@mxyzplk I will estimate that the OP's "cost to benefit" analysis of further revision was not favorable and thus the effort was abandoned.

Well exactly. So there's a meta, about "misuse" of Back It Up in... unclear scope. Gets closed. Now we have a chat about "misuse" of Back It Up in... unclear scope. Leaves everyone nonplussed and confused. There's only one fix to this, which is to clarify the problem. I feel like we've given it the ol' college try to elicit clarification and haven't been successful, so I'm moving on to other things until someone does generate a clear problem statement.