« first day (1960 days earlier)      last day (3265 days later) » 
01:00 - 13:0013:00 - 00:00

01:25
@DeNiSkA I got your answer now
In a neutron star's core, there is neutron degenerate gas
The neutrons are being tightly pressed near each other
This leads to a pressure since they can barely be moved more
The neutrons also occupy the lowest energy levels, with two neutrons (of opposite spins) occupying each energy level
So all the energy levels up to the Fermi energy (difference between highest and lowest energy neutron) are filled. Now, these neutrons barely move, since they are at such low energy levels. In order to move, the neutrons would have to increase to a higher energy level — which is incredibly hard to do.
Thus, the star doesn't really compress, since the neutrons hardly move. To get the star to compress, you'd need to add more mass, which will cause stronger gravity. Then we can have them start moving. The Fermi energy would increase, and the star would become more compact while the degenerate pressure increases.
This pressure will fight against the gravity. However, in general relativity, pressure is actually a source of the gravitational curvature of spacetime, so increasing pressure increases gravity. This thereby increases the amount of pressure you need to fight off the stronger gravity. Eventually, there's a point at which increasing the pressure will only be counter-effective for the star. At this point, no increase in pressure will prevent the neutron star from becoming a black hole.
phew
@0celo7 It's happened before. He writes a lot and sometimes it appears that he hasn't taken the time to make it shorter.
@ChrisWhite Absolutely over the top, but beautifully put none-the-less.
@dmckee Was what I said right about neutron stars?
Need to make sure
@SirCumference Not completely. It's not really true to say the neutrons hardly move; some of them are in states of quite high energy and RMS momentum and angular momentum.
The trick here is that this is a fully quantum mechanical state of matter and a intuition built on Newtonian lines will lead you astray.
01:40
I thought they occupy all the lower energy states?
They occupy the lowest available states, but that isn't the same as low in an absolute sense.
The Fermi energy is quite high.
Oh, really?
Then why is it that it takes so much energy to compress the neutron star?
Wait, let me re-write that.
Because any reduction in the physical volume of the star must be compensated for with a equivalent increase of the momentum-volume; because the Pauli principle says how many identical fermions can fit into a phase-space volume ($(\Delta x) (\Delta y) (\Delta z) (\Delta p_x) (\Delta p_y) (\Delta p_z)$) of size $\hbar^3$ (2, for spin 1/2 particles like neutrons).
If you reduce the product of the spacial dimensions you must increase the product of the momentum dimensions.
But that means increasing their energy.
Oooooooh
I guess my source is a liar
@dmckee How about my part of neutron degeneracy pressure?
 
1 hour later…
user116211
03:15
3
Q: Force distribution on corner supported plane

AndyrewThis question has been annoying me for a while. If you have a completely ridged rectangular plate of width and height x and y that is supported on each corner (A,B,C,D) and has force (F) directly in its center then I think the force on each corner support will be F/4. What I want to know is ho...

user116211
@Danu: Hey, why did you vote it to re-open? ^
user116211
This is definitely homework ;/
There is, of course, a really interesting conceptual question hiding in there, and that conceptual issue is why the problem is often given as homework.
user116211
03:34
@dmckee Then OP should better highlight the underlying concept query rather than asking how to prove this mathematically; the later tastes like homework definitely.
03:54
0
Q: Appropriate Response to Trollery

WillOFrom time to time, I've written up substantial answers to naive questions about special relativity, sometimes illustrating them with spacetime diagrams and explaining how to read them. Some novices have found these answers helpful. At least one novice, though, has apparently found these answers...

0
Q: A Problem With a User

WillOFrom time to time, I've written up substantial answers to naive questions about special relativity, sometimes illustrating them with spacetime diagrams and explaining how to read them. Apparently some novices have found these answers helpful. At least one novice, though, has apparently found th...

@user36790 Well, of course.
user116211
@dmckee: BTW, why is only our meta named as Physics Meta while at the Periodic Table, it is known as Feeds?
No idea.
user116211
@PhysicsMeta Tell OP not to publicise any user while alleging any complaint against him.
user116211
04:15
@dmckee: Is it good to name the user whom are talking about?
user116211
I've inserted [insert-here-the-user-who-shall-not-be-named] in place of the names; is it right?
@user36790 We discourage it rather strongly. Questions on meta should be about policy (i.e. general rules) rather than about specific cases.
user116211
@dmckee Can I quote your statement to defend my action?
@user36790 I'll take care of it.
user116211
@dmckee okay
09:41
Any diphoton rumours?
Funny, I don't think we've had a single diphoton 750 GeV question yet, have we?
The Moriond diphoton session begins in about 6 hours
Slides should be uploaded after the talks
10:19
0
Q: Would having a second set of tags relating to the nature of the question make sense?

Stéphane RollandinYesterday I asked a question which was based on a conceptual confusion, as was revealed by the excellent answers I received. It made me think that it would be nice if that fact was visible straight away for anyone coming to the page. There would be a second line of tags, relating to the nature o...

@user507974@ACuriousMind@Slereah algebra,calculus or differential equation first?
Algebra.
user116211
Wow! Completed reading Verhulst-Pearl Logistic curve.
Then calculus.
10:36
@Slereah after studiyng these how can compare these to real world physics?like QM
First do classical mechanics
2
Q: Physics books covering classic mechanics

Keefer RowanI am going to be a high school freshman next year and I have acquired a strong interest in physics. I have a mathematical background, upto, but not including, Calculus. I am looking for in depth resources covering classic mechanics enough to move onto more in depth texts on relativity as well as ...

10:57
Nope
As can be seen by the different name
user116211
@Slereah Phew!
@hubot sorry i was busy yesterday at 8:00 pm(Europe time)!!
user116211
@DeNiSkA UTC?
well! he told me Europe time so i also told the same :)
@DeNiSkA hi kid
who is older than me for 60030700 or something
11:09
@NihalJalaluddinP hahaha!!
how are you going to change the world?
@DeNiSkA My net usage is gonna help a lot of people.
no "gonna"but it is
it is.....?
helping now itself
i see!!
so am gonna change the status
suggest one
11:17
keep status about your interest
ok da
googling "da"?@DeNiSkA
i know in south india it is used ;)
you are an indian?
well born in Germany!
but actually south indian
How?
i was born in saudi
11:25
oh
user116211
I was born in.....
in.....?
user116211
India ;P
indians yay!!!!!
11:27
do you have any plan of going out of india!
user116211
@DeNiSkA Not now; as I said I want to do my graduation here.
oh! i see
user116211
@ACuriousMind: Am I still in your ignore list?
user116211
Damn, I'm still ignored by ACM ;(
@innisfree I think that's because no-one really has a good explanation for the excess, and no one knows really how significant the new analyses make it out to be. Without a snazzy headline like "model X confirmed!", "particle possibly detected which fits into hundreds of models but we don't know which one it is" is not really news of interest to non-physicists, I guess.
11:38
@DeNiSkA you are in 12?
Good morning chaps
@ACuriousMind Any thoughts on the car color?
user116211
@0celo7 o/
hello
@0celo7 The only thought I have to offer is: "Why are you still annoying me with that?"
damn.
user116211
11:45
@0celo7: Warning! ACM has still a place left in the ignore list ;P
It would suck if ACM ignored me
The silent treatment is torture.
4
user116211
@0celo7 Now, feel my situation ;(
@NihalJalaluddinP no i am writing my 11th exams
@user36790 why he kept you on ignore list?
@SirCumference well the answer did not fulfill my question but it was cool written by dmckee
user116211
@DeNiSkA distasteful story ;(
i think i am also on ignore list!!
user116211
11:50
:(
user116211
Dark AGE ;/
let me check @ACuriousMind are you here?
user116211
........
hahaa!! as i told ;)
user116211
There must be a way, I believe, to have the ban get lifted......
11:53
OP is just not ready for HE, I'm having to explain basic linear algebra
@0celo7 That's...your profile link.
lol
A friendly word of advice, OP. If you feel like you're stumbling time and time again in a book, you might not be ready for it. I think Wald's book on GR treats this material more clearly for a beginner. (I will still answer this question when I have time.) — 0celo7 21 hours ago
There.
user116211
Any idea how?
11:56
You...recommended Wald to a beginner?
@ACuriousMind I think my answer is very clear and he's just confused about what equivalence and isomorphism means
@ACuriousMind Yeah?
Wald is easier to read than Hawking, in general
At least as far as the geodesic congruence material is concerned
anyone knows about neutron degeneracy pressure?
Well, it's certainly easier, but does OP strike you as being able to read it? :P
Maybe not!
user116211
@DeNiSkA This is related to Exclusion Principle, I guess; though I read it qualitatively while studying about stars.
11:59
I don't know what to do, I don't want to spell out German middle school level linear algebra now
but I don't want to leave him hanging, either
@user36790 yes! it is do you know a lot about it so i will ask my question
user116211
@DeNiSkA No; but you can ask.
@0celo7 I would agree, apparently he just doesn't understand quotients and equivalence classes.
user116211
There are other users also who might help you.
@user36790 Who prevents neutron star from collapsing their is no repulsive force. (many people say it is because of exclusion principle but there should be some force to prevent huge attraction) john rennie in one way proved that their is a large force needed to compress it any further but i want to know which internal force is balancing external force
12:04
@ACuriousMind Should I just tell him in the comments to think about it some more?
@ACuriousMind NB: the vectors are bolded because HE bolds vectors.
I'm not suddenly a heathen
@0celo7 Uh...I don't really have an opinion about that
@ACuriousMind I know that if you were me and I were this guy, you'd tell him to think about it a while longer
because he's just refusing to read/understand the wiki article at this point
Nah, sometimes I also just wouldn't reply any more
:(
the silent treatment
And sometimes I would indeed expand the answer to include a bit more basics. It highly depends on my mood and spare time
12:08
speaking of mood, how do you feel about hiking
user116211
@0celo7: You don't ve to care too much for a user; you answered it correctly; tried to help.... that's a lot.
@DeNiSkA cbse?
@NihalJalaluddinP yes!
@0celo7 With the right kind of friends, it can be really fun
...why?
user116211
@DeNiSkA: This might be related:
user116211
12:10
2
Q: What prevents a star from collapsing after stellar death?

Murtuza VadhariaWhen the star stops burning because heavier elements like Iron are formed in its core. Then the gas pressure stops and as you know the gas pressure helps keep a star in equilibrium because it provides pressure against the force of gravity. So Iron does not give off energy. So what stops the star ...

@ACuriousMind because a certain friend wants me to go hiking, haven't been in years
@DeNiSkA I want to get into iiser or iit what sbt you?
not my thing
@user36790 me too
@NihalJalaluddinP IISc or IIT-madras but i will have my further education in Germany in think so?
12:11
Well...I wouldn't come up with a plan to go hiking on my own, either, but I tend to go with whatever plans my friends devise for trips/holidays
How you get into south India?
@NihalJalaluddinP my parents are pure south indians!
@DeNiSkA what are they doing?
@ACuriousMind hmm
@NihalJalaluddinP breathing!
12:13
Lol
I mean their profession
@ACuriousMind have you ignored me?
haha! all indians are being ignored by ACM
Yup, ACM doesn't like Indians
Indians sucks
i agree but i am german-indian
12:19
😉😉
@ACuriousMind the wildest rumours are it's going to be ~<5 sigma (I've heard the number 4.9 and 4.5) and spin-2 is favoured by forward direction of photons
I am an Arab Indian
Apparently
What's your relation with Germany ?
@DeNiSkA
@innisfree Spin-2 would be interesting as it's either composite or graviton. Is there some quark bound state/resonance we could feasibly expect to be responsible?
@NihalJalaluddinP i was born and for 10 years lived there!
As electrons can be used for electricity,can gravitons be used for graviticity?
I coined a new word
@DeNiSkA Mm
12:22
@ACuriousMind I don't know, scalar explanation was far more popular than spin-2. I didn't follow the literature in detail though.
After cms and atlas, Strumia will give a theory overview
@NihalJalaluddinP well that gravitons are totally hypothetical ! and there no such thnig gravicity
which will be 1) very informative and 2) very amusing if strumia is his usual self
Are you there? Is there a stream?
@JohnRennie Who prevents neutron star from collapsing as their is no repulsive force. (many people say it is because of exclusion principle but there should be some force to prevent huge attraction)[ john Rennie in one way made me understand that their is a large force needed to compress it any further] but i want to know which internal force is balancing external force.
I wish I was, I just read the schedule . No stream :( that sucks
12:28
@DeNiSkA hypothetically thing do turn to real things.
@innisfree Sooo...we have to wait for the slides then. Hopefully they are good, like all physics slides are ;P
@DeNiSkA you know linear algebra and all?
@NihalJalaluddinP yes!
From where?
@NihalJalaluddinP books!
12:30
School or Internet?
both
Can you recommend some?please.
@NihalJalaluddinP some.... what?
Linear algebra in which class? In cbse?
Books.
I am watching khan academy's video ,that is so helpfull
well i started in 8th standard i think with linear and in 9th with quadratic and polynomials
12:33
I am in 8th
@ACuriousMind what is wrong with people, she just said to pick a color that I like
that's 0 help
That is linear equation on one variable.
lol, but that's how you pick colors
Or anything else for that matter
@DeNiSkA what about QM
If you don't know anything about physics, don't worry about QM for now
12:36
@NihalJalaluddinP well QM demands a flood of mathematics according to me, it needs damn lot application of calculus, if you want to understand it fully
@Slereah uh
I learned Newtonian mechanics after GR and QM and was fine.
@0celo7 really?
@DeNiSkA yes
user116211
@DeNiSkA That is typical
Can you do basic step potential in QM now?
12:37
@Slereah me?
of course?
Well how am I supposed to know
why
You don't even know the quadratic formula
12:37
which one is harder?
because I'm not a dummy
...
@0celo7 when i read QM in my 14 i was blank without classical mechanics but now it is all set
:(((
hehe
12:38
@DeNiSkA from where you studied QM
@Slereah step potential is like page 100 in Shankar, hardly difficult
Well yes, that's why i asked
@NihalJalaluddinP i used to go to library and at home i used feynman vol 3
If u don't know how to do the basics
Then I could accuse you
of not rly being good
@Slereah why don't you accuse me of not knowing GR
12:40
Well
DO YOU KNOW GR
Is PDFs available for Feynman vol3?
I could not calculate the perihelion shift if you threatened an amputation
Hm, what is the simplest GR thing that isn't trivial
@0celo7 how much math do you know?
@NihalJalaluddinP yes
12:40
Schwarzschild, i guess?
Schwarzschild with no horizon
@K.N.O. basic linear algebra and calculus
@0celo7 and you know QM?
@K.N.O. yes
@0celo7 ...and a load of random differential geometry, don't forget that :P
Is there any channel on YouTube which thoroughly explains all the f*****ing GR and QM
12:41
@0celo7 you know differential equations and calculus with 2 and more variables!
@Slereah the perihelion shift is pretty much the easiest thing
but I have literally no idea how to do it :D
I s'ppose yeah
@0celo7 do you know functional analysis?
@K.N.O. no, no one uses that for QM unless you're a mathematician
12:42
Leave it guys
Can you do perihelion shift in linear GR
I wonder
I don't know
I think it's doable?
CAN YOU
Not sure
I can probably do like
12:43
@ACuriousMind that's just calculus (on manifolds) ;)
The Formula
Of an orbit in Schwarzschild
Showing a perihelion, maybe not
@Slereah $$\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}$$
That is Good
@DeNiSkA that's just calculus
Quadratic formula you use p. much all the time
12:44
@0celo7 physics is becoming too difficult for physicists! Hilbert (Space!) said! lol
@ACuriousMind are you proud of me
@0celo7 no
I memorized the quadratic formula for me PDE midterm
@0celo7 no you, told the basic one and in basic calculus we learn only one stupid variable
@DeNiSkA Was it you I was discussing this with before? I remember explaining how the exclusion force was generated, but I can't remember who I was discussing it with.
12:45
@ACuriousMind wtf
@JohnRennie YES
@DeNiSkA calculus is just metric spaces and limits
@DeNiSkAhttps://www.google.co.in/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwjD9obw38fLA‌​hUCWo4KHRQiBBcQFggKMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sci.buu.ac.th%2F~physics%2Fchainarong‌​%2Ffundamental%2520physics%2FRichard%2520Feynman%2520-%2520The%2520Feynman%2520Le‌​ctures%2520on%2520Physics%2520Volume%25203.pdf&usg=AFQjCNEQSjLl1trLOmiMARfqoBoX2y‌​JDhA&sig2=vJAqJcvDVTChFlsN00tYqg is it this?
What about 1 and 2?
Sorry about the long link
@0celo7 ?
I mean the definition of a derivative is just like
⊢ D = (𝑠 ∈ 𝒫ℂ, 𝑓 ∈ (ℂ ↑pm 𝑠) ↦ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ [(TopOpen ‘ℂfld) / 𝑗](𝑥 ∈ ((int ‘(𝑗 ↾t 𝑠)) ‘dom 𝑓) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ dom 𝑓 ↦ if(𝑧 = 𝑥, 𝑦, (((𝑓 ‘𝑧) − (𝑓 ‘𝑥)) / (𝑧 − 𝑥)))) ∈ (((𝑗 ↾t dom 𝑓) CnP 𝑗) ‘𝑥))})
p. simple
12:47
@JohnRennie did you get my question?
@K.N.O. what
how else are you going to define calculus
it's just analysis
which is just metric spaces
@0celo7 for mathematician this is not a correct definition
@0celo7 I have no idea how serious you are.
@DeNiSkA tnx buddy😘😘 sab bharathian bro and sis he
@Slereah indeed
@ACuriousMind Completely, why are people acting weird?
12:49
"Although the definition is valid for any subset of ℂ and is well behaved when 𝑠 contains no isolated points, we will restrict our attention to the cases 𝑠 = ℝ or 𝑠 = ℂ for the majority of the development, these corresponding respectively to real and complex differentiation."
Hm
So let's see
@0celo7 Ah, trolling, then.
f is a function from a subset of C to C
@ACuriousMind Screw you
and it maps that function to...
ordered pair <x,y>
I'm not trolling, and I don't know why you think so
analysis is the topology of metric spaces
12:51
TopOpen is the topology extraction function
Not sure what that is
@0celo7 I think calculus differs from analysis but i suppose we are talking about the same things!
@DeNiSkA is this book complicated? Or simple?
Cfld is the field of complex numbers...
@0celo7 How would differentiation be related to the "topology of metric spacs"?
@ACuriousMind I'm (mildly) curious to know who you're thinking of. There are some truly amazing (they amaze me) answers appearing in the review queues, but I can't think of any single worst offender.
12:51
Blah
Not easy to read
I wonder if we could do this for GR
Generate proofs like that
@Slereah whats the quotation about?
the definition I posted earlier
@NihalJalaluddinP simple but you need to know calculus and algebra
@Slereah its from which book?
@JohnRennie I can honestly think of only one user appearing so consistently in the VLQ queue, and so unable to write a single sentence without any error in it.
oh got it
@DeNiSkA ooh,let me study that.
@NihalJalaluddinP go for it!!
Trigonometry?
@NihalJalaluddinP yaa! that is also quite needed in some places
12:57
@user507974 I think mit ocw is a little complicated for 13 years old guy.
.@DeNiSkA have you read it?
When?
@NihalJalaluddinP yes!
@Slereah they wrote all proof by their own or they used a program?
Well the proof are written but they use a program to verify them
01:00 - 13:0013:00 - 00:00

« first day (1960 days earlier)      last day (3265 days later) »