« first day (1825 days earlier)      last day (1095 days later) » 

06:04
@JohnRennie Hi !
@KavinIshwaran Hi :-)
Are you free ? :)
I got a Doubt in GR. Does time have a physical geometry like the space ? or we can only represent it graphically ?
I guess it depends on what you mean by "physical".
In GR spacetime is four dimensional, one of those dimensions being time, so mathematically time is just a dimension like the three spatial dimensions.
06:09
@JohnRennie like distortion of fabric of space, time is also represented as one of those fabrics ?, or it can be represented graphically/mathematically only ?
I guess you're thinking that we can directly perceive space e.g. we can look along a line from us out into the distance and back, but we can't do this with time.
Is this what you have in mind?
yes, kind of
It's obvious that to humans time is different from space because we can freely move in space while we cannot freely move in time.
We are stuck with moving along the time axis at one second per second.
But the question is whether there is really a difference between time and space, or whether humans only perceive the difference because of the way our brains operate.
And I don't think this is a question that can be answered.
In google meet I am not being able to use my microphone
I can hear the concerned person
My microphone works well with all other apps on my laptop like Skype
Where did I go wrong?
@JohnRennie the above image is usually used to describe curvature of space, but can we say time is also a curvature of such fabric
@KavinIshwaran That's a very common way of representing spatial curvature, and it's OK as a metaphor but it's also highly misleading.
I have diabled java script and allow only in conditional places
Else I receive too many notifications
What I am missing or where did I go wrong?
@KavinIshwaran Let me make an analogy: suppose you and I are standing on the equator 1m apart both facing north, and we both head off north at some speed v.
There is no force between us, but as we travel north we gradually move closer together and we would eventually meet at the north pole. OK so far?
06:23
yes
So it looks as if there is some mysterious force pulling us together. Obviously there isn't really. We are moving together because we are moving on a curved surface. But if we didn't know the surface was curved we would think the force existed. Yes?
But this only happens if we are moving. If we both just stood still we wouldn't move together.
Absolutely
Also the faster we are moving the more rapidly we approach each other, i.e. it looks as if the force gets stronger the faster we move.
06:26
yes
but in a free fall, the fast moving is the time only... am I right ?
Now this is exactly what happens in GR. Suppose you and the Earth start off a few thousand km apart and both of you are stationary. Obviously you are going to fall towards the Earth.
@KavinIshwaran Yes. Even though you and the Earth are stationary you are both moving in time. In fact your speed along the time dimension is the speed of light!
And the curvature along the time dimension is what causes you to move together.
@JohnRennie is that what we say -ct ?
If we have some vector V = (x, y, z) the components x, y and z of the vector must all have the same type.
In relativity we use four-vectors V = (t, x, y, z), but obviously time has different units from the x, y and z components.
06:30
@JohnRennie yes, so we are multiplying velocity of light with time to get a distance vector to match the x,y,z (?)
To get round this we multiply t by c to get ct, because ct also has units of distance.
@KavinIshwaran Yes, the vector is really (ct, x, y, z) although we usually don't bother writing the c.
Anyhow the point I am working my way to is that in everyday life it's the time curvature that is responsible for motion in gravitational fields.
So that "rubber sheet" diagram is very misleading as it suggests that the spatial curvature is responsible.
The problem is it's hard to depict the time curvature on that sort of picture.
yes
probably time is easier to represent graphically
rather geometrically
Thanks for the clarification sir ! :)
07:06
@JohnRennie Please help me out
I am overhearing myself
In the computer drives
08:04
Is this the right place to find someone to help me with a physics problem for $$$? It's not at all related to homework or anything like that.
08:29
@LuddensDesir We can help you with a physics problem for free :-)
If you're looking for paid tuition this isn't the place.
I mean. I'm willing to pay is what I'm saying. But I'll accept free help LOL.
My problem is that I'm trying to make a flight sim type game but I wasn't ready for how different centripetal motion in 3D space is different from in 2D space.

Even though I never went past basic physics I understand circular motion and always thought circular motion questions were the easiest, but can't apply that knowledge to how an airplane moves.
So I have a flight stick and keyboard for input meaning I have direct control over linear and angular velocity, and know the delta time.
How do I use that info to find the radius I need to rotate an object around some point to make the motion circular?
 
8 hours later…
16:22
@JohnRennie Hi. How have you been? :-)
 
4 hours later…
20:18
Maybe I can just cancel the rotation of my ship by some rotation, make the calculations, then rotate it back.

« first day (1825 days earlier)      last day (1095 days later) »