Is it true that more correct ideologies always have more sensible and logical rebuttals? Is is possible to have an ideology that is so far off from what is observed in reality, and yet can successfully rebutt other ideologies?
If the above claim is false, it will seriously affect how politics should be approached and that iterated debates does not necessary narrow the discussion enough to converge to a solution
Another way to ask that question is: Does the correctness of a political ideal somehow determined by the social dynamics of the society at some moment in time?