I really enjoyed the first Star Wars movie when it was released. But I didn't like the direction that the series took. I thought the whole midichlorians thing was stupid. So I lost interest.
I was 18 when I saw the original Star Wars movie in the cinema, a few days after it was released, with no prior knowledge of the plot. I thought the destruction of Alderaan was pretty intense, but it didn't exactly shock me. As HorusKol and others have mentioned, we had no emotional connection to...
Of course, being a science fiction fan, I've picked up most of the story & various details about the Star Wars universe over the years. But I have no great desire to watch any more of the movies or TV series.
I saw the David Lynch Dune back in the 1980s. It was mostly ok, but it did have some annoying stuff, like the severely mutated navigators, and it didn't really cover the full story.
Although Dune focuses on important individuals, it's about the interplay between those individuals and the long-term fate and destiny of humanity as a whole.
Asimov explored those themes in his Foundation series.
I guess it was a pretty major theme in the mid 20th century, with people like Hitler & Stalin. They were products of their time, but their thoughts and feelings had huge repercussions on the lives and deaths of millions.
On a more positive note, we also had popular musicians and actors having a big influence on culture. Eg, The Beatles were just 4 young blokes from Liverpool. They weren't musical prodigies, but they had a huge permanent impact on popular music.
@RyderRude Oh, The Beatles were a huge sensation from the days of their earliest recordings. They had been performing for a few years by then, though, in England and Germany.
In Neverness, the FTL navigation is performed by pilots neurally linked to AI. The hyperspace manifold isn't simple, and to get from A to B you have to prove that the worldline exists. In some bad parts of hyperspace, you may not be able to find any finite exits.
It's not quite Greg Egan level, but it's the closest thing I've seen in sci-fi of pilots literally doing diff geo in cyberspace in order to fly their ships.
my idea was similar.... my story is based in a world where spacetime has become weirdly structured. in this world, people have the map of spacetime and their daily life involves visiting points on the spacetime similar to how we would visit points in space.
there is no linearity to past or future. past people and future people effectively live together in a society.
but u cant visit any point whenever u want because eventually, parts become causally disconnected
and this is where i will write the emotional parts
so eventually, u get blocked out from every portion of spacetime that was previously accessible to u
In Neverness, the galactic structure in hyperspace is rather different to the structure in normal space, but the pilot guild have pretty good maps, that they guard jealously. The guild headquarters are on an icy planet in a pretty average stellar system. But in hyperspace, that star is near a really major navigation nexus.
The main guild city has streets of ice, so people ice skate everywhere. There are no street signs. But the streets are marked by different colours of ice.
@RyderRude No, there's no actual mathematics. It just talks about the process of doing the proofs, literally on the fly.
The streets of the city are actually a map of the hyperspace nexus. So when an apprentice pilot has memorised the street map they've also memorised the local hyperspace.
In the Neverness universe, it was discovered that consciousness has a tiny but important affect on spacetime. Basically, a version of "consciousness causes wavefunction collapse" combined with quantum gravity. But the author doesn't go into details.
Kind of. It's a bit hand-wavy. He focuses more on the story than the technical details. That can sometimes be a bit frustrating when you actually want to know those details. ;)
But anyway, when you're flying through hyperspace, you aren't just proving that your worldline exists, your consciousness is also willing that worldline into existence.
Speaking of causally disconnected... The other day, you were talking about comparing times in different universes in the string landscape. ACM pointed out that the landscape doesn't actually imply that all of those universes exist. But if they do (or some of them do) it's not valid to make any kind of time comparisons. Not only are they causally disconnected, their time axes aren't even in the same space!
oh. i initially thought the same thing. they are literally entire universes, so no way to talk about what moments from different universes are simultaneous
A family of 4 is returning home, after ~ a decade doing admin work on a colony planet. At the last minute, the parents get separated, so they end up going on different ships, with each parent taking one kid.
I suspect that we're incapable of perceiving some fundamental aspect of time. And if we could perceive that aspect, it would all fall into place, and be obvious.
Greg Egan explores this in his novel Permutation City and short story Dust with his "Dust Theory". There's a FAQ, but it may not make a lot of sense without reading the story(s).
Crudely, if you make a movie of the world, and cut the film up into separate frames, and put the frames in a big pile, the causal relationships between the frames still exist even though the linear sequence of time is no longer imposed by the physical layout of the frames.
I have a fondness for Cramer's Transactional interpretation, but unfortunately no-one has been able to make it work for anything more complicated than "one atom emits a photon, another atom absorbs a photon".