last day (283 days later) » 

00:27
145, eh?
Woo
Also lol on the Gaussian primes problem, Laci was watching a friend of mine and I talk a bunch of random crap and not knowing what we were doing for like, an hour and a half
Well, new friend actually
Hah. Did Laci give you the problem?
It was one of his puzzles
00:31
Find the primes $p$ such that $\mathbb{F}_p[i]$ is a field.
He has recommended now to learn some number theory so I may do that
You should teach it to me
I forgot that shit
Want to read Weil's "Number theory for beginners?"
I was thinking of Grothendieck's EGA but sure...
:P
Lel
I don't actually know anything about algebraic geometry beside the EGA/Hartshorne memes, and the fact that there are Zariski topologies, schemes, and varieties
Does it have anything to do with number theory?
Yeah I think so but I only know some stuff about varieties and not how it relates to number theory
something something frobenius endomorphism something something
00:35
I imagine there is a wide variety of subjects that use it though :P
is this a demonark pun
Yes it is
i should have known
So, is Weil's book really for beginners or is it lying
That's actually a beginner book
Oh great
00:37
"Basic Number Theory" is a huge lie
Chapter 1 is locally compact fields
O_o
well i guess anything less than a topoi is basic so
Clearly
Oh man it's literally a hard core class field theory textbook
just looked at the contents
Yeah it's insane
Number theory for beginners starts by basic properties of a field and all
It goes rather fast
Like in 70 pages it's doing Gaussian primes
But it's actually self-contained
Okay. I think we're both used to fast somewhat
00:42
That's true
I have the book saved, let me know when you want to start reading it and I'll go ahead
Alright, I'll see. This pset in manifolds is the last, analysis either last or second last
Then is finals which may be iffy
After that I'll be in good shape
Great. When is finals?
So just finished 8th week of class, so 2 more weeks and then finals week
Aha, okay.
I'm free pretty much literally whenever
00:52
Nice
This summer I should have some time, though the bootcamp will take a bit
Luckily, then I'll pick up complex analysis and geometry of curves/surfaces
Noice
What do you guys do in bootcamps?
Working out of 4 books
like learning new stuff?
Ted's DG book, Titchmarsh theory of functions (for complex), Sinai probability, and a book on Dynamical systems
Yeah
Oh, very very nice
00:54
For sure
I loved the first two books
With the former two, all I'll have left is algebraic topology and then I can join the cool kids club
Oh did you use Titchmarsh? Huh
I learnt some stuff out of it. I used a LOT of complex analysis books over the years
the most recent being a reading course out of Stein-Shakarchi
Ah, a lot of teachers at my school use this a good deal for complex analysis
One of my friends is not too fond of it though
Said the exposition was alright, but the exercises were mostly either tedious or trivial
Haha
I kinda liked it, but mostly because I was taught out of it and didn't have to devour through it all by myself
00:59
Lol, for what it's worth they're being taught by an iffy teacher
Schlag's book and Narasimhan are fast but seem good
I got the first downloaded (copyleft) but I haven't looked at it carefully
01:26
Hey I'm back
And did you download the abridged one or the whole thing from lib gen?
No, the libgen thing
after you told me the one online was abridged
Ah, good
Yeah that one is just really aggressive
gotcha
01:30
From chapter 1
But yeah like, he wrote this book for the graduate complex analysis class here
Ah fair enough. I like H^2 but most complex analysis students prob won't have background on hyperbolic geometry
And that's third quarter, so by the time the grad students reach his class they did a lot
(I don't know hyperbolic geometry except from what I overheard)
Since there are 3 sequences going on simultaneously, so they'll know real and functional analysis, algebraic and differential topology, and representation theory and commutative algebra/algebraic geometry
He doesn't rely too heavily on all that stuff
Mostly the algebraic topology plus a bit of Hilbert spaces
But yeah, that's one book, Narasimhan is the one Ted likes, which I've found to be good (fewer topology-type prereqs and more analysis, which is probably better for me in this current state)
02:08
@Daminark Interesting. I can imagine it but I certainly have never "done" a "course" on CA which uses algebraic topology and Hilbert spaces
Yeah, I'm hoping to take grad complex but Marianna won't really be assuming much background in that sort of thing
Though she will assume you did undergrad level complex
By the way, what are you planning for college?
I... don't really have any plans :)
Come to Chicago! :P
(Kidding of course, though I dunno, if you were to go to America I'd say it's a decent place)
02:21
It'd be fun but I don't really want to leave the country. homesick dude
Fair
I just want to fit in somewhere and get a more or less secured math-based life.
hopefully that'd work out
Haha, same
I think UChicago is a decent place. Lotta cool faculty
For sure
Also, I think it's probably one of the only schools around where I accelerate as much as I did
Like, in most schools either you come in with ridiculous background and place out of everything right away
Or you waddle through 2 years of math for engineers before you reach the good stuff
02:27
Yeah
Who have you heard about from here? Given that you're doing foliations you've probably heard of Danny Calegari
I know Calegari, Farb are there. Nori on the alg-geo side
I probably know a bunch of other. Let me crack open the faculty page
Ah, yeah, Farb, he's rather bouncy
Seems like his research bounces a lot
:D
I think he's a good friend of a person I know
As well as him physically
02:29
oh Drinfeld is there? wow
Matt Emerton, man, that guy
I might take his class next year
He teaches the third quarter of an algebra section (Galois theory)
Emerton?
Yeah
He's really good. I like a lot of his answers in MSE.
Apparently he's also a fantastic teacher
02:31
(Oh, and I know Peter May of course.)
@Daminark No wonder
He tends to not just prove things, but also go on rants about how to think about things
Like, why does it make sense that x form of argument would be the way to go about proving this statement?
I like that so much
Right?
I'm excited
Bloch is an Emeritus there? Huh!
02:40
@Daminark I freaked out a little while reading this review of his
Oh snap
did you read paragraph 3
I know it's hilarious

  last day (283 days later) »