« first day (503 days earlier)      last day (1525 days later) » 

08:59
@hBy2Py hahaha... well, print the licence key, put it on there, frame it, hang it next to your computer...
 
4 hours later…
12:30
I suggest deleting the following, I don't think it is very useful in the long run
:: chemistry.stackexchange.com/q/70631/4945 I feel like this had the potential to be a half-useful question but I think it's not worth the effort to improve it. Hence deleted -o
12:46
I suggest to reopen, I don't see how it falls within the hw policy:
I suggest to delete, it doesn't really have an answer, and in total I find it unhelpful:
Request burnination with extreme burn:
:: chemistry.stackexchange.com/q/61468/4945 gave it a gentle touch up; hw tag removed;;; answer expanded-o
13:08
I removed the homework tag form How to compute molecular formula? See the comments within. The answer isn't particularly good though, or very helpful... So what to do? Would it maybe just be more practical to delete it? Or maybe someone could write a better answer to it... Opinions?
Do we have a canonical for determining the empirical formula from mass percentages?
3
@Martin-マーチン That's basically what we did, IIRC -- printed out the purchase confirmation, stuck the property-tag sticker to it, and filed it with the other software purchase documentation.
Can we delete this one:
:: chemistry.stackexchange.com/q/61163/4945 kept new title, rm hw tag
@Martin-マーチン mmmm... with a rewritten title, it might be useful enough to keep. The answer is good, and concise, and addresses the confusion of OP.
@hBy2Py IIrc we might have done that similarly in Marburg, although usually we got a CD or manual with purchase, so stick it in that then :D
@Martin-マーチン <nod> COMSOL is download-only, though, so.... nothing physical whatsoever.
@hBy2Py Maybe "What are the products of the double displacement reaction of oxalic acid and cesium hydroxide?"
13:15
samesies with the chemcraft... (and all them softwarez from our university shop O.o)
Once "homeworky" questions age beyond a month or two, I'm much less disinclined to give detailed answers.
@hBy2Py Do it! I like the idea
@hBy2Py don't forget to rm the hw tag ;)
@Martin-マーチン Done and detagged.
Probably scrub most of the comments on the question... maybe keep Zhe's last one?
done. I even gave it an upvote so that it doesn't look too sad sitting at -6
<nod>, as did I
13:20
we had so much worse questions...
still 1.5k questions tagged with homework
@Martin-マーチン I'm not really sure why this got downvoted to oblivion.
It's a reasonable question... based on a misunderstanding, but a reasonable one.
Hmmm... being one of the downvoters... I can't actually tell you. I guess I thought it was too basic
i'll edit it a bit further
@Martin-マーチン Check mine first
ಠ_ಠ
i was almost done...
but yeah you changed what i would have ;)
Eeep 0:-D
13:30
Would you agree to reopen that while were at it. I do not see it fitting within the hw policy. @hBy2Py
<nod>, good idea... done.
@Martin-マーチン This does seem like a good target for a new canonical, if one doesn't exist yet.
I agree.
no time to write it though
@Martin-マーチン I edited and VTROd
okay, let's give it a few spins in the queue...
It is a basic question, but extents of solubility are often expressed in these sorts of qualitative terms, so I'm ok with the question staying around.
13:35
The catalyst is fairly soluble in pure water during a full moon in Australia. Othertimes it is only slightly soluble. It is a little bit soluble in slightly deuterated water.
The compound dissolved freely in a glass beaker of DI water wrapped in tinfoil. It was hardly soluble in DI water in a polypropylene bottle, and in a glass beaker covered with Parafilm.
13:47
When stirred with a magnetic bar, it dissolved much faster, than when using a precision stirrer (KPG).
Spin-orbit solubility will get you. Every. Time.
13:59
According to Heisenberg's solubility principle, the catalyst is in a superposition of dissolved and precipitated.
The exterior of the container became acidified due to quantum proton tunneling through the wall.
Osmotic quantum pressure could be contained though through raising the potential energy walls by about one arbitrary unit to 11.
The automatic in-hood washdown was activated after convergence failure of the self-consistent field distillation calculation and subsequent apparatus rupture.
The density function of the evolving potato cloud lead us to conclude that the catalyst is very well suited for this type of synthesis, if handled with proper care.
lol, 'evolving potato cloud'?

« first day (503 days earlier)      last day (1525 days later) »