@TimStone unless the PXL uses some really exotic propellant mix, I don't buy it; fuel is generally the cheapest part of a launch by a huge margin.
And launching from a subsonic platform -- which that behemoth definitely is -- saves you, at most, 350m/s on a ~9000m/s delta-v budget
The rocket equation means you save more than the 1/27th of the fuel budget it looks like at first glance, but enough to count as "significant", especially once you take into account the cost of maintaining the launch platform?
@Yuuki if the answer is "it means we can launch from any airport into any inclination you want" that makes a lot more sense
@ToxicFrog The Pegasus itself is always launched by a host aircraft for some reason so multiple launches in a single flight might be savings by that metric at least, though it's unclear to me what the value in the Pegasus launch mechanism itself is
@TimStone yeah, like, if you take air launch as a starting point packing multiple launches onto a single flight is probably a win, but why that starting point
Wikipedia is claiming the nozzle on the first stage can be larger and fixed because of the low ambient air pressures and reduced crosswinds, which reduces cost if the first stage is dispoable
Also the aircraft lets them launch over the ocean which supposedly reduces insurance costs but it seems like the launch aircraft itself would still carry risk for that?
Given that the Pegasus has only flown 43 missions (not all of which were successful) since 1990 and the Stratolaunch has already eaten up hundreds of millions of dollars it seems like it would still take quite a bit of time to break even >_>
A revolting display of white male privilege.
•Man sexually abuses his granddaughter—no prison
•Woman yells at judge for the light sentencing—4 days in jail & $200 fine
Utter injustice. America desperately needs criminal justice reform😓 https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/crime-and-courts/2018/02/26/woman-jailed-contempt-court-after-outburst-sentencing-grandfather-who-abused-6-year-old/373946002/
Based on no actual legal knowledge, I would guess that the prosecution agreed to plea down that far because they thought they didn't have enough evidence to convict him of the original charge
But more generally, it's not really as simple as "man gets light sentence for a crime". It's "prosecution allows man to plea guilty to lesser crime and get definite lesser punishment instead of fighting a lengthy court battle that may result in a heavy sentence and may result in an acquittal"
And if the problem really was a lack of evidence, then I think this is the criminal justice system working correctly. No matter how heinous the crime, it shouldn't be possible to convict and punish someone without sufficient evidence.
@murgatroid99 and that's what's disgusting about it, that the 6 year old either isn't or can't provide enough evidence alone. and not to mention you'll have the defense probably claiming that he "couldn't control himself" or paint the victim as lying about the entire thing. give that in december during an evaluation he admitted he has 10 drinks a week they'd probably also blame the drinking
@Memor-X for some reason when you have 10 drinks and drive a car you are responsible but if you have 10 drinks and molest a 6 year old, then "it was the alcohol's fault"
@murgatroid99 well if there was a torn hymen or vaginal/anal scaring i doubt there's be much of a problem, however it obviously depends on what's actually happening which is also another sick part if the perpetrator instigates the acts and avoids leaving evidence
@GodEmperorDune OK. What I'm saying is that you can't change that by changing the criminal justice system. You can't just change a law and magically make evidence appear
@Memor-X Normally, you have to prove not only that a crime was committed but that the accused was the person who committed it
@murgatroid99 especially when the defense's job sometimes is to make the jury have doubts by questioning motivations of testimony and using the lack of evidence to make speculations
i want Obama to lean back and smirk as he says "we had wild sex parties in the oval office on a weekly basis. we truck in all the hos and coke and we absolutely trashed the joint like a frat house. not a peep out it got out to the media"
@GodEmperorDune Also, I think you're kind of missing the point. We're arguing about this case without actually knowing what evidence the prosecutor had available to present, and you're just assuming that they threw the case, and not that they were simply doing their job
Does this prosecutor have a history of pleading out cases that they could have won? Do we have any reason to assume that they're not competent at their job? It's not reasonable to just assume that someone is bad at their job because they made a decision you don't like based on information you don't have.
@murgatroid99 apparently iowa state prosecutions of sex abuse cases do not get as many convictions, compared to federal
i have no idea if that is because of a competence thing or how the numbers are counted or what
i do know that in general, the criminal justice system tends to be more forgiving to white men than people of color so my default when a white man gets leniency is that something fishy is afoot
would it be better if all people were given leniency? sure
In criminal law, Blackstone's formulation (also known as Blackstone's ratio or the Blackstone ratio) is the principle that:
"It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer",
...as expressed by the English jurist William Blackstone in his seminal work, Commentaries on the Laws of England, published in the 1760s.
Historically, the details of the ratio have varied, but the message that government and the courts must err on the side of innocence has remained constant.
== Historic expressions of the principle ==
The principle is much older than Blackstone's formulation, being...
We should also get rid of judges, juries, and lawyers, because they all introduce human bias into the system
All criminal justice system should be made by perfectly objective robots, and in order to avoid introducing bias, they should only be programmed by other robots
I'm using hyperbole for effect here, but I don't really think you can eliminate the biases you're describing while you still have the decisions made in the end by human lawyers, juries, and judges
Also, I'm pretty sure it's paralegals that are on the way to being replaced by AI. Computers are good at finding relevant case law, but that doesn't mean they can synthesize an argument in court
@TimStone I think it's a bit more complicated than that. A trial has uncertainty on both sides. Sometimes guilty people get acquitted, and sometimes innocent people get convicted. A plea deal creates a compromise of certainty and expediency that isn't great, but is better than the worst outcome for both sides.
Yes, it's not really good that we equate "the defendant is guilty" with "the prosecution has won", but there's also inherent value in the adversarial justice system and it may be difficult to eliminate that issue without throwing out something important.
@GodEmperorDune And also that we could get most humans together in a room to train a criminal justice AI
I guess in theory, a democratically trained justice robot would be the closest thing you can get to that kind of agreement. But pure democracy is the tyranny of the majority, and if you don't have good checks against that, you won't end up with a good justice robot.
uhhhhhhh what is "seems idiotic for those who hate guns to go after those who own them" implying exactly https://twitter.com/mflynnjr/status/968280782530908161
“We’ve seen NO EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION....I have seen nothing, the firing of James Comey and all of the aftermath, that suggests that the President has obstructed justice because he’s exercising his power as the President of the U.S. I just don’t see it.” Judge Ken Starr
Australian Department of Home Affairs talks cyber, and they have a moat, with geoblocking "forward posts"! That's nice.
Thanks for the laugh @Jordonsteele
also: my guy the kid who was pro-gun should also be able to vote let's go everyone vote
(idk)
The left benefits from large turnout and high enfranchisement, so I mean this is p transparent
in, both directions, tbh
to me age is kind of weird but it should be no higher than 18 since, again, draft without representation
also lol at this local piece on how it took these idiots in the city two full years to pass a needle exchange
(they spent a long time talking about how they've been looking at the issue for a while, and listed literally every meeting any comissioner or the mayor went to tangentially related to the issue since 2014)
> The city was not wasting time, city leaders said Monday, but instead was evaluating its options, studying the issue, and attending meetings. ... > But still, no action was taken, despite calls from local health officials ... that inaction would likely result in a spike in HIV and hepatitis C cases.
well at least A Thing happened eventually, and I guess you have to give credit to them for not doing a "we'll do it when another county and city do it too"
like what has been in place for a couple years nearby
@Unionhawk lmao, the article goes on to say "Vietnam was winding down so we didn't really need 18 year olds in the military anyway" and says 18-24 year olds being the most-left-leaning group and letting them vote is "gerrymandering"
Do they engineer these people in the lab for maximum dumbassery?
Trump Saturday: The NRA is on our side. Let's raise the age limit for assault weapons purchases.
Trump Sunday: Has a secret lunch with NRA heads Wayne LaPierre and Chris Cox
Trump Now: On second thought, I'm now against the plan I proposed on Saturday. https://twitter.com/acosta/status/968289131234234368
The Supreme Court has ruled that immigrants, even those with permanent legal status and asylees, do not have the right to bond hearings — effectively meaning they can be held indefinitely.
> The Obama administration appealed to the high court, insisting that Congress — not the courts — has the power to make immigration law and that the law allows the government to detain "criminal and terrorist aliens" as well as "aliens seeking admission to the United States."
@Nzall That's a bit different from "Obama has nothing to do with this".
Not to mention, trying to leave it to SCOTUS when his administration could've just withdrawn the case is more than a bit of a misstep.
My other point is that we need to recognize faults when they are faults. If we keep idolizing previous administrations because the current one is literally a dumpster fire, we're never going to get anything done.
It's basically the same thing as "the good old days" that the boomers keep harping on about.
And yes, Obama was very good on other issues but that doesn't excuse his administration from issues like deportation and drone policy.
No, we shouldn't condemn his presidency for failing to tackle these issues properly, but we also shouldn't glorify it just because Trump is literally a baby with a toupee and a temper tantrum.
@davidhogg111 I would love to have you on today to clear up some of the disinformation that has been put out about my statements concerning the tragedy. I notice you're calling me a "shit journalist" and "snake oil" salesman when I have never called you any disparaging names.
Wait 🤔didn't you get sued for pedaling lies about the survivors and victims of another school shooting? Clearly someone didn't learn from their mistakes
Ok y’all it’s almost time to tune in to watch me present the @dollyslibrary’s 100 Millionth Book to @librarycongress. I’ll be live on http://facebook.com/dollyparton at 10am ET! #100MillionBooks
@davidhogg111 Again Mr Hogg, in your name CNN has shut down my speech on YouTube. It is critical that you come out and support the 1st Amendment and not let them use you to end free speech.
EXCLUSIVE: The Mysterious Professor At The Center Of The Russia-Trump Probe Has Disappeared. Even His Girlfriend Can't Find Him. https://www.buzzfeed.com/albertonardelli/the-mysterious-professor-at-the-center-of-the-russia-trump?utm_term=.tsaArbAQY By @AlbertoNardelli
WATCH: NSA Director Rogers on Russian cyberattacks: "I believe that President Putin has clearly come to the conclusion there's little price to pay here, and that therefore I can continue this activity." https://t.co/3c5gGLvrAS
@TimStone Rogers also stated that neither Trump nor Mattis has given him instruction to counteract any attempts by the Russians at future interference and without such an order he's unable to do anything
I like how there are all these books of conspiracy theories where the military generals or some group gives orders and makes plans behind the incompetent president's back. But in real life, they'd rather not do anything and just wait on his hand and foot.
Like, how many times has there been a spy movie where it turns out there's some kind of government conspiracy that works beneath the radar in opposition to the current administration?
Scoop: DCCC warned Dem candidates against pushing for gun reforms after the Las Vegas concert shooting. Urged offering "thoughts and prayers" instead. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/dccc-las-vegas-massacre-email_us_5a9579f6e4b036ab0142c108?ncid=engmodushpmg00000004 … via @danielmarans
Yeah, it's just crazy annoying because they'll call up asking for money claiming "Oh but we can't let the Republicans win" and I'm like "The hell is the difference?"
One way the NYT could really challenge and provoke its readers in an interesting way would be to have a genuine socialist columnist who disagrees with Bennett (and the Times' readership!) on the value of capitalism.
@Unionhawk So it sounds like this ruling isn't quite as horrifying as NPR makes it sound?
This isn't what happened. The Court struck down the justification that the 9th Circuit had used to require bond hearings — and told the 9th Circuit to go back and make a _new ruling_ about whether prolonged detention violates immigrants' rights. https://twitter.com/NPR/status/968508235966828551
the tl;dr is basically the tweet there but to clarify, the 9th Circuit said "We don't have to consider the constitutional question because we interpret the statute to require this"; Alito & majority say "You can't interpret the statute that way, it's not reasonable, so you need to consider the constitutional question, go do that"
Breyer with the dissent says "Obviously it's unconstitutional if you opt to interpret the statute the way the majority does so this is dumb"
I am desperate for a pollster to ask Republicans if they think Parkland was a false flag and the teens are crisis actors. I would bet so much that it’s over 50%.
And yes, quoting that poem is very inappropriate here, and yes, I acknowledge that there are no legal rights to having your speech supported by any specific private platform, but even accounting for those things, it doesn't mean that someone who thinks otherwise is a Nazi
@murgatroid99 didn't say it was anything as egregious as being actual nazi, but they seem to be a 2nd amendment absolutist in other posts and in the post you're quoting the words "just to see the left cry" were stated
i can't really take someone whose political thinking revolves around childish bullying of a political bogeyman as not being somewhat sympathetic to those assorted forms of ideology