; maybe it's up to like 25 by now
 
Do you speak Chinese?
 
7:53 AM
Only a little
 
user116211
@DavidZ Can you write some?
 
why?
I mean, 为什么? :-P
2
 
user116211
@DavidZ ;)))
 
8:08 AM
OMG, see something weird here
 
user116211
@hwlau where?
 
Nothing just see David Z writing cheinese
 
user116211
awooh
 
9:15 AM
@vzn Sorry for the slow reply. Graduate level, our interest is in quantum simulation of photosynthesis. There's a bunch of proposals waiting to be harvested, most of them dealing with the fact that photosynthesis operates in a regime where quantum light harvesting is not optimal (decoherence mainly) and still manages to outperform pretty much everything we know classically, while at the same time showing some quantum signatures
@DanielSank Hi Daniel! So if I am not mistaken, you have quite a background in qubits and such. My main question is if you know of any research in which they have investigated the behaviour of single/multiple qubits under high levels of decoherence (introduced artificially I'd say). You can think of fluctuating magnetic fields for superconducting circuits for example. My worry is that for high levels of decoherence the linewidths will become super broad
So I do not know how one would then say, ah, the qubit has a decoherence rate of this amount of MHz. Moreover, standard T2 measurements won't work if the T2 is lower than the time it takes to measure your Ramsey or whatever
Of course, it is very counterintuitive because as has been pointed out most research aims to decrease the decoherence rate, not increase it
 
He's very busy this month.
FYI :-)
 
Not sure if it is aimed at me, but if it is, that's fair enough! I'm trying to look into it myself as well, just thought that someone in the field might remember a specific reference or two
 
10:04 AM
Hi @user3183724
 
10:54 AM
@Danu Didn't know you were still into physics Danu
 
 
2 hours later…
user116211
12:51 PM
@DanielSank: Welcome.
 
@user3183724 would you mind emailing me a description of what you're actually trying to do?
@MAFIA36790 hi
 
1:33 PM
o/
 
o/
I feel like if we ever did an h-bar meetup the first ten minutes or so would be slapping each other
 
^
 
@EmilioPisanty Welcome aboard :)
 
user116211
1:41 PM
@EmilioPisanty congrats :)
 
@ACuriousMind Thanks
There was a time where you and me were neck and neck on that one
but you beat me by a month
 
@EmilioPisanty Nice! Congrats mate!
Y'all still gotta climb though, only John and Floris are famous down here :p
 
@BernardMeurer Who cares about fame? I can singlehandedly dupe-hammer now.
 
user116211
@BernardMeurer And Lubos but he never came here.
 
2:23 PM
@ACuriousMind Any thoughts on my Morse theory question
 
@0celo7 You're reading the book, not I. And you seemed to have found a (partial) solution to the problem, so I did not spend time trying to solve a problem only to have you tell me "I knew that".
 
Jesus, I come into the elu room and say
in English Language & Usage, 9 mins ago, by skill patrol
Brext is a great topic.
and BANG a mod tells me to leave
>8(
 
@skillpatrol If you are surprised that politically controversial topics might blow up in some rooms, I envy your faith in humanity. Why would you say something like that if not to incite a heated debate, anyway?
 
These are all Americans.
 
@skillpatrol Who are "These", how do you know, and what has that to do with anything?
 
2:31 PM
Your reasoning follows if it was a mixed crowd.
I know them pretty well :-)
That particular mod has my number.
 
@skillpatrol Still, why would you insert that statement into an ongoing conversation about something completely different?
 
No, they were talking about it at the time
Moreover it is a great topic
At least for Americans
That and Trump :P
 
@ACuriousMind What did you think when you were reading the book?
I don't understand step 1 of the proof
If we already have that in our hypothesis, why is he restating it?
 
Did you know @ACuriousMind that Trump proposed to build a wall between Mexico and the US to keep the Mexicans out.
 
Well germans know all about wall building
 
user116211
2:41 PM
@Slereah The Berlin Wall?
 
user116211
The Atlantic Wall?
 
So do the Chinese
:P
 
@skillpatrol Illegal Mexicans.
And other illegals, like ISIS operatives.
 
@Slereah That we do
 
Don't misrepresent his policies.
 
2:42 PM
ISIS operatives don't come from Mexico, though
 
We have a party lobbying to re-erect the wall between West and East.
 
@Slereah They come through Mexico, allegedly.
 
Allegedly.
 
user116211
Can't they use ladder to skip over the wall?
 
(They're a satirical party)
 
user116211
2:43 PM
And where would he get so much money to build the wall?
 
user116211
Let alone maintaining them.
 
@Slereah They say they do, for what it's worth.
 
Politicians build walls
 
@0celo7 Rereading what you wrote, I do not understand your issue.
That $f^{-1}[c-\epsilon,c+\epsilon]$ contains no other critical points and is compact is part of the hypothesis of the theorem (as indicated by the "suppose that").
 
@ACuriousMind I know.
So why is step (1) a thing?
Half-way down page 15.
 
2:45 PM
@0celo7 It's not "step (1)". It's one of the two conditions that $\epsilon$ needs to fulfill.
The hypothesis only gives you that some $\epsilon$ fulfill (1).
You are told to choose $\epsilon$ small enough so that both (1) and (2) hold.
 
@ACuriousMind I'm not convinced.
 
vzn
@user3183724 did see a paper a few mos ago that probably would be relevant, let me try to dig it up, hopefully saved it, there was another guy in here looking into photosynthesis/QM models. anyway there are only a "few" labs in the entire world that are working with qubits, it would be helpful if you sketch out your experiment. also presumably your advisor or "principal investigator" has already tipped you off on some papers/ refs?
 
@0celo7 What is there to be "convinced" of?
 
3:07 PM
\o @dmckee
 
3:21 PM
I'm supposed to prove $x \to x^k$ is a surjective map iff $k$ is relatively prime to the order of $x$ in a finite cyclic group $G$. I don't believe being relatively prime to the order is required though
suppose $G = \{e,x,x^2,x^3,x^4,x^5\}$ then the order is $6$ and so the map $x \to x^5$ would be the only surjective map
I don't get it
 
@Obliv What do you not get? You haven't made any argument for why the statement should be false yet.
 
For some reason I can't see what the map actually does with the elements. For a map $x^a \to x^b$ and setting conditions for the domain and target set/domain I understand
but doesn't this just map one elements of $G$ to an element of $G$?
 
@Obliv For a cyclic group, mapping the generator $x$ to something determines the images of all other elements if you demand the map be a group homomorphism (if you don't see this, prove it).
 
@acuriousmind why would you need to demand the map be a group homomorphism? Why not just map the entire domain of $\langle x \rangle$ or whatever
 
@Obliv What?
 
3:34 PM
I'm not sure I understand you correctly. Are you saying that $x$ gets mapped to $x^k$ then by a group homomorphism, you are able to map $x^2$ to $x^{2k}$ etc
 
@Obliv Yes, exactly.
 
but then why must $k$ be relatively prime for this to be surjective?
 
@Obliv Well, that is what the exercise asks you to prove. Think about it.
 
$x^{ak}$ for all $a \in \mathbb{Z}$ this element will be in the cyclic group so all of $\langle x \rangle$ will be able to be mapped to $x^{ak}$ no?
 
1
Q: Why can't a question be deleted with answers while there is first a note given that it is only not advisable?

Marijn If you want to delete a question with an answer, you have an option to delete that question. But when you have made that option to delete the question it seems not possible. Is that a mistake of this program or is there an other reason?

 
3:49 PM
@acuriousmind I can't think about it if I don't understand the problem ;_;
 
@Obliv What do you not understand about the problem?
 
Just cut up a 12''x12'' piece of copper into little pieces
my hands are blistered :(
and scraped up
workplace injury, can I sue?
 
@acuriousmind I don't see what's stopping $x \to x^k$ and the corresponding group homomorphisms from being surjective.
wait give me a sec
 
@Obliv That's not "not understanding the problem", that's "not having the solution".
 
lol
 
3:52 PM
@0celo7 Was that injury unavoidable?
 
@ACuriousMind Convinced that any map has that property.
@ACuriousMind I could have worn gloves.
In hindsight, I should have
My hands are all banged up right now
got sliced by a rhenium sheet the other day
 
@0celo7 Then I guess that was a valuable learning experience but not something you can sue for ;P
 
got my thumb caught in a sanding machine yesterday
 
must have been a near death experience @0celo7
 
@Obliv I'll grow my hair out and get it caught in the diamond wheel saw
 
3:54 PM
you have a saw tipped with diamond?
 
ACM would probably die in our lab
@Obliv yes
we need a new blade for it
 
must be very expensive..
 
and we're getting a diamond band saw too
should be coming any day now
 
i thought you said hand saw for a second lol
 
@0celo7 What property? The claim is not that every $f$ can fulfill (1) and (2) - the claim is that for an $f$ that fulfills (1) for some small $\epsilon$, you can choose $\epsilon$ such (possibly smaller) that it also fulfills (2).
 
3:55 PM
@ACuriousMind I'm not convinced that there is any $f$ that does that!
 
@0celo7 Why is that relevant?
 
At least for $M$ noncompact
 
The theorem does not make an existence claim - it says that if you have such an $f$, then...
 
I understand that
 
if $\varphi : x \to x^k$ then $\varphi(x^2x^5) = \varphi(x^2)\varphi(x^5) = x^{2k}x^{5k} = x^k = \varphi(x^7)$ assuming the order is $6$. Then if $k$ were to be not relatively prime to the order, say $k = 2$, what keeps the map from being surjective
 

« first day (2080 days earlier)      last day (2853 days later) »