@Randal'Thor , @Mithrandir - anyone here? I got a nice trivia for you.

@Derpy Hmm?

I was wondering...I think it is pretty clear that the preview screenshot for the video in this post was altered. What's the site policy in such situations?

wait. Missing link

Here (warning, may be considered NSFW)

@Randal'Thor (not so new anymore - already a year old ;))

@Derpy What do you mean, "altered"?

You can point out that it may not be reliable.

@Mithrandir do you really think that in the original material AJ shirt looked like that?

I will still have to check if the video was edited too.

I don't know. I really have no idea.

anyway, it would be simpler to replace the video with the original one from Hasbro official Youtube channel

@Mithrandir Nope, it didn't.

@Derpy Viewing the markdown of the post, you can see that there's no tampering with the preview image in the SE post. It's just a direct link to the YT video, so any tampering must have been on that side.

@Randal'Thor Never I wanted to imply the opposite. What I mean is that the user seems to refer to an official video Hasbro made, but links to an unofficial source. The unofficial source uses a preview image that is not taken from the video, and was edited in a way that could make it NSFW or at least not what people looking for info on the show would expect. Should the post be edited to link another version of the video, possibly from an official source?

@Derpy I'd say editing to link to a different video would be overstepping the mark, but you should definitely leave a comment about it (maybe asking if they actually meant to link to that unofficial video, or would it be better to use an official one?), and if it's really NSFW you could maybe edit a warning to that effect into the post.

ok, I was just wondering what the general consensus is

This ^^ is just my judgement. There isn't an existing meta on this AFAIK, but if you want a general consensus you could make one :-)

open votes plz scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/179865/…