« first day (137 days earlier)      last day (53 days later) » 

Anonymous
8:23 PM
@BalarkaSen I'm having trouble visualizing how the dimension of quotient space $V/U$ is $\text{dim}(V)-\text{dim}(U)$
 
Anonymous
Suppose we consider $V$ as $\Bbb R^2$
 
Anonymous
And $U$ as the line having slope $2$ and passing through origin
 
If $V$ is an inner product space $V/U$ is isomorphic to the orthogonal complement of $U$ in $V$. Take that as an exercise.
 
Anonymous
@BalarkaSen Huh, okay. I guess it would be helpful if we take the above example for visualization purpose
 
Anonymous
I'll try that out, though
 
8:26 PM
Well if you use my exercise you end up with $V/U$ being isomorphic to the line perpendicular to your line of slope 2
That 2 - 1 = 1 dimensional
 
Anonymous
Could you check if my definition of quotient space is correct, first of all:
 
Anonymous
Suppose $U$ is a subspace of $V$, then the quotient space $V/U$ is the set of all affine subsets of $V$ parallel to $U$ (i.e. the set of all lines of slope 2, in this case....right?)
 
Anonymous
So, you're saying that the set of all lines of slope $2$ is isomorphic to the line perpendicular to the line of slope $2$? Or am I doing something wrong?
 
Yes, that is what I am saying
 
Anonymous
9:17 PM
Ah, I think it's just this: Consider a map $P:V\to(V/U)$. Then $\text{null}(P)=U$, since if you take any element of $U$, it produces the zero vector in $V/U$ after being acted upon by the linear map $P$.
 
Anonymous
Then we use $dim(null(P))+dim(range(P))=dim(V)$
 
Sure. But did you prove my exercise?
 
Anonymous
The isomorphism part is easy to show after we show that they have the same dimension i.e. 1
 
Anonymous
By mapping the basis vector
 
That's a total garbage proof.
It's a proof, just a garbage one
Figure out the "right" proof
 
Anonymous
9:20 PM
Alright, I will try
 
The point is your proof using rank-nullity doesn't give you any visualization of the fact, which is what you wanted in your initial question.
It's purely algebraic until put into the context of inner product spaces.
 

« first day (137 days earlier)      last day (53 days later) »