« first day (3807 days earlier)      last day (882 days later) » 

mlc
mlc
4:59 AM
i can't figure out the right action to take with this "late answer": https://travel.stackexchange.com/a/169840/94507
it seems like they are including the link to promote their own blog (name and logo match) but in a previous answer with the same circumstance https://travel.stackexchange.com/a/163285/94507 they insist there's no affiliation
otherwise, the answer seems fine, though it doesn't really add much (beyond the mysterious link) that's not there in a previous answer
 
Willeke
Willeke
5:22 AM
I think the current edit, claiming affiliation, does the trick. If OP edits it out we can take action.
 
 
14 hours later…
Zach Lipton
Zach Lipton
7:48 PM
I assume they changed their username at some point? Setting their name/logo is a way of disclosing affiliation I guess, but it sounds like they were wildly dishonest when they claimed no affiliation back in April if they subsequently set their username to be the same as the company name
 

« first day (3807 days earlier)      last day (882 days later) »