@Chance Perhaps for cops you should require them to write a different polyglot. For instance cops do task X in some set of languages and robbers have to do task Z in the same languages.
You would need to show that each language can do task Z too, otherwise you would find a single language that can do X but not Z and then polyglot it with as many languages as possible to make an answer that can't be cracked
This way cops have to do work to earn more difficult to crack submissions
I worry that this challenge has made a lot of "most languages" polyglots trivial to produce.
you could literally remove half of the languages in here, and it would still be the biggest on PPGC (I believe).
And quite a few of our languages are outputting strings too, which are trivial to change in most cases.
Personally, I want to task the community with creating"poly-nots" because I don't believe there is a resource out there that provides information on language incompatibility.
Quite a few times in this project, I've found myself wondering if I was opening more doors than I was closing.
oops, my last patebin was the wrong link. This is the Japt refactor. pastebin.com/4jgqn5xn
@WheatWizard For example, when I added C++ for example, I had to change the top 2 lines a lot (and make them very restricted). I worried that the number of C like languages that might be added to the ployglot is less than the number of 2D languages I closed off the polyglot to more 2D languages.
@Chance Have you tried removing parens from the python code? I went back and read some of the old posts and they seem to be there to aid Brain-Flak code I destroyed. Might help with prelude but it should certainly make it shorter
