^ thoughts on flax having triadic links?

Triads don't naturally fit the tacit, one dimensional language design

You can go up to quad-arg functions with 2D tacit langs such as Jellyfish, but generally, you stick to dyads max with tacitness

@cairdcoinheringaahing what if i need 6 args :P

Use a list, and treat it as a monad :P

are there 3d languages

@cairdcoinheringaahing but what if you added chaining rules that sort of replicated triadic behaviour?

for example, this extension of the monadic chaining rule:

Pattern : curr =
2 3 Ǎ   :  Ǎ(2, 3, curr) -> (2).Ǎ(3, curr)
2 Ǎ 3   :  Ǎ(curr, 2, 3) -> curr.Ǎ(2, 3)
+ × Ǎ 2 :  Ǎ(curr + alpha, curr × alpha, 2) -> (curr + alpha).Ǎ(curr × alpha, 2)
A 1 Ǎ 2 :  Ǎ(A(curr), 1, 2) -> A(curr).Ǎ(1, 2)
Ǎ +     :  Ǎ(curr, alpha, alpha + curr) -> curr.Ǎ(alpha, curr + alpha)
Ǎ I     :  Ǎ(curr, alpha, I(alpha)) -> curr.Ǎ(alpha, I(alpha))
Ǎ 2     :  Ǎ(curr, alpha, 2) -> curr.Ǎ(alpha, 2)
Ǎ       :  Ǎ(curr, alpha, alpha) -> curr.Ǎ(alpha, alpha)

also,

Let Ǎ, Ǐ, Ǒ be triads
    +, ÷, × be dyads
    A, I, O be monads
    1, 2, 3 be nilads

@PyGamer0 Yes, I've written one

@cairdcoinheringaahing link?

github.com/cairdcoinheringaahing/Levels

if one of the arguments you're thinking of would naturally have to be a positive integer one option would be to have a dyad returning an infinite list or some shit like that

has anyone implemented a tacit lang in C?