In conclusion ...
Although Wildcat basically already said it, I would like to add a few thoughts and numbers. I have to admit that this illdesigned, untargeted "experiment" did not turn out the way I would liked it to have. Some of my initial thoughts I have already shared with you: Let's talk a...
I don't know, I get the feeling that there are just a handful of (over?)zealous users who want to close everything...
Because "the site's integrity" blahblahblah
If it angers you so much, just downvote and move on... there are probably even scripts that hide downvoted questions so that you don't need to hurt your eyes on them...
I do think @Mart is right (if I've understood him correctly, anyways), that "VTC HW" has become too much a proxy for "I don't like this question" and/or "I don't want to take the time to answer this question"
Yep
Ignore and/or downvote are indeed the proper responses to those.
Can't speak for Martin, but I'd suppose upvotes on posts.
My suspicion is that it's only a vocal minority who want the close reason, though. The rest just follow.
I don't know whether it made sense to simply overrule the community. We have never really done that at all, because we aren't really here to make decisions, we're here to execute community decisions. But if there was ever a time to do it, it would have been now.
But yeah, come to think of it, we never tried to do an explicit poll. Well, I guess that is something we can learn from that.
For every meta proposal, make an explicit poll, an explicit time for which the poll lasts, and an explicit warning that the post with most upvotes will become policy. There's far too much inaction on meta.
On proper Stack Exchange sites, poll-style questions are not considered acceptable. They typically would serve only to measure users' opinions in aggregate, which is not constructive.
However, meta sites are a bit different. Determining users' opinions is one of their purposes. The scores of pos...
@hBy2Py Yeah. I mean, it's basically a referendum, right? Like brexit, it's been debated to death, and people are sick of hearing arguments for and against. We just need a yes/no question for people to tick.
If parliaments can pass bills by simple voting, I don't see why per-site metas can't, after all the discussion has been had. I really don't agree with that meta.se post.
@orthocresol I agree, to disagree with the Meta.SE post
It's not a great idea to lead with a poll-type question
But if an issue is dragging out, the options are fairly constrained, and resolution is not forthcoming, I think a poll is probably the least worst choice.
From that Meta.SE post, by Mr. Cartaino: "I've always broadened these these rigid, pre-posted conversations to a more open format, and I've never had an author or the community disagree with the reasoning."
Actually, I think he was more cautious (prudent, probably). If I was the only mod here, I would have simply gotten rid of it: "enough discussion, I've heard all your arguments, and I think I'm correct."
@hBy2Py well, I tried to combine the ideas of polling + discussion. On second thoughts, I wouldn't really want to have an explicit poll, as it's messy and necessitates a new meta post (and then we need one for every proposal).