« first day (514 days earlier)      last day (1514 days later) » 

08:46
I forgot about that book... I actually met him, he was still lurking a bit around after he officially retired. Nice guy. He sold off all his Author copies to the book for a tenner, but when I moved, I left all my textbooks for my group...
09:18
@orthocresol I like Q&H... that needs to be remembered.
@orthocresol I'm a bit torn about this. The answer doesn't actually answer anything, It just gives you a cookbook recipe how to answer the question. It's basically a hint in oh so many words... and the question, well, there's no meat to the bone... I think I would prefer deletion. Any other opinions?
 
2 hours later…
11:44
Might be roomba'd now:
I suggest clearing this unclear question:
12:21
If we had a source for the task, we could file it as erratum, but now this just stands there being not helpful
What a gem :D
@ADG Names of quantities shall not be used in the place of quantity symbols. Write $n=\frac{m}{M}$ and not $amount~of~substance=\frac{mass}{molar~mass}$ — Loong ♦ May 3 '15 at 8:41
hm?
@Loong You not using the text macro...
:D
this Q&H just got recently bumped by an NAA...
I don't remember if that was on purpose.
no worries... I found it stranger that you didn't call him out on the no. of mol.
anyway... i was distracted by that...
what are we going to do about this Q&H&wA (wrong answers)?
@orthocresol I think we can salvage that.
12:35
@Martin-マーチン I guess the number of moles were implied in my example. ;-)
I saw that ;)
It sometimes makes me want to smash the keyboard in the monitor...
@Martin-マーチン yeah, we just need to change the focus to be on the real issue, which is the confusion over the term 'vapour density'
13:06
@orthocresol what does Q&H mean?
Aug 17 at 18:33, by orthocresol
^ suggest delete - Q&H that isn't going anywhere (H is for hint, of course).
:P
nice name
@Martin-マーチン Not sure about this one... i dislike these questions, but that is a personal response to it, I don't think it's an issue to keep it around especially if we flesh out the upvoted (hint-)answer
on the other hand, I'm not sure if it's worth the effort
@orthocresol Yes that was exactly my thought. These are basically all questions about counting. I would not miss that one if it were gone.
13:44
Well, shall we just nuke it, then?
Agreed, and I did the deed.
14:07
Here is a Q&H, which is quite unspecific:
:: chemistry.stackexchange.com/q/4472/4945 edited to remove part of the unclearness, refocused on concept, reopened, added post notice
HW Q&A, with accepted answer blocking roomba:
(Plus I hate questions that neglect that the second protolysis step of sulfuric acid is not nearly as strong as the first...)
___
Please confirm that the answer is wrong:
---
I suggest deleting this incomplete Q&A:
14:53
---
Edited, and might be eligible to reopen, but not sure. If not then we might want to consider deleting:
---
This should be deleted for the title alone:
@A.K. @AvnishKabaj @GaurangTandon You can also decide. It doesn't have to be a mod making the decision. Simply read through the post and then say: I can salvage that, or let's delete, or I cast a reopen vote, or, or, or... When we come back here, we then do the deed.
 
1 hour later…
16:01
@Martin-マーチン sure
@Martin-マーチン I think it's good enough to reopen

« first day (514 days earlier)      last day (1514 days later) »