« first day (1799 days earlier)      last day (3427 days later) » 
00:00 - 19:0019:00 - 00:00

obe
obe
00:26
I thought you were Qmechanic for a sec.
Nice avatar @obe
obe
obe
00:41
thanks it's from an anime.
@StanShunpike you really do look like @Qmechanic
obe
obe
I am happy my problem set is due the friday after this one.
Rescheduled.
00:59
@TanMath i am the chameleon. My profile pic changes spontaneously for no known reason.
01:55
Howdy
user54412
02:37
Anyone familiar with accessories for overhead projectors and transparencies?
Nope...
obe
obe
How familiar?
Say obe, wanna hear a joke?
user54412
I need the following device: a transparent screen that can display a changing image in semi-transparent color at a reasonable refresh rate. Basically, something I can put on a projector in place of a transparency to play movies.
What did the electron do when he saw an atomic nucleus? He lepton (leapt-on).
obe
obe
02:39
wow.
What did one physicist say when he wanted to fight the other? "Let me atom!"
Where does bad light end up? In a prism.
obe
obe
I didn't hear the last one before.
Never trust a particle. They make up everything.
obe
obe
Your jokes are bad, also self study calculus.
.-.
Calc is hella difficult. It's gotta be structured or I'll get confused later on
Well how about you? When'd you start calc?
obe
obe
02:52
I did calc in my sophomore year.
Junior ;-;
Plus, I skipped Precalc. So I gotta catch up on that too...
obe
obe
Hurry.
03:07
How did you skip precalc?
@Rigor I did really well in trig
:P
Though I got held back in 4th grade math...so I'm finally back in a normal schedule. Except they just cancelled calc...
So..
Did you hear oxygen and magnesium got together? OMg
03:39
Agreed, people just have an impression that physics = theoretical + abstract. Everyday physics usually involve a lot of process that those interested can actually learn a lot more than reading textbooks

PS I have never casted a close vote
An analogy stretched too far...
:24569037 One of the examples where it is easy to draw, but hard to calculate. I like nonlinear equations because their vector fields are pretty, but I am bad at solving them
@Rigor It might seemed nonintuitive to have a hyperbolic surface formed from something basically straight and pointy, but hyperbloids are ruled surfaces thus the animation is completely valid.

So that curved shape is the envelope traced out by the rotating cube
04:07
@Secret yes, the animation is completely valid; but there is a visible flaw in the animation that I am asking you to look for pal :-)
 
1 hour later…
05:16
> Everyday physics usually involve a lot of process that those interested can actually learn a lot more than reading textbooks
@Secret Could say that about anything discussed on this site though.
@skillpatrol Thanks
Hi @DanielSank
np pal @Danu
@yuggib Err how else do you want it to arise?
Basically you need to non-simultaneously-diagonalizable matrices in your Lagrangian, and you have only the mass matrix and the weak-interaction-couplings matrices to deal with for neutrinos
@DanielSank Just link the question you're disgruntled about :P
@HaykoKoryun It's just a factor 1/2 on the momentum imparted (when the "wind" is straight into the sails, at least)
05:44
@Danu Hello.
I served a friend a dish I've been working on for more than a year.
That sounds exciting
It's vegetarian, and she's Hindu, so I figured I was up against high expectations.
Also high pressure on the friend :P
She asked for the recipe!
I was ridiculously proud of myself.
Do you know she "knows about" food, or is this a case of positive discrimination? ;)
05:47
@Danu I have no idea what her tastes are, but she likes to talk about food and that's usually an indication of someone who pays attention to taste.
Yes, usually it is :)
She said she considered marrying someone from north India for the food.
right :P
@Danu Want the recipe?
@DanielSank Sure ;D
05:57
Ok, let's see if Google docs is as cool as I hope it is.
Hope it's not super complicado---my kitchen here isn't that amazing :P
Huy
Huy
I just used my mixer I bought before summer again.
It's such an awesome device. I don't know why I stopped using it. Lazyness is a bitch.
Haha :P
@Danu tell me if this works
Huy
Huy
seriously. I tend to forget about eating fruits. with the mixer I can just cut whatever I have left in the fridge and throw it in and it always tastes good. :D
05:59
@Huy Dude, dump a banana into a mixer full of milk and turn it on.
Instant delicious snack.
Huy
Huy
that is my current breakfast
plus a little bit of joghurt and honey
Does that link work?
Huy
Huy
does for me @DanielSank
Groovy.
I recommend it.
Huy
Huy
I'm a terrible cook
06:02
@DanielSank It does.
@Huy lol
Huy
Huy
that's really not funny. :/
@DanielSank If only I didn't hate milk :P
Huy
Huy
u wat m8
06:19
@DanielSank I assume it's fine to use different peppers, right. I've got a bunch of different kinds (dried) in my cabinet, but they're not going to be the same stuff that one gets in CA, I assume.
07:10
Breaking News: Scientists on Antarctica found to be only human after an inspection by the National Science Foundation notes problems with alcohol abuse among those who have to live there to do science:
"NSF officials acknowledged that alcohol consumption in the USAP can create unpredictable behavior that has led to fights, indecent exposure, and employees arriving to work under the influence. However, we noted that breathalyzer tests are rarely administered to determine if employees are intoxicated"
@Danu Wait, what?
What does that mean "found to be only human"?
Oh, you're kidding.
Right
"We were informed by a subcontractor employee that a researcher was brewing the beer at the station, which is also prohibited by the USAP Alcohol Policy."
@Danu I doubt dry peppers are going to work.
You might be able to replace the smoked ones with dried, but you'll be missing the juicy sauce they come in and that will seriously change the flavor.
07:11
I'm in Munich you know :P
I'm certain you can still make something nice!
Ain't nobody got adobo sauce
It will probably change a lot in translation.
The pasillas are important too. If you get get some kind of fresh mild chili peppers and bake those it will work.
The key is the baking, I think.
@Danu, do you love me?
@DanielSank Possibly
@Danu Ok, well I'm going to give your love a reason.
Bam.
07:15
lol
also
by Pasilla
do you mean
The dried peppers?
or, as Wikipedia puts it "A fresh poblano pepper, often sold incorrectly under the name 'pasilla' north of Mexico"
@Danu Those would probably work, but I wouldn't bother to roast them if you used dried ones.
@Danu Ok ok, yes, I actually mean poblano peppers, but nobody knows that word :D
The pasilla chile or chile negro is the dried form of the chilaca chili pepper, a long and narrow member of species Capsicum annuum. Named for its dark, wrinkled skin and pronounced pah-SEE-yah (literally "little raisin"), it is a mild to medium-hot, rich-flavored chile. As dried, it is generally 6 to 8 in (15 to 20 cm) long and 1.0 to 1.5 in (2.5 to 4 cm) in diameter. The fresh narrow chilaca can measure up to 9.0 in (22 cm) long and often has a twisted shape, which is seldom apparent after drying. It turns from dark green to dark brown when fully mature. In the United States, producers and grocers...
@DanielSank Aight
I use fresh poblanos.
Also, "north of Mexico", lol.
"north of Mexico" -> "by gringos".
:D
@ChrisWhite weren't you going to be in SB soon?
07:36
@Rigor That part of the horizontal line of the middle gridline is missing?
08:05
mornin
@Danu And if you have an additional interaction term (maybe mediated by something else) that gives rise to non-vanishing probability of mixing flavors? As I said, to assert that oscillations prove that neutrinos have mass, you need to find a contradiction otherwise, i.e. find a contradiction in assuming flavor change and all the masses equal to zero
Ah, the miracle of physics Christmas
We get a mainstream news about physics and 2 months of questions on it :p
Without a more convincing reasoning (that may exist, simply I do not know it), it's like saying: I observed two quantities that do not commute, and I know that position and momentum do not commute. Then those two quantities are position and momentum.
@Slereah I am not asking a question, just criticizing the nobel committee press release :-P
that is not very convincing
@Slereah Which part?
08:18
the fallacy :p
that's a pretty old one too
Like ancient greece old
yes, probably...
for neutrinos, I feel that they are incurring in that fallacy
but maybe it's just my lack of knowledge
(as a recall, the sentence that is fallacious is the one that can be found here)
"the discovery of neutrino oscillations, which shows that neutrinos have mass"
This one?
yep
It is accurate enough
read above^^
08:21
Massless neutrinos would not experience proper time and hence would not change during transit
and what if they behave like photons (also massless), and interacting they are destroyed and then created with a different flavor (like photons are annihilated and then created with a different energy for example)?
I know that is not allowed by the standard model
but that does not mean there could not be a model where this is possible
I recall you that in present relativistic QFT knowledge, no one knows exactly what happens in the "interaction" :P
we have only asymptotic perturbative knowledge T_T
Not quite
It's just that mathematically it is easier to do
there are some exactly solved QFTs
even interacting
not in 3+1
and I know very well there are
Actually yes in 3+1!
Supersymmetric QFTs
not fully relativistic
08:26
Still yes!
explain "exactly solved"
Supersymmetry is nice and symmetric, helps out a bit to solve
Is there a self-adjoint generator of time translations, i.e. the Hamiltonian
in a precise Hilbert space realization?
if there is, I am very interested in seeing it, for no one in the mathematical community seem to know about it
@yuggib With only SM interactions I think this is the only way.
I don't know too much about exactly solved SUSY models
08:28
I don't think it makes a whole lot of sense to assume extra interactions when it's unnecessary.
Lemme see if I can dig up a paper
So within the SM I think it's "proven"
@Danu I know, but that does not mean that this assertion is justified. Also, it is crystal clear that neutrino oscillations already go beyond the SM
a bunch of solved QFTs
Moshe Moshe
what a name
08:30
Let my people gooo
@Slereah interesting, but not at the level of rigor I was thinking of
Well it's a review
Reviews are not for rigor
Reviews are for you to look at the bibliography
And look up the papers
but I am sure, even if I don't want to read it, that I would see an Hamiltonian operator in there
or even a Hilbert space :-D
@Danu Within the SM there are no neutrino oscillations; so since you have to change it, it is not clear which the best way would be. And again, that does not constitute a proof in any reasonable sense of the word
@yuggib : Within QFT as it is currently understood, only one type of term valid under the assumption produces neutrino oscillations
>cobordism lecture
Noooo
Which assumption? Which term? My point simply is that is not clear; and I do like things when they are clear.
08:37
@yuggib Renormalizability, causality, gauge invariance
that kind of things
It constrains the expression of it a lot
Even the Gauge groups are basically constrained to O and SU and E IIRC
@yuggib Ah, fair enough... It's a sticky issue.
In a QFT it is usually restricted to like
- a kinetic term
- an interaction term of power 4 max
beyond that things start to get a bit fucky
You can't have higher derivatives because it fucks with causality
Same with integral terms
You can't have interactions too fancy because they cease to be renormalizable
You can't even have mass terms for bosons because it breaks gauge invariance
(well gauge bosons)
@Slereah Yes, but that is just at our present level of knowledge
well yes
but that is what the assumptions are
per definition, something that is beyond the SM is already beyond our current knowledge XD
08:43
if you want to rewrite the standard model from scratch feel free to
I am talking about QFT in general
Not the standard model
the one I do not agree with is renormalizability; we know too few about that
@yuggib Not really, since we know neutrinos have mass :D
@Danu we know that they oscillate :D
so who knows which type of theories we are able to study non-perturbatively...at the moment very few of them (at the same level that we can study QM)
@yuggib : But then with that logic you can dismiss everything
How do you even know photons exist
All we know is that our instruments say a thing!
I can study reasonably well models of quantum electrodynamics
not the most fundamental ones, but reasonable ones
like quantum EM field interacting with extended charges
08:47
well yes, but that is just the model we know of :p
I agree
Hmmm
it is called making effective theories
Is this an explicit solution to a homework-type question?
08:47
0
Q: Why are the odd point green functions in free field theory zero?

Abhishek PalI don't understand why the $(N=\mathrm{odd})$-point Green functions calculated in free field theory are identically zero. Is it because the Green functions are odd? If so, then how do I prove it? Is there any physical interpretation of the result?

well the solution is in Peskin certainly :p
maybe yes
09:00
0
A: Which will collide first, the moon and Earth, or Sun and Earth?

GodservantThe Moon and The Son will collide - Answer from The Creator of all, The All Knowing: Allah says in The Holy Quran 75: 6. He asks, "When is the Day of Resurrection?" 75:7. When vision is dazzled. 75:8. And the moon is eclipsed. 75:9. And the sun and the moon are joined together. 75:10. On tha...

Ahahah
 
4 hours later…
13:10
without @0celo7 the chat is really quiet
4
almost deserted
::tumbleweed rolls by::
Only 4 working days left
woo
then holidays or unemployment?
unemployment
The best holiday
T_T
you should return back to the path of $E\wedge E$
13:16
I might
Spend some time doing physics during that time
you should try to find a PhD grant
not that one of those should serve you well on the job market
but it is fun! :D
Ahahah
I tried for 3 years :p
34
Q: How can I keep my cat off my keyboard?

Tom MedleyThis is a common scenario when typing: When the family assembled for Sunday dinner, With their minds made up that they wouldn't get thinner On Argentine joint, potato^DR&FTGYB`kuhadrggoy867rt98wouth4bfgdhjlkhdsfghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhf This happens beca...

Asking the real question
@Slereah you should think about leaving loire atlantique
I have :p
Leaving France mb I suppose
13:20
it's time to see europe :D
But that is a whole other can of worm
I'd need to be paid pretty well to be able to
@ACuriousMind "technology" tag lol
PhDs in non-latin europe should be paid well
@Danu Not sure if it refers to the fact that a computer is involved or that cat-deterring technology is desired :D
The real geek solution would find cat-like patterns in the keyboard input
13:23
@ACuriousMind the cardboard box solution is surely not high-techy
heheh
13:48
Interesting...JD has come and left without a word?
user54412
@DanielSank November 1-3.
14:07
Back in the bebop jazz era, a good trumpeter or sax player would be said to "blow a good horn" (and variants). It got shortened to "he blows." Then when people wanted to say he blows a bad horn, that got shortened to "he doesn't blow, he sucks."
So goes the evolution of phraseology :-)
14:39
That blows... :P
:P
I was wondering @Danu is one mod allowed to cancel the suspension given by another?
Is that even in the rule book?
I think I've seen it done...
perhaps a meta question :-)
15:18
0
Q: Can one moderator cancel or reduce the suspension given out by another?

skill patrolI was wondering if this is even discussed anywhere in the policies of this network?

Asking the real question :P
@skillpatrol Why would you ask that on the Physics Meta? Ask it on Mother Meta!
@skillpatrol ...without checking out what's out there :P
9
A: How can a temporary account suspension be lifted?

AlenannoModerator here: Yes, suspensions can be cancelled. Speaking in general, there is not a strict rule. For example, a suspension can be lifted if say, it's a first offence, it wasn't something that bad, and you know the user just had a bad moment... etc. But note: this is not always true. While ...

I keep forgetting about the meta of the meta :( @Danu
Thanks btw.
obe
obe
15:38
It's lonely here without 0celo7.
0
Q: Can one moderator cancel or reduce the suspension given out by another?

skill patrolI was wondering if this is even discussed anywhere in the policies of this network?

DIVIDE AND CONQUER!
@Secret did you find it?
find what?
12 hours ago, by Rigor
@Secret yes, the animation is completely valid; but there is a visible flaw in the animation that I am asking you to look for pal :-)
15:49
Yup, I am guessing its the missing line, I already replied on rigor on that
Oops, sorry I missed that.
Good job :-)
Hi @DavidZ
how's it going?
Busy, as always
16:15
Busy keeps the business going :-)
@skillpatrol : I was going to say something but I was pushed for time and had to log off.
The animation shouldn't have concave sides.
Why not?
Because the sides of the cube are straight.
What would you suggest Sir?
The sides shouldn't be concave, they should be vertical.
16:21
Like a cylinder? @JohnDuffield
Like a cone on top of a cylinder on top of an inverted cone.
The concavity of the sides is correct, since the corners of the cube are indeed farther out from the rotation axis than the middle points of the edges.
But hey, I could be wrong.
What evidence do you have?
:-)
I haven't. You wanted me to say something. I did. And I've just seen what ACM said. Oops, my bad.
16:24
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruled_surface
This is why they are curved
Humble apologies for getting it wrong.
2
Did you notice the missing line along the equator?
obe
obe
equator
Missing line? Nope. I didn't notice it.
Look at the left side going right, the line stops.
It should rap around like the rest :-)
obe
obe
16:30
What is the point though?
I saw it after you mentioned it. I was a bit surprised I hadn't noticed it before, because I'm usually pretty good with stuff like the man in the gorilla suit.
Have you see the big Spanish castle illusion? I think it's brilliant.
@obe developing powers of observation.
Attention to detail etc.
IMHO the PacMan illusion is brilliant too. You can't always trust your own senses.
You can't always trust what you think you know either.
That pacman thing is awesome, what causes it?
16:38
@ACuriousMind well, to be fair, we won't ever develop models if we don't have senses
I like how that went from classical to quantum
Or at least, pre-Einstein to Einstein
lol
All^^^ very good questions/comments.
@bolbteppa : I think it's an after-image thing. There will be a detailed explanation somewhere. Edit : see Wikipedia
At least I know it's not the self-induced computer-vision-syndrome I've given myself
@Secret The comic is not disputing that.
16:45
@Secret : funnily enough most of your senses are motion detectors in some guise or another. Your ears detect sound, which is moving air. Your eyes detect light, which is moving electromagnetic waves. You feel the wind on the skin of your face, or somebody moves their hand and touches you. There's even a Vibration theory of olfaction.
An optical illusion (also called a visual illusion) is characterized by visually perceived images that differ from objective reality. The information gathered by the eye is processed in the brain to give a perception that does not tally with a physical measurement of the stimulus source. There are three main types: literal optical illusions that create images that are different from the objects that make them, physiological illusions that are the effects of excessive stimulation of a specific type (brightness, colour, size, position, tilt, movement), and cognitive illusions, the result of unconscious...
obe
obe
@skillpatrol When I cover the cylinder the shadow remains.
@skill patrol : I used Edward Adelson's CheckerShadow illusion in something I wrote back in 2008 about conviction.
Okay, that wasn't nice. Sorry
@obe I never thought to try that, but...yes
obe
obe
16:51
Weird, A and B still look different.
@obe Yeah, even when I blind out the other squares
Funny, how that works
With practice you learn to see what's there. The checkershadow illusion just doesn't work for me any more.
obe
obe
I demand a refund.
@JohnDuffield The point here is that "practice" trains the brain.
@obe Even after you remove the cylinder, the issue is still that the squares surrounding B are darker than B while the square surrounding A are lighter than A
16:55
@skill patrol : agreed. It's the same for R Beau Lotto's illusions, such as this. He told me that certain people in the colour-printing business and clothing business aren't fooled by these colour-context illusions.
@JohnDuffield just like the spinning cube :-)
@JohnDuffield Inb4 reference to that ridiculous shirt nonsense that happened a few months (maybe more?!) back...
@Danu 'Twas a dress :P
Yep. Look at the checkershadow illusion at an angle and the context disappears. You see the colours as they are.
That was a great meme :-D
16:57
@Danu : shirt? Dress? Maybe that was before my time.
@JohnDuffield It was
And what wasn't nice?
@JohnDuffield Never mind it.
Huh. OK, time for tea. Back later.
Memes are intended to entertain
Like optical illusions.
16:59
Who starred that message of mine? Seems rather useless
8
obe
obe
What is the illusion here?
From the math room
No illusion
Real beauty imo
@Danu You should know by now that meta-comments about starring usually achieve the opposite of what they're intended to ;)
in Mathematics, 1 hour ago, by J. M. is back.
@anon Thanks, it's an old elliptic function plot I had lying around. :)
17:46
@ACuriousMind Who told you that wasn't exactly my plan?
Are you a reverse psychologist? ;P
obe
obe
He's a reverse astronomer.
Reverse engineer :-)
18:38
@skillpatrol pretty! what function is it?
@skillpatrol oh. nm.
Huy
Huy
where's 0celo7
Huy
Huy
wat he do
My guess is that it was constant teasing comments about JD. Either that or there was some really offensive chat message that got totally removed.
But dmckee is here and i wouldn't gossip. ::whistles to self::
:)
18:53
@NeuroFuzzy I don't get to gossip. I signed something about that at some point.
00:00 - 19:0019:00 - 00:00

« first day (1799 days earlier)      last day (3427 days later) »