« first day (2500 days earlier)      last day (420 days later) » 

05:25
@KavinIshwaran That is not due to the JEE. In any other polyhedral geometry there is a possibility for bond distortions (mostly elongation) in response to repulsive bond pairs. That corresponds to an overall bond energy optimization towards a local minima in accordance with Bent's rule. We don't have this luxury in the diatomic case since it has only one bond
As an example: PCl5 distorts axially in response to repulsions. Hence the 5 sp3d hybrid orbitals do not remain equivalent. Since for the same value of principal quantum number, s orbitals have the lowest energy followed by p and d, hence it redistributes the percent s character towards the equatorial plane. You can imagine this as the axial bond pairs shift away from the central P, so it redistributes to bond pairs closer to P. Net result is energetic stabilization
06:01
@YusufHasan Oh !
@YusufHasan Thank you for the explanation :-)
@JohnRennie Hi !
Hi :-)
A solid cylinder with inner radius a and outer radius b has length l and resistivity rho. find the resistance across its lateral surfaces
@JohnRennie I tried integrating by taking a small cylindrical element. But i couldn't able to frame a correct equation
What does it mean by lateral surfaces?
The inner and outer surface? Or between the ends?
The inner and outer surface
Suppose we treat the cylinder as a lot of cylindrical shells of thickness dr.
Then what we have is the shells all in series so their resistances all just add. Yes?
06:16
Yes
the dr = rho dr/A
But I am stuck with finding what should be the area for this cylindrical element
If we take dr to be infinitesimally small then the inner and outer areas are the same. Yes?
So that area is 2𝜋𝑟 × 𝓁
Yes?
06:46
@JohnRennie Yes
I get it now :-)
I will take it from here
OK :-)
06:58
Hey my friend can you help me
Hi :-) What's the question?
A particle of mass m is initially at rest at the origin. It is subjected to a force and starts moving along the x- axis. Its kinetic energy K changes with time as dK/dt = t, where  is a positive constant of appropriate dimensions. Which of the following statements is (are) true?
(A) The force applied on the particle is constant
(B) The speed of the particle is proportional to time
(C) The distance of the particle from the origin increases linearly with time (D) The force is conservative
Please help only in (D)
PYQ JEE ADVANCED 2018
Forces are conservative as long as energy is not lost to friction, or something similar to friction like aerodynamic drag.
How do I know if a force is conservative just by looking at its formula
It isn't clear from the question whether any form of friction is present, but I assume not since friction isn't mentioned, and in that case the force will be conservative.
@AayushSethia There is no way to know just from the formula for the force.
07:06
Only friction dissipated energy
?
dissipates
This means " If in the question it is not written about any type of friction I assume that the force is conservative and it does not dissipated energy "
?
Yes. If there is no friction all the work done by the force goes into mechanical energy, and then that mechanical energy can be used to produce the same force.
 
4 hours later…
11:38
@JohnRennie Hi !
Hi :-)
We just need to find potential of a sphere and equate it to kinetic energy ?
How far have you got with this?
@KavinIshwaran Yes, just use conservation of energy.
Ok :-)
I was not sure if we can do as all the three will be moving and the potential will change..
Consider the top sphere. PEs just add, so its PE is the sum of the PEs due to the other two spheres i.e. V = 2Gmm/d.
Yes?
11:45
Yes
And when the spheres collide the separation between them is 2R, so now the PE is U = 2Gmm/2a = Gmm/R
So ¹⁄₂mv² = 2Gmm/d - Gmm/R
Oops, other way round:
¹⁄₂mv² = Gmm/R - 2Gmm/d
The answer is (4) isn't it?
11:50
Shouldn't it be ¹⁄₂mv² = Gmm/R - 2Gmm/d ?
@JohnRennie Yes :-)
@KavinIshwaran Yes :-)
@JohnRennie Yes :-)
Actually you could answer this without doing any work. Suppose d = ∞ so 1/d = 0.
Options 1 and 2 would give the square root of a negative number so they cannot be right.
11:52
Yes
Then take d = 2R i.e. the spheres start and end at the same separation. Here the velocity has to be zero because there was no PE change, but option 3 gives a non-zero velocity.
So only option 4 can be correct.
Yes
@JohnRennie Thank you for the clarifications :-)
You're welcome :-)
Will you be around tomorrow ?
During the day yes, but not in the evening as we are having a big New Year dinner. I will be here this evening.
11:55
Ok :-)
@JohnRennie Will see you later :-)
Bye :-)
 
5 hours later…
16:31
@JohnRennie Hi !
Hi :-)
I am having a doubt in probability
I'll help if I can ...
I have no idea how to do that. Sorry :-(
16:33
Its Ok :-)
I'm going to drop out now. I'll be back tomorrow morning as usual.
 
2 hours later…
18:31
Happy New Year IST

« first day (2500 days earlier)      last day (420 days later) »