« first day (693 days earlier)      last day (3792 days later) » 

01:15
@DaveBlackston so how did you search for John White in the Barbour collection? Inquiring minds want to know. ;-)
I say this as someone who spent a weekend on Ancestry.co.uk and discovered that my husband's great-grandfather's hometown is apparently not in the list of "Ancestry places" there. Wonder what implications that has for finding records about that town.
@JanMurphy : Nothing sneaky. Pomfret is one of the cataloged towns so I looked through that volume a bit. I also searched for "John White" and White born in Pomfret in the Barbour collection specifically.
You looked through the bound volumes at NYPL?
And that sounds like ancestry might be the wrong resource for that town. ;-)
Or you searched online, and if so, where?
No -- they're all scanned so I did page through the Pomfret volume.
I searched ancestry.com -- I've not yet gotten comfortable with the other resources out there.
01:19
Ah! did you see the note at the Conn State Library about the subtle differences between the card file and the bound volumes?
FWIW, I did have more luck finding WHite references in Ohio. I did that by searching for his father-in-law. ;-)
You checked the date bounds on the Pomfret data, I hope?
I did -- I am still digesting the links.
@DaveBlackston Good!
Oh there were births before and after, though I admittedly did not check for 1758 itself.
White married into an influential family that has all sorts of references.
01:21
Don't forget that pages of bound volumes can be skipped in scanning.
There were unlikely to be any skipped Whites -- they are lised alphabetically and I noticed no gaps.
Just running through the checklist.
Also, there was definitely only one John.
BTW the rabbit home Quicktip has references to PA resources in it.
I checked all the J's.
I noticed that. Part of the digestion. :)
01:23
What about the towns nearest Pomfret?
Let me verify something...
Did the family move to Pomfret when he was an infant and so the story is he was "from Pomfret?"
If scans of the actual registers were available, I would look for people with close-by birthdates and read the registers. The other possibility is that the birth year is typoed somewhere.
Well, there are no John Whites born in the Barbour between 1753 and 1760.
Wanna hear my wild thwory?
(I'm full of 'em.)
Fire away.
My theory is that he lied about his age so he could join the Continental army for the Revolution.
01:26
Possible! Very possible!
I have a similar hinky birth year for a Civil War veteran
The birthdays (October 20 and October 21) are very similar.
I thought about the Julian/Gregorian calendar change, too, but you're a couple of years out from that.
nod Good thought.
The Gregorian calendar, also called the Western calendar and the Christian calendar, is internationally the most widely used civil calendar. It is named for Pope Gregory XIII, who introduced it in 1582. The calendar was a refinement in 1582 to the Julian calendar amounting to a 0.002% correction in the length of the year. The motivation for the reform was to bring the date for the celebration of Easter to the time of the year in which the First Council of Nicaea had agreed upon in 325. Because the celebration of Easter was tied to the spring equinox, the Roman Catholic Church considered this steady...
I remember a detective story I read as a kid that depended on something occurring during one of the skipped dates. I felt a bit cheated. I didn't think a kid should be expected to know that.
01:28
"England, Ireland and the British colonies changed the start of the year to 1 January in 1752 (so 1751 was a short year with only 282 days) though the tax year has stayed as 25 March to this day (being 6 April in the new calendar). Later that year in September the Gregorian calendar was introduced throughout Britain and the British colonies (see the section Adoption). These two reforms were implemented by the Calendar (New Style) Act 1750.[21]"
@DaveBlackston Oh, that doesn't abide by the fair play rule at all.
Harrumph.
;-)
One of the articles I read said that people often retrofitted their birthday to the NS date but again, your date is too modern for that kind of retcon.
Yes, and that retrofitting would still be less than a year, right?
It would put the birthday n days different.
Yes. This was a 4 year (+/- one day) difference.
01:32
I forget which article talked about George Washington rendering his birthday in NS so that it became the 22nd.
Another possibility is a 5/6 transcription error.
When a headstone is made.
I don't mean this case necessarily, just in general.
Here's a q for you. The DAR has his bday as 1758. How accurate are their records of Revolutionary War veterans? Is that suitable for a q on SE?
Shakespeare and Cervantes seemingly died on exactly the same date (23 April 1616), but Cervantes predeceased Shakespeare by ten days in real time (as Spain used the Gregorian calendar, but Britain used the Julian calendar). This coincidence encouraged UNESCO to make 23 April the World Book and Copyright Day.
(Quoted from Wikipedia)
Heh. That's a nice secondary effect.
@DaveBlackston Why not ask a question about how the DAR lineage books are created? I warn you though, I don't know the answer, so you may hear the sound of crickets chirping for a while. Try the Ancestry Learning Center use Google to search for information on the process.
You could do the research and answer your own question. It's not only allowed here, it's encouraged.
That's a good idea. I will do that in the near future. (And it'd be nice to get a real answer under my belt.)
I've got to run, but thanks for chatting! (The kids need to go to sleep.)
01:38
You have to plunge in somewhere. And if someone has a better answer, they'll upvote you.
Thanks for chatting! Sorry to disrupt your schedule, I was just dropping a Q in for you to answer later.

« first day (693 days earlier)      last day (3792 days later) »