:: chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/47156124#47156124 Edited/reopen -o

Can you please reopen this question Mods???

@Abcd you can help by incorporating the OP's comment into the question. A good edit, combined with a first reopen vote, usually leads to the reopening of the question via the review queue, or also makes us more inclined to vote to reopen via this chat room. Anyway, I've edited and reopened this one. I don't think it's too broad.

@Abcd I find that if I advocate for a question and explain in the comments against closing, the question seldom gets the votes to be closed.

:: chemistry.stackexchange.com/a/8886/23561 Burned -o

^Does this answer makes sense to anyone? It may be above my organic background, or nonsense, I cant tell.

:: chemistry.stackexchange.com/q/90947/16683 del-o

^ suggest deleting

@A.K. I have yet to see an Uncle Al answer that isn't nonsense.

@orthocresol I agree - way too broad and answer is more appropriate as a comment (head nod for deletion)

I don't really think it's too broad, but it's just generally low quality and I could write a complete Q+A on the topic myself in 20 minutes or so which would (i think) be far better than that thing ;)

@orthocresol Well except for the one you edited when you should have just given your own answer, yes I do wonder how this guy got 7k+ reputation.

In the early years I think the site was generally less stringent about quality, although I've only been around since 2015 ish, so no firsthand experience

@orthocresol Well you've been here 6 months longer than me, but I think you are right. many of the posts before 2014 are low quality, but it probably helped the site graduate so can't say it was wrong. I do find Uncle Al as a good resources posts to clean though.

:: chemistry.stackexchange.com/q/8411/23561 Reopened, reclosed as dupe, an answer deleted

tschoppi's answer is the only correct answer there

Could obviously be fleshed out a bit more...