Spring Cleaning

« first day (1162 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (866 days later) »

Sir Arthur7

04:33

@orthocresol No :)

@orthocresol I think we can wait for @Martin's opinion

:: chemistry.stackexchange.com/q/7152/83758 Sorry Loong, deleted -o

It seems Chem SE started out pretty humbly ;)

Sir Arthur7

05:00

:: chemistry.stackexchange.com/q/31378/83758 edit m.

Can we keep this for the answer?

:: chemistry.stackexchange.com/q/40046/83758 del m.

I think we can do without this.

orthocresol

I'll be back later.

8 hours later…

Martin - マーチン

13:06

@orthocresol gush... the things I up-boated five years ago...

orthocresol

I know that feeling..

Martin - マーチン

@SirArthur7 That was misleading... It was either delete -> no, or need to say more -> no. I decided to go with the former.

By which I mean the latter...

Ha! Plot-twist :P

@SirArthur7 Yes, yes indeed. To be honest, I wouldn't be too sure whether this is actually worth keeping. (Back in the day, I had little to no idea how SE works O.o)

orthocresol

> How much methane gas (cm3) is required heat 150 m3 of air by 10 °C?

Wow, how are we actually doing the heating?

Are we burning the methane?

Or are we compressing the methane (thus warming it up) and allowing the air to come into thermal equilibrium with it?

Or are we heating the methane and blowing it through a ventilation system?

Or are we feeding the methane to some bacteria and letting the bacteria generate heat via their metabolism?

I'm surprised that Nicolau jumped to the first option so quickly. He's usually far sharper than that. :-)

Or maybe he was trying not to be an ass like me...

Martin - マーチン

13:28

hahaha

Martin - マーチン

14:21

@SirArthur7 After editing that, I think we should have just deleted it. The answer is mediocre at best. I tried to salvage what ever was possible. The constant omitting of units just made this really hard to understand for me. IIRC most of the answers by Yomen are this way.

2 hours later…

Sir Arthur7

16:01

Hahaha!

Good to see you people!

@orthocresol Err...why is this still out there? @Loong stood for it? Nostalgia? Humility? ;)

@Martin-マーチン Same feeling here ;)

Sir Arthur7

16:35

:: chemistry.stackexchange.com/q/4571/83758 edited, or maybe rewritten, -o

:: chemistry.stackexchange.com/q/6558/83758 deleted o

Latter could be kept if the question seems worth it.

:: chemistry.stackexchange.com/q/34139/83758 this was already edited by o

This can be deleted

:: chemistry.stackexchange.com/q/33404/83758 del m.

Same here

:: chemistry.stackexchange.com/q/62639/83758 heavily edited

I feel a bit put off thinking about wasting three answers...

orthocresol

17:07

@SirArthur7 What did you want to do about this one?

Hmm, never mind, I think I'll edit it

orthocresol

17:36

@SirArthur7 I'm very unsympathetic towards titration questions. There are already so many of them. The answer isn't an answer at all. So I am in favour of deleting this.

orthocresol

18:00

@SirArthur7 I think this one can stay, actually. It's late now and I don't want to tidy it up, maybe tomorrow

« first day (1162 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (866 days later) »

all rooms