« first day (774 days earlier)      last day (1662 days later) » 

Wipqozn
Wipqozn
12:06 AM
> The employee, David Mackereth, 56, had argued that the Department for Work and Pensions acted in breach of the country’s Equality Act when it instructed him to use clients’ preferred pronouns, or face the loss of his job.

> But the tribunal, in a ruling made public this week, found his stance to be “incompatible with human dignity.”
> In its ruling, the tribunal panel found that Dr. Mackereth had not been discriminated against or harassed under the Equality Act. Christianity is protected under the act, but the panel found that Dr. Mackereth’s specific beliefs were not.

> It ruled that “belief in Genesis 1:27, lack of belief in transgenderism and conscientious objection to transgenderism in our judgment are incompatible with human dignity and conflict with the fundamental rights of others, specifically here, transgender individuals.”
(it's possible I stole this story from @Robotnik, but he's never in here anyways, so he'll never know!)
 
Stormblessed
Stormblessed
@Wipqozn oh that’s great!
@Wipqozn what is this about?
 
Wipqozn
Wipqozn
@Stormblessed It'll be a mystery forever.
 
 
1 hour later…
Stormblessed
Stormblessed
1:19 AM
@Wipqozn I’ve confusion :o
 
 
3 hours later…
Stormblessed
Stormblessed
4:34 AM
Damn, iTunes doesn't have much of the Colbert Report for sale :-(
 
Robotnik
Robotnik
4:49 AM
@Wipqozn I lurk here more than I post. The room moves too fast for me (which isn't that high a bar honestly). Especially recently.
 
GodEmperorDune
GodEmperorDune
5:47 AM
@Wipqozn this whole drama reminds me of the moderator election question "How would you deal with a user who produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments?"
 
 
5 hours later…
Wipqozn
Wipqozn
11:01 AM
@GodEmperorDune Very astute
 
Tim Stone
Tim Stone
12:00 PM
 
Wipqozn
Wipqozn
 
Tim Stone
Tim Stone
12:15 PM
 
user15026
@TimStone oh my gooooooosh look at itttttttt
 
Tim Stone
Tim Stone
It's so cute!
 
 
3 hours later…
Wipqozn
Wipqozn
2:58 PM
> It has wide implications for peaceful protests in Canada. The police, the court said, have no authority under the English common law (a centuries-old body of precedents) to arrest provocative but lawful protesters – even when police fear others may engage in violence.
> “That is a recipe for a police state, not a free and democratic society,” Justice Suzanne Côté wrote in a 7-0 ruling. “It would directly undermine the expectation of all individuals, in the lawful exercise of their liberty, to live their lives free from coercive interference by the state.”

> She stressed that in general, arrests of peaceful protesters when no charges are laid pose a danger to civil liberties because no court would be involved, and therefore no judge would review police actions.
 
Frank
Frank
@Wipqozn Unanimous. That makes me happy.
 
 
4 hours later…
Stormblessed
Stormblessed
7:03 PM
Wtf
 
Wipqozn
Wipqozn
7:23 PM
> "I believe in the sanctity of marriage," he said. "Other families should see what the consequences are to not only breaking the vow to whatever religion you subscribe to, but also your legal responsibilities."
> Mills said the tort began from old English law, when women were viewed as property. In the same way that a man could sue for the theft of a horse, he could sue for the theft of a wife. Now, any spouse can sue regardless of their gender or their partner.
Emphasis mine, because of course that's where the law comes from.
 

« first day (774 days earlier)      last day (1662 days later) »