@HakashinouShinonouko it's not a rule, but rather a minimum standard of quality. Anything that falls short of the minimum, is deemed LQ
@AyanoSugiura I don't like we need a clear policy on this. We just need to show ppl that 1: theses are things you should have, 2: you don't need to write an essay, 3: if you show that you've attempted put forth the minimum amount of effort (as stated), then your question is fine.
There will always be people that don't read the rules before posting, admonish them isn't going to be much help and may seem elitist
forcing them to follow a strict set of guidelines can also be a big turn off. the emotions of these users are often times more brittle than bath tissue paper. Since we have a low return on these question we should just spoonfed these users enough information that they can at least know what's needed. Users who choose to ignore the help we're provided are not likely to make good contributions to the community
if we show that we've at least made an attempt to be empathetic to their effort, but they choose not to heed to them, it's on them and not us.
@ton.yeung i think our shit ass classifications board would put any echii with underage girls as child pornography. after all according to them Atelier Ronona Plus has High Impact Sexual Violence
@HakashinouShinonouko i'd settle for a globally accepted ratings system that way "if it's good enough for [COUNTRY] it's good enough for the rest of the world" that way the UK and AU can stop censoring US Stuff (ie. Monster Monpeice, Agarest Generations of War 2)
@AyanoSugiura then we need a globally recognized classifications board consisting of atleast a gamer, an otaku and a parent who doesn't use video games to babysit their kids